Test: HTC Desire 19+ – 2.5 kameror och en fräck design (Sammanfattning)
Jämförelseenheter
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | HTC Desire 19+ Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1520x720 | |
| 84.6 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Honor 20 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 164 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.21" | 2340x1080 | |
| 82.1 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 06/2019 | LG Q60 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 172 g | 6.26" | 1520x720 | ||
| 78.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Motorola One Action Exynos 9609, Mali-G72 MP3 | 176 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.30" | 2520x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 491 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1488:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.34 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.302
| HTC Desire 19+ IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Honor 20 Lite IPS, 2340x1080, 6.2" | LG Q60 IPS, 1520x720, 6.3" | Motorola One Action IPS LCD, 2520x1080, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -9% | 3069% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 58 ? -21% | 38 ? 21% | 45.2 ? 6% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 32 ? -7% | 22 ? 27% | 20.4 ? 32% |
| PWM Frequency | 100 | 100 ? 0% | 9259 ? 9159% | |
| Screen | -17% | -26% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 491 | 455 -7% | 477 -3% | 564 15% |
| Brightness | 470 | 456 -3% | 437 -7% | 540 15% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 94 12% | 87 4% | 93 11% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.58 -76% | 0.7 -112% | 0.43 -30% |
| Contrast | 1488 | 784 -47% | 681 -54% | 1312 -12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.34 | 4.43 -2% | 4.84 -12% | 5.5 -27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.17 | 6.81 17% | 8.32 -2% | 10.4 -27% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.4 -26% | 5.2 -21% | 7.7 -79% |
| Gamma | 2.302 96% | 2.248 98% | 2.144 103% | 2.12 104% |
| CCT | 7214 90% | 7336 89% | 7376 88% | 8465 77% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-15% | 1522% /
818% | 1% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (4040 - 7753, n=8) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (3814 - 5794, n=11) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (3.5 - 7.6, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (3.8 - 4.2, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (2.2 - 4.8, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | |
| Honor 20 Lite | |
| LG Q60 | |
| Motorola One Action | |
| Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 (1.4 - 1.5, n=11) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| HTC Desire 19+ | Honor 20 Lite | LG Q60 | Motorola One Action | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 34% | -22% | 108% | 1% | 698% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 288 | 288.1 0% | 266.2 -8% | 501 74% | 274 ? -5% | 1839 ? 539% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 210.8 | 200.9 -5% | 97.9 -54% | 189.3 -10% | 176.2 ? -16% | 1425 ? 576% |
| Random Read 4KB | 76.5 | 38.7 -49% | 53.9 -30% | 108.4 42% | 59.4 ? -22% | 277 ? 262% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20.4 | 73.1 258% | 13.94 -32% | 128.5 530% | 32 ? 57% | 309 ? 1415% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.8 ? | 75.7 ? -7% | 79.5 ? -3% | 78.1 ? -5% | 77.4 ? -5% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 61.8 ? | 66.9 ? 8% | 58.7 ? -5% | 70.2 ? 14% | 58.3 ? -6% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC Desire 19+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 74.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 20 Lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Honor 20 Lite 3400 mAh | LG Q60 3500 mAh | Motorola One Action 3500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 795 | 685 -14% | 949 19% | 697 -12% | 985 ? 24% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Bra, trots små brister
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Priset på HTC Desire 19+ har redan gått ner betydligt runtom internet. Inte konstigt det, för 3.000 kronor hade varit lite för dyrt i denna kraftigt konkurrensutsatta miljö även om telefonen argumenterar väl för sitt pris: Ett stort batteri är ett exempel, precis som en ljusstark och färgriktig skärm, en högtalare med bra ljud och skaplig systemprestanda. Dualkameran med sin extralins är flexibel och tar skapliga bilder.
Den har hyfsat snabbt WLAN och fingeravtrycksläsaren fungerar bra. Höljet finns dessutom i en hipp blå färg för mer extravaganta köpare och i en klassisk vit för mer återhållsamma personer, så det borde finnas något åt alla.
För priset på runt 2.000 kronor som den kostar på internet nu är den nästan ett fynd: Utöver en aningen ojämn skärmbelysning, en viss brist på detaljskärpa hos kameran och kraftiga variationer i WLAN-signalens kvalitet har vi knappt något att klaga på.
HTC Desire 19+ har blivit en bra telefon som dessutom behagar med ett extravagant yttre.
64 GB masslagring bör dessutom vara tillräckligt för de flesta, men i ärlighetens namn får man säga att en del konkurrenter erbjuder mer.
HTC Desire 19+
- 10/26/2019 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
