Test: Google Pixel C Tablet (sammanfattning)

Name: Google Pixel C
Brand: Google

Laptop-ambitioner. Kraftfull systemkrets, bra skärm, nya Android 6.0 och även ett tangentbord som tillval; 10,2-tummaren Google Pixel C vill vara med i toppstriden bland surfplattorna och gör ett riktigt positivt intryck i vårt test.

Manuel Masiero, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 02/22/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Google Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel C (Pixel Serie)

Processor

Nvidia Tegra X1 8 x 1.9 GHz, Erista (Cortex-A57 + A53)

Grafikkort

NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU

Minne

3 GB

, LPDDR4

Skärm

10.20 tum 2:1.4, 2560 x 1800 pixlar, LTPS, 308 ppi, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 52.9 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm, NFC, Sensorer: Ljussensor, gyroskop, accelerometer, kompass, Hallsensor, närhetssensor, USB-OTG

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7 x 242 x 179

Batteri

34 Wh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix Videoinspelning i upp till 1080p
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix Videoinspelning i upp till 1080p

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Netzteil, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

517 g, Strömförsörjning: 35 g

Pris

600 Kr

Länkar

Google hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Google Pixel C Apple iPad Air 2 2014 Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Google Nexus 9 DIN A5 ❌

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


513 cd/m²	509 cd/m²	525 cd/m²
503 cd/m²	487 cd/m²	504 cd/m²
516 cd/m²	498 cd/m²	533 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 533 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 509.8 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 487 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1249:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.16

	Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-2%	-12%	18%	-22%
Brightness middle	487	423 -13%	430 -12%	358 -26%	471 -3%
Brightness	510	427 -16%	411 -19%	357 -30%	457 -10%
Brightness Distribution	91	92 1%	92 1%	86 -5%	92 1%
Black Level *	0.39	0.61 -56%	0.77 -97%		0.46 -18%
Contrast	1249	693 -45%	558 -55%		1024 -18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.24	2.86 45%	3.17 40%	1.78 66%	8.69 -66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.95	2.37 70%	3.29 59%	1.38 83%	11.24 -41%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.43 ^91%	2.39 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.17 ^101%
CCT	6565 ^99%	6941 ^94%	6746 ^96%	6366 ^102%	9508 ^68%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		88	62
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					99

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

3DMark - 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	40665 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	21707 Points -47%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	33812 Points -17%
Google Nexus 9	26455 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	19867 Points -51%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	24566 Points -40%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	4216 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	4530 Points +7%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	5419 Points +29%
Google Nexus 9	3154 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	4221 Points 0%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	3949 Points -6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	1411 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	1816 Points +29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	3200 Points +127%
Google Nexus 9	1879 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	1247 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	1298 Points -8%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	39 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	52.1 fps +34%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	59.3 fps +52%
Google Nexus 9	43.4 fps +11%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	56 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	29 fps -26%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	37 fps -5%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	69 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	70.4 fps +2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	163.2 fps +137%
Google Nexus 9	57.8 fps -16%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	65 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	38 fps -45%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	54 fps -22%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	40 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	37.6 fps -6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	80.1 fps +100%
Google Nexus 9	31 fps -22%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	32 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	17 fps -57%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	26 fps -35%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	22 fps
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	27 fps +23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	33.3 fps +51%
Google Nexus 9	22.5 fps +2%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	29 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	12 fps -45%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	16 fps -27%

Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	9834 points
Google Nexus 9	3910 points -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	12400 points +26%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	7118 points -28%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	4497 points
Google Nexus 9	4435 points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	4489 points 0%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	4138 points -8%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	90568 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	101062 Points +12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	184346 Points +104%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	87000 Points -4%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	1909 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	1967 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	3282 Points +72%
Google Nexus 9	1845 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	1103 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	1482 Points -22%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	2724 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	4104 Points +51%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	6230 Points +129%
Google Nexus 9	1729 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	2867 Points +5%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	2488 Points -9%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	868 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	832 Points -4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	2027 Points +134%
Google Nexus 9	1509 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	590 Points -32%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	954 Points +10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	6355 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	4920 Points -23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	8422 Points +33%
Google Nexus 9	8602 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	1385 Points -78%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	2683 Points -58%
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	884 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	1263 Points +43%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	1091 Points +23%
Google Nexus 9	516 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	648 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	758 Points -14%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	764 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014	754 Points -1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9	1871 Points +145%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761	665 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	0 Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C	6858 Points
Google Nexus 9	5841 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE	5565 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet	4441 Points -35%

Legend

Google Pixel C Nvidia Tegra X1, NVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad Air 2 2014 Apple A8X, PowerVR GXA6850, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 Apple A9X, Apple A9X / PowerVR Series 7XT, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)

Google Nexus 9 Nvidia Tegra K1 (Denver), NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU, 32 GB eMMC Flash

NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 Nvidia Tegra K1, NVIDIA Tegra K1 Kepler GPU, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP6, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sunspider | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Google V8 Ver. 7 | WebXPRT 2015

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	833 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	291.1 ms * +65%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	181 ms * +78%
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	919 ms * -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1016 ms * -22%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	553 ms * +34%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7563 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	10512 Points +39%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	19852 Points +162%
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	8210 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6885 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7790 Points +3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5533 ms *
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	2396 ms * +57%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	1499 ms * +73%
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	4031 ms * +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6483 ms * -17%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4064 ms * +27%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8439 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9355 Points +11%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	19567 Points +132%
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	10142 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7197 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7177 Points -15%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points
Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	158 Points +23%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)	215 Points +68%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash	106 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79 Points -38%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	93 Points -27%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	154.3 MB/s
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	279.2 MB/s +81%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash	105 (105^min - 113^max) MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	248.2 MB/s +61%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	256 MB/s +66%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	109.4 MB/s
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	75.5 MB/s -31%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash	44 (40^min - 46^max) MB/s -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.37 MB/s -55%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	81 MB/s -26%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	19.96 MB/s
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	36.22 MB/s +81%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12.5 (12^min - 13^max) MB/s -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	25.56 MB/s +28%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	20 MB/s 0%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	10.08 MB/s
Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	14.49 MB/s +44%
NVIDIA Shield Tablet LTE P1761 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2.5 (1.9^min - 2.6^max) MB/s -75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	9.82 MB/s -3%
Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	13.6 MB/s +35%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


40.1 °C	31.3 °C	28.9 °C
42.3 °C	31.3 °C	29.5 °C
35.7 °C	32.9 °C	32.2 °C

Max: 42.3 °C
Medel: 33.8 °C


29 °C	33.5 °C	34.9 °C
28.3 °C	33.6 °C	36 °C
29.5 °C	31.5 °C	33.5 °C

Max: 36 °C
Medel: 32.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 38.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.07 / 0.8 Watt
Låg belastning	1.82 / 4.26 / 4.33 Watt
Hög belastning	9.82 / 13.99 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		34tim 50min
WiFi Websurfing		10tim 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12tim 20min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 54min

	Google Pixel C Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU, X1, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPad Air 2 2014 PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 9 GeForce ULP K1 (Tegra K1 Kepler GPU), K1 (Denver), 32 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE Mali-T760 MP6, Exynos 5433, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-26%	-22%	-17%	-22%
H.264	740	562 -24%	597 -19%	651 -12%	705 -5%
WiFi v1.3	638			393 -38%	525 -18%
Load	294	212 -28%	224 -24%	291 -1%	166 -44%
WiFi		630	574

För

+ Utmärkt design

+ Sofistikerade material

+ Android 6.0

+ Snabb SoC

+ 3 GB RAM

+ USB Typ-C

+ Ljusstark skärm

+ Bra kamera i dagsljus

+ Lång batteritid

Emot

- Ingen minneskortplats

- Ingen GPS-modul

- Inget modem

- Grynig kamera i mörka situationer

- Dyrt tangentbord

In Review: Google Pixel C. Test model courtesy of Google Germany.

Många funktioner i 10,2-tummaren Google Pixel C är övertygande. Tack vare den tilltalande designen och det sofistikerade aluminiumhöljet kan den lätt konkurrera med iPad rent visuellt. Några andra fördelar är senaste Android-versionen, Nvidia Tegra X1-kretsen med 3 GB minne, den ljusstarka skärmen med breda betraktningsvinklar, hög kontrast och bra färgreproduktion samt den mycket långa batteritiden. Dessutom ingår saker som en USB typ C-port och möjligheten att omvandla Pixel C till en slags bärbar dator med ett tangentbord som tillval.

Det finns inte lika mycket att kritisera, men en punkt är att varken 32 GB- eller 64 GB-modellerna av Pixel C har microSD-kortplats, så du bör tänka över dina lagringsbehov innan du slår till. Varken GPS eller modem ingår, men du får i alla fall snabbt Wi-Fi 802.11ac. Vi skulle också ha velat se en USB Type-C-kabel för filöverföring. Google säljer den tyvärr bara i online-butiken tar ganska bra betalt för den. Ett annat dyrt tillbehör är tangentbordet för ca 1600 kr (170 euro).

Google Pixel C - 04/13/2016 v5 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Design

90%

Tangentbord

76 / 80 → 95%

Mus

93%

Anslutningar

33 / 65 → 50%

Vikt

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Batteri

93%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

60 / 68 → 88%

Programprestanda

49 / 76 → 65%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

75 / 85 → 88%

Medel

77%

90%

Tablet - Vägt medel

Read about the changes in the new rating version 5

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1698 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Google Pixel C Tablet (sammanfattning)

Manuel Masiero, 2016-02-22 (Update: 2016-03- 6)