Test: Honor 7A Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Honor 7A | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 417 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2317:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.423
| Honor 7A IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Umidigi A1 Pro IPS, 1440x720, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Sony Xperia L1 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -17% | -2% | -9% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 417 | 483 16% | 594 42% | 425 2% | 479 15% |
| Brightness | 395 | 460 16% | 570 44% | 425 8% | 478 21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 86 -2% | 93 6% | 94 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.4 -122% | 0.22 -22% | 0.37 -106% | 0.58 -222% |
| Contrast | 2317 | 1208 -48% | 2700 17% | 1149 -50% | 826 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.46 | 5.8 10% | 6.63 -3% | 4.7 27% | 4.5 30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.72 | 12.6 -18% | 13.99 -31% | 8.3 23% | 7.5 30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 5 14% | 9.2 -59% | 4.6 21% | 4.1 29% |
| Gamma | 2.423 91% | 2.6 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.03 108% |
| CCT | 7839 83% | 7709 84% | 8663 75% | 7445 87% | 7139 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  | |
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=16) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=11) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=18) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3408 - 3892, n=16) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia L1 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 7A | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 2.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=16) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=18) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto E4 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Umidigi A1 Pro (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 7A (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=18) | |
| Sony Xperia L1 (Chrome 59) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 7A | Huawei Y6 2018 | Umidigi A1 Pro | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus | Sony Xperia L1 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | -11% | 8% | -49% | -34% | 1597% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 254.8 | 254.3 0% | 269.2 6% | 194.4 -24% | 181.9 -29% | 164.5 ? -35% | 1887 ? 641% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 72.5 | 65.6 -10% | 44.4 -39% | 42 -42% | 40.2 -45% | 43 ? -41% | 1471 ? 1929% |
| Random Read 4KB | 39.2 | 38.8 -1% | 29.6 -24% | 19.15 -51% | 13.6 -65% | 21.7 ? -45% | 278 ? 609% |
| Random Write 4KB | 9.4 | 9 -4% | 10.2 9% | 29.4 213% | 5.9 -37% | 8.08 ? -14% | 311 ? 3209% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 ? | 84.9 ? 0% | 81 ? -5% | 66.3 -22% | 37.81 ? -55% | 59.1 ? -30% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.4 ? | 64 ? -2% | 58.8 ? -10% | 46.6 -29% | 26.25 ? -60% | 39.8 ? -39% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Honor 7A audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 58.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (113.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.03 / 0.05 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.3 / 1.6 / 2.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.7 / 6.4 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | -29% | 20% | -8% | 3% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.8 -38% | 1.7 -31% | 0.89 32% | 0.89 32% | 0.918 ? 29% | 0.881 ? 32% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.3 -44% | 2.5 -56% | 1.87 -17% | 2.05 -28% | 2.01 ? -26% | 1.463 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 3.2 -10% | 3.2 -10% | 1.98 32% | 2.18 25% | 2.28 ? 21% | 1.618 ? 44% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 4.7 -27% | 5.2 -41% | 3.04 18% | 6.02 -63% | 3.97 ? -7% | 6.57 ? -78% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.4 | 6 6% | 6.8 -6% | 4.01 37% | 6.94 -8% | 6.46 ? -1% | 9.91 ? -55% |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 7A 3000 mAh | Umidigi A1 Pro 3150 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto E4 Plus 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia L1 2620 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | -2% | 20% | -14% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 657 | 608 -7% | 643 -2% | 788 20% | 567 -14% |
| Reader / Idle | 1329 | 1398 | |||
| H.264 | 702 | 656 | |||
| Load | 279 | 223 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Det är inte dom unika funktionerna som får Honor 7A att stå ut (Finns det egentligen någon som har 7 vänner som alla äger en Honor 7A och som träffar dem för att skapa en surround-system byggt av smartphones?) utan dess smala skärminfattning, höga prestanda, bra batteritid och exakta GPS. Kameran är dessutom acceptabla bilder, även om dom är ganska mörka. På så sätt får Honor 7A poäng för mer grundläggande dygder som gör en nöjd i vardagslivet snarare än för funktioner som passar bra i marknadsföring men som sällan används.
Faktum att Honor 7A är ganska billig gör det än mer imponerande att den presterar bra på så många områden. Det finns förstås också svagheter, som att skärmen inte är särskilt ljusstark, en märkbar blå ton efter leverans och ett plasthölje som är okej men knappast vinner några priser. Men detta är mindre detaljer jämfört med den goda prestationen i dom grundläggande grenarna.
Honor 7A kan övertyga på många områden: Den har bland annat massor av prestanda och bra batteritid till ett överkomligt pris.
Totalt sett är Honor 7A en billig smartphone med ett väldigt bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.
Honor 7A
- 07/09/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
