Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: HTC U11 Life Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Honor 9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 545 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1298:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Xiaomi Mi 5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 15% | -36% | 1% | 36% | |
| Brightness middle | 545 | 550 1% | 458 -16% | 627 15% | 539 -1% |
| Brightness | 526 | 535 2% | 473 -10% | 596 13% | 542 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 88 1% | 91 5% | 93 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.42 -0% | 0.51 -21% | 0.6 -43% | |
| Contrast | 1298 | 1310 1% | 898 -31% | 1045 -19% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 3.3 33% | 7.1 -45% | 4.5 8% | 1.6 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 4.5 47% | 14.5 -71% | 7.5 12% | 2.6 69% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 3.6 33% | 10.5 -94% | 4.5 17% | 1.5 72% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7610 85% | 7226 90% | 8951 73% | 7427 88% | 6422 101% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 Life | |
| Honor 9 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 5s (Chrome 55) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Honor 9 (Chrome 59) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 Life | Honor 9 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Xiaomi Mi 5s | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | -14% | 42% | -34% | 14% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 268 | 293 9% | 270.5 1% | 412.7 54% | 182 -32% | 287.4 7% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 120 | 204 70% | 139.6 16% | 153.5 28% | 77.1 -36% | 205.3 71% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.3 | 55.7 42% | 37.97 -3% | 100.3 155% | 22.41 -43% | 68.6 75% |
| Random Write 4KB | 50.2 | 32.7 -35% | 12.07 -76% | 15.08 -70% | 12.13 -76% | 7.59 -85% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.8 ? | 68 ? -18% | 78.7 ? -5% | 73.7 ? -11% | 86.9 ? 5% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.8 ? | 34.64 ? -42% | 49.77 ? -17% | 56 ? -6% | 66.5 ? 11% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 28 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U11 Life audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.03 / 0.13 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.63 / 2.1 / 2.15 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.34 / 4.83 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -41% | -6% | -18% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.63 | 1.13 -79% | 0.67 -6% | 0.4 37% | 0.64 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 2.1 | 2.25 -7% | 1.7 19% | 1.7 19% | 1.36 35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.15 | 2.3 -7% | 1.78 17% | 1.81 16% | 1.4 35% |
| Load Average * | 3.34 | 4.89 -46% | 4.42 -32% | 5.84 -75% | 2.53 24% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.83 | 7.99 -65% | 6.3 -30% | 9.12 -89% | 3.63 25% |
* ... smaller is better
| HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Honor 9 3200 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -22% | -8% | -9% | 32% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1820 | 1399 -23% | 1840 1% | 2418 33% | |
| H.264 | 798 | 564 -29% | 644 -19% | 984 23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 725 | 516 -29% | 730 1% | 663 -9% | 843 16% |
| Load | 303 | 278 -8% | 254 -16% | 467 54% |
För
Emot
Det finns fortfarande en del saker med HTC U11 Life som får denna telefon att stå ut bland jämförelse-enheterna. Åter och åter igen måste vi påpeka HTC:s uppfinningsrikedom och tydliga vilja till innovation, vars faktiska resultat nu också introducerats i en mittenskikts-enhet med USonic och Edge Sense. Tack vare Android One-filosofin så garanteras man uppdateringar fär flera år, vilket ger en bra känsla särskilt i dessa tider med säkerhetshål som upptäcks veckovis. Man förväntar sig antagligen inte dom utmärkta hörlurarna som ingår i paketet hos en enhet för ~3 500 SEK. Men man förväntar sig heller inte en högtalare som låter så burkig i det prisskiktet, särskilt inte från HTC.
På många andra områden är HTC U11 Lifes prestanda gedigen: en bra batteritid, en hyfsad skärm och lämplig prestanda för en mittenskikts-enhet. Höljet är tjusigt men ganska genomsnittligt i fråga om kvalitet och utöver dom nya möjligheterna att kontrollera den så skapar Edge Sense också en del nya problem, såsom oavsiktlig aktivering. Kameran levererar också bra prestanda, men står inte ut jämfört med andra smartphones.
Garanterade, regelbundan säkerhetsuppdateringar - detta är ett starkt argument för HTC U11 Life. At ett par utmärkta hörlurar ingår och bra batteritid är fler argument. Men det finns också baksidor med en dålig högtalare, avsaknaden av en ljudport och inte särskilt exakt navigering.
Allt som allt, HTC U11 Life är en enhet som man borde prova att hålla i sin hand. Some köpare måste man fråga sig: hur mycket gillar jag höljet, hur bra kan jag hantera Edge Sense och kan jag leva med en medioker högtalare? Är det okej för mig att det inte finns en dedikerad ljudutgång? Att använda telefonen för navigering får heller inte vara viktigt för dig. Trots alla dessa orosmoment så kan HTC U11 Life eventuellt övertyga om du provar den, särskilt om regelbundna säkerhetsuppdateringar är viktigt för dig.
HTC U11 Life
-
01/11/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer