Test: Eve V (m3, i5, i7) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)

Name: Eve-Tech Eve V i5
Brand: Eve-Tech

Från massan till folket. Det har gått ungefär ett år sedan Eve V-projektet gjorde vågor på gräsrotsfinansieringsplattformen Indiegogo. Det finansiella målet nåddes på rekordtid och projektet fick tillslut mer än 1800% av sitt mål. Nu är det dags att förbereda enheterna för leverans till de som stött projektet samt göra dom tillgängliga för intresserade köpare. Vi har redan testat enheten och jämför alla tre CPU-modellerna tillgängliga för Eve V.

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 11/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Tablet Convertible / 2-in-1 Laptop / Notebook Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Eve-Tech Eve V i5

Processor

Intel Core i5-7Y54 2 x 1.2 - 3.2 GHz, Kaby Lake

Grafikkort

Intel HD Graphics 615 - 1024 MB VRAM, Kärna: 400 MHz, Minne: 931 MHz, 22.20.16.4815

Minne

8 GB

, LPDDR3

Skärm

12.30 tum, 2880 x 1920 pixlar 281 PPI, Tryckkänslig, native pen support, Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, IPS LED, IGZO, glansig: ja, detachable screen

Moderkort

Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH

Hårddisk

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, 256 GB

Ljudkort

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Anslutningar

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlurar, Kortläsare: Micro SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Hall, gravitation, och ljussensor, gyroskop, accelerometer

Nätverk

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.9 x 296 x 205

Batteri

48 Wh

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: Främre och bakre webkamera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: 4 högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Inmatningspenna, tangentbordsöverdrag, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless

Released

11/20/2017

Vikt

1.36 kg, Strömförsörjning: 220 g

Pris

1199 Kr

Länkar

Eve-Tech hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Huawei MateBook X DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	130.7 MB/s +87%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s +26%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.8 MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	72.6 MB/s +4%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 (Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)	69.8 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.5 MB/s -65%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	194 MB/s +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	93.8 MB/s +10%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	89.6 MB/s +5%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	87.4 MB/s +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 (Toshiba Exceria microSDHC 32GB UHS-I)	85.2 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.6 MB/s -69%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.2 MB/s -70%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	668 MBit/s +30%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	644 MBit/s +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	618 MBit/s +21%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	440 MBit/s -14%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	246 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	606 MBit/s +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	586 MBit/s 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	584 MBit/s
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller	577 MBit/s -1%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	569 MBit/s -3%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	520 MBit/s -11%


420 cd/m²	440 cd/m²	431 cd/m²
453 cd/m²	471 cd/m²	458 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	401 cd/m²	422 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 471 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 432.7 cd/m² Minimum: 9.2 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 471 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1472:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Sharp LQ123Z1JX3X, , 2880x1920, 12.3"	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3"	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Samsung SDCA029, , 2160x1440, 12"	Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3"	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung SDC4A49, , 2716x1824, 12.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12"
Display		-1%	8%	-4%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	68.2	67.6 -1%	77.3 13%	65.8 -4%	66.7 -2%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	99 -1%	92.8 -7%	96.2 -4%	98 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70	69.1 -1%	83.1 19%	66.8 -5%	68.7 -2%
Response Times		687%	19%	31%	53%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	49.1 ?(23.1, 26)	42 ?(20, 22) 14%	4 ?(2, 2) 92%	33 ?(15, 18) 33%	45.6 ?(23.6, 22) 7%	28.4 ?(15.2, 13.2) 42%
Response Time Black / White *	33.6 ?(18.1, 15.5)	29 ?(18, 11) 14%	20 ?(18, 2) 40%	24 ?(12, 12) 29%	21.6 ?(9.2, 12.4) 36%	22.8 ?(13.6, 9.2) 32%
PWM Frequency	985 ?(25)	21000 2032%	250 ?(100) -75%		2119 ?(50) 115%	221.2 ?(49) -78%
Screen		-6%	71%	3%	-4%	-37%
Brightness middle	471	417 -11%	376 -20%	408 -13%	443 -6%	388.1 -18%
Brightness	433	401 -7%	378 -13%	395 -9%	446 3%	344 -21%
Brightness Distribution	85	88 4%	91 7%	88 4%	88 4%	78 -8%
Black Level *	0.32	0.29 9%	0.03 91%	0.45 -41%	0.41 -28%	0.39 -22%
Contrast	1472	1438 -2%	12533 751%	907 -38%	1080 -27%	995 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.2	3.63 -65%	4.1 -86%	1.55 30%	2.6 -18%	4.6 -109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.6	6.74 -20%	6.45 -15%	2.19 61%	4 29%	9.1 -63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	2.18 36%	3.64 -7%	1.91 44%	3 12%	6.1 -79%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	3.09 ^71%	2.58 ^85%	2.34 ^94%	2.38 ^92%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	6270 ^104%	6767 ^96%	7113 ^91%	6491 ^100%	6780 ^96%	7104 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	70	63 -10%	74 6%	61 -13%	62.6 -11%	59 -16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92.99	99 6%	93 0%	96 3%	98 5%	91 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		227% / 125%	33% / 50%	10% / 5%	16% / 7%	-19% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.1 ms rise
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.1 ms rise
49.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

985 Hz

≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 985 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 985 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (7W)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Surface Pro 2017 i5-7300U

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel Core i5-7300U	141 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel Core i5-7200U	127 Points +13%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Core i5-7200U	127 Points +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel Core i7-7Y75	121 Points +8%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Core i5-7200U	116 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) Intel Core i5-5350U	116 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Core i5-7Y54	115 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Core i5-7Y54	112 Points
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	105 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF Intel Core i5-8250U	534 Points +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel Core i5-7300U	334 Points +51%
Huawei MateBook X Intel Core i5-7200U	322 Points +46%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel Core i5-7200U	322 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points +45%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) Intel Core i5-5350U	277 Points +25%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30	250 (227.93^min - 249.83^max) Points +13%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel Core i7-7Y75	236 (227.93^min - 235.62^max) Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel Core i5-7Y54	234 Points +6%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel Core i5-7Y54	221 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

28.54 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

221 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

112 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V m3-7Y30

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i7-7Y75

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit Loop - Eve V i5-7Y54 (12W)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3999 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	3538 Points +31%
Huawei MateBook X HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, LITEON CB1-SD256	3507 Points +29%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3289 Points +21%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-54SF UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3197 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3092 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M	2936 Points +8%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 HD Graphics 615, i7-7Y75, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	2786 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	2709 Points
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7	2685 Points -1%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2709 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3664 poäng
PCMark 10 Score		2556 poäng
Hjälp

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Samsung PM971 KUS030202M	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-23%	23%	25%	91%
Write Seq	588	275.8 -53%	559 -5%	831 41%	1264 115%
Read Seq	1127	688 -39%	1066 -5%	805 -29%	1770 57%
Write 4K	143.6	121.8 -15%	152 6%	124 -14%	143 0%
Read 4K	26.6	29.53 11%	21 -21%	42 58%	53.4 101%
Write 4K Q32T1	170.2	252.3 48%	444 161%	300 76%	471 177%
Read 4K Q32T1	283.1	140.3 -50%	457 61%	322 14%	418.1 48%
Write Seq Q32T1	574	359.5 -37%	559 -3%	846 47%	1270 121%
Read Seq Q32T1	1557	770 -51%	1404 -10%	1656 6%	3196 105%
AS SSD		-36%	13%	-12733%	123%
4K Write	115	105.6 -8%	130.1 13%		132.2 15%
4K Read	32.3	32.42 0%	33.2 3%		45.24 40%
Seq Write	572	346.7 -39%	539 -6%	156.7 -73%	897 57%
Seq Read	1346	705 -48%	1208 -10%	1037 -23%	2197 63%
4K-64 Write	508	264.4 -48%	471 -7%	75 -85%	657 29%
4K-64 Read	279	137.2 -51%	500 79%	1222 338%	2280 717%
Access Time Write *	0.03	0.047 -57%	0.028 7%	23 -76567%	0.027 10%
Access Time Read *	0.08	0.106 -33%	0.058 27%	0.071 11%	0.041 49%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-30% / -29%	18% / 18%	-6354% / -5443%	107% / 107%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 574 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 283.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 170.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1127 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 588 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 26.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 143.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1709 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1533 Points +28%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1528 Points +28%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1510 Points +26%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	1384 (1376^min - 1390^max) Points +16%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	1234 (1228^min - 1268^max) Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1195 (1195^min - 1239^max) Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	1161 Points -3%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	9678 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7776 Points +22%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7542 Points +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	7334 Points +15%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U	7265 Points +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	7138 (7124^min - 7152^max) Points +12%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	6387 (6307^min - 6467^max) Points 0%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	6360 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	6164 Points -3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1150 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	971 Points +14%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30	948 Points +11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	933 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U	889 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	875 Points +3%
Eve-Tech Eve V i7 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-7Y75	873 Points +2%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	853 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54	728 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		1319 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		4836 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		762 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		292 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Overwatch | FIFA 18

Overwatch
1280x720 Low (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:1x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	141.8 fps +403%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	63.3 (46^min - 81^max) fps +124%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	53.6 (39^min - 70^max) fps +90%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	49.6 fps +76%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	33.3 fps +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	28.2 fps
1366x768 Medium (Render Scale 100 %) AA:FX AF:2x
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	97.2 fps +344%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	41 (29^min - 50^max) fps +87%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	30.7 fps +40%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006	25 fps +14%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	24.1 (16^min - 35^max) fps +10%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	21.9 fps

FIFA 18
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	135.6 fps +200%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	69.5 (59^min - 78^max) fps +54%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	45.2 fps
1366x768 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	161.4 fps

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	57.4	31.85	15.7	14.1
Overwatch (2016)	28.2	21.9
FIFA 18 (2017)	45.2
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	8.6
ELEX (2017)	8.8

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	177 (154^min) fps +208%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	125.6 fps +119%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	105.9 fps +84%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	92 (75^min) fps +60%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	79.3 (64.1^min) fps +38%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	68 (58^min) fps +18%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	57.4 (50.3^min) fps
1366x768 med (1/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	149 (128^min) fps +368%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	97 fps +205%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	89.8 fps +182%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	63.7 (55^min) fps +100%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	58 (48.5^min) fps +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	55 (40^min) fps +73%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	31.85 (27.6^min) fps
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	142 (121^min) fps +804%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	78.5 fps +400%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	62.3 (53.4^min) fps +297%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	53.1 fps +238%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	29.5 (26^min) fps +88%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	27.6 (25^min) fps +76%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	15.7 (14.6^min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K, Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB MZ7PD256HAFV-0Z000	141 (123^min) fps +900%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	68.9 fps +389%
Razer Core V2 GTX 1080 + Eve V m3 GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), m3-7Y30	58.6 (50.3^min) fps +316%
Asus AsusPro P4540UQ-FY0056R GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	47.7 fps +238%
Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	23 (21^min) fps +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M	19.8 (17^min) fps +40%
Eve-Tech Eve V i5 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	14.1 (12.8^min) fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


40.4 °C	42.4 °C	38.3 °C
35.3 °C	34.7 °C	34.6 °C
34.2 °C	36.8 °C	37.9 °C

Max: 42.4 °C
Medel: 37.2 °C


39.6 °C	42.1 °C	41.9 °C
38.1 °C	39.4 °C	39.7 °C
34.2 °C	34.9 °C	34.2 °C

Max: 42.1 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C

Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-9.8 °C / -17.6 F).

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.6 / 1.9 Watt
Låg belastning	4.2 / 7.2 / 7.8 Watt
Hög belastning	20.4 / 34.6 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 2880x1920, 12.3"	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3"	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 2880x1920, 12.3"	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3"	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, Super AMOLED, 2160x1440, 12"	Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3"	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3"
Power Consumption		-0%	-4%	-1%	-17%	-42%	-35%
Idle Minimum *	4.2	4.3 -2%	4.5 -7%	3.6 14%	3.9 7%	4.6 -10%	4.1 2%
Idle Average *	7.2	7.3 -1%	7.6 -6%	8.1 -13%	9 -25%	11 -53%	9.2 -28%
Idle Maximum *	7.8	7.8 -0%	8.1 -4%	8.7 -12%	11.9 -53%	12 -54%	11.1 -42%
Load Average *	20.4	21.1 -3%	22 -8%	25.5 -25%	27.3 -34%	39.5 -94%	33.8 -66%
Load Maximum *	34.6	33.2 4%	33.1 4%	23.5 32%	27.9 19%	34.6 -0%	49.2 -42%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		16tim 28min
WiFi Websurfing		8tim 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 34min

	Eve-Tech Eve V i5 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Eve-Tech Eve V m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Eve-Tech Eve V i7 i7-7Y75, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book 12 SM-W728 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 39 Wh	Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh	HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 i7-7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		-4%	-14%	25%	-16%	-42%	-28%	-25%	-5%
Reader / Idle	988			1054 7%	1031 4%	512 -48%	833 -16%	662 -33%
H.264	634	607 -4%	563 -11%		409 -35%		377 -41%		614 -3%
WiFi v1.3	523		435 -17%	744 42%		337 -36%	378 -28%	441 -16%	489 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra			194						115
Load			174	168		162	138	134	112

För

+ högkvalitativt helgjutet hölje, robust konstruktion

+ bekväm känsla på surfplatta och tangentbord

+ Thunderbolt 3 och Typ-C Gen. 1 portar

+ bra WiFi-prestanda

+ komplett paket med tangentbordsdocka och penna som ingår i priset

+ tangentbordet också lämpligt för längre skrivande

+ skärm med väldigt bra ljusstyrka och kontrast

+ exakt färgreproduktion redan vid leverans

+ användning av eGPU är möjlig

+ tyst drift

+ måttlig uppvärmning

+ attraktivt pris

Emot

- jämförelsevis ganska tung

- den inkluderade Typ-C laddningskabeln vrider sig

- smuts-resistansen hos tangentbordet kan ifrågasättas

- prestandan för m3-versionen stämmer inte överens med våra förväntningar

- de extra fördelarna med en eGPU är kraftigt begränsade av CPU:n

- medioker ljudkvalitet på de inbyggda högtalarna

Och här är den, folkets nya omvandlingsbara Eve V! Här är en sammanfattning av vårt test:

I fråga om höljet visar sig Eve V vara en vinnare. Det helgjutna aluminium-höljet och Alcantara-tangentbordet har en känsla av hög kvalitet, visar inga svagheter i sin konstruktion och verkar väldigt robust. På nästan 1.4 kg är systemet egentligen inte lättare än aktuella Ultrabook-modeller. Men det är också den enda verkligt negativa aspekten av vår utvärdering. De bra anslutningsmöjligheterna är å andra sidan en positiv aspekt. Med två Typ-A USB 3.0 och två Typ-C anslutningar, där en är en full Thunderbolt 3-port, så är du väl utrustad för alla eventualiteter. Vi gillade också tangentbordet och det är fullt tillräckligt för längre skrivuppgifter. Vår erfarenhet med inmatningen från den inkluderade N-Trig pennan var tillfredställande och det är definitivt lovvärt att endast erbjuda paket med tangentbord och penna inkluderade så som Eve-Tech gör. På detta sätt kan man undvika att "överraska" användaren med dolda kostnader.

Skärmen erbjuder väldigt bra ljusstyrka och kontrast. Eve V kommer med en kalibrerad skärm direkt ur lådan och har relativt exakta färger. 3K-upplösningen ger hög bildskärpa, men kan leda till problem med specifika program på grund av den nödvändiga Windows-skalningen.

Eve V är en attraktiv enhet, men borde inte överskattas.

Sen till Eve Vs prestandareserver: För detta projekt valdes processorer från Intels Y-serie. Dessa är passivt kylda chip med en TDP på 4.5 watt. Även om i5-7300U i Surface Pro kan erbjuda mycket högre prestanda en kort stund så kommer den under långvarig belastning jämna ut sig med den i5-7Y54-modell vi provar här. Samtliga testade CPU-modeller (m3, i5, i7) visar nästan stabil prestanda under konstant belastning. Men det var underligt att m3-modellen som vi hade här klarade sig mycket bättre i många av våra tester än de mycket dyrare i5- och i7-modellerna. Eve V är en bra enhet för grundläggande kontorsarbete, särskilt med tanke på den långa batteritid den kan uppnå. För innehålls-skapare kommer enhetens CPU snart att bli en flaskhals för komplex mjukvara.

Eve V är tillgänglig från ca 7 900 SEK (799 Euro). Men utöver m3-CPU:n får du bara 128 GB lagringsutrymme, vilket kan vara för lite för många användare. Nästa steg är i5-modellen med 256 GB lagringsutrymme, som redan kostar ca 11 800 SEK (1199 Euro). Ett tillägg på ca 4 000 SEK (400 Euro) för en CPU som knappt visar några fördelar och 128 GB ytterligare lagringsutrymme är ganska mycket. Det fortsätter på detta sätt: i5, 16 GB RAM och 512 GB lagring kostar ca 15 200 SEK (1549 Euro), i7-modellerna börjar på ca 16 200 SEK (1649 Euro) och topp-modellen med i7, 16 GB RAM och 1 TB SSD (Samsung PM961) kostar maffiga 19 700 SEK (1999 Euro).

I jämförelse med konkurrensen såsom Surface Pro från Microsoft hittar Eve V en bra nivå i fråga om pris (Surface Pro i5-7300U, 256 GB SSD, 8 GB: ca 11 300 SEK (1149 Euro) + Type Cover ca 1 800 SEK (179 Euro) + Surface Pen ca 1 100 SEK (109 Euro)), särskilt med tanke på att tangentbord och penna är inkluderade i paketet. Men tittar man på prisskillnaderna mellan modellerna ser vi att pristilläggen för de andra modellerna som följer Microsofts stil är väl tilltagna, särskilt med tanke på att skillnaden mellan processorerna är minimal.

Eve V har redan skickats till de som gett stöd åt projektet och borde anlända snart. Andra intresserade köpare kan börja beställa online från 4:e December.

Eve-Tech Eve V i5 - 2017-11-19 11/19/2017 v6 ^(old)
J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum

Design

90 / 98 → 91%

Tangentbord

89%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

63 / 80 → 79%

Vikt

71 / 35-78 → 83%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

55 / 68 → 81%

Programprestanda

71 / 87 → 82%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

97%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

58 / 85 → 69%

Medel

78%

86%

Convertible - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Eve V (m3, i5, i7) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)

J. Simon Leitner, Klaus A. Hinum, 2017-11-23 (Update: 2017-11-23)