Notebookcheck Logo

Test: HP Omen 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, SSD, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Kompakt spelracer.

Omen 15 ritar smidigt upp alla moderna datorspel på sin matta Full HD-skärm. Hewlett-Packard använder här en riktigt responsiv IPS-skärm på 144 Hz och resten av utrustningen är också okej: NVMe SSD, 32 GB arbetsminne och Thunderbolt 3.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR) Windows
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1379 MHz, Minne: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, 256 bitars anslutning, Nvidia 417.01, no Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR4-2666, dubbla kanaler, två platser (båda upptagna)
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 144 Hz, Nvidia G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1433 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DVI, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerad ljudanslutning, mikrofoningång, Kortläsare: SDXC, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 25 x 360 x 263
Batteri
70.07 Wh, 4550 mAh Litiumjon, 15.4 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereo, Tangentbord: chiclet, McAfee LiveSafe (Testversion), 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.52 kg, Strömförsörjning: 652 g
Pris
2099 Euro
Länkar
HP hemsida
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

❌
383 mm 260 mm 29.5 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2 kg358 mm 248 mm 17.9 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)
95.7 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.1 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -1%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s -67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years)
119.6 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s -63%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s -63%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
665 MBit/s +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (605min - 668max) MBit/s
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
643 MBit/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
694 MBit/s +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
691 MBit/s +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (569min - 693max) MBit/s
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 (484min - 680max) MBit/s -10%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (569-693)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (484-680)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (605-668)
274
cd/m²		279
cd/m²		307
cd/m²
263
cd/m²		317
cd/m²		300
cd/m²
242
cd/m²		276
cd/m²		293
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
LG Philips LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 283.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.1 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 76 %
Mitt på batteriet: 317 cd/m²
Kontrast: 511:1 (Svärta: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-37%
0%
1%
0%
0%
26%
Display P3 Coverage
64.2
39.64
-38%
65.1
1%
66.7
4%
64.4
0%
64.3
0%
90
40%
sRGB Coverage
93.4
59
-37%
91.1
-2%
91.2
-2%
93.4
0%
94.1
1%
100
7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.1
40.95
-37%
65.9
1%
66.7
2%
65.5
1%
65.3
0%
86
32%
Response Times
-187%
3%
33%
6%
10%
-44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17 ?(9, 8)
47.2 ?(23.6, 23.6)
-178%
16 ?(9, 7)
6%
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
56%
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
20%
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
6%
24.4 ?(14.4, 10)
-44%
Response Time Black / White *
11 ?(7, 4)
32.4 ?(18, 14.4)
-195%
11 ?(7, 4)
-0%
10 ?(4.4, 5.6)
9%
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-9%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
13%
15.8 ?(13.8, 2)
-44%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
25510 ?(19)
Screen
-14%
14%
20%
22%
17%
-6%
Brightness middle
317
275
-13%
235
-26%
294
-7%
304.3
-4%
325
3%
292
-8%
Brightness
283
254
-10%
235
-17%
275
-3%
293
4%
303
7%
258
-9%
Brightness Distribution
76
90
18%
85
12%
84
11%
80
5%
90
18%
81
7%
Black Level *
0.62
0.27
56%
0.22
65%
0.24
61%
0.38
39%
0.33
47%
0.23
63%
Contrast
511
1019
99%
1068
109%
1225
140%
801
57%
985
93%
1270
149%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.83
4.62
-63%
2.82
-0%
2.57
9%
1.79
37%
2.69
5%
5.82
-106%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.78
8.05
-39%
4.82
17%
4.88
16%
3.69
36%
4.91
15%
9.05
-57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
4.31
-116%
2.32
-16%
2.41
-21%
1.1
45%
2.34
-17%
4.61
-131%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.49 88%
2.49 88%
2.5 88%
2.27 97%
2.38 92%
2.65 83%
CCT
6493 100%
7000 93%
6310 103%
6370 102%
6665 98%
6872 95%
6950 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
38
-37%
59
-2%
59
-2%
59.8
0%
60
0%
76
27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
59
-37%
92
-1%
91
-2%
92.8
0%
94
1%
100
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.59
4.88
2.14
1.27
2.82
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-79% / -42%
6% / 10%
18% / 18%
9% / 15%
9% / 13%
-8% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Gråskala
CalMAN - Gråskala
CalMAN - Mättnad
CalMAN - Mättnad

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø796 (778-805.1)
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø993 (983.33-1046.24)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø924 (911.97-1007.8)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1104 (1087.93-1138.69)
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1024 (1006.34-1167)
CPU-klockfrekvenser vid körning av CB15-loopen
CPU-klockfrekvenser vid körning av CB15-loopen
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11042
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
31360
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6473
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.2 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
11.77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115.4 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1067 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Hjälp
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=193, last 2 years)
277 Points +64%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +4%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
173 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
172 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
169 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=196, last 2 years)
3402 Points +219%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
1167 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1154 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1113 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
1100 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1067 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H
1008 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
805 Points -25%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +216%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.89 Points +10%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.7 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.44 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.77 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.43 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
8.68 Points -26%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +73%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.99 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.94 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.89 Points -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points +103%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29664 - 35307, n=25)
33163 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
31360 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
31213 Points 0%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points +51%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6236 - 6645, n=25)
6479 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
6473 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
6440 Points -1%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
22587 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (20725 - 22665, n=13)
21871 Points -3%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
4144 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (3734 - 4163, n=13)
3995 Points -4%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31808 - 41034, n=3, last 2 years)
36990 Points +75%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
21175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17048 - 22006, n=8)
19665 Points -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6453 - 7348, n=3, last 2 years)
6951 Points +39%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
4997 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4548 - 4997, n=8)
4839 Points -3%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)
54312 Points +140%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
22614 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (17709 - 23313, n=17)
21069 Points -7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
17709 Points -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)
8126 Points +59%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
5126 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (4669 - 5146, n=17)
4982 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H
4669 Points -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
1174 ms * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (695 - 1272, n=50)
1108 ms * -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1100 ms *
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
1088 ms * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=177, last 2 years)
506 ms * +54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years)
95460 Points +171%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
35283 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
34795 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (27460 - 44549, n=47)
34108 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
33963 Points -4%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)
526 Points +117%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)
259.2 Points +7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)
249.8 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (205 - 299, n=49)
247 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
241.9 Points

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
7168 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5130 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5908 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5818 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5728 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7775 Points +36%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5728 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4910 - 5728, n=9)
5223 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5191 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5184 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points -10%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4910 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4707 Points -18%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)
10833 Points +17%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
9270 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8770 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
8712 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (6838 - 9270, n=9)
8199 Points -12%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
8085 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8051 Points -13%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7853 Points -15%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)
9877 Points +31%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7532 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7390 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (7032 - 7793, n=9)
7324 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7162 Points -5%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7065 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
7030 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
7030 Points -7%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)
12039 Points +65%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7303 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5793 - 7303, n=9)
6468 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6355 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
6200 Points -15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5970 Points -18%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5793 Points -21%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4980 Points -32%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5130 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4650 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4620 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4393 - 5130, n=10)
4599 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
4585 Points -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4446 Points -13%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
4271 Points -17%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
4109 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5818 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5706 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5705 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB
5669 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5651 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (5323 - 5818, n=10)
5628 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G
5362 Points -8%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5210 Points -10%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Sequential Read: 1407 MB/s
Sequential Write: 524 MB/s
512K Read: 643 MB/s
512K Write: 524 MB/s
4K Read: 13.6 MB/s
4K Write: 112.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 599 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 523 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ		Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-37%
27%
48%
75%
97%
-25%
36%
Write 4K
87.5
77.1
-12%
89.2
2%
98.2
12%
97.9
12%
100.5
15%
66.4
-24%
114 ?(79.1 - 148.7, n=12)
30%
Read 4K
16.08
29.51
84%
34.36
114%
39.43
145%
41.32
157%
48.64
202%
29.59
84%
35.6 ?(16.1 - 49.7, n=12)
121%
Write Seq
614
130.9
-79%
949
55%
1386
126%
1594
160%
1456
137%
477.9
-22%
684 ?(250 - 1342, n=12)
11%
Read Seq
1341
857
-36%
899
-33%
1100
-18%
1353
1%
1278
-5%
515
-62%
1612 ?(276 - 2353, n=12)
20%
Write 4K Q32T1
307.9
104.1
-66%
371.4
21%
270.3
-12%
305.6
-1%
298.1
-3%
180.2
-41%
401 ?(266 - 518, n=12)
30%
Read 4K Q32T1
358.4
195.8
-45%
399
11%
340.3
-5%
354.1
-1%
348.7
-3%
199.5
-44%
427 ?(258 - 773, n=12)
19%
Write Seq Q32T1
525
130.8
-75%
1035
97%
1454
177%
2033
287%
2742
422%
497.6
-5%
830 ?(459 - 2969, n=12)
58%
Read Seq Q32T1
3077
1096
-64%
1603
-48%
1681
-45%
2543
-17%
3389
10%
547
-82%
2950 ?(1783 - 3228, n=12)
-4%
Write 4K Q8T8
760
887 ?(527 - 1246, n=2)
Read 4K Q8T8
811
1060 ?(722 - 1397, n=2)
AS SSD
-69%
65%
48%
146%
123%
-27%
69%
Seq Read
2432
1238
-49%
850
-65%
903
-63%
1820
-25%
1915
-21%
512
-79%
2137 ?(1408 - 2612, n=15)
-12%
Seq Write
843
123.5
-85%
869
3%
1261
50%
1917
127%
2324
176%
462.8
-45%
744 ?(261 - 2294, n=15)
-12%
4K Read
21.24
31.48
48%
36.43
72%
40.02
88%
48.56
129%
48.03
126%
32.36
52%
30.1 ?(21.2 - 52.8, n=15)
42%
4K Write
99.3
79.3
-20%
84.4
-15%
103.6
4%
99.2
0%
106
7%
68.6
-31%
93.6 ?(4.25 - 154.1, n=15)
-6%
4K-64 Read
730
187.8
-74%
839
15%
1030
41%
1177
61%
1598
119%
348.6
-52%
784 ?(528 - 1464, n=15)
7%
4K-64 Write
484.4
103.6
-79%
602
24%
1285
165%
1664
244%
2085
330%
294.3
-39%
515 ?(86 - 1350, n=15)
6%
Access Time Read *
0.126
0.177
-40%
0.104
17%
0.129
-2%
0.05
60%
0.038
70%
0.101
20%
0.09253 ?(0.05 - 0.2, n=15)
27%
Access Time Write *
0.063
0.227
-260%
0.044
30%
0.036
43%
0.037
41%
0.034
46%
0.051
19%
0.1653 ?(0.026 - 1.066, n=15)
-162%
Score Read
994
343
-65%
960
-3%
1161
17%
1407
42%
1837
85%
432
-57%
1028 ?(733 - 1773, n=15)
3%
Score Write
668
195
-71%
773
16%
1515
127%
1955
193%
2423
263%
409
-39%
683 ?(119 - 1733, n=15)
2%
Score Total
2091
670
-68%
2233
7%
3294
58%
4095
96%
5224
150%
1071
-49%
2170 ?(1157 - 4406, n=15)
4%
Copy ISO MB/s
1632
840
-49%
1452
-11%
1109 ?(585 - 1963, n=10)
-32%
Copy Program MB/s
30.89
306.9
894%
370.7
1100%
380 ?(30.9 - 570, n=10)
1130%
Copy Game MB/s
980
622
-37%
882
-10%
738 ?(458 - 1173, n=10)
-25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-53% / -56%
46% / 51%
48% / 48%
111% / 120%
110% / 112%
-26% / -26%
53% / 57%

* ... smaller is better

3DMark 06 Standard Score
35269 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
16908 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
165902 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34535 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12877 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6571 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
4856 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=184, last 2 years)
43666 Points +128%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
23061 Points +20%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
19187 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (17680 - 20829, n=18)
19016 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18296 Points -5%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18234 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
14367 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14180 Points -26%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
9266 Points -52%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
143183 Points +41%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
101453 Points
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
99921 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (73739 - 107807, n=16)
97317 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
81178 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
80748 Points -20%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
73739 Points -27%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
49254 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31337 Points +113%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
17720 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (14146 - 16165, n=16)
14910 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14724 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14463 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
11558 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11315 Points -23%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H
7576 Points -49%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13077 Points +178%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
4734 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
4708 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (4548 - 4795, n=5)
4687 Points 0%
lågmed.högultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 313.8 279.9 256 139.4
GTA V (2015) 166.7 159.8 145.9 64.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 251 170.8 97.7 55.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 126.9 118.2 111.7 109.7
World of Warships (2015) 205.4 169.8 146.3 140.7
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) 150.1 110.8 77.6 68.5
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) 167.3 106.4 100.9 89.9
Team Fortress 2 (2017) 128.4 126.3 122 120.8
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) 158.3 62.7 45.7 31.9
Destiny 2 (2017) 152.6 137.4 130.8 111
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 109 96.5 81.1
Monster Hunter World (2018) 156.5 88.4 80.4 60.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 130 78 72 61
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 169.8 105 98.9 93.3
Hitman 2 (2018) 92 80.5 74.8 68.8
Battlefield V (2018) 140.7 80.6 70 64.7
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 214.4 167.6 110.4 89.6
Darksiders III (2018) 169.2 83.9 68.3 59.7
Just Cause 4 (2018) 126.1 86.1 78.8 75.7
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years)
127.4 fps +130%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
60.6 fps +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
55.3 fps
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
51.5 (45min - 58max) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (46 - 55.3, n=19)
51.5 fps -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
49.2 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
38.6 fps -30%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
37 fps -33%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
24.2 fps -56%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
139.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
  (109.6 - 139.4, n=10)
127.3 fps -9%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
118 (22min - 273max) fps -15%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
109.8 fps -21%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø53.7 (49-58)
GPU-värden som uppmätts under The Witcher 3-testet.
GPU-värden som uppmätts under The Witcher 3-testet.

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30.6 / 30.6 / 32.2 dB(A)
Hög belastning
47.2 / 42.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.132.832.631.834.12536.432.534.530.736.43137.334.432.632.937.34030.730.529.430.230.75031.229.630.53031.26334.327.629.927.834.38028.226.827.427.428.210027.526.527.226.527.512533.132.132.325.833.116027.326.224.225.327.320027.626.523.622.727.625028.425.723.122.728.431530.428.321.72230.44003129.221.1213150029.426.420.620.129.463031.12820.919.831.180033.829.921.518.933.8100037.433.522.118.337.4125037.333.621.21837.316003934.220.418.139200036.830.718.817.936.8250037.231.219.418.137.2315033.72818.718.133.7400034.328.618.918.334.3500033.928.418.918.433.9630033.327.618.918.633.3800028.622.318.918.828.61000027.521.218.818.827.51250022.520.518.818.622.51600020.320.218.918.720.3SPL47.242.332.230.947.2N5.43.71.61.35.4median 31.1median 28median 20.6median 18.8median 31.1Delta3.42.92.11.93.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-dc0015ng
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-7%
2%
-12%
-0%
-14%
-10%
-2%
7%
off / environment *
30.6
29
5%
30.7
-0%
29
5%
28.1
8%
29
5%
30
2%
29.4 ?(28 - 30.7, n=15)
4%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=155, last 2 years)
22%
Idle Minimum *
30.6
29
5%
32.1
-5%
33
-8%
28.1
8%
29
5%
30
2%
30.5 ?(28.5 - 33, n=16)
-0%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=156, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
30.6
33
-8%
32.1
-5%
34
-11%
33
-8%
35
-14%
35
-14%
31.8 ?(28.5 - 37, n=16)
-4%
27.3 ?(23 - 37.5, n=156, last 2 years)
11%
Idle Maximum *
32.2
41
-27%
32.4
-1%
40
-24%
33.5
-4%
40
-24%
36
-12%
34.6 ?(28.6 - 43, n=16)
-7%
30.3 ?(23 - 47, n=156, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
47.2
44
7%
39
17%
47
-0%
42.2
11%
50
-6%
42
11%
43.2 ?(35.2 - 49, n=16)
8%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=156, last 2 years)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.7
47
-13%
51
-22%
45.3
-9%
53
-27%
54
-29%
Load Maximum *
42.3
49
-16%
40.2
5%
53
-25%
45.7
-8%
58
-37%
56
-32%
48.2 ?(40.2 - 54.2, n=16)
-14%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=156, last 2 years)
-26%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 45.1 °C48.1 °C43.1 °C 
 40.2 °C49.7 °C40.3 °C 
 29.5 °C27.6 °C30.9 °C 
Max: 49.7 °C
Medel: 39.4 °C
43.6 °C42.1 °C43.6 °C
31.1 °C48 °C42.8 °C
27.6 °C27.1 °C28.2 °C
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 37.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-9%
4%
-4%
-5%
-7%
5%
-1%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.7
51
-3%
46.6
6%
54
-9%
51.2
-3%
56
-13%
48
3%
52.1 ?(46.6 - 58, n=16)
-5%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years)
7%
Maximum Bottom *
48
58
-21%
56.6
-18%
60
-25%
55.2
-15%
68
-42%
49
-2%
57.3 ?(41.2 - 65, n=16)
-19%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
32
35
-9%
28.8
10%
30
6%
31
3%
28
12%
29
9%
29.2 ?(24 - 33, n=16)
9%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Bottom *
34
35
-3%
28.5
16%
30
12%
35.6
-5%
29
15%
31
9%
29.9 ?(25 - 34, n=16)
12%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203131.8312531.430.731.4313532.9354030.430.230.45029.93029.9632827.8288027.727.427.710027.926.527.912533.725.833.71604025.34020046.622.746.625044.622.744.631555.62255.640064.92164.950062.720.162.763063.819.863.88006818.968100063.418.363.4125061.41861.4160067.618.167.6200065.917.965.9250062.118.162.1315060.318.160.3400059.518.359.5500063.118.463.163006618.666800070.618.870.61000069.318.869.31250067.118.667.11600059.218.759.2SPL77.430.977.4N37.81.337.8median 62.7median 18.8median 62.7Delta81.9835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-dc0015ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.45 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 14 / 18.2 / 24 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 143 / 190 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
24%
31%
-10%
13%
22%
8%
17%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
14
12
14%
7.4
47%
17
-21%
14.9
-6%
10
29%
9
36%
11.4 ?(7 - 19.1, n=16)
19%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
18.2
14
23%
11.7
36%
20
-10%
17.5
4%
13
29%
14
23%
15.7 ?(11 - 20.8, n=16)
14%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
24
18
25%
16.8
30%
29
-21%
19.2
20%
18
25%
19
21%
20.7 ?(13.7 - 29, n=16)
14%
26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years)
-11%
Load Average *
143
92
36%
94
34%
112
22%
103.2
28%
95
34%
91
36%
98.1 ?(73.7 - 143, n=16)
31%
106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years)
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126
100
21%
152
-21%
123.1
2%
114
10%
182
-44%
Load Maximum *
190
142
25%
177
7%
211
-11%
132.7
30%
179
6%
238
-25%
173.8 ?(150.3 - 211, n=16)
9%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=155, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
7tim 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
4tim 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3tim 24min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 57min
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 70.07 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 70 Wh		MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Neo 15
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 46.7 Wh		MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
66%
25%
-54%
47%
5%
-33%
33%
Reader / Idle
460
626
36%
447
-3%
213
-54%
400
-13%
340
-26%
566 ?(155 - 1290, n=68, last 2 years)
23%
H.264
204
506
148%
353
73%
288
41%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
100%
WiFi v1.3
274
514
88%
428
56%
157
-43%
402
47%
262
-4%
240
-12%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=155, last 2 years)
37%
Load
117
106
-9%
85
-27%
42
-64%
111
-5%
46
-61%
85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=119, last 2 years)
-27%

