Test: Eurocom Sky X7C (i9-9900K, RTX 2080, FHD 144 Hz) Clevo P775TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Connectivity
SD-kortläsare
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG G703GX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG G703GX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ROG G703GX | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Asus ROG G703GX | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 276.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 767:1 (Svärta: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K AU Optronics B173HAN03.1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Sky X7C AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Alienware 17 R5 JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Asus ROG G703GX AU Optronics B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 32% | -3% | 2% | 28% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.7 | 86 33% | 63.4 -2% | 64.1 -1% | 90.9 40% | 64 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.1 | 99.9 12% | 86.1 -3% | 93.3 5% | 100 12% | 90.4 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 98.9 52% | 62.9 -4% | 65.6 1% | 86.2 32% | 64.8 -1% |
| Response Times | -131% | 14% | 36% | 52% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18 ? | 38.4 ? -113% | 20.8 ? -16% | 7.2 ? 60% | 8 ? 56% | 15.6 ? 13% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 26.8 ? -148% | 6 ? 44% | 9.6 ? 11% | 5.6 ? 48% | 12.8 ? -19% |
| PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -8% | -13% | -2% | 24% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 276.1 | 333 21% | 398 44% | 296 7% | 240 -13% | 299.1 8% |
| Brightness | 260 | 330 27% | 367 41% | 279 7% | 248 -5% | 273 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 88 4% | 86 1% | 85 0% | 83 -2% | 81 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.4 -11% | 0.51 -42% | 0.25 31% | 0.22 39% | 0.27 25% |
| Contrast | 767 | 833 9% | 780 2% | 1184 54% | 1091 42% | 1108 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.51 | 5.87 -67% | 5.45 -55% | 4.77 -36% | 2.14 39% | 5.07 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.84 | 9.74 -42% | 10.36 -51% | 9.08 -33% | 5.04 26% | 10.55 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.56 | 4.59 -29% | 2.56 28% | 1.46 59% | 1.54 57% | 3.31 7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 4.5 -67% | 5.4 -100% | 5.83 -116% | 1.62 40% | 6.8 -152% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.34 94% | 2.4 92% | 2.47 89% | 2.28 96% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6947 94% | 6384 102% | 7453 87% | 8076 80% | 6846 95% | 7805 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.8 | 88 52% | 56 -3% | 60 4% | 77 33% | 58.5 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.8 | 100 13% | 86 -3% | 93 5% | 100 13% | 89.9 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -36% /
-16% | -1% /
-7% | 12% /
4% | 35% /
29% | -6% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5610 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6352 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7171 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R5 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ROG G703GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -69% | -19% | -15% | -33% | -36% | |
| Seq Read | 2323 | 2203 -5% | 1632 -30% | 3058 32% | 2237 -4% | 1153 -50% |
| Seq Write | 2887 | 559 -81% | 1767 -39% | 2196 -24% | 1230 -57% | 1328 -54% |
| 4K Read | 30.51 | 38.74 27% | 50.4 65% | 38.37 26% | 37.51 23% | 35.05 15% |
| 4K Write | 131.8 | 92.7 -30% | 101.9 -23% | 97.7 -26% | 120.8 -8% | 96 -27% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1507 | 447.2 -70% | 1196 -21% | 1347 -11% | 851 -44% | 727 -52% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1483 | 279.1 -81% | 1631 10% | 1236 -17% | 646 -56% | 1212 -18% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.032 | 0.091 -184% | 0.061 -91% | 0.056 -75% | 0.052 -63% | 0.063 -97% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.065 -132% | 0.037 -32% | 0.038 -36% | 0.033 -18% | 0.04 -43% |
| Score Read | 1770 | 706 -60% | 1410 -20% | 1691 -4% | 1112 -37% | 878 -50% |
| Score Write | 1904 | 428 -78% | 1910 0% | 1553 -18% | 890 -53% | 1441 -24% |
| Score Total | 4602 | 1424 -69% | 4057 -12% | 4066 -12% | 2547 -45% | 2784 -40% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 3044 | 2048 -33% | 1487 -51% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 574 | 428.5 -25% | 608 6% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1489 | 1173 -21% | 1162 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28229 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 58727 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22398 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9890 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 452.2 | 368.6 | 344.1 | 201.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 387.2 | 272.8 | 174.2 | 90.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 318.2 | 225 | 175.7 | 140.5 |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | Asus ROG G703GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -13% | 4% | -7% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.9 | 30 -4% | 30 -4% | 28.3 2% | 28.3 2% | 29 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.7 | 30 -1% | 32 -8% | 31.5 -6% | 33.5 -13% | 29 2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.7 | 35 -18% | 34 -14% | 31.6 -6% | 33.6 -13% | 32 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 41 -37% | 37 -23% | 31.6 -5% | 35 -17% | 33 -10% |
| Load Average * | 36.5 | 44 -21% | 43 -18% | 32.3 12% | 38 -4% | 47 -29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 51 -4% | 57 -16% | 43 12% | 50 -2% | 49 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 57 | 52 9% | 62 -9% | 45.5 20% | 56.9 -0% | 51 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 30 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 36.5 / 57 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.4 °C / 77.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 5.3 / 7.3 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 41.3 / 41.8 / 46.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
116.6 / 352.6 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SF i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 3% | 27% | 38% | 37% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 41.3 | 5 88% | 31 25% | 23 44% | 16.4 60% | 19 54% |
| Idle Average * | 41.8 | 24 43% | 35 16% | 33 21% | 21.9 48% | 22 47% |
| Idle Maximum * | 46.1 | 42 9% | 45 2% | 40 13% | 25.4 45% | 30 35% |
| Load Average * | 116.6 | 112 4% | 130 -11% | 94 19% | 90.7 22% | 104 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 245.9 | 284 -15% | 268 -9% | 177 28% | 203.3 17% | 167 32% |
| Load Maximum * | 352.6 | 320 9% | 374 -6% | 228 35% | 222.9 37% | 203 42% |
* ... smaller is better
| Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 82 Wh | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | Asus ROG G703GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Eurocom Sky X7C i7-8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 82% | 98% | 58% | 19% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 120 | 218 82% | 238 98% | 190 58% | 143 19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 268 | 301 | 225 | |||
| Load | 64 | 78 | 63 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Skillnaden i prestanda mellan GeForce RTX 2080 och GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q verkar vara mindre den här generationen jämfört med den förra. Att välja Eurocom Sky X7C med RTX 2080 för bara med sig en ökning i GPU-prestanda på 15 till 20 procent jämfört med det mycket tunnare, lättare, billigare, uthålligare och mer energieffektiva alternativet med RTX 2080 Max-Q.
Den största anledningen att skaffa Sky X7C är inte grafikprestandan eller skärmen utan processorns prestanda och möjligheten att uppgradera densamma. Core i9-9900K är runt 60 procent snabbare än Core i7-8750H, vilket i större utsträckning rättfärdigar ökningen av chassits storlek, fläktarnas ljudnivå och energiförbrukningen. Om du förlitar dig på CPU-intensiva uppgifter snarare än de vanliga GPU-fokuserade spelen bör Sky X7C passa perfekt.
Den som kan dra full nytta av desktop-processorn kommer att få ut mest ur Eurocom Sky X7C. I övrigt är den minimala ökningen i grafikprestanda jämfört med ett fastlött RTX 2080 eller RTX 2080 Max-Q för liten för att rättfärdiga det rejäla chassit, den höga energiförbrukningen och den klumpiga AC-adaptern.
Eurocom Sky X7C i9-9900K
- 03/11/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
