Test: Google Pixel 5 - Kraftfull mittenskiktare med Android 11 (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.6 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Google Pixel 5 SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 151 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.00" | 2340x1080 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 194 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.10" | 1792x828 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Google Pixel 4 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 162 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 5.70" | 2280x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Google Pixel 4 XL SD 855, Adreno 640 | 193 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.30" | 3040x1440 | |
83.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Vivo X50 Pro SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 181.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.56" | 2376x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | ZTE Axon 11 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Tageslicht-Szene 1Tageslicht-Szene 2Weitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Umgebung
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 635 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Google Pixel 5 OLED, 2340x1080, 6" | Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | Google Pixel 4 OLED, 2280x1080, 5.7" | Google Pixel 4 XL P-OLED, 3040x1440, 6.3" | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4" | Vivo X50 Pro AMOLED, 2376x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | ZTE Axon 11 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 6% | 5% | -116% | -60% | -93% | -16% | -99% | |
Brightness middle | 635 | 679 7% | 554 -13% | 557 -12% | 529 -17% | 784 23% | 584 -8% | 603 -5% |
Brightness | 636 | 671 6% | 550 -14% | 555 -13% | 531 -17% | 780 23% | 583 -8% | 608 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 93 -4% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% | 94 -3% | 97 0% | 97 0% | 92 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.68 | |||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 0.8 -0% | 0.8 -0% | 3.9 -388% | 2.53 -216% | 3.5 -338% | 1.17 -46% | 3 -275% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 2.4 -9% | 1.4 36% | 6.1 -177% | 4.52 -105% | 6.4 -191% | 2.95 -34% | 6.2 -182% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.1 35% | 1.3 24% | 3.5 -106% | 1.7 -0% | 3 -76% | 1.7 -0% | 3.8 -124% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.249 98% | 1.99 111% | 2.231 99% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6492 100% | 6610 98% | 6213 105% | 6127 106% | 6462 101% | 6666 98% | 6341 103% | 7242 90% |
Contrast | 999 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 367.6 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Google Pixel 5 | |
Google Pixel 4 | |
Google Pixel 4 XL | |
OnePlus Nord | |
Vivo X50 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Vivo X50 Pro (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83) | |
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Google Pixel 5 (Chrome 86.0.4240.110) | |
Google Pixel 4 XL (Chrome 80) | |
Google Pixel 4 (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0) |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 5 | Google Pixel 4 | Google Pixel 4 XL | OnePlus Nord | Vivo X50 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | ZTE Axon 11 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 3% | 30% | 10% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 248% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 851 | 655 -23% | 871 2% | 956 12% | 925 9% | 980 15% | 956 12% | 760 ? -11% | 1882 ? 121% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 190 | 247.7 30% | 197.4 4% | 473.1 149% | 209.1 10% | 476.9 151% | 417.1 120% | 297 ? 56% | 1467 ? 672% |
Random Read 4KB | 138.9 | 122.4 -12% | 142.2 2% | 126.7 -9% | 165.2 19% | 156.4 13% | 166.3 20% | 152.9 ? 10% | 278 ? 100% |
Random Write 4KB | 155.9 | 146.6 -6% | 164.2 5% | 104.5 -33% | 156.8 1% | 138.5 -11% | 128.4 -18% | 131.6 ? -16% | 310 ? 99% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 88.3 ? | 76 ? | |||||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.4 ? | 59.6 ? |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.69 / 0.82 / 0.85 Watt |
Hög belastning |
2.73 / 4.4 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Google Pixel 5 4080 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh | Google Pixel 4 XL 3700 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Vivo X50 Pro 4315 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | ZTE Axon 11 5G 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -116% | -83% | -61% | -106% | -104% | -130% | -65% | -81% | -92% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 0.56 19% | 1.01 -46% | 0.83 -20% | 1.8 -161% | 1.18 -71% | 1.5 -117% | 0.78 -13% | 0.965 ? -40% | 0.882 ? -28% |
Idle Average * | 0.82 | 2.99 -265% | 1.63 -99% | 1.24 -51% | 2.1 -156% | 2.45 -199% | 2.2 -168% | 1.43 -74% | 1.899 ? -132% | 1.448 ? -77% |
Idle Maximum * | 0.85 | 3.02 -255% | 1.69 -99% | 1.25 -47% | 2.3 -171% | 2.51 -195% | 2.9 -241% | 1.54 -81% | 2.07 ? -144% | 1.603 ? -89% |
Load Average * | 2.73 | 4.17 -53% | 4.67 -71% | 4.98 -82% | 3.4 -25% | 3.61 -32% | 4.4 -61% | 5.04 -85% | 3.98 ? -46% | 6.57 ? -141% |
Load Maximum * | 4.4 | 5.44 -24% | 8.78 -100% | 9.09 -107% | 5.2 -18% | 5.36 -22% | 7.2 -64% | 7.49 -70% | 6.19 ? -41% | 9.92 ? -125% |
* ... smaller is better
Google Pixel 5 4080 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh | Google Pixel 4 2800 mAh | Google Pixel 4 XL 3700 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Vivo X50 Pro 4315 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | ZTE Axon 11 5G 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | -50% | -23% | -13% | -20% | 4% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 2245 | 2765 23% | 1007 -55% | 2003 -11% | 1529 -32% | 1683 -25% | 1700 -24% | |
H.264 | 1466 | 1147 -22% | 617 -58% | 1064 -27% | 1352 -8% | 1403 -4% | 1070 -27% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 808 | 866 7% | 460 -43% | 623 -23% | 869 8% | 763 -6% | 884 9% | 679 -16% |
Load | 333 | 267 -20% | 185 -44% | 261 -22% | 216 -35% | 448 35% | 240 -28% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Pixel 5 går mot trenden
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Google har gjort något vågat med Pixel 5. Istället för att göra som sina konkurrenter och hela tiden satsa på större och större telefoner känns Googles senaste försök pyttig med sina 6 tum. Google har därmed minskat ett glapp som inte borde bortses från, då många användare vill ha kompakta och kraftfulla telefoner.
Kraftfull är definitivt ett karaktärsdrag som passar OLED-skärmen, det dubbla kamerasystemet och batteritiden. Skärmen övertygade med riktigt hög ljusstyrka och utmärkt färgprecision, dubbelkameran tog riktigt bra bilder och Googles telefon visade sig också ha riktigt uthållig batteritid.
Även om Google Pixel 5 har många förbättringar över Pixel 4 ligger den efter tekniskt jämfört med andra toppmodeller. Den som däremot letar efter en kompakt Android 11-smartphone med garanterade uppdateringar bör verkligen ta en titt på Pixel 5.
Detta för oss till det andra vågade beslutet: vanligen förväntar man sig en toppskikts-SoC i en flaggskeppstelefon. Pixel 5 använder istället en Snapdragon 765G från mittenskiktet. Men vid vardagsbruk kommer du knappt märka av skillnaden i prestanda ändå. Det hade däremot inte skadat om Google också tagit fram en version med en mer kraftfull SoC. Med tanke på att Pixel 5 gör reklam för att hålla länge hade lite mer prestandareserver inför framtiden definitivt varit till nytta.
Pixel 5 kostar ca 6.300 kronor. Det är betydligt lägre än vad många av konkurrenternas toppmodeller kostar, även om de sistnämnda också kommer med snabbare hårdvara. Pixel 5 kan kompensera för detta med ett löfte från Google, som kan avgöra saken för många: Pixel 5 kommer med Android 11 och kommer få minst 3 års operativsystems- och säkerhetsuppdateringar.
Google Pixel 5
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero