Test: HP ZBook Studio G5 (i7, P1000, 4K) Arbetsstation (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Anslutbarhet
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=17, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 227, n=17, last 2 years) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 418 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1438:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M Sharp SHP148D / LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS B156ZAN03.2, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) APPA040, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA CMN15E7, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | 25% | 25% | -35% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.2 | 76.5 12% | 86.4 27% | 98.7 45% | 43.05 -37% | 67.8 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.2 | 98.4 2% | 99.9 4% | 99.9 4% | 64.7 -33% | 94.1 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 76.4 11% | 99.1 44% | 86.6 26% | 44.5 -35% | 67.9 -1% |
Response Times | 10% | 8% | 17% | 22% | 10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 48 ? 21% | 55.6 ? 9% | 43.2 ? 29% | 41.6 ? 32% | 56 ? 8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 33.6 ? -2% | 30.8 ? 6% | 31.2 ? 5% | 28.8 ? 12% | 29 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 | 117000 ? | 25770 ? | |||
Screen | -6% | -12% | 28% | -36% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 417 | 451.7 8% | 397.6 -5% | 520 25% | 229 -45% | 440 6% |
Brightness | 412 | 440 7% | 396 -4% | 492 19% | 212 -49% | 389 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 85 0% | 88 4% | 88 4% | 83 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.4 -38% | 0.25 14% | 0.39 -34% | 0.23 21% | 0.34 -17% |
Contrast | 1438 | 1129 -21% | 1590 11% | 1333 -7% | 996 -31% | 1294 -10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 3.11 29% | 4.95 -13% | 1.2 73% | 4.2 5% | 5.04 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | 8.62 -29% | 10.23 -53% | 2.3 66% | 18 -169% | 6.99 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 3.07 -62% | 4.22 -122% | 4.2 -121% | 2.04 -7% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 3.7 26% | 5.1 -2% | 1.3 74% | 2 60% | 4.98 -0% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.11 104% | 2.234 98% | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 7575 86% | 6492 100% | 7543 86% | 6738 96% | 6292 103% | 7777 84% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.3 | 69 11% | 87.6 41% | 41 -34% | 61 -2% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 98 2% | 100 4% | 64.5 -33% | 94 -2% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
-1% | 7% /
-2% | 23% /
25% | -16% /
-28% | 1% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30 ms rise | |
↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3433 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4453 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4462 poäng | |
Hjälp |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M SK hynix PC400 512 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 5% | 8% | -15% | -15% | 20% | |
Write 4K | 102.7 | 97.8 -5% | 108 5% | 98.8 -4% | 94.8 -8% | 126.7 ? 23% |
Read 4K | 38.32 | 41.21 8% | 37.24 -3% | 33.98 -11% | 26.45 -31% | 44 ? 15% |
Write Seq | 1417 | 1312 -7% | 1476 4% | 395.7 -72% | 1037 -27% | 1617 ? 14% |
Read Seq | 1289 | 1667 29% | 1367 6% | 2063 60% | 1280 -1% | 1716 ? 33% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 278.9 | 449.5 61% | 302.4 8% | 352.3 26% | 277.6 0% | 413 ? 48% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 348.8 | 327.4 -6% | 375 8% | 281.8 -19% | 333.9 -4% | 420 ? 20% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1895 | 1385 -27% | 2433 28% | 355 -81% | 1037 -45% | 2076 ? 10% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3352 | 2948 -12% | 3493 4% | 2775 -17% | 3135 -6% | 3130 ? -7% |
SiSoft Sandra 2016 | |
Image Processing | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (264 - 269, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512) | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (10.8 - 11, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision) | |
HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (23.2 - 23.8, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6377 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16596 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4453 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1560 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=25, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (26.1 - 29.9, n=3) |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 249.7 | 152.2 | 133.7 | 51 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88.7 | 54.4 | 29.5 | 16.1 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 100.1 | 57.5 | 32.3 | 27 | 10.6 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.6 / 28.6 / 30 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 38.1 / 42.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-1.8 °C / -3.3 F).
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.16 / 0.69 Watt |
Låg belastning | 6.8 / 11.3 / 14.3 Watt |
Hög belastning |
78 / 126 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, IGZO, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -26% | -8% | 15% | 37% | 5% | 9% | -23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.8 | 9.8 -44% | 7.1 -4% | 3.4 50% | 3.2 53% | 6.1 10% | 5.09 ? 25% | 8.12 ? -19% |
Idle Average * | 11.3 | 16.8 -49% | 14.4 -27% | 11 3% | 6.1 46% | 10.2 10% | 9.25 ? 18% | 13 ? -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.3 | 16.9 -18% | 14.6 -2% | 14.9 -4% | 9.7 32% | 13.4 6% | 13 ? 9% | 18.4 ? -29% |
Load Average * | 78 | 102.3 -31% | 93.9 -20% | 78.9 -1% | 62 21% | 82 -5% | 78.2 ? -0% | 96.1 ? -23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 64 | 76.5 -20% | 77.9 -22% | 48 25% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 126 | 114.5 9% | 88.3 30% | 91.2 28% | 71 44% | 122 3% | 132.7 ? -5% | 162.6 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 97 Wh | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.6 GHz, 560X) i7-8850H, Radeon Pro 560X, 83 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G5 2ZC05EA i5-8550U, Radeon Pro WX 3100, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | -45% | 17% | 21% | -2% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 1036 | 991 -4% | 1301 26% | 1027 -1% | 927 ? -11% | ||
H.264 | 544 | 701 29% | 623 15% | 581 7% | 671 ? 23% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 582 | 501 -14% | 320 -45% | 614 5% | 514 -12% | 523 -10% | 520 ? -11% |
Load | 131 | 110 -16% | 200 53% | 128 -2% | 83.7 ? -36% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 88 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av recensionen på engelska här.
HP ZBook Studio G5 lyckades bra i vår recension – därför fick den en poängsumma på 87% och omdömet "bra". Den delar de flesta av sina bästa funktioner med EliteBook 1050 G1.
Det är förstås inte förvånande med tanke på att ZBook Studio använder samma helgjutna chassi som EliteBook 1050 G1 – men i grått istället för silver. Annat som är identiskt: det bekväma tangentbordet, det stora batteriet, portutbudet, de lovvärda uppgraderingsmöjligheterna, den utmärkta CPU-prestandan samt styrplattan. Vår recensionsenhet använder exakt samma AOU LCD-skärm som sitt EliteBook-syskon. Skillnaderna är vid en första anblick mindre uppenbara: Den viktigaste skillnaden är att den har en annan GPU – medans ZBook använder det CAD-optimerade Quadro P1000 använder HP det snabbare Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q i EliteBook. Detta ger ZBook en nackdel i fråga om GPU-prestanda, åtminstone tills det finns konfigurationer med Quadro P2000 tillgängliga. Utöver det bör det noteras att ZBook har Dreamcolor-skärmen som tillval vilket tyvärr EliteBook 1050 G1 inte har.
Bristen på GPU-prestanda håller i sig vid jämförelsen med Lenovo ThinkPad P1 och Dell Precision 5530: Båda kommer med Quadro P2000 vilket ZBook inte gör, åtminstone inte för tillfället. Den delar också andra brister med EliteBook 1050. Dessa inkluderar högre vikt än konkurrenterna, dålig placering av fläktventilerna och prestandastrypning vid batteridrift. Sist men inte minst: ZBook Studio G5 är en riktigt dyr enhet.
Övertygande: ZBook Studio G5 är en gedigen arbetsstation med få svaga punkter.
Totalt sett förtjänar ZBook verkligen vår rekommendation. Om den är att föredra framför Lenovo ThinkPad P1 eller Dell Precision 5530 är en fråga om smak eller krav på funktioner.
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA
-
03/26/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig