Test: HP Omen 15 - Stark AMD-processor får Intel att darra (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.8 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
82.7 % v7 (old) | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
82.1 % v7 (old) | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83.7 % v7 (old) | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 28 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus 5 KB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: 900:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.066
HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP BOE08FB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 5 KB LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 69% | 0% | 1% | 61% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.12 | 67.2 72% | 38.92 -1% | 39.51 1% | 63.4 62% | 38.8 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.6 | 95.9 66% | 58.5 2% | 58.1 1% | 92.8 61% | 57.8 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.42 | 68.5 69% | 40.22 0% | 40.81 1% | 64.8 60% | 40.09 -1% |
Response Times | 61% | -14% | 4% | 50% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.4 ? | 9.6 ? 68% | 34 ? -12% | 29.2 ? 4% | 14.4 ? 53% | 26 ? 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.8 ? | 9.6 ? 54% | 24 ? -15% | 20 ? 4% | 11.2 ? 46% | 17 ? 18% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | |||||
Screen | 0% | 1% | -8% | 33% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 297 | 312 5% | 280 -6% | 279 -6% | 318 7% | 301 1% |
Brightness | 275 | 290 5% | 254 -8% | 257 -7% | 298 8% | 277 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 89 1% | 87 -1% | 77 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.2 39% | 0.15 55% | 0.31 6% | 0.3 9% | 0.26 21% |
Contrast | 900 | 1560 73% | 1867 107% | 900 0% | 1060 18% | 1158 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.54 | 4.84 -7% | 5.89 -30% | 5.84 -29% | 2.49 45% | 5.12 -13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.92 | 13.85 27% | 19 -0% | 21.8 -15% | 5.06 73% | 8.86 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.66 | 1.77 62% | 4.79 -3% | 4.54 3% | 1.53 67% | 4.88 -5% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 9 -329% | 4.08 -94% | 3.1 -48% | 1.6 24% | 3.47 -65% |
Gamma | 2.066 106% | 2.105 105% | 2.33 94% | 2.116 104% | 2.211 100% | 2.37 93% |
CCT | 6291 103% | 8099 80% | 7303 89% | 6577 99% | 6714 97% | 7062 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 68 70% | 37 -7% | 41 3% | 65 63% | 37 -7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 92 59% | 58 0% | 59 2% | 89 53% | 57 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 43% /
21% | -4% /
-1% | -1% /
-5% | 48% /
41% | 5% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-en0375ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00 | Aorus 5 KB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT) | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 28% | -13% | -0% | 10% | -18% | 3% | |
Write 4K | 119.6 | 233 95% | 219.8 84% | 117.5 -2% | 162.1 36% | 145.4 22% | 164.3 ? 37% |
Read 4K | 47.4 | 54.5 15% | 50.2 6% | 47.36 0% | 60.7 28% | 51.6 9% | 48.2 ? 2% |
Write Seq | 2677 | 3050 14% | 979 -63% | 2748 3% | 2366 -12% | 1007 -62% | 2096 ? -22% |
Read Seq | 2220 | 3042 37% | 1990 -10% | 2084 -6% | 2633 19% | 1145 -48% | 2123 ? -4% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 427.4 | 520 22% | 516 21% | 407.3 -5% | 428.2 0% | 468.4 10% | 451 ? 6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 549 | 546 -1% | 298.3 -46% | 474.6 -14% | 582 6% | 528 -4% | 509 ? -7% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2706 | 3241 20% | 982 -64% | 3069 13% | 2480 -8% | 1381 -49% | 2551 ? -6% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2869 | 3538 23% | 1907 -34% | 3154 10% | 3121 9% | 2291 -20% | 3330 ? 16% |
AS SSD | 15% | -29% | -3% | -17% | -36% | -16% | |
Seq Read | 2255 | 2836 26% | 1682 -25% | 2369 5% | 2795 24% | 2012 -11% | 2605 ? 16% |
Seq Write | 2129 | 2452 15% | 904 -58% | 2446 15% | 2172 2% | 1261 -41% | 1905 ? -11% |
4K Read | 49.5 | 60.4 22% | 60.2 22% | 40.61 -18% | 53.3 8% | 43.66 -12% | 45.8 ? -7% |
4K Write | 175.1 | 190.5 9% | 164.8 -6% | 103.2 -41% | 121.3 -31% | 109.3 -38% | 155.6 ? -11% |
4K-64 Read | 1463 | 1283 -12% | 472.5 -68% | 1637 12% | 714 -51% | 851 -42% | 1181 ? -19% |
4K-64 Write | 2061 | 2298 11% | 845 -59% | 1961 -5% | 1376 -33% | 780 -62% | 1372 ? -33% |
Access Time Read * | 0.138 | 0.034 75% | 0.087 37% | 0.06 57% | 0.049 64% | 0.117 15% | 0.0801 ? 42% |
Access Time Write * | 0.022 | 0.02 9% | 0.02 9% | 0.036 -64% | 0.036 -64% | 0.036 -64% | 0.04195 ? -91% |
Score Read | 1738 | 1627 -6% | 701 -60% | 1915 10% | 1046 -40% | 1096 -37% | 1488 ? -14% |
Score Write | 2449 | 2734 12% | 1101 -55% | 2309 -6% | 1714 -30% | 1016 -59% | 1718 ? -30% |
Score Total | 5075 | 5184 2% | 2143 -58% | 5205 3% | 3279 -35% | 2643 -48% | 3938 ? -22% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
20% | -21% /
-22% | -2% /
-2% | -4% /
-6% | -27% /
-28% | -7% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18798 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 38655 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14526 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6161 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O | |
Aorus 5 KB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 165 | 159 | 127 | 70.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 107 | 56.4 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 123 | 115 | 109 | 104 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 91.5 | 81.9 | 68.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 83 | 73 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 102 | 93.1 | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 61.9 | 48.1 | ||
Valorant (2020) | 177 | |||
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 52.9 | 40 | ||
FIFA 21 (2020) | 163 | 161 | ||
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 66 | 36 | ||
Dirt 5 (2020) | 59.2 | 38.7 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 53 | 46 | ||
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) | 62.2 | 57.1 | ||
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 71.8 | 64.1 | ||
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 54 | 51 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) | 45.3 | 38.8 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 24 / 25 / 37 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 45 / 51 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -6% | -2% | -8% | -6% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25 -4% | 30.2 -26% | 25 -4% | 25 -4% | 30.7 -28% | 24 ? -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 26 -8% | 30.2 -26% | 25 -4% | 26 -8% | 30.7 -28% | 25.5 ? -6% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 30 -20% | 30.2 -21% | 29 -16% | 30 -20% | 30.7 -23% | 27.2 ? -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 37 | 32 14% | 30.2 18% | 34 8% | 34 8% | 30.7 17% | 30.2 ? 18% |
Load Average * | 45 | 46 -2% | 40 11% | 44 2% | 53 -18% | 36.6 19% | 42.5 ? 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 48 -0% | 49 -2% | 49 -2% | 51 -6% | 47 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 51 | 48 6% | 49 4% | 49 4% | 56 -10% | 50.9 -0% | 53.4 ? -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 4% | -21% | -11% | 2% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 51 -21% | 42.9 -2% | 55 -31% | 50 -19% | 46.3 -10% | 46.1 ? -10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 64 -19% | 49.9 8% | 65 -20% | 49 9% | 44.4 18% | 49.2 ? 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 29 -4% | 27.8 1% | 32 -14% | 35 -25% | 28.1 -0% | 31.2 ? -11% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 32 -10% | 27 7% | 34 -17% | 31 -7% | 29.4 -1% | 32.2 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-en0375ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.1 / 0.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4 / 9 / 22 Watt |
Hög belastning |
102 / 182 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -43% | -5% | -4% | -31% | 12% | -82% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 12 -200% | 5.4 -35% | 4 -0% | 8 -100% | 3.2 20% | 13.5 ? -238% |
Idle Average * | 9 | 14 -56% | 10 -11% | 10 -11% | 12 -33% | 8.3 8% | 18.9 ? -110% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 20 9% | 10.5 52% | 19 14% | 21 5% | 8.7 60% | 26.7 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 102 | 103 -1% | 135 -32% | 96 6% | 128 -25% | 82 20% | 106.6 ? -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 119 | 125 -5% | 144 -21% | 136 -14% | 138 -16% | 151 -27% | |
Load Maximum * | 182 | 193 -6% | 147 19% | 214 -18% | 217 -19% | 195 -7% | 249 ? -37% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 70.9 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-52-79LP i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 58.7 Wh | Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48.96 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -41% | -28% | -38% | -52% | -27% | -38% | |
Reader / Idle | 1200 | 469 -61% | 587 -51% | 575 -52% | 538 -55% | 848 -29% | 565 ? -53% |
WiFi v1.3 | 628 | 354 -44% | 370 -41% | 329 -48% | 285 -55% | 433 -31% | 376 ? -40% |
Load | 108 | 87 -19% | 116 7% | 92 -15% | 58 -46% | 84 -22% | 85.3 ? -21% |
H.264 | 371 | 322 | 554 | 408 ? |
För
Emot
Sammanfattning
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Om du kan stå ut med en 60 Hz-skärm med dåliga färger samt hög ljudnivå i 3D-läge är Omen 15-en0375ng en kraftfull och inte allt för dyr spellaptop.
Vi tycker att 12.600 kronor för en Ryzen 7 4800H CPU, en GeForce RTX 2060 GPU, en SSD-enhet på 512 GB och 16 GB RAM med dubbla kanaler är ett bra erbjudande som appellerar till prismedvetna gamers. Det är sällan några problem med höga detaljnivåer i datorns egna upplösning (1920 x 1080). Man blir dessutom bortskämd med förstklassig batteritid som till och med slår modeller från en del andra laptopklasser.
Om HP nu bara förbättrar WLAN-modulens hastighet, höljets stabilitet och den flerfaldigt kritiserade bildkvaliteten får konkurrenterna klä sig extra varmt.
Obs: Andra AMD-varianter av Omen 15 har en (antagligen bättre) 144 Hz-skärm.
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
- 12/29/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser