Test: HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 (i7-8650U, FHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 416.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1436:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.69 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.13
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Chi Mei CMN14D7, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 4% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 66.8 4% | 64.3 0% | 65.9 2% | 64.7 1% | 67.1 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 94.1 | 97.1 3% | 94.6 1% | 95.2 1% | 93.1 -1% | 95.5 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.5 | 69 5% | 66.2 1% | 67.6 3% | 65.3 0% | 67.9 4% |
| Response Times | 1169% | 31% | 35% | 7% | 986% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 70.8 ? | 34.4 ? 51% | 40.8 ? 42% | 40.4 ? 43% | 58 ? 18% | 43 ? 39% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.4 ? | 30 ? 13% | 27.6 ? 20% | 25.6 ? 26% | 36 ? -5% | 25 ? 27% |
| PWM Frequency | 735 ? | 26040 ? 3443% | 22000 ? 2893% | |||
| Screen | -17% | -51% | -19% | -18% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 416.3 | 295.9 -29% | 316 -24% | 442.7 6% | 404 -3% | 484 16% |
| Brightness | 400 | 287 -28% | 291 -27% | 428 7% | 389 -3% | 473 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 85 -4% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.23 21% | 0.36 -24% | 0.31 -7% | 0.37 -28% | 0.33 -14% |
| Contrast | 1436 | 1287 -10% | 878 -39% | 1428 -1% | 1092 -24% | 1467 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.69 | 2.83 -5% | 5.9 -119% | 2.24 17% | 3.72 -38% | 4.29 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.95 | 7.34 -48% | 12.9 -161% | 7.19 -45% | 7.38 -49% | 6.46 -31% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.13 | 1.3 39% | 1.11 48% | 2.06 3% | 1.34 37% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 5.2 -79% | 8.6 -197% | 9.7 -234% | 4.44 -53% | 4.3 -48% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 1.42 155% | 2.34 94% | 2.51 88% |
| CCT | 6623 98% | 7056 92% | 6854 95% | 6227 104% | 7095 92% | 7315 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.1 | 63 5% | 60.7 1% | 61.6 2% | 60 0% | 62 3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94.5 | 97 3% | 94.5 0% | 95 1% | 93 -2% | 95 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 385% /
209% | -6% /
-31% | 6% /
-9% | -4% /
-12% | 327% /
170% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 70.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 34.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 36 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 735 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 735 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 735 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8650U (128 - 178, n=17) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8650U (451 - 675, n=19) | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3308 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4558 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4078 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6 i5 256GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ256G | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -45% | -52% | -25% | -111% | -42% | |
| Seq Read | 1816 | 1585 -13% | 1850 2% | 2416 33% | 1169 -36% | 2035 12% |
| Seq Write | 1270 | 863 -32% | 661 -48% | 1170 -8% | 171 -87% | 658 -48% |
| 4K Read | 46.25 | 38.49 -17% | 38.04 -18% | 48.33 4% | 29.51 -36% | 39.74 -14% |
| 4K Write | 104.1 | 100.1 -4% | 95 -9% | 103.1 -1% | 83.7 -20% | 105.7 2% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1342 | 782 -42% | 434.3 -68% | 1039 -23% | 330 -75% | 461 -66% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1209 | 662 -45% | 266.3 -78% | 399.6 -67% | 130.5 -89% | 300.1 -75% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.105 -144% | 0.069 -60% | 0.058 -35% | 0.069 -60% | 0.061 -42% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.038 -9% | 0.056 -60% | 0.036 -3% | 0.276 -689% | 0.051 -46% |
| Score Read | 1569 | 979 -38% | 657 -58% | 1329 -15% | 476 -70% | 704 -55% |
| Score Write | 1440 | 848 -41% | 427 -70% | 620 -57% | 231 -84% | 471 -67% |
| Score Total | 3790 | 2299 -39% | 1373 -64% | 2575 -32% | 911 -76% | 1479 -61% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2034 | 534 -74% | 539 -74% | 739 -64% | 231.9 -89% | 893 -56% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 450.3 | 133.7 -70% | 209.7 -53% | 312.3 -31% | 218.1 -52% | 287.9 -36% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1024 | 394.2 -62% | 340 -67% | 486.3 -53% | 165.3 -84% | 618 -40% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 | |
| HP EliteBook 755 G5 3UN79EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 13 20J1005TPB | |
| HP x2 210 G2 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2131 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9217 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT HD Graphics 630, i7-7820HQ, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -1% | -5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 29.7 -5% | 27.9 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Load Average * | 32.6 | 33.3 -2% | 31.8 2% | 36.2 -11% | 33.5 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.6 | 35.3 4% | 32.7 11% | 45.2 -23% | 33.5 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 32.6 / 36.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.8 °C / 1.5 F).
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.3 / 0.7 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 2.7 / 6.5 / 11.5 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
38.7 / 50.5 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -6% | -23% | -19% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 5.1 -89% | 3.3 -22% | 3.5 -30% | 4.8 -78% | 3.2 -19% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 7 -8% | 6.8 -5% | 8.9 -37% | 8.6 -32% | 8.7 -34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 11.7 -2% | 9.5 17% | 12.3 -7% | 10.4 10% | 10.4 10% |
| Load Average * | 38.7 | 41.2 -6% | 40.8 -5% | 54.2 -40% | 37.9 2% | 29.2 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.5 | 56.9 -13% | 57 -13% | 52.1 -3% | 48.5 4% | 40.8 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, 67 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -20% | -20% | -22% | -28% | -28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1673 | 1349 -19% | 1432 -14% | 1243 -26% | 1032 -38% | 1083 -35% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 623 | 665 7% | 550 -12% | 557 -11% | 498 -20% | 509 -18% |
| Load | 187 | 96 -49% | 124 -34% | 133 -29% | 141 -25% | 131 -30% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
EliteBook x360 1040 G5 är allt som vi gillade med EliteBook x360 1030 G3 men med en rymligare skärm på 14 tum. Den kan bäst beskrivas som en Spectre x360 13 på överväxel i fråga om funktionalitet och säkerhet. Du kommer inte att kunna hitta en annan omvandlingsbar på 14 tum med ett bättre tangentbord och som dessutom har Thunderbolt 3, 4G LTE, utmärkta högtalare, en superljusstark skärm på 700 nit och riktigt lång batteritid. Det är så nära en "ultimat" Windowsbaserad omvandlingsbar för den som reser ofta som man kan komma.
Det finns ett par viktiga brister att tänka på. För det första så reducerar den antireflexbehandlade matta tryckkänsliga skärmen reflektioner på den dyra bekostnaden av ökad grynighet. En del användare kanske inte störs av detta, men den som är van vid skarpa blanka skärmar med snabba responstider kommer märka att den matta tryckkänsliga skärmen ser anskrämlig ut. Som tur är finns ett alternativ i form av en vanlig blank (BrightView) skärm.
För det andra ligger processorns prestanda återigen under genomsnittet på grund av begränsad Turbo Boost. Förhoppningsvis kommer detta inte bli en trend för EliteBook x360-serien, för vi noterade liknande resultat på EliteBook x360 1030 G3. Det känns helt enkelt inte rätt när den billigare Core i7-8550U som sitter i Lenovo Yoga C930 presterar nästan 20 procent bättre än den förmodat snabbare Core i7-8650U som sitter i vår HP.
Till sist låter fläkten mer högfrekvent än vi hade förväntat oss från en Ultrabook. Vi misstänker att de små fläktarna på ~30 mm är ansvariga då frekvensen naturligtvis blir högre allt eftersom diametern minskar. Detta innebär inte att datorn är högljudd, men fläktarna märks ändå när de drar igång.
Vi kan verkligen rekommendera EliteBook x360 1040 G5. Inte bara till företagskunder som reser mycket utan även åt vanliga användare som kan tänkas överväga en Ultrabook-modell. Till och med den billigaste SKU:n kan erbjuda lika mycket som någon annan omvandlingsbar Ultrabook. Spara några tusen kronor på att inte välja Core i7-varianterna och ta istället en med Core i5. Systemet kan inte riktigt få ut den fulla potentialen ur Core i7-serien på grund av begränsad Turbo Boost.
Det här är den omvandlingsbara 14-tummaren andra kommer vilja försöka överträffa. De få nackdelarna förtar inte den långa listan över fördelar och den har hårdvarualternativ som de flesta andra subnotebook-modeller inte har alls, vilket inkluderar 4G LTE och en tryckkänslig skärm på 700 nit. Om GPU-prestanda är viktigt kan dock Acer Swift 7 eller Surface Book 2 vara bättre alternativ.
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
- 10/22/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