För

+ matt IPS-skärm
+ Full HD-upplösning
+ 144 Hz-skärm
+ NVMe SSD + HDD
+ bra tangentbord (belyst)
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ redo för VR

Emot

- skärm med låg kontrast
- ingen grafikbyteslösning (Optimus)
- batteritid som ligger under genomsnittet
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng, recensionsex från HP Germany
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng, recensionsex från HP Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Omen 15 har hårdvara som kan visa alla aktuella datorspel på den matta Full HD-skärmen utan ryckighet. Det går alltid att välja höga eller maximala grafikinställningar. Nvidias G-Sync teknik säkrar att bilden visas smidigt på 144 Hz-skärmen. Enligt underhållsmanualen kan G-Sync även användas för externa skärmar. Ansluter man en sådan skärm går det också att använda upplösningar som är högre än Full HD, men då får du reducera grafikens kvalitetsnivå.

Med sin Omen 15 levererar Hewlett-Packard en kompakt spellaptop som totalt sett kan sägas vara en framgång. Men trots sitt pris på 21.000 kronor är den inte utan brister.

En extremt snabb NVMe SSD säkrar att systemet känns kvickt. Dessutom är datorn utrustad med en hårddisk på 1 TB. Båda lagringsmodulerna kan bytas ut. Allt detta stöds av ett bra tangentbord. Även om batteritiden inte direkt är inspirerande så är den acceptabel för en spellaptop som har sin integrerade grafikkärna inaktiverad.

Den matta Full HD-skärmen tillfredsställer med stabila betraktningsvinklar och snabba responstider. Men den saknar ljusstyrka och har i synnerhet för låg kontrastnivå för en laptop i den här prisklassen.

Även om syskonmodellen som vi tidigare testat bara hade en USB 3.1 Typ C Gen 1-plats så har den enhet vi testar idag en Thunderbolt 3-anslutning, så du kan också ansluta en extern GPU ifall den inbyggda modellen nån dag inte räcker till för dina behov.

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng - 12/10/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
66 / 81 → 81%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batteri
74%
Skärm
88%
Spelprestanda
97%
Programprestanda
95%
Temperatur
83 / 95 → 87%
Ljudnivå
82 / 90 → 91%
Audio
74%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Medel
77%
86%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)
Test
•
Test: HP Omen 15 - Gaming med ...
|
Test
•
Test: HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GT...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HP Omen 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, SSD, FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2018-12-16 (Update: 2018-12-16)