Test: HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (i5-8250U, HD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 220.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 759:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.09
ΔE Greyscale 12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.37% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 AUO, B156HW01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM Chi Mei CMN15D5, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -4% | 4% | 69% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.37 | 38.66 1% | 37 -4% | 40.09 4% | 66 72% |
| sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 57.9 0% | 55.6 -4% | 59.7 3% | 96.5 67% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.65 | 39.94 1% | 38.23 -4% | 41.47 5% | 66.7 68% |
| Response Times | -33% | -43% | 4% | -55% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.6 ? | 32 ? 27% | 41 ? 6% | 44 ? -1% | 49 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15.2 ? | 29.2 ? -92% | 29 ? -91% | 14 ? 8% | 30 ? -97% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 961 ? | |||
| Screen | 23% | 29% | -4% | 60% | |
| Brightness middle | 220.1 | 240.1 9% | 251 14% | 234 6% | 413 88% |
| Brightness | 210 | 233 11% | 240 14% | 211 0% | 378 80% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 84 -10% | 83 -11% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.23 21% | 0.2 31% | 0.43 -48% | 0.29 -0% |
| Contrast | 759 | 1044 38% | 1255 65% | 544 -28% | 1424 88% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.4 | 4.25 63% | 5.25 54% | 11.27 1% | 2.44 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 25.96 | 17.84 31% | 10.04 61% | 18.03 31% | 4.46 83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.09 | 4 2% | 2.48 39% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 12 | 2.8 77% | 3.28 73% | 11.54 4% | 2.48 79% |
| Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 12625 51% | 6503 100% | 6502 100% | 11607 56% | 7006 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.5 | 36.8 1% | 35 -4% | 38 4% | 62 70% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.5 | 57.8 1% | 55 -4% | 60 4% | 96 67% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
12% | -6% /
13% | 1% /
-1% | 25% /
48% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (0.91 - 1.79, n=35) | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (3.15 - 7.76, n=35) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
| HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3675 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4654 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3250 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Toshiba MQ04ABF100 | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Dell G3 15 3579 Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 SK hynix SC311 SATA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -22% | -44% | 6194% | 3535% | |
| Write 4K | 3.885 | 1.168 -70% | 0.202 -95% | 95.9 2368% | 48.25 1142% |
| Read 4K | 0.426 | 0.536 26% | 0.461 8% | 31.32 7252% | 23.77 5480% |
| Write Seq | 121 | 114.1 -6% | 53.5 -56% | 746 517% | 444.9 268% |
| Read Seq | 142.6 | 114.9 -19% | 107.2 -25% | 1347 845% | 497.5 249% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 4.249 | 1.212 -71% | 0.882 -79% | 294.6 6833% | 223.5 5160% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 1.106 | 1.189 8% | 1.057 -4% | 334 30099% | 171.8 15433% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 134.3 | 113.2 -16% | 63.7 -53% | 766 470% | 511 280% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 149.8 | 114.1 -24% | 77.1 -49% | 1896 1166% | 553 269% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 310.2 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 349.5 |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Dell Latitude 5491 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
| LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip S UX370 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (26409 - 59483, n=71) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1840 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7721 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 39.2 | 18.3 | 15.7 | |
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 23.3 | 16.4 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.4 | 6.5 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 31.7 / 31.7 / 32 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 32.8 / 35 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM Vega 3, R3 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF) | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx Vega 8, R5 2500U, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | 3% | -5% | 0% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.2 -4% | 30.4 -8% | 30.3 -7% | 29.7 -5% | 28.5 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.7 | 29.3 8% | 30.4 4% | 30.3 4% | 30.3 4% | 32.3 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 31.7 | 29.5 7% | 30.4 4% | 30.3 4% | 30.3 4% | 32.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 30.5 5% | 31.2 2% | 30.9 3% | 31.1 3% | 34.2 -7% |
| Load Average * | 32.8 | 41.2 -26% | 31.5 4% | 37.8 -15% | 34.9 -6% | 36.2 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 35 | 47.2 -35% | 31.5 10% | 40.6 -16% | 34.9 -0% | 45.3 -29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 34.3 | 42.8 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.8 °C / 80.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2 °C / 3.6 F).
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.26 / 0.43 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 5.6 / 7.1 / 7.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
32.8 / 30.5 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM R3 2200U, Vega 3, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx R5 2500U, Vega 8, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -80% | 4% | -19% | -32% | -17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 5.1 9% | 3.9 30% | 5.6 -0% | 5.9 -5% | 3.7 34% |
| Idle Average * | 7.1 | 6.3 11% | 6.6 7% | 8.5 -20% | 8.7 -23% | 8.5 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 10.5 -33% | 9.3 -18% | 8.4 -6% | 10.5 -33% | 10 -27% |
| Load Average * | 32.8 | 82.2 -151% | 30.2 8% | 41 -25% | 45.7 -39% | 36 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 30.5 | 103.2 -238% | 33.2 -9% | 44.2 -45% | 49.4 -62% | 48.7 -60% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 85.9 | 32 | 45.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM R3 2200U, Vega 3, 37 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9570 i7 UHD i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 97 Wh | HP Envy x360 15m-bq121dx R5 2500U, Vega 8, 55.8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | -7% | -27% | -3% | -19% | |
| Reader / Idle | 722 | 671 -7% | 536 -26% | 655 -9% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 318 -24% | 435 4% | 344 -18% | 576 37% | 398 -5% |
| Load | 134 | 110 -18% | 83 -38% | 76 -43% | 77 -43% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 62 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Känslan av oattraktiv budget-design var en av nyckelfaktorerna som talade mot tidigare Pavilion 15-modeller. En snabb titt på den gamla Pavilion 15 från 2015 jämfört med en MacBook Pro visar varför Pavilion bara kostade hälften så mycket. Denna skillnad finns även mellan den nya Pavilion 15 från 2018 och Apples senaste motsvarighet, men det är inte i närheten så dåligt som det brukade vara. För målgruppen studenter och yngre användare kan denna märkbara visuella uppgradering göra Pavilion värd att överväga.
På insidan imponerades vi av förmågan att upprätthålla Turbo Boost, dom låga kärntemperaturerna och den i allmänhet tysta fläkten. Dessa aspekter är inte så vanliga som vi hade önskat, särskilt när det kommer till dyrare Ultrabook-modeller där kylningen oftast hamnar i skymundan till förmån för liten storlek och låg vikt.
De sämsta aspekterna av nya Pavilion är dess mjuka tangentbordsknappar, mjuka styrplatteknappar och gungande skärm. Dessa aspekter i kombination gör att Pavilion känns som en billig, plastig laptop trots den nya visuella designen.
I det lägre skiktet runt 4.000 - 7.000 kronor kan Pavilion 15 vara värd en titt för den som behöver tänka på budgeten. Undvik dom dyrare varianterna till varje pris då det i så fall är bättre att investera pengarna i någon Envy- eller Spectre-modell.
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl
- 08/05/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
