Notebookcheck Logo

Test: HTC U11 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Trendig. HTC U11 Plus dyker upp ungefär ett år efter U11 och har liknande specifikationer. Den kommer med mer lagringsutrymme och den nya Super LCD-skärmen har nu ett trendigt 2:1-bildförhållande. Dessutom får batteriet en betydelsefull uppgradering. I vår recension får du reda på hur bra denna nya smartphone klarar sig.
HTC U11 Plus (U Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 8 x 2.5 GHz, Kryo 280
Minne
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Skärm
6.00 tum 2:1, 2880 x 1440 pixlar 537 PPI, kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, Super LCD 6, DCI-P3, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 119 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ-C, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 2 TB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Kant-sensor, närhetssensor, rörelsesensor, magnetometer, G-sensor, sensorhubb, kompass, OTG, HTC Connect, DLNA, AirPlay, Miracast
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1.800 och 1.900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1.900 och 2.100 MHz), LTE Cat. 15 (FDD-Band: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, TDD: 38, 39, 40 och 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.5 x 158.5 x 74.9
Batteri
3930 mAh Litiumpolymer, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 24.5 tim
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (HTC UltraPixel 3, 1.40 μm, UltraSpeed AF, OIS, f/1.7, 4k video med High-Res ljud, 120 fps ultrarapid i 1080p)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, HDR, 1080p-video
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, AC-adapter, datakabel, ANC-headset, SIM-kortsverktyg, adapter för ljudanslutning, rengöringsduk, plasthölje, HTC Sense, 24 Månader Garanti, HTC USonic med aktiv brusreducering, HTC BoomSound, Hi-Res stereoljud, Qualcomm aptX, IP68, USB Typ-C, SAR-värde (huvud): 0.63 W/kg, SAR-värde (kropp): 0.67 W/kg, Hybrid dual-SIM, fanless
Vikt
188 g
Pris
799 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

162.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.6 mm 195 g158.5 mm 74.9 mm 8.5 mm 188 g157.9 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 175 g156.1 mm 75 mm 7.3 mm 162 g154.2 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 178 g153.9 mm 75.9 mm 7.9 mm 169 g151.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.3 mm 158 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 174 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
703 MBit/s +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s +13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s +11%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 MBit/s +10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
627 (490min - 666max) MBit/s +8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s -61%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
583 MBit/s
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s +172%
LG V30
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 MBit/s +90%
HTC U11
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
394 MBit/s +14%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
368 MBit/s +7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
355 (105min - 550max) MBit/s +3%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s -2%
HTC U11 Plus
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 MBit/s
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s -31%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus
HTC U11 Plus

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
334
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 355.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 361 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1719:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.21
HTC U11 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6"
HTC U11
Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6"
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8"
LG V30
OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6"
Screen
-8%
32%
30%
40%
-51%
7%
-9%
Brightness middle
361
482
34%
560
55%
629
74%
600
66%
432
20%
425
18%
415
15%
Brightness
356
472
33%
562
58%
636
79%
606
70%
428
20%
423
19%
420
18%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
93
3%
94
4%
94
4%
87
-3%
92
2%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.21
0.33
-57%
Contrast
1719
1461
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.5
3.2
-28%
1.7
32%
1.7
32%
1.2
52%
4.18
-67%
2.1
16%
2.7
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.3
5.4
-2%
3.4
36%
3.6
32%
3
43%
8.53
-61%
3.4
36%
4.3
19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
2.2
-29%
1.6
6%
2.4
-41%
1.6
6%
5.3
-212%
2.5
-47%
3.3
-94%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.22 99%
2.13 103%
2.15 102%
2.23 99%
2.33 94%
2.32 95%
2.36 93%
CCT
6580 99%
6581 99%
6435 101%
6337 103%
6707 97%
7487 87%
6455 101%
6787 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 9615 Hz ≤ 33 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9615 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9615 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
183057 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points -3%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points +8%
LG V30
173749 Points -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points -9%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points -6%
HTC U11
175032 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
165382 Points -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
179595 Points -2%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
7964 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points +6%
LG V30
6854 Points -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points +4%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points -3%
HTC U11
8295 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5830 Points -27%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
8553 Points +7%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6695 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points +4%
LG V30
5603 Points -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points +4%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points -1%
HTC U11
6828 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5195 Points -22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6998 Points +5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3447 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points -9%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points +8%
LG V30
2702 Points -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points -3%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points +7%
HTC U11
3034 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3301 Points -4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3625 Points +5%
System (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
5926 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points -12%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points +73%
LG V30
4238 Points -28%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points 0%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points -1%
HTC U11
5570 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
5319 Points -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
5918 Points 0%
Memory (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3376 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points +23%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points -64%
LG V30
2091 Points -38%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points -13%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points +14%
HTC U11
2085 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3135 Points -7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3652 Points +8%
Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6086 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points -40%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points +52%
LG V30
5949 Points -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points +1%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points 0%
HTC U11
5976 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6126 Points +1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6144 Points +1%
Web (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
1159 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points +6%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points +45%
LG V30
1009 Points -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points +2%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points +15%
HTC U11
1221 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1163 Points 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1300 Points +12%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
1935 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points -2%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points +120%
LG V30
1900 Points -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points -1%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points +1%
HTC U11
1906 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2015 Points +4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
1911 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6771 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points 0%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points +51%
LG V30
6078 Points -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points -8%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points -1%
HTC U11
6443 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
6695 Points -1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6711 Points -1%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
7946 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points +8%
LG V30
8016 Points +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points -5%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points +1%
HTC U11
8281 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
8295 Points +4%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
41644 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points -27%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points +54%
LG V30
34139 Points -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points -5%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points +1%
HTC U11
40014 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
29282 Points -30%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40848 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
58307 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points -42%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points +93%
LG V30
55271 Points -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points -7%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points 0%
HTC U11
55725 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
33077 Points -43%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
55485 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
20820 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points +9%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points +23%
LG V30
14601 Points -30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points -3%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points +3%
HTC U11
20140 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
20892 Points 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
21239 Points +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
4982 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points -35%
LG V30
4738 Points -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points -3%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points -3%
HTC U11
4744 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3958 Points -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
4969 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
6060 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points -45%
LG V30
5895 Points -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points -3%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points -4%
HTC U11
5877 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
4786 Points -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
6035 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3071 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points -6%
LG V30
2808 Points -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points -2%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points -1%
HTC U11
2832 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2465 Points -20%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3071 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3732 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points -24%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points -16%
LG V30
3635 Points -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points -2%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points +1%
HTC U11
3590 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3188 Points -15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3713 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3987 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points -29%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points -13%
LG V30
3903 Points -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points -3%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points +1%
HTC U11
3883 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3479 Points -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
3991 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
3049 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points -6%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points -23%
LG V30
2931 Points -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points -1%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points +1%
HTC U11
2841 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
2466 Points -19%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2986 Points -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps -1%
LG V30
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps 0%
HTC U11
58 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
58 fps -3%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
60 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
113 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps -1%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps +57%
LG V30
113 fps 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps -1%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps 0%
HTC U11
91 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
104 fps -8%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
105 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
35 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps +60%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps +67%
LG V30
35 fps 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps 0%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps +51%
HTC U11
29 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
38 fps +9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
36 fps +3%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
60 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps -10%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps +47%
LG V30
59 fps -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps -2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps 0%
HTC U11
51 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
50 fps -17%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
54 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
21 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps +81%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps +110%
LG V30
19 fps -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps -5%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps +76%
HTC U11
15 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
23 fps +10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
22 fps +5%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
41 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps -10%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps +19%
LG V30
40 fps -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps 0%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps 0%
HTC U11
33 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42 fps +2%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
40 fps -2%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
13 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps +69%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps +113%
LG V30
13 fps 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps 0%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps +77%
HTC U11
13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
13 fps 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
15 fps +15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
25 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps -16%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps +27%
LG V30
24 fps -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps -4%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps 0%
HTC U11
24 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25 fps 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
25 fps 0%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
38.71 fps
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21.49 fps -44%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps -3%
HTC U11
36.58 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
25.06 fps -35%
Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
39033 Points
HTC U11
44696 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
41901 Points
High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
25922 Points
HTC U11
38752 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
42335 Points
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus
868 Points
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points -9%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points +96%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points -2%
HTC U11
812 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
1280 Points +47%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
59.7 fps
HTC U11
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
59.7 fps

Legend

 
HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points +245%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
69.5 Points +7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
66.7 Points +3%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.5 Points +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
64.9 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.7 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
62.2 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.6 Points -13%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
52.9 Points -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points +205%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
14050 Points +22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
12929 Points +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points +8%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
11781 Points +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
11553 Points
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
10506 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
3630 ms * -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3591 ms * -15%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434 ms * -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
3175 ms * -1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
3132 ms *
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * +1%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
2760 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2237 ms * +29%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points +98%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points +1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)
179 Points
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)
162 Points -9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)
161 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)
154 Points -14%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)
138 Points -23%

* ... smaller is better

HTC U11 PlusSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusLG V30Motorola Moto Z2 ForceHonor View 10
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-29%
-4%
11%
Sequential Read 256KB
728
788
8%
669
-8%
696
-4%
810
11%
Sequential Write 256KB
207.9
194.2
-7%
193.2
-7%
213.6
3%
194.3
-7%
Random Read 4KB
132.4
127.2
-4%
78.2
-41%
148.8
12%
144.3
9%
Random Write 4KB
135.7
15.27
-89%
10.21
-92%
78.6
-42%
160
18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
62.8
-17%
77.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
51.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
47.2
-8%
54.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
65.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
27%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high29 fps
 very low30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high59 fps
Hög belastning
 36.8 °C35.9 °C35.7 °C 
 36.1 °C36.5 °C35.6 °C 
 35.9 °C35.7 °C34.1 °C 
Max: 36.8 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
31.9 °C33.3 °C34.1 °C
31.6 °C32.5 °C36.1 °C
31.2 °C32.2 °C34.4 °C
Max: 36.1 °C
Medel: 33 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
HTC U11 Plus: pink noise graph
Pink noise graph
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.236.52532.936.43137.233.84031.733.95039.634.56328.328.78027.327.110026.931.912526.737.21602443.420020.949.925020.950.831519.555.540018.563.450017.56663017.565.180015.770.1100015.874.9125016.675160015.875.4200015.474.2250015.57531501675.6400015.874.850001674.9630016.375.8800016.372.31000016.268.41250016.459.31600016.448.7SPL28.686N1.165.4median 16.4median 68.4Delta2.210.931.633.925.429.825.32632.928.833.627.631.627.328.425.72730.320.834.22241.121.349.220.855.321.260.819.462.119.566.617.770.217.97217.873.417.373.617.474.416.773.317.274.118.273.217.969.817.666.917.769.617.863.817.953.818.15118.244.73082.91.356.6median 17.9median 66.61.41135.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4median 73.62.210.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHTC U11 PlusSamsung Galaxy S8 PlusGoogle Pixel 2 XL
HTC U11 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.62 / 1.87 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.92 / 8.27 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
-16%
10%
6%
-32%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.73
-43%
0.68
-33%
0.58
-14%
1.28
-151%
0.85
-67%
Idle Average *
1.62
1.96
-21%
1.13
30%
1.44
11%
1.87
-15%
1.15
29%
Idle Maximum *
1.87
1.98
-6%
1.16
38%
1.53
18%
1.89
-1%
1.23
34%
Load Average *
3.92
4.82
-23%
4.69
-20%
3.17
19%
3.73
5%
4.12
-5%
Load Maximum *
8.27
7.15
14%
5.24
37%
8.54
-3%
8.08
2%
8.42
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 63)
10tim 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 11min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 51min
HTC U11 Plus
3930 mAh
HTC U11
3000 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
3500 mAh
Motorola Moto Z2 Force
2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
-19%
33%
-15%
11%
8%
11%
Reader / Idle
1625
1250
-23%
1744
7%
1292
-20%
1754
8%
1565
-4%
1630
0%
H.264
611
498
-18%
929
52%
634
4%
799
31%
742
21%
811
33%
WiFi v1.3
607
560
-8%
818
35%
564
-7%
718
18%
736
21%
531
-13%
Load
291
212
-27%
398
37%
180
-38%
257
-12%
275
-5%
354
22%

För

+ snabb SoC
+ utmärkt kamera
+ exakt positionering
+ utökningsbar lagring
+ dual-SIM
+ snabb USB som kan användas för att ansluta en extern skärm
+ utmärkta hörlurar i förpackningen
+ bra högtalare
+ vatten- och dammsäker

Emot

- skärmen är för mörk
- kamera-appen erbjuder inte många alternativ
- medelmåttiga Micro SD-hastigheter
- endast LTE kategori 15
In review: HTC U11 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de
In review: HTC U11 Plus. Review device provided courtesy of: notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

HTC är trogen sin design med U11 Plus. Men trots detta ger dom den nya flaggskepps-enheten en mindre färgpalett än U11. HTC gör många saker rätt med sitt senaste flaggskepp och förlitar sig återigen på dom vältestade beståndsdelar vi redan sett hos den mindre syskonmodellen. Dessa inkluderar: En extremt snabbt Snapdragon-SoC, rikligt med lagringsutrymme som kan utökas, ett vatten- och dammsäkert hölje, en exakt GPS-modul och en väldigt välkalibrerad skärm, som tack vare dess nya 2:1-bildförhållande är riktigt bekväm att hålla i trots sin storlek.

Tyvärr är skärmen jämförelsevis mörk. Detta kommer att skapa en del problem under årets soliga delar då läsligheten utomhus är ganska begränsad. Ett annat mysterium rör varför HTC U11 Plus inte använder sitt LTE-modem fullt ut och istället begränsar det till kategori 15-hastigheter.

Med U11 Plus erbjuder HTC en utmärkt smartphone. Men trots det förstör tillkortakommanden i fråga om skärmljusstyrka och LTE-hastighet ett i övrigt gott intryck.

Det tjocka batteriet leder till bra batteritid. Men vi hade förväntat oss bättre batteritider från en enhet i den här storleken. Med det sagt så kan batteritiden fortfarande komma att förbättras med framtida uppdateringar. Systemprestandan är på en väldigt hög nivå. Detta gör HTC U11 Plus till en av dom snabbaste Android-telefonerna på marknaden.

HTC U11 Plus - 02/28/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design
89%
Tangentbord
69 / 75 → 91%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
66 / 60 → 100%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
65 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
69 / 70 → 99%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
85%
Medel
83%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: HTC U11 Plus Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-03- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)