Test: Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Google Pixel 3a XL
Brand: Google

Googles återkomst till mittenskiktet.

Google har än så länge bara släppt flaggskeppstelefoner i sin Pixel-serie. 3a och 3a XL ändrar på detta med sina mittenskiktspriser. Enheterna lovar flaggskeppskameror till budgetpris, men hur bra har Google lyckats genomföra detta? Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 06/05/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 3a XL (Pixel 3 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 8 x 2 GHz, Kryo 360 Gold / Silver

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 616

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.00 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv, OLED, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Active Edge, barometer, e-kompass,, eSIM

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. CDMA/EVDO: BC0, BC1, BC10. 4G/LTE: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66., LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 160.1 x 76.1

Batteri

3700 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4 μm, ƒ/1.8, 76° autofokus, dualpixel-fasigenkänning, optisk och elektronisk bildstabilisering
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1.12 μm, ƒ/2.0, 84° fixfokus

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Modulär USB-laddare, USB Typ C till USB Typ C-kabel, USB Typ A till USB Typ C-adapter, hörlurar (endast för enheter som säljs i Australien, Frankrike, Tyskland, Indien, Italien och Spanien), 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.19 W/kg, Huvud - 1.17 W/kg., fanless

Vikt

167 g, Strömförsörjning: 81 g

Pris

479 Kr

Länkar

Google hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	580 (548^min - 602^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s -8%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s -48%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	237 MBit/s -59%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 (133^min - 180^max) MBit/s -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +1%
Google Pixel 3a XL Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash	668 (617^min - 692^max) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (163^min - 343^max) MBit/s -53%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s -53%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	232 MBit/s -65%

Google Pixel 3a XL; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (617-692)

Google Pixel 3a XL; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (548-602)

GPS-test: Google Pixel 3a XL – Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9

click to load images

Google Pixel 3a XL

Canon EOS 70 D

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Xiaomi Mi 9


407 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	414 cd/m²
400 cd/m²	409 cd/m²	406 cd/m²
405 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	414 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 409.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.35 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 409 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5"
Screen		22%	-102%	-158%	-170%
Brightness middle	409	593 45%	567 39%	446 9%	572 40%
Brightness	410	587 43%	547 33%	451 10%	580 41%
Brightness Distribution	96	94 -2%	92 -4%	93 -3%	96 0%
Black Level *			0.61		0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.9 31%	4.39 -238%	6.58 -406%	4.5 -246%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.3	2 13%	7.28 -217%	11.94 -419%	12.2 -430%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	1.5 -0%	4.9 -227%	3.6 -140%	7.9 -427%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.248 ^98%	2.199 ^100%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	6621 ^98%	6548 ^99%	7642 ^85%	7116 ^91%	8726 ^74%
Contrast			930		1430

