Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: HP Spectre Folio 13 (i5-8500Y) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 (Spectre Folio 13 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8500Y 2 x 1.5 - 4.2 GHz, Amber Lake-Y
Grafikkort
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 24.20.100.6222
Minne
16 GB
, fastlött, 933.3 MHz, 14-17-17-40, LPDDR3, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
13.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 166 PPI, 10 punkters kapacitiv, native pen support, AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, glansig: ja
Moderkort
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Hårddisk
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB
Vikt
1.49 kg, Strömförsörjning: 292 g
Pris
1400 USD
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics AUO572D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 422.4 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 395.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21.71 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 389.8 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1444:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 LGD0588, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1834 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 1% | -4% | 1% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 71.9 9% | 66.7 1% | 65.5 -1% | 67.8 2% | 64.3 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 98.1 1% | 98.6 1% | 90.4 -7% | 96.1 -1% | 94.6 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 73.1 7% | 68.7 1% | 65.6 -4% | 69.8 2% | 66.2 -3% |
| Response Times | 7% | 26% | 26% | 25% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 51.6 ? 1% | 39.6 ? 24% | 42 ? 19% | 39.6 ? 24% | 40.8 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.2 ? | 32.4 ? 13% | 27.2 ? 27% | 25 ? 33% | 28 ? 25% | 27.6 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 20800 ? | 113600 ? | |||
| Screen | 3% | -1% | -15% | 16% | -45% | |
| Brightness middle | 389.8 | 329.8 -15% | 467.2 20% | 463 19% | 320 -18% | 316 -19% |
| Brightness | 396 | 318 -20% | 445 12% | 450 14% | 315 -20% | 291 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 74 -16% | 91 3% | 83 -6% | 95 8% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.25 7% | 0.4 -48% | 0.32 -19% | 0.29 -7% | 0.36 -33% |
| Contrast | 1444 | 1319 -9% | 1168 -19% | 1447 0% | 1103 -24% | 878 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.72 | 2.37 13% | 2.41 11% | 3.76 -38% | 1.2 56% | 5.9 -117% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.49 | 4.08 26% | 5.58 -2% | 7.35 -34% | 3.2 42% | 12.9 -135% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.25 | 1.33 -6% | 2.68 -114% | 0.5 60% | 1.3 -4% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.8 33% | 3.7 12% | 3.18 24% | 0.8 81% | 8.6 -105% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.145 103% | 2.37 93% | 2.53 87% | 2.2 100% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 7470 87% | 6441 101% | 7158 91% | 6994 93% | 6548 99% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.2 | 67 8% | 62.5 0% | 59 -5% | 62.1 0% | 60.7 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.2 | 98 0% | 99.6 1% | 90 -8% | 96 -2% | 94.5 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
4% | 9% /
2% | 2% /
-8% | 14% /
14% | -8% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, i7-8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø220 (212.35-271)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 UHD Graphics 615, Pentium 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø162.9 (162.13-163.67)
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 128 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø99.3 (96.12-100.08)
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø202 (196.49-249.97)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (4435 - 5830, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2921 - 6089, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2737 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4406 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2945 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP Stream 14-ax002ng SanDisk DF4032 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 8% | -227% | -126% | -346% | |
| Seq Read | 1693 | 1798 6% | 1114 -34% | 289.8 -83% | 144.8 -91% |
| Seq Write | 1214 | 1374 13% | 340 -72% | 126.7 -90% | 89.2 -93% |
| 4K Read | 42.69 | 46.05 8% | 40.46 -5% | 18.29 -57% | 12.01 -72% |
| 4K Write | 95.9 | 104.3 9% | 80.6 -16% | 35.07 -63% | 9.2 -90% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1621 | 1408 -13% | 277.9 -83% | 40.27 -98% | 29.14 -98% |
| 4K-64 Write | 605 | 790 31% | 129.3 -79% | 44.48 -93% | 6.93 -99% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.041 20% | 0.913 -1690% | 0.151 -196% | 0.332 -551% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.036 3% | 0.301 -714% | 0.233 -530% | 0.932 -2419% |
| Score Read | 1833 | 1634 -11% | 430 -77% | 88 -95% | 56 -97% |
| Score Write | 823 | 1032 25% | 244 -70% | 92 -89% | 25 -97% |
| Score Total | 3569 | 3484 -2% | 870 -76% | 225 -94% | 112 -97% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1374 | 1947 42% | 128.1 -91% | 99.1 -93% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 631 | 453.9 -28% | 94 -85% | 44.34 -93% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 971 | 990 2% | 124.4 -87% | 76.5 -92% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 41% | -56% | -80% | -91% | |
| Write 4K | 140 | 120 -14% | 68.1 -51% | 26.91 -81% | 7.611 -95% |
| Read 4K | 52.4 | 43.42 -17% | 30.64 -42% | 19.72 -62% | 13.21 -75% |
| Write Seq | 948 | 1814 91% | 133.8 -86% | 126.2 -87% | 65.8 -93% |
| Read Seq | 922 | 2227 142% | 705 -24% | 268 -71% | 120.6 -87% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 227.8 | 391.8 72% | 104.4 -54% | 62.9 -72% | 7.547 -97% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 299.2 | 288.7 -4% | 196.3 -34% | 39.82 -87% | 35.25 -88% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1259 | 1860 48% | 135.5 -89% | 131.3 -90% | 61.5 -95% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3112 | 3376 8% | 1124 -64% | 259.3 -92% | 122 -96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
20% | -142% /
-165% | -103% /
-109% | -219% /
-238% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3112 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1259 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
299.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
227.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
922 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
948 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
52.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
140 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 (821 - 1378, n=10) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000 | |
| HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 2018 | |
| Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 615 (734 - 1294, n=10) | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 | |
| HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA | |
| HP Stream 14-ax002ng | |
| Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6386 poäng | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 3813 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1169 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 36523 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4660 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 648 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 257 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 39.2 | 19.8 | 18.1 | 5.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.6 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 33.2 | 16 | 10.3 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.7 °C / -1.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-0.7 °C / -1.2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby |   0.23 / 0.54 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.8 / 3.8 / 7.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
26.9 / 38.5 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10" | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G, IPS, 2736x1834, 12.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -79% | -55% | -16% | -85% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.8 | 2.88 -60% | 5.3 -194% | 4.3 -139% | 2.2 -22% | 3.5 -94% |
| Idle Average * | 3.8 | 4.8 -26% | 9.6 -153% | 8.7 -129% | 5.7 -50% | 8.9 -134% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7.5 3% | 10.1 -31% | 9.4 -22% | 10.3 -34% | 12.3 -60% |
| Load Average * | 26.9 | 16.9 37% | 34.4 -28% | 24.5 9% | 25.6 5% | 54.2 -101% |
| Load Maximum * | 38.5 | 23.8 38% | 34.8 10% | 36 6% | 30.6 21% | 52.1 -35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 i7-8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -47% | -41% | -30% | -35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1882 | 771 -59% | 792 -58% | 1066 -43% | 1243 -34% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 852 | 448 -47% | 537 -37% | 545 -36% | 668 -22% | 557 -35% |
| Load | 212 | 180 -15% | 114 -46% | 118 -44% | 131 -38% | 133 -37% |
För
+ unik läderdesign och omvandlingsbar formfaktor som känns bra att hålla i
+ högkvalitativ skärm; >95 procent sRGB, hög kontrast
+ mer ljusstark skärm än Spectre x360 13
+ både eSIM och nano-SIM; Gigabit LTE
+ helt tyst, inget elektroniskt ljud
+ utsidan drar inte åt sig fingeravtryck
+ snabb Samsung SSD
+ fullständig prestanda även vid batteridrift
+ dubbla Thunderbolt 3-portar
+ aktiv S-Pen ingår
+ lång batteritid
Emot
- begränsad till CPU på 5 W; inga alternativ för Kaby Lake-R eller Whiskey Lake-U
- skärmen har långsamma responstider; ghosting syns tydligare
- svår att underhålla; inga uppgraderingar går att göra från användarens sida
- både tyngre och större än Spectre x360 13
- saknar USB Typ A, HDMI, RJ-45 och SD-kortläsare
- saknar Kensington-lås och fingeravtrycksläsare
- mindre styrplatta än Spectre x360 13
- låg prestanda per krona
- tangentbordet är inte spillsäkert
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
HP har skapat sig en bekväm nisch med sin Spectre Folio. Jämfört med Surface Go eller Surface Pro 6 har denna omvandlingsbara modell från HP LTE-anslutbarhet, Thunderbolt 3, längre batteritid och en större skärm, vilket bör tilltala företagskunder som konstant är på resande fot. Den kraftiga läderutsidan gör den både estetiskt tilltalande och lätt att hålla i och bära.
Trots att den ser tjusig ut och känns bra är Spectre Folios största fiende Spectre x360 13 då både är omvandlingsbara modeller för ungefär samma pris på 13.000 - 14.000 kronor. Även om läderutsidan känns lyxig kommer den på bekostnad av storlek, vikt och servicemöjligheter då Spectre x360 13 är mindre, lättare, tunnare och enklare att laga eller uppgradera vid behov. Spectre x360 13 är till och med snabbare än Spectre Folio på grund av Kaby Lake-R processorn och den har faktiskt både en USB Typ A-port och en SD-kortläsare.
Den som överväger denna läderbeklädda omvandlingsbara HP-modell bör uppskatta designen och dra nytta av dess inbyggda stöd för 4G LTE. Annars är Spectre x360 13 ett mer prisvärt alternativ då den är snabbare och har fler funktioner än Spectre Folio.
En fräsch design som passar för att arbeta i både cafeer och klassrum. Spectre Folio kombinerar ett antikt utseende med den senaste Intel Amber Lake-Y processorn och har dessutom 4G LTE eSIM-teknik och lång batteritid för att alltid kunna vara ansluten. Om du inte tilltalas av chassits unika design finns det dock andra Ultrabook-modeller som har fler funktioner och mindre storlekar.
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
-
11/23/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Vägt medel
Price comparison
