Test: Google Pixel 3a - En Pixel-smartphone i Nexus-stil (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Sony Xperia 10 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Sony Xperia 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Huawei P30 Lite |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 403 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 3a P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6" | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6" | Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2" | Sony Xperia 10 IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6" | Samsung Galaxy A70 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Google Pixel 3 OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 31% | 20% | -6% | 9% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 403 | 583 45% | 451 12% | 547 36% | 554 37% | 393 -2% |
Brightness | 411 | 577 40% | 430 5% | 525 28% | 552 34% | 398 -3% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 97 1% | 90 -6% | 93 -3% | 98 2% | 91 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.36 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.1 | 1.6 69% | 1.4 73% | 4.6 10% | 3.3 35% | 1.4 73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11 | 3.9 65% | 4.4 60% | 12.1 -10% | 9.2 16% | 2.5 77% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.7 -35% | 2.5 -25% | 3.9 -95% | 3.4 -70% | 1.2 40% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.08 106% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 6589 99% | 6267 104% | 6422 101% | 7158 91% | 6606 98% | 6597 99% |
Contrast | 820 | 1519 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 271.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 271.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 271.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Sony Xperia 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Google Pixel 3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7988 - 9458, n=4) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Sony Xperia 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Google Pixel 3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6633 - 7387, n=4) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Sony Xperia 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Google Pixel 3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 3a | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE | Huawei P30 Lite | Sony Xperia 10 | Samsung Galaxy A70 | Google Pixel 3 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 11% | -10% | -30% | 7% | 74% | -29% | 379% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 302 | 492.5 63% | 293.2 -3% | 273.8 -9% | 508 68% | 766 154% | 274 ? -9% | 1834 ? 507% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 253.9 | 190.1 -25% | 158.6 -38% | 232.9 -8% | 194 -24% | 181.8 -28% | 176.2 ? -31% | 1426 ? 462% |
Random Read 4KB | 63.6 | 115.8 82% | 71.6 13% | 53.1 -17% | 103.8 63% | 149.8 136% | 59.4 ? -7% | 278 ? 337% |
Random Write 4KB | 99.9 | 21.86 -78% | 87.3 -13% | 14.39 -86% | 21.95 -78% | 133.8 34% | 32 ? -68% | 310 ? 210% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 76.8 ? | 83.2 ? | 76.2 ? | 77.4 ? | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.8 ? | 63.8 ? | 58.8 ? | 58.3 ? |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel 3a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.22 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.61 / 1.56 / 1.6 Watt |
Hög belastning |
2.67 / 4.33 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | -60% | -28% | -19% | -62% | -67% | -61% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.61 | 0.53 13% | 0.91 -49% | 0.72 -18% | 0.66 -8% | 1.21 -98% | 1.18 ? -93% | 0.895 ? -47% |
Idle Average * | 1.56 | 1.18 24% | 2.41 -54% | 2.16 -38% | 1.69 -8% | 2.01 -29% | 2.89 ? -85% | 1.447 ? 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 1.2 25% | 2.43 -52% | 2.17 -36% | 1.8 -13% | 2.05 -28% | 2.94 ? -84% | 1.608 ? -1% |
Load Average * | 2.67 | 3.04 -14% | 4.57 -71% | 3.32 -24% | 3.42 -28% | 4.06 -52% | 3.82 ? -43% | 6.41 ? -140% |
Load Maximum * | 4.33 | 4.83 -12% | 7.57 -75% | 5.34 -23% | 5.88 -36% | 8.79 -103% | 5.65 ? -30% | 9.61 ? -122% |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9 SE 3070 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 2870 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Google Pixel 3 2915 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 612 | 510 -17% | 515 -16% | 541 -12% | 736 20% | 471 -23% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Google klarar också av mittenskiktet
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Företagets tidigare toppskikts-telefoner med sina breda infattningar har gjort det tydligt att Google inte riktigt hänger med i fråga om designspråk. Vi förväntade oss detsamma från den här mittenskiktstelefonen ur Pixel-serien. Men bortsett från den punkten sökmotor-mästaren Google visat att de också är kapabla att producera en riktigt bra mittenskiktstelefon, både i fråga om teknik och i fråga om mjukvara.
Den som älskar kompakta enheter kommer märka att Pixel 3a är en av de bästa telefonerna som finns att tillgå just nu.
Trots en ganska gammaldags design är Pixel 3a en riktigt kompakt enhet som dessutom är trevlig att hantera tack vare bakstycket i plast. Även om Pixel ser ganska slätstruken ut på papperet har den trevlig vardagsprestanda. Pixel lyckas få ut riktigt tilltalande resultat ur sina båda kameror. Vi imponerades också av högtalaren och vibrationsmotorn som båda får Pixel 3a att stå ut gentemot sina konkurrenter.
På papperet får det höga priset på 4.000 kronor en telefon utrustad med Snapdragon 670 att se utdaterad ut och det kan till och med verka som ett riskabelt drag. Pixel 3a hade klarat sig ännu bättre med ett Snapdragon 700-chip: Den har en del brister när det kommer till prestandan trots sin väloptimerade mjukvara. Vidare förstår vi inte riktigt varför Google inte inkluderar en SD-kortplats i en mittenskiktsenhet som bara har 64 GB intern lagring.
Google Pixel 3a
-
09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich