Test: HP Omen 15 - Gaming med GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q och 144 Hz
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus 15 X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 324 cd/m²
Kontrast: 752:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 P79F Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5590 AU Optronics B156HAN, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-dc0015ng LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 39% | -38% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.8 | 64.9 2% | 99.9 57% | 39.26 -38% | 64.2 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 95.6 2% | 100 7% | 59.1 -37% | 93.4 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65 | 66.3 2% | 100 54% | 40.56 -38% | 65.1 0% |
| Response Times | -11% | 80% | -197% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 15.2 ? -9% | 2.6 ? 81% | 45 ? -221% | 17 ? -21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11 ? | 12.4 ? -13% | 2.3 ? 79% | 30 ? -173% | 11 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 60.2 ? | ||||
| Screen | 3% | -15% | -76% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 316 | 305.1 -3% | 452.1 43% | 234 -26% | 317 0% |
| Brightness | 295 | 295 0% | 452 53% | 219 -26% | 283 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 78 -7% | 90 7% | 82 -2% | 76 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.33 21% | 0.17 60% | 0.62 -48% | |
| Contrast | 752 | 925 23% | 1376 83% | 511 -32% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 2.58 4% | 6.34 -135% | 8.6 -219% | 2.83 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.65 | 4.32 24% | 12.97 -130% | 17.49 -210% | 5.78 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.58 | 1.33 16% | 4.06 -157% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.35 | 3.4 -45% | 2.8 -19% | 8.55 -264% | 2 15% |
| Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.21 100% | 3.02 73% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6904 94% | 6374 102% | 6114 106% | 7802 83% | 6493 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60.7 1% | 91 52% | 37 -38% | 60 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 95.2 2% | 100 8% | 59 -37% | 93 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
1% | 35% /
12% | -104% /
-84% | -7% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5857 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5609 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Alienware m15 P79F Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Dell G5 15 5590 KBG30ZMS128G | HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 53% | 35% | -53% | -21% | 70% | |
| Write 4K | 50.2 | 147.2 193% | 148.4 196% | 64.3 28% | 87.5 74% | 116.1 ? 131% |
| Read 4K | 35.32 | 63.7 80% | 49.65 41% | 29.3 -17% | 16.08 -54% | 189.5 ? 437% |
| Write Seq | 991 | 1573 59% | 1139 15% | 131.1 -87% | 614 -38% | 1409 ? 42% |
| Read Seq | 1526 | 2602 71% | 2353 54% | 776 -49% | 1341 -12% | 1624 ? 6% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.1 | 531 19% | 484.7 9% | 96.8 -78% | 307.9 -31% | 360 ? -19% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 526 | 598 14% | 542 3% | 198.6 -62% | 358.4 -32% | 396 ? -25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1647 | 1592 -3% | 1139 -31% | 127.8 -92% | 525 -68% | 1492 ? -9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3427 | 2981 -13% | 3108 -9% | 1044 -70% | 3077 -10% | 3313 ? -3% |
| AS SSD | -8% | -9% | -347% | -45% | -17% | |
| Seq Read | 2485 | 1912 -23% | 1937 -22% | 1036 -58% | 2432 -2% | 2032 ? -18% |
| Seq Write | 1575 | 1553 -1% | 1066 -32% | 115.1 -93% | 843 -46% | 1339 ? -15% |
| 4K Read | 53.4 | 56.5 6% | 31.76 -41% | 29.6 -45% | 21.24 -60% | 46.1 ? -14% |
| 4K Write | 113.5 | 119.6 5% | 102.6 -10% | 67.8 -40% | 99.3 -13% | 107.4 ? -5% |
| 4K-64 Read | 725 | 869 20% | 1140 57% | 184.5 -75% | 730 1% | 712 ? -2% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1371 | 584 -57% | 938 -32% | 95.2 -93% | 484.4 -65% | 999 ? -27% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.059 | 0.049 17% | 0.058 2% | 1.519 -2475% | 0.126 -114% | 0.07076 ? -20% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.031 3% | 0.04 -25% | 0.255 -697% | 0.063 -97% | 0.04352 ? -36% |
| Score Read | 1027 | 1116 9% | 1366 33% | 318 -69% | 994 -3% | 961 ? -6% |
| Score Write | 1642 | 859 -48% | 1147 -30% | 174 -89% | 668 -59% | 1240 ? -24% |
| Score Total | 3163 | 2544 -20% | 3168 0% | 620 -80% | 2091 -34% | 2671 ? -16% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1329 | 946 | 159.2 | 1632 | 1297 ? | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 404.3 | 452.8 | 94.4 | 30.89 | 409 ? | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1071 | 1013 | 106.3 | 980 | 786 ? | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 23% /
17% | 13% /
9% | -200% /
-223% | -33% /
-35% | 27% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13166 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31932 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10797 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (115.8 - 211, n=15) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (203 - 297, n=14) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (105.8 - 126, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 244, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (111.4 - 135, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| Anno 1800 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (28.5 - 40, n=5) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (58.5 - 70.6, n=4) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 308.7 | 264.3 | 244.6 | 115.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 126.5 | 117.4 | 111.4 | 105.8 |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 58.5 | 28.45 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 32.8 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 42.5 / 47.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.6 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.2 / 0.26 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 14.7 / 18.6 / 22.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
90 / 120 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -60% | -4% | 22% | -23% | -23% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14.7 | 26 -77% | 10.9 26% | 3.5 76% | 14 5% | 15.4 ? -5% | 13.5 ? 8% |
| Idle Average * | 18.6 | 30.8 -66% | 12.3 34% | 6.9 63% | 18.2 2% | 20 ? -8% | 18.9 ? -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.6 | 34.9 -54% | 19 16% | 8.5 62% | 24 -6% | 26.7 ? -18% | 26.7 ? -18% |
| Load Average * | 90 | 90.7 -1% | 96 -7% | 127 -41% | 143 -59% | 105.2 ? -17% | 106.3 ? -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 120 | 241.2 -101% | 229.1 -91% | 179 -49% | 190 -58% | 201 ? -68% | 249 ? -108% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 175 | 161.7 | 126 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Omen 15-dc1303ng i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Dell G5 15 5590 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 70.07 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -43% | 57% | 158% | 54% | 67% | |
| Reader / Idle | 301 | 105 -65% | 890 196% | 460 53% | 565 ? 88% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 197 | 95 -52% | 309 57% | 463 135% | 274 39% | 375 ? 90% |
| Load | 69 | 61 -12% | 168 143% | 117 70% | 85.6 ? 24% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
HP Omen 15 förblir en gedigen spellaptop. Modellen dc1303ng behåller sin föregångares styrkor samtidigt som den har betydligt mer kraft under huven. Den håller sig också jämförelsevis tyst vid belastning, vilket alltid är trevligt. Den är relativt enkel att uppgradera eller laga, då det bland annat gåra att byta ut RAM, lagring och WiFi-kort. Men en del personer kan nog tycka att det är en aning svårt att ta bort bottenplattan.
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng är riktigt prisvärd, med kraftfull hårdvara som använder 144 Hz-skärmen med 1080p-upplösning väl. Dåligt kontrastförhållande och svag batteritid förtar dock helhetsupplevelsen en aning.
Omen 15 har förvånansvärt dålig batteritid, särskilt med tanke på att HP har inkluderat ett batteri på 70 Wh. Vi uppskattar förvisso att HP har valt att använda en PWM-fri 144 Hz-panel, men det låga kontrastförhållandet och de höga nivåerna av svärta var en besvikelse.
För att sammanfatta så är HP Omen 15-dc1303ng en spellaptop designad för den som endast planerar att spela med ett nätuttag i närheten eller med enheten ansluten till en extern monitor. Ett RTX 2070 Max-Q och sex kärnor för 20.000 kronor är dock fortfarande prisvärt.
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
- 06/24/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
