Test: HP Pavilion 15 (AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, Vega 8) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 217 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1240:1 (Svärta: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 6.07
ΔE Greyscale 4.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
36.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.81
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AU Optronics AUO23ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng BOE072C, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS AUO B156HTN03.8, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Chi Mei CM15E9, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE Chi Mei CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | -1% | 8% | 13% | 5% | 15% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 36.7 | 39.64 8% | 36.36 -1% | 40.1 9% | 41.36 13% | 38.37 5% | 42.27 15% |
sRGB Coverage | 55 | 59.3 8% | 54.7 -1% | 59 7% | 62.2 13% | 57.7 5% | 63.5 15% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 37.91 | 40.96 8% | 37.57 -1% | 41.43 9% | 42.74 13% | 39.65 5% | 43.69 15% |
Response Times | -10% | 14% | -12% | 0% | 17% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 40 ? -0% | 38.8 ? 3% | 43 ? -8% | 40 ? -0% | 43.6 ? -9% | 40 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 31 ? -19% | 19.6 ? 25% | 30 ? -15% | 26 ? -0% | 15.2 ? 42% | 32 ? -23% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 1471 ? | 25000 ? | 25000 ? | |||
Screen | -1% | -58% | 10% | 24% | -41% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 186 | 239 28% | 252.2 36% | 284 53% | 221 19% | 220.1 18% | 259 39% |
Brightness | 180 | 223 24% | 251 39% | 254 41% | 207 15% | 210 17% | 230 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 84 -5% | 80 -9% | 87 -1% | 93 6% | 82 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.15 | 0.27 -80% | 0.54 -260% | 0.29 -93% | 0.15 -0% | 0.29 -93% | 0.19 -27% |
Contrast | 1240 | 885 -29% | 467 -62% | 979 -21% | 1473 19% | 759 -39% | 1363 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.94 | 5.3 11% | 12.36 -108% | 4.22 29% | 4.35 27% | 11.4 -92% | 3.13 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.81 | 10.03 7% | 24.75 -129% | 9.29 14% | 8.98 17% | 25.96 -140% | 7.81 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 6.07 | 3.64 40% | 4.43 27% | 4.09 33% | 3.09 49% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.44 | 5.85 -32% | 12.2 -175% | 1.17 74% | 3.09 30% | 12 -170% | 1.42 68% |
Gamma | 2.81 78% | 2.45 90% | 1.83 120% | 2.39 92% | 2.23 99% | 2.09 105% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 6272 104% | 7169 91% | 13028 50% | 6360 102% | 6068 107% | 12625 51% | 6391 102% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35 | 38 9% | 34.6 -1% | 38 9% | 56 60% | 36.5 4% | 40 14% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 55 | 59 7% | 54.5 -1% | 59 7% | 86 56% | 57.5 5% | 63 15% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-1% | -15% /
-38% | 2% /
7% | 12% /
19% | -6% /
-25% | 9% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3404 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4467 poäng | |
Hjälp |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Average Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -15% | 51% | 130% | 6% | 102% | |
Read Seq | 1040 | 508 -51% | 1123 8% | 1487 43% | 477.3 -54% | 1228 ? 18% |
Write Seq | 179.9 | 202.4 13% | 601 234% | 1241 590% | 267.8 49% | 628 ? 249% |
Read 512 | 641 | 309.6 -52% | 822 28% | 923 44% | 331.4 -48% | 856 ? 34% |
Write 512 | 300.3 | 158.2 -47% | 534 78% | 797 165% | 268.4 -11% | 587 ? 95% |
Read 4k | 19.99 | 33.15 66% | 25.03 25% | 49.38 147% | 25.41 27% | 61.5 ? 208% |
Write 4k | 72 | 68.7 -5% | 94.7 32% | 97.3 35% | 78.2 9% | 151.4 ? 110% |
Read 4k QD32 | 264.5 | 262.1 -1% | 262.2 -1% | 295 12% | 394.5 49% | 353 ? 33% |
Write 4k QD32 | 206.1 | 116.4 -44% | 208.9 1% | 212.5 3% | 264.8 28% | 341 ? 65% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2549 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6493 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1617 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Far Cry 5 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (37 - 187, n=50, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (15 - 43, n=9) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (20 - 162, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7 - 20, n=9) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 154, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7 - 18, n=7) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng |
F1 2018 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (29 - 64, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:4x | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (16 - 33, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (12 - 25, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (56 - 204, n=9, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (17 - 46, n=4) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (25 - 150, n=13, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (6 - 17, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 146, n=15, last 2 years) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (6 - 15, n=3) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 13.5 | 6.6 | 3.7 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 15 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
F1 2018 (2018) | 29 | 16 | 12 | 8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 17 | 6 | 6 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.6 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 33.5 / 35.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.5 / 7.3 / 9.4 Watt |
Hög belastning |
34 / 41.9 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS R5 2500U, Vega 8, SK Hynix Canvas SC311 256GB HFS256G32TNF, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR R5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -39% | -21% | -40% | -6% | 5% | -8% | -15% | -89% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 6.3 -40% | 7.6 -69% | 6.9 -53% | 4.8 -7% | 5.6 -24% | 3.3 27% | 5.68 ? -26% | 6.85 ? -52% |
Idle Average * | 7.3 | 8.4 -15% | 10.6 -45% | 9.6 -32% | 7 4% | 7.1 3% | 5.6 23% | 8.75 ? -20% | 11.4 ? -56% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 10.2 -9% | 11.8 -26% | 11.8 -26% | 9.5 -1% | 7.9 16% | 7.8 17% | 10.1 ? -7% | 13.5 ? -44% |
Load Average * | 34 | 59 -74% | 24.1 29% | 50 -47% | 40.8 -20% | 32.8 4% | 54 -59% | 37.8 ? -11% | 72 ? -112% |
Load Maximum * | 41.9 | 66.3 -58% | 39.4 6% | 60 -43% | 44.3 -6% | 30.5 27% | 63 -50% | 46.2 ? -10% | 118.6 ? -183% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.3 |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 41 Wh | HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 41 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS R5 2500U, Vega 8, 35 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-41G-R6BR R5 2500U, Radeon RX 540, 48 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG-50WE i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 41% | -22% | 31% | 41% | 29% | 62% | 118% | |
Reader / Idle | 504 | 797 58% | 724 44% | 722 43% | 1146 ? 127% | |||
H.264 | 230 | 350 52% | 366 59% | 516 124% | 821 ? 257% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 302 | 414 37% | 237 -22% | 401 33% | 426 41% | 419 39% | 505 67% | 627 ? 108% |
Load | 126 | 145 15% | 109 -13% | 134 6% | 118 -6% | 98.6 ? -22% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I ärlighetens namn var våra förväntningar innan detta test en aning högre. HP Pavilion 15 är en lågprisenhet med en tjusig design och bra konstruktionskvalitet. Men systemet känns inte bara långsammare, det är verkligen långsammare. Vi hade nöjet att testa denna Pavilion 15 (AMD Ryzen 5 2500U) samtidigt som vi testade Pavilion 14 (Intel i7-8550U). Ibland startade vi prestandatesterna samtidigt och långt efter att Intel-processorn var klar var AMD-varianten av Pavilion fortfarande mitt i. En Ryzen 5 2500U CPU är förstås inte på samma nivå som en i7-8550U och ligger istället närmare en i5-8250U, men skillnaden var avsevärd. På grund av det kan vi inte hålla med PCMark 8-resultaten som framställer Pavilion 15 som snabbare än 14-tumsversionen av HP Pavilion
Men kylprestandan och de tysta fläktarna är definitivt fördelar. Inte ens vid full belastning förkommer någon överhettning och temperaturerna håller sig på en bekväm nivå.
HP kunde ha tagit Pavilion en aning lägre och fabrikskonfigurerat den för ett högre TDP-värde eller längre turbo-varaktighet.
Å andra sidan hade det varit skadligt för batteritiden, som redan är en av enhetens svaga punkter. Prestandatesterna visade väldigt tydligt att denna laptop absolut inte är gjord för spel. Den integrerade grafiklösningen är alldeles för svag för att hantera spel utan ryckighet ens på lägsta detaljnivå. Totalt sett är HP Pavilion 15 en genomsnittlig arbetsenhet med en tjusig design som gör sitt jobb, men den står inte ut från mängden.
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
- 09/30/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Puschina