Test: HP Chromebook x2 11 - Snapdragon 7c fungerar bra med Chrome OS (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 10/2021 | HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618 | 583 g | 7.7 mm | 11.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2021 | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 18.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3 | 1.1 kg | 18.8 mm | 11.60" | 1366x768 | |
| 79.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3 | 920 g | 18.2 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.2 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 16.8 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Angelbird V60) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 447.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 995:1 (Svärta: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.48 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.08
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx IPS, 2160x1440, 11" | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 12% | -3% | -3% | 6% | 39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 35 ? 25% | 41.2 ? 11% | 45 ? 3% | 40.1 ? 14% | 36 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 27 ? -1% | 31.2 ? -16% | 29 ? -8% | 27.5 ? -3% | 12 ? 55% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 | 200 ? | ||||
| Screen | -69% | -28% | -120% | -87% | -38% | |
| Brightness middle | 447.8 | 282 -37% | 286.8 -36% | 219 -51% | 397 -11% | 426 -5% |
| Brightness | 427 | 259 -39% | 262 -39% | 214 -50% | 360 -16% | 388 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 84 -5% | 85 -3% | 90 2% | 81 -8% | 85 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.15 67% | 0.2 56% | 0.21 53% | 0.44 2% | 0.56 -24% |
| Contrast | 995 | 1880 89% | 1434 44% | 1043 5% | 902 -9% | 761 -24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.48 | 5.55 -275% | 2.05 -39% | 4.87 -229% | 3.19 -116% | 2.25 -52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 7.46 -187% | 5.37 -107% | 18.57 -614% | 11 -323% | 5.29 -103% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.97 -162% | 3.8 -100% | 3.39 -78% | 5.9 -211% | 3.53 -86% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% | 2.201 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.32 95% | |
| CCT | 6624 98% | 6473 100% | 7004 93% | 6941 94% | 7938 82% | 6368 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-53% | -16% /
-23% | -62% /
-97% | -41% /
-68% | 1% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench ML: 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | 0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Sunspider: 1.0 Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Jetstream 2: Total Score
| Geekbench ML / 0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 | |
| Geekbench ML / 0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark for Android / Work 3.0 | |
| Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx 128 GB eMMC Flash | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise SK hynix BC501A HFM128GDGTNG | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 64 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Edge 20 Lite 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | OnePlus Nord 2 5G 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drive Performance Rating | ||||||
| Percent | 15.3 | 39.5 158% | 8.1 -47% | 55.2 261% | 99.8 552% | 28.6 87% |
| AndroBench 3-5 | 154% | -32% | 438% | 871% | 126% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 113.5 | 555 389% | 116.6 3% | 954 741% | 1827 1510% | 300.5 165% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 172.5 | 284.9 65% | 122.1 -29% | 478.3 177% | 1256 628% | 210.3 22% |
| Random Read 4KB | 74.6 | 225.1 202% | 24.3 -67% | 141.4 90% | 223.7 200% | 118 58% |
| Random Write 4KB | 19.2 | 11.7 -39% | 12.8 -33% | 161.9 743% | 239 1145% | 69.2 260% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 156% /
155% | -40% /
-35% | 350% /
402% | 712% /
807% | 107% /
118% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-10 °C / -18 F).
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.25 / 1.9 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.7 / 5.2 / 5.3 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
6.1 / 10.6 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2160x1440, 11" | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501A HFM128GDGTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -92% | -141% | 19% | 5% | -128% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.7 | 3.4 -100% | 3.4 -100% | 1.7 -0% | 1.4 18% | 2.7 -59% |
| Idle Average * | 5.2 | 6.5 -25% | 7.1 -37% | 3.6 31% | 4.5 13% | 5.5 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.3 | 7.8 -47% | 7.2 -36% | 3.7 30% | 5.1 4% | 6.7 -26% |
| Load Average * | 6.1 | 12.5 -105% | 11.6 -90% | 5.5 10% | 7.5 -23% | 25 -310% |
| Load Maximum * | 10.6 | 30.1 -184% | 57.3 -441% | 8.3 22% | 9 15% | 36 -240% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx SD 7c, Adreno 618, 32 Wh | Asus Chromebook Flip CX5 CX5500FEA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7410 Chromebook Enterprise i5-10310U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Acer Chromebook Spin 311 CP311-3H-K2RJ MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3, 36.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Duet Chromebook 10 Helio P60T, Mali-G72 MP3, 27.6 Wh | Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-2W-560V i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50.3 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 563 | 561 0% | 748 33% | 781 39% | 758 35% | 619 10% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
De bästa aspekterna av Chromebook x2 11 är den tryckkänsliga skärmen, den utmärkta konstruktionskvaliteten samt det löstagbara stället. Skärmen är ljusstark och välkalibrerad, täcker hela sRGB och har hög kontrast. Den slår lätt andra 2-i-1 Chromebooks i prisskiktet under 4 000 kronor. Både plattan och stället är av hög kvalitet. Plattan böjer sig knappt alls och stället har ett kraftfullt gångjärn.
För att få ut mesta möjliga av ultralätta Chromebook x2 11 behöver du dra nytta av den ljusstarka och färgexakta tryckkänsliga skärmen och USI-pennan. Annars erbjuder en mer traditionell omvandlingsbar Chromebook som Samsung Galaxy eller Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 en överlägsen skrivupplevelse.
Det värsta med den här enheten är tangentbordsbasen som böjer sig alldeles för lätt när man skriver. Återkopplingen är svampig och den grunda klickplattan är precis lika otillfredsställande. Planerar du att skriva mycket får du vara förberedd på att ha ett eget tangentbord och egen mus redo.
HP Chromebook x2 11-da0023dx
- 10/20/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
