Test: Gigabyte P57X v7 (sammanfattning)

Name: Gigabyte P57X v7
Brand: Gigabyte

Marginellt förbättrad. Få saker har förändrats sedan den förra Gigabyte P57X vi testade. Men med en ny Kaby Lake-CPU, mer RAM och en kraftigt förbättrad 4K-skärm kanske det är den här modellen man ska äga?

Steve Schardein, Published 02/26/2017 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...

Windows Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Gaming Geforce

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte P57X v7 (P57 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1645 MHz, Minne: 8000 MHz, 21.21.13.7586 - nVIDIA ForceWare 375.86

Minne

32 GB

, DDR4-2400, dual-channel (16 GB x 2)

Skärm

17.30 tum 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixlar 255 PPI, no, SHP145E, IPS, glansig: nej

Hårddisk

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), 256 GB

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Anslutningar

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kopfhörer- / Mikrofon-Ports, Kortläsare: SD

Nätverk

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optisk enhet

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 31 x 418 x 296

Batteri

75.81 Wh Litiumpolymer

Camera

Webbkamera: HD 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2 x 2 W högtalare, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

3.412 kg, Strömförsörjning: 938 g

Länkar

Gigabyte hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Gigabyte P57X v7 Gigabyte P57X v6 EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 DIN A4 ❌

Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.0 x 2, SD card reader, headphones, microphone

Right: USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C, HDMI, mini-DP (beneath removable cover), VGA, charging port

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	166 MB/s +112%
Gigabyte P57X v7	78.2 MB/s
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	78 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte P57X v6	76.4 MB/s -2%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296	224 MB/s +148%
Gigabyte P57X v7	90.4 MB/s
Gigabyte P57X v6	89.9 MB/s -1%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG	88 MB/s -3%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	507 MBit/s +4%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	487 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	619 MBit/s
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	497 MBit/s -20%


385.3 cd/m²	430.2 cd/m²	407.3 cd/m²
380.5 cd/m²	441.3 cd/m²	402.6 cd/m²
395.9 cd/m²	425.8 cd/m²	400 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

SHP145E tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Max: 441.3 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 407.7 cd/m² Minimum: 14.29 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 441.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1003:1 (Svärta: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Gigabyte P57X v6 LGD0469, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Sharp LQ173D1JW31, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display		-23%	0%	-4%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	87.8	68 -23%	86.9 -1%	90.6 3%	87.3 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	87.5 -12%	100 0%	99.9 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	98.9	64 -35%	99.4 1%	84.7 -14%	98.8 0%
Response Times		43%	41%	69%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	55.6 ?(18.4, 37.2)	33.6 ?(14, 19.6) 40%	37 ?(13, 24) 33%	26 ?(12, 14) 53%	45.6 ?(22.8, 22.8) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	46.8 ?(10.4, 36.4)	25.6 ?(5.2, 20.4) 45%	24 ?(5, 19) 49%	7 ?(4, 3) 85%	35.2 ?(9.2, 26) 25%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(29)				1042 ?(29) 4%
Screen		-11%	9%	-30%	2%
Brightness middle	441.3	329.2 -25%	336 -24%	307 -30%	399.1 -10%
Brightness	408	321 -21%	320 -22%	284 -30%	360 -12%
Brightness Distribution	86	93 8%	88 2%	85 -1%	81 -6%
Black Level *	0.44	0.267 39%	0.25 43%	0.25 43%	0.4 9%
Contrast	1003	1233 23%	1344 34%	1228 22%	998 0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.1	5.93 -16%	3.61 29%	9.65 -89%	4.78 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.8	11.07 -13%	6.02 39%	16.36 -67%	7.65 22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	6.72 -56%	4.78 -11%	10.07 -134%	3.8 12%
Gamma	2.08 ^106%	2.12 ^104%	2.32 ^95%	2.12 ^104%	2.03 ^108%
CCT	7345 ^88%	7611 ^85%	6185 ^105%	12145 ^54%	7288 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	87	57 -34%	88 1%	75 -14%	86.9 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	87 -13%	100 0%	100 0%	100 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -6%	17% / 12%	12% / -12%	6% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.4 ms rise
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
55.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 37.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	1.95 Points +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.71 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.68 Points -2%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.5 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	9.6 Points +19%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.04 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.75 Points -4%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.44 Points -7%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	172 Points +13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	152 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -7%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 Intel Core i7-7820HK	864 Points +17%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	706 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Intel Core i7-6700HQ	656 Points -11%
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	635 Points -14%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Gigabyte P57X v6 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	374.4 s * -10%
Gigabyte P57X v7 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	340.3 s *
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.7 s * +34%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.71 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.04 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.5 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

152 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

736 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

93.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4437 Points +24%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4206 Points +18%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points +14%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	3569 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5014 Points +19%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4623 Points +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	4218 Points
Creative Score Accelerated v2
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	7780 Points +51%
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5192 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	5161 Points
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -55%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3569 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5161 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4218 poäng
Hjälp

	Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-2%	352%	174%
Read Seq	517	481.7 -7%	3219 523%	1658 221%
Write Seq	305.7	315.4 3%	2572 741%	1249 309%
Read 512	315	303.1 -4%	1776 464%	1044 231%
Write 512	306.1	314.4 3%	2445 699%	1254 310%
Read 4k	26.04	25.93 0%	51.1 96%	51.6 98%
Write 4k	82.3	84.6 3%	141.3 72%	145.2 76%
Read 4k QD32	281.3	273.9 -3%	658 134%	601 114%
Write 4k QD32	296	274.9 -7%	554 87%	386.8 31%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)

Överföringshastighet min.: 359.5 MB/s

Överföringshastighet max.: 411.8 MB/s

Överföringshastighet med.: 400.7 MB/s

Accesstid: 0.1 ms

Burst rate: 83.3 MB/s

CPU-användning: 2.3 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	28675 Points +23%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	23356 Points 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	23243 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	22427 Points -4%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	21228 Points -9%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	10945 Points +20%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	9550 Points +5%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9116 Points
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8366 Points -8%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	7795 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	127933 Points +70%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	100453 Points +34%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	84341 Points +12%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	79578 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	75190 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK	21026 Points +22%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	17170 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	17106 Points 0%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	15718 Points -8%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	8357 Points +1%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8236 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	8057 Points -2%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	4005 Points
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	3957 Points -1%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	258199 Points +123%
Gigabyte P57X v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	123302 Points +6%
Gigabyte P57X v7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	116033 Points

3DMark 06 Standard Score		28053 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance		16753 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24337 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13444 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7498 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Batman: Arkham Knight - 3840x2160 High / On (Interactive Smoke & Paper Debris Off) AA:SM AF:8x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	47 fps
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	45 fps -4%

Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	156.3 fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	43 fps
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	37.4 fps -13%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	40.6 fps -6%

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	116.3 fps

Fallout 4 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	42 fps
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	44.3 fps +5%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	130 fps
Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	123.8 fps -5%
EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	131.8 fps +1%

	ultra	4K
Mafia 2 (2010)	156.3
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	116.3
BioShock Infinite (2013)	130
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)		47
Fallout 4 (2015)		42
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		43

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		30.4 / 32.1 / 32.1 dB(A)
Hög belastning		45.6 / 51.5 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Gigabyte P57X v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0)	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Noise		-4%	-7%	-6%	-4%
off / environment *	29	29.7 -2%	31 -7%	30 -3%	29.2 -1%
Idle Minimum *	30.4	33.2 -9%	33 -9%	34 -12%	33.9 -12%
Idle Average *	32.1	33.2 -3%	34 -6%	35 -9%	33.9 -6%
Idle Maximum *	32.1	33.2 -3%	40 -25%	37 -15%	33.9 -6%
Load Average *	45.6	47.5 -4%	44 4%	39 14%	43.8 4%
Load Maximum *	51.5	52.5 -2%	50 3%	56 -9%	53.4 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


26.8 °C	51.2 °C	39.2 °C
27.8 °C	38.8 °C	41.4 °C
23.6 °C	21.6 °C	20.4 °C

Max: 51.2 °C
Medel: 32.3 °C


35.8 °C	56.8 °C	27 °C
27.4 °C	28 °C	21.8 °C
20.8 °C	21 °C	22.8 °C

Max: 56.8 °C
Medel: 29 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 53 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.6 °C / 74.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+5.3 °C / 9.5 F).

Gigabyte P57X v7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.37 / 0.8 Watt
Låg belastning	15.7 / 23.4 / 23.5 Watt
Hög belastning	184.6 / 233.1 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption		-2%	-31%	-38%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	15.7	18.4 -17%	25 -59%	29 -85%	27.3 -74%
Idle Average *	23.4	22.8 3%	35 -50%	35 -50%	34.9 -49%
Idle Maximum *	23.5	24 -2%	46 -96%	40 -70%	37.6 -60%
Load Average *	184.6	175.5 5%	103 44%	94 49%	164.4 11%
Load Maximum *	233.1	229.5 2%	223 4%	315 -35%	202.5 13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		4tim 16min
WiFi Websurfing		2tim 35min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 38min

	Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh	MSI GT73VR 7RF-296 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh	EVGA SC17 GTX 1070 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74.48 Wh
Battery Runtime		33%	10%	3%	-15%
Reader / Idle	256	418 63%	278 9%		242 -5%
WiFi v1.3	155	201 30%	200 29%	160 3%	160 3%
Load	98	103 5%	89 -9%		55 -44%

För

+ hög GPU-prestanda; de flesta spel kan spelas i 4K

+ snabb och bra systemprestanda överlag

+ förbättrad 4K-skärm

+ hanterbara medeltemperaturer

+ användbar systemmjukvara

+ relativt portabel för en 17-tummare

+ expansionsporten är användbar

Emot

- plastchassi (knarrar på testenheten)

- dåliga pekplatte-knappar

- två tydliga hotspots och varmt tangentbord under belastning

- fortfarande relativt högljudd, men bättre än föregångaren

- batteritiden är märkbart sämre än förut

In review: Gigabyte P57X v7. Test model provided by Gigabyte.

Läs det längre originaltestet på engelska här.

Egentligen har inte mycket förändrats mellan P57X v6 och den nyare v7 som vi testat idag. Båda har identiska plastchassin, liknande krestkort och interna komponenter, och till och med samma GPU och SSD. De största (och kanske enda märkbara) skillnaderna i v7 är en Kaby Lake Core i7-7700HQ-CPU, bättre 4K-skärm och dubbelt så mycket RAM (med snabbare minneshastighet).

Allt detta bidrar till lägre fläktnivåer, mindre värmeutveckling (även om ett par specifika områden är särskilt varma), och en mycket trevligare visuell upplevelse tack vare den kraftigt förbättrade bildskärmen (bättre ljusstyrka, färgrymd och naturligtvis upplösning).

Däremot kvarstår problem på andra håll. Chassit är inte mycket att hurra för och locket på skärmen verkar lite tunt. Ljudet är fortfarande ganska högt (men programvara för ingår), och styrplattan är helt enkelt dålig. Batteritiden har också minskat sedan den senaste modellen. Det vore egentligen ingen överraskning med tanke på skärmupplösningen och mer RAM, om det inte vore för det faktum att våra mätningar av strömförbrukningen tyder på annat. Oavsett vilket är det här en bärbar speldator, så batteritiden är mindre viktig.

Svarstiderna är egentligen den enda negativa man kan säga om skärmen, då de skulle kunna vara problematiska i FPS-spel. Genom att välja en 1080p-panel skulle man sannolikt få bättre svarstider (så var fallet med v6-panelen), men som det är nu går det inte att få det bästa av två världar.

Även om det finns snabbare och mer välbyggda bärbara speldatorer är Gigabyte P57X v7 ett kraftfullt alternativ med bra skärm. Den hanterar hög belastning utan problem och har expansionsmöjligheter för den som gärna laborerar själv. Förutsatt att du inte lägger stor vikt vid batteritiden, eller besväras av chassit och den mediokra styrplattan, är datorn inget dåligt val.

Gigabyte P57X v7 - 04/25/2017 v6 ^(old)
Steve Schardein

Design

74 / 98 → 76%

Tangentbord

79%

Mus

67%

Anslutningar

67 / 81 → 83%

Vikt

54 / 10-66 → 79%

Batteri

67%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

95%

Programprestanda

86%

Workstation

75%

Temperatur

88 / 95 → 93%

Ljudnivå

76 / 90 → 84%

Audio

40%

Camera

69 / 85 → 81%

Medel

73%

82%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Steve Schardein - Tech Writer - 98 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @othersteve, LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Gigabyte P57X v7 (sammanfattning)

Steve Schardein, 2017-02-26 (Update: 2024-11- 4)