Test: Honor 20 - En fyrdubbel kamera i en mittenskiktstelefon
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 491 cd/m²
Kontrast: 875:1 (Svärta: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.12
Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Honor 20 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -119% | -47% | -33% | -66% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 481 | 514 7% | 555 15% | 594 23% | 569 18% | 409 -15% |
Brightness | 481 | 495 3% | 537 12% | 607 26% | 537 12% | 410 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 94 -1% | 91 -4% | 79 -17% | 96 1% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.5 9% | 0.39 29% | 0.31 44% | ||
Contrast | 875 | 1028 17% | 1423 63% | 1835 110% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 5.1 -364% | 2.3 -109% | 1.51 -37% | 3.5 -218% | 1.3 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 7.8 -271% | 6 -186% | 4.27 -103% | 6 -186% | 2.3 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 5.8 -346% | 3.9 -200% | 2.6 -100% | 5.1 -292% | 1.5 -15% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.219 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6442 101% | 8142 80% | 6212 105% | 6390 102% | 6827 95% | 6621 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9728 - 13531, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (7567 - 9326, n=10) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (24 - 54, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (25 - 56, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Honor 20 | |
Honor 20 Pro | |
Honor 10 | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (268359 - 322616, n=10) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 74) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 74) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=10) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=10) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=10) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 20 | Honor 20 Pro | Honor 10 | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | Google Pixel 3a XL | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 10% | -1% | -4% | 0% | -39% | 6% | 231% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 829 | 843 2% | 828 0% | 809 -2% | 831 0% | 315.6 -62% | 760 ? -8% | 1839 ? 122% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 196.4 | 247.3 26% | 192.1 -2% | 196.9 0% | 195.6 0% | 179.1 -9% | 297 ? 51% | 1425 ? 626% |
Random Read 4KB | 156.7 | 173.6 11% | 145.9 -7% | 142.5 -9% | 153.3 -2% | 92.1 -41% | 152.9 ? -2% | 277 ? 77% |
Random Write 4KB | 157 | 160.4 2% | 163 4% | 148.5 -5% | 160.2 2% | 87 -45% | 131.6 ? -16% | 309 ? 97% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 3a XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.02 / 0.22 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.88 / 2.27 / 2.34 Watt |
Hög belastning |
4.81 / 6.63 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor 20 3750 mAh | Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -10% | 12% | -7% | 30% | 0% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.88 | 0.9 -2% | 1.12 -27% | 0.7 20% | 0.81 8% | 0.7 20% | 0.802 ? 9% | 0.894 ? -2% |
Idle Average * | 2.27 | 1.4 38% | 2.26 -0% | 1 56% | 2.35 -4% | 1.63 28% | 2.07 ? 9% | 1.456 ? 36% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.34 | 2.6 -11% | 2.3 2% | 1.3 44% | 2.37 -1% | 1.67 29% | 2.38 ? -2% | 1.616 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 4.81 | 5 -4% | 5.14 -7% | 5.2 -8% | 5.33 -11% | 2.64 45% | 4.87 ? -1% | 6.45 ? -34% |
Load Maximum * | 6.63 | 6.9 -4% | 7.89 -19% | 10 -51% | 8.55 -29% | 4.62 30% | 7.46 ? -13% | 9.8 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor 20 3750 mAh | Honor 20 Pro 4000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 43% | 2% | 35% | 110% | 37% | |
Reader / Idle | 1262 | 2030 61% | 1162 -8% | 1768 40% | 2114 68% | 1822 44% |
H.264 | 606 | 914 51% | 662 9% | 987 63% | 2138 253% | 960 58% |
WiFi v1.3 | 654 | 796 22% | 663 1% | 762 17% | 801 22% | 709 8% |
Load | 208 | 287 38% | 216 4% | 249 20% | 409 97% | 289 39% |
För
Emot
Verdict - a lot of storage and a good camera
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Honor 20 visar sig vara en riktigt välavrundad smartphone. Den går att få tag på för straxt under 5.000 kronor och har bra kvalitet på kameran, massor av intern lagring och tillräckligt med prestanda för både vardagsbruk och mer krävande applikationer. Prestandan går att förbättra ytterligare genom att aktivera High Performance-läget, men det påverkar förstås batteritiden. Batteritiden är på nästan 11 timmar, vilket är riktigt bra och Honor 20 kan lätt stå sig mot sina konkurrenter.
Honor 20 får poäng för en bra kamera och skaplig batteritid. Man får dock klara sig utan microSD-kort.
Det finns inte mycket att kritisera Honor 20 för: Designen med ett runt hål i skärmen är en fråga om smak och alla uppskattar kanske inte att fingeravtrycksläsaren sitter på sidan. Men det är riktigt synd att Honor inte inkluderat en microSD-kortläsare, särskilt eftersom dualSIM-platsen lätt kunde ha varit en hybridplats.
Honor 20
- 08/19/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker