Test: Honor Play Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Honor Play
Brand: Honor

"Play with honor."

Huaweis första speltelefon kommer till det västra halvklotet: Även om Honor Play inte riktigt ser ut som en spelenhet vill den imponera på gamers med sitt låga pris. Vi tar en titt på om detta är en fördel eller en nackdel och huruvida telefonen har tillräckligt med kraft för moderna spel.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Tanja Hinum-Balaz (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 09/24/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Gaming Smartwatch Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Play (Play Serie)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 970 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G72 MP12

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.30 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 54 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 256GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass, USB-C

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (1/3/5/7/8/20/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.5 x 157.9 x 74.3

Batteri

3750 mAh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix Dual: f/2.2, Fasdetektions-autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, video @2160p/30fps (huvudkamera); 2.0MP, f/2.4, skärpedjup (sekundär kamera)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, video @1080p

Övrigt

Högtalare: monohögtalare på enhetens nedre kant, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, AC-adapter, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Skyddsfodral i silikon, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat. 18 (1.2 GBit/s nedladdning, 250 MBit/s uppladdning); SAR-värde: 1.10 W/kg (kropp)

Vikt

176 g, Strömförsörjning: 68 g

Pris

350 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Phone 2017 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 MBit/s +248%
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	307 MBit/s +62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	237 MBit/s +25%
Honor Play Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	190 MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	117 MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Phone 2017 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	665 MBit/s +254%
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	232 MBit/s +23%
Honor Play Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	188 MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	116 MBit/s -38%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


396 cd/m²	429 cd/m²	445 cd/m²
403 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	444 cd/m²
396 cd/m²	442 cd/m²	440 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 445 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 425.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.12 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 435 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1115:1 (Svärta: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251

	Honor Play IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Razer Phone 2017 IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.7"	Xiaomi Black Shark IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6"	Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		12%	-22%	-34%	9%
Brightness middle	435	436 0%	549 26%	446 3%	458 5%
Brightness	426	417 -2%	541 27%	451 6%	463 9%
Brightness Distribution	89	92 3%	95 7%	93 4%	92 3%
Black Level *	0.39	0.16 59%	0.42 -8%		0.22 44%
Contrast	1115	2725 144%	1307 17%		2082 87%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.89	3.88 -34%	6.08 -110%	6.58 -128%	4 -38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.03	7.96 -32%	10.69 -77%	11.94 -98%	7.4 -23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	5.8 -41%	6.6 -61%	3.6 12%	4.7 -15%
Gamma	2.251 ^98%	2.45 ^90%	2.305 ^95%	2.199 ^100%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	7408 ^88%	7657 ^85%	8399 ^77%	7116 ^91%	7425 ^88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

83.3 Hz

≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 83.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 83.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	178745 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark	230642 Points +29%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	93813 Points -48%
Nokia 7 Plus	117165 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)	177915 Points 0%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	152773 Points
Razer Phone 2017	208972 Points +37%
Xiaomi Black Shark	290397 Points +90%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	115656 Points -24%
Nokia 7 Plus	141701 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)	197811 Points +29%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play	9326 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7968 Points -15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	6457 Points -31%
Nokia 7 Plus	6825 Points -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)	8537 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play	6293 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7046 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8309 Points +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	5640 Points -10%
Nokia 7 Plus	6077 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)	6860 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor Play	2174 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3651 Points +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3489 Points +60%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	2044 Points -6%
Nokia 7 Plus	2369 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)	3125 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +191%
System (sort by value)
Honor Play	3795 Points
Razer Phone 2017	5660 Points +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark	7105 Points +87%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	4628 Points +22%
Nokia 7 Plus	4976 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)	5387 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +168%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor Play	2417 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4085 Points +69%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2871 Points +19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	2208 Points -9%
Nokia 7 Plus	2503 Points +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)	3946 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +181%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play	2231 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6273 Points +181%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5846 Points +162%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	1625 Points -27%
Nokia 7 Plus	2298 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)	3638 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +669%
Web (sort by value)
Honor Play	1091 Points
Razer Phone 2017	1225 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark	1243 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	1052 Points -4%
Nokia 7 Plus	1101 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)	1245 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +44%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	1904 Points
Razer Phone 2017	1942 Points +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark	2437 Points +28%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	1330 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus	1646 Points -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)	1901 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +188%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	6673 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6742 Points +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8453 Points +27%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	4941 Points -26%
Nokia 7 Plus	5867 Points -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)	6697 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +126%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	8454 Points
Razer Phone 2017	7931 Points -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark	13620 Points +61%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	4501 Points -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)	8080 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +42%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	29924 Points
Razer Phone 2017	42278 Points +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60543 Points +102%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	19873 Points -34%
Nokia 7 Plus	26610 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)	29035 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor Play	34836 Points
Razer Phone 2017	58360 Points +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82423 Points +137%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	20908 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus	29333 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)	32596 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play	20035 Points
Razer Phone 2017	21521 Points +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31384 Points +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	16939 Points -15%
Nokia 7 Plus	20085 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)	21027 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor Play	3487 Points
Razer Phone 2017	5030 Points +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark	6324 Points +81%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	1474 Points -58%
Nokia 7 Plus	2035 Points -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)	3155 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play	3734 Points
Razer Phone 2017	6127 Points +64%
Xiaomi Black Shark	8312 Points +123%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	1333 Points -64%
Nokia 7 Plus	1895 Points -49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)	3305 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play	2832 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3092 Points +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3443 Points +22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	2337 Points -17%
Nokia 7 Plus	2734 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)	2732 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor Play	2973 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3810 Points +28%
Xiaomi Black Shark	4668 Points +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	953 Points -68%
Nokia 7 Plus	1332 Points -55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)	2958 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play	3018 Points
Razer Phone 2017	4049 Points +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark	5220 Points +73%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	815 Points -73%
Nokia 7 Plus	1161 Points -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)	2994 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play	2827 Points
Razer Phone 2017	3157 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark	3408 Points +21%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	2327 Points -18%
Nokia 7 Plus	2749 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)	2842 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	60 fps
Razer Phone 2017	79 fps +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	35 fps -42%
Nokia 7 Plus	48 fps -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)	57.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +44%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	115 fps
Razer Phone 2017	117 fps +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark	151 fps +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	36 fps -69%
Nokia 7 Plus	50 fps -57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)	108 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +146%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor Play	55 fps
Razer Phone 2017	40 fps -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark	59 fps +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	15 fps -73%
Nokia 7 Plus	22 fps -60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)	50.4 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	62 fps
Razer Phone 2017	43 fps -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark	82 fps +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	16 fps -74%
Nokia 7 Plus	23 fps -63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)	54.6 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +170%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	31 fps
Razer Phone 2017	22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark	53 fps +71%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	9.8 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus	15 fps -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)	33.6 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +112%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	39 fps
Razer Phone 2017	21 fps -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark	60 fps +54%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	10 fps -74%
Nokia 7 Plus	14 fps -64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)	33.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +204%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	19 fps
Razer Phone 2017	15 fps -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark	31 fps +63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	6 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus	9.1 fps -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)	19.8 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +152%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play	20 fps
Razer Phone 2017	25 fps +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark	35 fps +75%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	6.3 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus	8.3 fps -58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)	20.4 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +256%

Legend

Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average HiSilicon Kirin 970

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	63.3 Points +91%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	53.9 Points +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)	51.4 Points +55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	44.59 Points +35%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)	33.09 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +457%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	13663 Points +104%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	12600 Points +88%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	10945 Points +64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)	10111 Points +51%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	8519 Points +27%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)	6692 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Play (Chrome 68)	6221 ms *
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	4820 ms * +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)	4378 ms * +30%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	3937 ms * +37%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)	3476 ms * +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	2287 ms * +63%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +75%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)	246 Points +107%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	168 Points +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)	165.4 Points +39%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play	154 Points +29%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)	119 Points

* ... smaller is better

	Honor Play	Razer Phone 2017	Xiaomi Black Shark	Motorola Moto Z3 Play	Nokia 7 Plus	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-22%	-12%	-31%	-37%	-16%	241%
Sequential Read 256KB	895	732 -18%	742 -17%	271.7 -70%	283.1 -68%	696 ?(392 - 895, n=52) -22%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 106%
Sequential Write 256KB	188.3	202.5 8%	199.6 6%	182.5 -3%	211.6 12%	224 ?(132.7 - 512, n=52) 19%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 663%
Random Read 4KB	142.4	142.5 0%	127.2 -11%	60.6 -57%	54.7 -62%	137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52) -4%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 95%
Random Write 4KB	155.5	14.3 -91%	114.1 -27%	84.1 -46%	19.62 -87%	84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52) -46%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 98%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.4 -4%		83.7 1%	82.2 -1%	68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33) -17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	52.5 -27%		62.7 -13%	62.3 -13%	52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33) -27%

PUBG Mobile
	Inställningar	Värde
	Smooth	32 fps
	HD	32 fps

Arena of Valor
	Inställningar	Värde
	min	55 fps
	high HD	54 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


41.3 °C	38.3 °C	39.6 °C
41.5 °C	38.6 °C	40.2 °C
40.2 °C	38.4 °C	39.5 °C

Max: 41.5 °C
Medel: 39.7 °C


36.1 °C	37.8 °C	39 °C
36.6 °C	38.3 °C	39.2 °C
37.1 °C	38.8 °C	39.7 °C

Max: 39.7 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 45.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastning	1.4 / 2.6 / 4.3 Watt
Hög belastning	6.5 / 8.2 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Play 3750 mAh	Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 970	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	27%	30%	33%	23%	24%
Idle Minimum *	1.4	0.83 41%	0.8 43%	1.3 7%	0.65 54%	0.978 ?(0.67 - 1.4, n=8) 30%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 36%
Idle Average *	2.6	2.11 19%	1.5 42%	2 23%	1.76 32%	2.12 ?(1.15 - 2.7, n=8) 18%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 44%
Idle Maximum *	4.3	2.24 48%	2.3 47%	2.7 37%	1.78 59%	2.51 ?(1.23 - 4.3, n=8) 42%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 62%
Load Average *	6.5	4.94 24%	4.8 26%	3.7 43%	4.47 31%	5.01 ?(2.47 - 6.5, n=8) 23%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -0%
Load Maximum *	8.2	9.08 -11%	10.1 -23%	5.1 38%	9.13 -11%	8.1 ?(2.49 - 11.5, n=8) 1%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -20%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		28tim 43min
WiFi Websurfing		11tim 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12tim 39min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 24min

	Honor Play 3750 mAh	Razer Phone 2017 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh
Battery Runtime		7%	6%	-15%	-9%
Reader / Idle	1723		1753 2%	1245 -28%	1703 -1%
H.264	759		747 -2%	648 -15%	706 -7%
WiFi v1.3	710	762 7%	711 0%	595 -16%	672 -5%
Load	204		253 24%	199 -2%	158 -23%

För

+ bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda

+ diskret hölje

+ kameran tar skarpa bilder

+ skärmen har bra färgåtergivning

+ exakt tryckkänslig skärm

+ snabb lagring

+ bra batteritid

Emot

- telefonen blir överhettad vid kraftig belastning

- fuskar på prestandatester

- överdrivna färger i kamerans AI-läge

- förinstallerad bloatware

- långsamt WiFi

Recenseras: Honor Play. Recensionsex från Honor Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Honor Play är inte gjord för hardcore-gamers som vill få ut så många bildrutor som möjligt ur sin smartphone. Den riktar sig åt en större grupp av mobila användare som letar efter en snygg enhet som även låter dem spelar krävande spel. Honor Play har lyckats uppfylla dess krav: Den har tillräckligt med prestanda, skärmen har god färgprecision, det finns ingen fördröjning när den reagerar på inmatning och den har lång batteritid.

Men förvänta dig inte allt för mycket från funktionerna som luktar marknadsföring: 3D-ljudeffekten för hörlurar är ganska kul, precis som vibrationsfunktionen i PUBG. Det sistnämnda är dock begränsat till enstaka spel för tillfället. Det återstår att se om fler spel kommer stödja funktionen i framtiden. Mjukvaran avger inte heller någon stark spelkänsla - Xiaomi och Razer visade mycket tydligare att det rörde sig om en dedikerad speltelefon.

Honor Play är en diskret spelsmartphone för genomsnittliga behov med ett bra förhållande mellan pris och prestanda.

Totalt sett lämnar detta oss med en riktigt bra mittenskikts-telefon som finns att köpa till ett bra pris, precis som förväntat från Honor. Alla gamers med vanliga krav som då och då vill spela ett mer krävande spel men inte bryr sig allt för mycket om grafiken bör bli nöjda med den här enheten. Om du letar efter ett 120 Hz-läge eller en flashigare speldesign får du leta lite mer. Å andra sidan är Honor Play mer diskret. Om du vill spel spel under ett tråkigt möte kan Honor Play vara ett bra val.

Honor Play - 09/14/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design

79%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

91%

Anslutningar

42 / 60 → 70%

Vikt

90%

Batteri

94%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

63 / 63 → 100%

Programprestanda

65 / 70 → 93%

Temperatur

80%

Ljudnivå

100%

Camera

76%

Medel

78%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Honor Play Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 2018-09-24 (Update: 2018-09-24)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Honor Play audio analysis

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison