Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Google Pixel XL (sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 402 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19
| Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Google Nexus 6P AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Huawei P9 Plus AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Microsoft Lumia 950 XL AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7" | HTC 10 Super LCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 19% | 47% | 43% | -20% | 10% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 402 | 363 -10% | 557 39% | 554 38% | 361 -10% | 297 -26% | 445 11% |
| Brightness | 408 | 365 -11% | 553 36% | 552 35% | 366 -10% | 297 -27% | 434 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 97 14% | 96 13% | 87 2% | 93 9% | 93 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.36 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 2.34 41% | 1.4 65% | 1.59 60% | 5.1 -28% | 2.67 33% | 2.8 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.1 | 3.1 69% | 2.56 75% | 10 1% | 3.98 61% | 5.8 43% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.03 68% | 1.3 59% | 2.01 37% | 5.5 -72% | 2.81 12% | 3.7 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.01 109% | 2.24 98% | 2.08 106% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7037 92% | 6429 101% | 6667 97% | 6321 103% | 7388 88% | 6379 102% | 7164 91% |
| Contrast | 1591 | 1236 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 82.12 | 66.31 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.98 | 99.79 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| LG G5 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| HTC 10 | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Lenovo ZUK Z2 | |
| LG G5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC 10 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | OnePlus 3 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Lenovo Moto Z Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo ZUK Z2 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 64 GB eMMC Flash | LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 56% | 43% | 155% | 42% | -47% | 37% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 258.2 | 275.1 7% | 408.7 58% | 487.3 89% | 439.7 70% | 281.3 9% | 239.4 -7% | 427.6 66% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 83.4 | 115.6 39% | 153.3 84% | 145.1 74% | 168.3 102% | 72.2 -13% | 46.52 -44% | 141.3 69% |
| Random Read 4KB | 87.7 | 29.92 -66% | 137.6 57% | 86.7 -1% | 117.2 34% | 39 -56% | 21.27 -76% | 89.3 2% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.56 | 15.89 9% | 18.23 25% | 15.79 8% | 74.9 414% | 47.45 226% | 5.64 -61% | 16.22 11% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 58 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Google Pixel XL 2016 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.12 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.53 / 1.07 / 1.12 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.53 / 6.26 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Google Nexus 6P 3450 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -45% | -52% | -15% | -13% | -24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.53 | 0.83 -57% | 0.68 -28% | 0.77 -45% | 0.63 -19% | 0.87 -64% | 0.57 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 1.07 | 1.09 -2% | 1.49 -39% | 2.04 -91% | 1.1 -3% | 1.2 -12% | 1.24 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.12 | 1.17 -4% | 1.91 -71% | 2.24 -100% | 1.56 -39% | 1.27 -13% | 1.36 -21% |
| Load Average * | 5.53 | 7.49 -35% | 7.4 -34% | 4.69 15% | 5.95 -8% | 4.69 15% | 5.92 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.26 | 9.51 -52% | 9.71 -55% | 8.66 -38% | 6.7 -7% | 5.63 10% | 10.53 -68% |
* ... smaller is better
| Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Google Nexus 6P 3450 mAh | HTC 10 3000 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | Huawei P9 Plus 3400 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 3% | -2% | 28% | 55% | 20% | 38% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1333 | 1447 9% | 1273 -5% | 1835 38% | 1663 25% | 1446 8% | 1338 0% |
| H.264 | 505 | 533 6% | 648 28% | 813 61% | 914 81% | 776 54% | 847 68% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 505 | 375 -26% | 413 -18% | 587 16% | 732 45% | 530 5% | 840 66% |
| Load | 230 | 280 22% | 203 -12% | 225 -2% | 392 70% | 263 14% | 268 17% |
För
Emot
Google Pixel XL är en mycket bra smartphone, men huvudfunktionen Google Assistant bör inte vara det främsta skälet att köpa den. Framförallt är det inget som rättfärdigar den höga prislappen.
Med det sagt är Pixel XL utrustad med en snabb processor, gott om RAM-minne, en utmärkt kamera, snabbt WiFi och LTE Cat. 11. Dessutom är samtalskvaliteten utmärkt.
Designen kan man alltid ha åsikter om, men det är en besvikelse att man inte kan utöka lagringsutrymmet med microSD-kort, eftersom merkostnaden för en modell med högre kapacitet är ganska kännbar. Det obegränsade molnlagringsutrymmet för foton väger upp till viss del. Batteritiden kunde också varit bättre, men det kan möjligen åstadkommas med ny mjukvara, eftersom komponenterna borde ha bättre potential.
Google Pixel XL har utmärkta funktioner. Tyvärr sätter även priset ett nytt rekord. Till syvende och sist är det en smartphone för entusiaster, som blir målgruppen som får avgöra om konceptet är framgångsrikt.
Google Pixel XL 2016
- 11/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