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

242.7 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.6 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1616 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +118%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1330 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1346 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1601 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)	1651 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +239%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5172 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +113%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4941 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4804 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5826 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)	5359 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +191%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	6479 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points +15%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points +5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4501 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4278 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5542 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)	6348 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +85%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	9397 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points -12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6457 Points -31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7181 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6338 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7988 - 9458, n=4)	8742 Points -7%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7377 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points -7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5640 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6018 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5789 Points -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6633 - 7387, n=4)	7024 Points -5%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	26999 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +130%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19873 Points -26%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	25783 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=4)	25989 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	35596 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +199%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20908 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29065 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35619, n=4)	32249 Points -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	14631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +73%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16939 Points +16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	18523 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=4)	15710 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2441 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +194%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1474 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1469 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2054 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=4)	2438 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2428 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +310%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1333 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1327 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1918 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=4)	2407 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +95%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2489 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +45%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points -1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2337 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2349 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2741 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=4)	2556 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2528 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +195%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1541 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1536 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1898 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=4)	2541 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +339%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2537 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +306%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points +13%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1400 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1397 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1757 Points -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2541, n=4)	2536 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +677%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2495 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points +1%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2352 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2645 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=4)	2562 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1631 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +238%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	953 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	946 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1354 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=4)	1629 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1487 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +327%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	815 Points -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	808 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1185 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=4)	1476 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2466 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +52%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points +2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2327 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2351 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2073 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=4)	2553 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1754 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +237%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1008 Points -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1003 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1433 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=4)	1758 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +343%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1612 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +339%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	865 Points -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	862 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1268 Points -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=4)	1612 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +616%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2532 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +48%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2345 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2774 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=4)	2584 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1550 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points +217%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	944 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1563, n=3)	1551 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1416 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points +304%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1425, n=3)	1416 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +119%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2314 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points +42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2282 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2365, n=3)	2322 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +17%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	53 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +13%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	30 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=4)	47.5 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +63%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	58 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +188%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps +12%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	46 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=4)	55 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +383%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	28 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +114%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps +11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	13 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=4)	24.8 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +170%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=4)	29 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +470%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	19 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +205%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -48%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	8.4 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=4)	15.7 fps -17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +246%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	20 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps +15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -50%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=4)	19.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +486%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +245%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps +9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -45%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.1 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.3 fps -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=4)	9.6 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +335%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +282%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +18%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9.1 fps -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=4)	10.4 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +542%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +236%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4.9 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	7.5 fps -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=4)	9.7 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +350%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +242%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps +17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.1 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=4)	12 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +565%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	7.2 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +233%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps +14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.2 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4.8 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=4)	6.38 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +419%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	4.5 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +256%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps +11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 4.5, n=4)	4.45 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +611%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	12.45 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps +186%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2)	12.2 fps -2%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	11.62 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps +177%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12.1 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)	9.65 fps -17%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	13.79 fps
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps +171%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14.3 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)	13.4 fps -3%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	158868 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +136%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	115656 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117574 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140878 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)	156363 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1473 Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score +237%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1681 Score +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2)	1448 Score -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +295%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2794 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +64%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2044 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1734 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2364 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2621 - 2811, n=4)	2720 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +125%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	5507 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +53%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points +3%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4628 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4342 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5063 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5024 - 5507, n=4)	5332 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +85%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	3316 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points +22%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points -11%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2208 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1236 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2393 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2877 - 3316, n=4)	3094 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +104%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	2815 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +229%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points +10%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1625 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1611 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2790 - 2818, n=4)	2810 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +501%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	1186 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +16%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points -9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1052 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1046 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1105 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=4)	1182 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +32%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3a XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096	447 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points +217%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	482 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2)	446 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +418%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +275%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4)	33 Points +3%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.08 Points
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	25.96 Points -19%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +319%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +102%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	32.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3)	31.9 runs/min -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	27.4 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +140%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +74%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points +16%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	62 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3)	60.3 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	59 Points -5%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	55 Points -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	54 Points -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +236%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +122%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points +15%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	11056 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4)	10864 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	10145 Points -8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	8519 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	8163 Points -26%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	4820 ms * -43%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	4739 ms * -41%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	3842 (1^min) ms * -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4)	3525 ms * -5%
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73)	3361 ms *
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3035 ms * +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +44%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +53%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 3a XL	Xiaomi Mi 9	Nokia 8.1	Motorola Moto Z3 Play	Sony Xperia 10 Plus	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		95%	-29%	-12%	-23%	-29%	409%
Sequential Read 256KB	315.6	666 111%	279.3 -12%	271.7 -14%	280.3 -11%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) -13%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 483%
Sequential Write 256KB	179.1	388.3 117%	203.8 14%	182.5 2%	205.2 15%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -2%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 696%
Random Read 4KB	92.1	149.4 62%	69.9 -24%	60.6 -34%	77.7 -16%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -36%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 201%
Random Write 4KB	87	165.3 90%	7.3 -92%	84.1 -3%	16.77 -81%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) -63%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 255%

PUBG Compare

Google Pixel 3a XL; Smooth: Ø39.5 (11-41)

Google Pixel 3a XL; HD: Ø29.9 (28-31)

Arena of Valor

Google Pixel 3a XL; min: Ø59.6 (50-60)

Google Pixel 3a XL; high HD: Ø56 (36-60)

Shadow Fight 3

Google Pixel 3a XL; high: Ø59.4 (51-60)

Google Pixel 3a XL; minimal: Ø59.4 (50-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


36.4 °C	34.2 °C	31.6 °C
36.3 °C	34.6 °C	31.4 °C
34.2 °C	34.4 °C	31.1 °C

Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C


32.4 °C	32.3 °C	35.7 °C
30.8 °C	32.4 °C	36.2 °C
30 °C	32.5 °C	34.8 °C

Max: 36.2 °C
Medel: 33 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 27.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.27 Watt
Låg belastning	0.7 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt
Hög belastning	2.64 / 4.62 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-18%	-10%	-44%	-28%	-58%	-54%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	0.67 4%	0.8 -14%	1.3 -86%	0.68 3%	1.18 ?(0.61 - 2.07, n=4) -69%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Average *	1.63	1.26 23%	1.5 8%	2 -23%	2.12 -30%	2.89 ?(1.56 - 4.43, n=4) -77%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Maximum *	1.67	1.29 23%	1.8 -8%	2.7 -62%	2.17 -30%	2.94 ?(1.6 - 4.52, n=4) -76%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 3%
Load Average *	2.64	3.71 -41%	3.2 -21%	3.7 -40%	3.82 -45%	3.82 ?(2.64 - 5.91, n=4) -45%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -144%
Load Maximum *	4.62	9.3 -101%	5.4 -17%	5.1 -10%	6.44 -39%	5.65 ?(4.33 - 7.91, n=4) -22%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -112%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		30tim 22min
WiFi Websurfing		11tim 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 49min

	Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-15%	-8%	-28%	-27%
Reader / Idle	1822	1650 -9%	1682 -8%	1245 -32%	1400 -23%
H.264	960	1008 5%	857 -11%	648 -32%	701 -27%
WiFi v1.3	709	546 -23%	738 4%	595 -16%	635 -10%
Load	289	194 -33%	246 -15%	199 -31%	154 -47%

För

+ välbyggd

+ bra kameror

+ ren Android Pie

+ stryps inte ens vid långvarig belastning

+ bra högtalare

+ jämförelsevis bra batteritid

Emot

- stor skärminfattning

- Active Edge går inte att ställa in

- har ingen microSD-kortläsare

- batteritiden lever inte upp till förväntningarna

Recension av telefonen Google Pixel 3a XL. Recensionsex från Google Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Pixel 3a XL bevisar att Google inte har glömt hur man tillverkar en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon. 3a XL varken känns eller ser sämre ut än sina dyrare syskon samtidigt som den enklare hårdvaran fortfarande kan leverera smidig prestanda och hantera krävande applikationer. Även om vi har sett många tredubbla eller fyrdubbla kameror på mittenskiktstelefoner det senaste så utklassar Google sina rivaler med en enda sensor på 12.2 MP.

Google Pixel 3a XL är en ny tävlande i mittenskiktet som utmärker sig på många områden. Den har några mindre brister, men de hindrar inte enheten från att vara fantastiskt prisvärd.

Tyvärr ärver 3a XL en del av den kritik som vi riktat åt de andra Pixel-telefonerna. Bristen på riktigt stöd för dual-SIM är en miss, precis som faktum att Google vägrar att inkludera en microSD-kortläsare. Den tjocka skärminfattningen och plastdesignen kommer också att resultera i delade meningar, även om de har sina fördelar. I huvudsak: inget jack. Valet av en Snapdragon 670 SoC istället för något kraftigare har också resulterat i en del kritik från andra recensioner. Men Snapdragon 670 visar inte upp några praktiska begränsningar och kör i princip vilken app eller vilket spel som helst som du utsätter den för.

Sammanfattningsvis är Pixel 3a XL en exceptionell mittenskiktstelefon som har bättre kamera och batteritid än sina konkurrenter. Den är dessutom väldesignad och de flesta bristerna är en fråga om smak.

Google Pixel 3a XL - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Design

81%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

94%

Anslutningar

47 / 70 → 66%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

91%

Spelprestanda

19 / 64 → 30%

Programprestanda

61 / 86 → 71%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

58%

Medel

75%

81%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel 3a XL Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Mike Wobker, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 5)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Compare

Arena of Valor

Shadow Fight 3

Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison