Test: Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Core i7-8750H, RTX 2070 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 250 cd/m²
Kontrast: 862:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 2% | 2% | 3% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 63.6 0% | 66.7 5% | 66.2 4% | 65.3 3% | 64.2 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.1 | 93.8 1% | 91.2 -2% | 92.1 -1% | 94.9 2% | 92.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.5 | 64.9 1% | 66.7 3% | 67.2 4% | 66.3 3% | 65.7 2% |
| Response Times | 8% | 41% | -1% | 7% | 35% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 16.8 ? -2% | 7.4 ? 55% | 17.6 ? -7% | 16.8 ? -2% | 8 ? 51% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 13.6 ? | 11.2 ? 18% | 10 ? 26% | 12.8 ? 6% | 11.6 ? 15% | 11.2 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 12% | -18% | -10% | -31% | -75% | |
| Brightness middle | 250 | 313 25% | 294 18% | 254 2% | 314.7 26% | 304 22% |
| Brightness | 235 | 300 28% | 275 17% | 262 11% | 312 33% | 299 27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 78 -8% | 84 -1% | 89 5% | 90 6% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.24 17% | 0.22 24% | 0.38 -31% | 0.27 7% |
| Contrast | 862 | 948 10% | 1225 42% | 1155 34% | 828 -4% | 1126 31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.46 | 1.29 12% | 2.57 -76% | 2.37 -62% | 2.56 -75% | 4.66 -219% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.47 | 2.04 17% | 4.88 -98% | 4.71 -91% | 4.89 -98% | 9.65 -291% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.27 | 0.69 46% | 2.41 -90% | 1.58 -24% | 3.4 -168% | 5.53 -335% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.43 91% | 2.5 88% | 2.48 89% | 2.3 96% | 2.5 88% |
| CCT | 6749 96% | 6550 99% | 6370 102% | 6785 96% | 6435 101% | 8028 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 59 -2% | 60 0% | 60.7 1% | 60 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 94 1% | 91 -2% | 92 -1% | 94.6 2% | 93 0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.14 | 1.84 | 1.71 | 1.72 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
9% | 8% /
-6% | -3% /
-6% | -7% /
-19% | -13% /
-45% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (31808 - 41034, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (6453 - 7348, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
| Average of class Gaming (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 (Edge 44) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 6400 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4338 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5111 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5645 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5353 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -10% | -14% | 1% | 3% | 23% | |
| Write 4K | 97.1 | 94.4 -3% | 98.2 1% | 95.3 -2% | 93.9 -3% | 93.6 -4% |
| Read 4K | 53.7 | 37.65 -30% | 39.43 -27% | 40.13 -25% | 40.56 -24% | 38.82 -28% |
| Write Seq | 1526 | 1335 -13% | 1386 -9% | 1883 23% | 1468 -4% | 2455 61% |
| Read Seq | 2020 | 1404 -30% | 1100 -46% | 1322 -35% | 1540 -24% | 2107 4% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 285.6 | 268.6 -6% | 270.3 -5% | 309.9 9% | 293.5 3% | 298.7 5% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 321.8 | 332.8 3% | 340.3 6% | 353.7 10% | 346 8% | 338.7 5% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1533 | 1375 -10% | 1454 -5% | 1919 25% | 1941 27% | 2902 89% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2351 | 2627 12% | 1681 -28% | 2466 5% | 3266 39% | 3536 50% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34534 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16608 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 80496 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31838 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15587 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 6400 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 233.9 | 217.9 | 202.6 | 127.7 |
| GTA V (2015) | 133.1 | 123.1 | 92.9 | 54.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 177.7 | 144.9 | 86.5 | 58.3 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 60.2 | 53.1 | 52.6 | |
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 110.9 | 95.9 | 96.9 | 96.1 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 84.6 | 70.2 | 61.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 94 | 73 | 70 | 67 |
| Darksiders III (2018) | 102.2 | 68.2 | 65.3 | 64.9 |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 | |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 32 / 34 / 36 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 42 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -7% | 5% | 10% | 2% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 28.8 4% | 29 3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 30 6% | 33 -3% | 30 6% | 28.8 10% | 30 6% | 25.5 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 31 9% | 34 -0% | 31 9% | 28.8 15% | 32 6% | 27.2 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 36 | 35 3% | 40 -11% | 34 6% | 29.4 18% | 34 6% | 30.2 ? 16% |
| Load Average * | 42 | 49 -17% | 47 -12% | 43 -2% | 35.7 15% | 44 -5% | 42.5 ? -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 51 -16% | 51 -16% | 42 5% | 42.5 3% | 46 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 54 -13% | 53 -10% | 44 8% | 45 6% | 47 2% | 53.4 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | -2% | 9% | 11% | -5% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 56 | 53 5% | 54 4% | 49 12% | 49 12% | 49 12% | 46.1 ? 18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 66 | 65 2% | 60 9% | 63 5% | 49 26% | 58 12% | 49.2 ? 25% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 26 4% | 30 -11% | 24 11% | 25.4 6% | 33 -22% | 31.2 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 27 | 30 -11% | 30 -11% | 25 7% | 27.2 -1% | 33 -22% | 32.2 ? -19% |
* ... smaller is better
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.6 / 0.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 16 / 18 / 23 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
88 / 167 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -21% | 13% | 7% | -15% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 14 12% | 17 -6% | 7 56% | 10.4 35% | 16 -0% | 13.5 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * | 18 | 18 -0% | 20 -11% | 11 39% | 14.6 19% | 22 -22% | 18.9 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23 | 22 4% | 29 -26% | 20 13% | 16.3 29% | 32 -39% | 26.7 ? -16% |
| Load Average * | 88 | 91 -3% | 112 -27% | 98 -11% | 88.5 -1% | 89 -1% | 106.6 ? -21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 120 | 142 -18% | 152 -27% | 132 -10% | 155.4 -30% | 147 -23% | |
| Load Maximum * | 167 | 173 -4% | 211 -26% | 182 -9% | 182.4 -9% | 173 -4% | 249 ? -49% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | -65% | -17% | -8% | -47% | -10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 549 | 762 39% | 213 -61% | 507 -8% | 682 24% | 335 -39% | 565 ? 3% |
| H.264 | 364 | 504 38% | 356 -2% | 408 ? 12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 382 | 513 34% | 157 -59% | 362 -5% | 387 1% | 190 -50% | 376 ? -2% |
| Load | 174 | 156 -10% | 42 -76% | 81 -53% | 88 -49% | 81 -53% | 85.3 ? -51% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 är en utmärkt spellaptop men den utgör egentligen bara en förfining jämfört med sin föregångare och lägger dessutom till ett par brister. En Core i7-8750H processor och en RTX-2070 Max-Q GPU är en vinnande kombination som är tillräckligt kraftfull för att hantera alla AAA-spel med maximala grafikinställningar i 1080p. Vidare säkrar en NVMe SSD att systemet körs smidigt även vid ihållande belastning. Enheten är också lätt att underhålla och uppgradera, vilket är en bonus.
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 är bland de bästa i klassen när det kommer till tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorer, men den är inte riktigt lika imponerande som föregångaren var för ett år sedan.
På samma sätt imponerade 144 Hz IPS-skärmen på oss med en X-Rite Pantone-certifiering, stabila betraktningsvinklar och korta responstider. Men skärmen är en aning mörk, vilket resulterar i ett dåligt kontrastförhållande.
Tyvärr är batteritiden en besvikelse med tanke på vilket utmärkt exempel föregångaren var på den punkten. Vi hoppas att detta är en bugg som Gigabyte kan fixa. Vidare genererar den kraftigare GPU:n mer värme vilket gör att enheten blir för varm för att ha i knät om man spelar eller redigerar video. Att den håller kvar vid enkelkanals-RAM resulterar också i en prestanda-flaskhals vilket känns onödigt och bör vara lätt för Razer att åtgärda. Som tur är kan alla dessa problem, bortsett från de höga temperaturerna, förhoppningsvis gå att lösa. Den här enheten kostar för tillfället också flera tusen kronor mer än sin föregångare men kommer ändå bara med mindre förbättringar. Sammanfattningsvis är Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 en av de bästa tunna och lätta bärbara speldatorerna som går att köpa för pengar, men det höga priset och problemen vi noterat vid skrivande stund innebär att vi inte kan rekommendera den lika mycket som föregångaren.
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
- 02/25/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
