Test: Huawei Mate 10 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 704 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2514:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.34
| Huawei Mate 10 IPS, 2560x1440, 5.9" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -45% | 6% | -69% | -12% | 9% | -58% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle | 704 | 696 -1% | 629 -11% | 470 -33% | 530 -25% | 560 -20% | 432 -39% | 415 -41% |
| Brightness | 692 | 680 -2% | 636 -8% | 445 -36% | 536 -23% | 562 -19% | 428 -38% | 420 -39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 93 -1% | 94 0% | 88 -6% | 93 -1% | 93 -1% | 87 -7% | 87 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.42 -50% | 0.22 21% | |||||
| Contrast | 2514 | 1657 -34% | 2136 -15% | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4.3 -79% | 1.7 29% | 5.5 -129% | 2.6 -8% | 1.7 29% | 4.18 -74% | 2.7 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 9.4 -124% | 3.6 14% | 11.9 -183% | 5.1 -21% | 3.4 19% | 8.53 -103% | 4.3 -2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 4.8 -71% | 2.4 14% | 7.6 -171% | 2.7 4% | 1.6 43% | 5.3 -89% | 3.3 -18% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.13 103% | 2.33 94% | 2.36 93% |
| CCT | 6423 101% | 7255 90% | 6337 103% | 7454 87% | 6206 105% | 6435 101% | 7487 87% | 6787 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | |||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC U Ultra (Chrome 56) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 (Chrome Version 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 | Huawei Mate 9 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | HTC U Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | LG V30 | Google Pixel 2 XL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -46% | 8% | -32% | -22% | -23% | -35% | -22% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 790 | 594 -25% | 732 -7% | 423.9 -46% | 797 1% | 788 0% | 669 -15% | 760 -4% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 201.7 | 142.9 -29% | 208.7 3% | 164.7 -18% | 205.9 2% | 194.2 -4% | 193.2 -4% | 195.3 -3% |
| Random Read 4KB | 169.7 | 94.7 -44% | 132.3 -22% | 84.2 -50% | 122.5 -28% | 127.2 -25% | 78.2 -54% | 170.6 1% |
| Random Write 4KB | 105.3 | 8.77 -92% | 164.4 56% | 13.7 -87% | 14.55 -86% | 15.27 -85% | 10.21 -90% | 17.84 -83% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80.6 ? | 54 ? -33% | 82.8 ? 3% | 67.9 ? -16% | 71.1 ? -12% | 62.8 -22% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.9 ? | 29.53 ? -53% | 67.6 ? 7% | 59.3 ? -6% | 57.2 ? -9% | 47.2 -25% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 29 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei Mate 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC U Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.03 / 0.22 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.89 / 2.31 / 2.38 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.87 / 9.16 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | 25% | -11% | 28% | 35% | 29% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.89 | 0.78 12% | 0.85 4% | 1 -12% | 0.73 18% | 0.68 24% | 0.72 19% | 1.28 -44% |
| Idle Average * | 2.31 | 2.13 8% | 1.15 50% | 2.41 -4% | 1.44 38% | 1.13 51% | 1.37 41% | 1.87 19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.38 | 2.17 9% | 1.23 48% | 2.46 -3% | 1.53 36% | 1.16 51% | 1.41 41% | 1.89 21% |
| Load Average * | 4.87 | 6.32 -30% | 4.12 15% | 6.8 -40% | 4.56 6% | 4.69 4% | 3.46 29% | 3.73 23% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.16 | 6.49 29% | 8.42 8% | 8.9 3% | 5.09 44% | 5.24 43% | 7.83 15% | 8.08 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei Mate 10 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 8 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | 12% | -25% | -29% | -10% | -3% | -12% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1671 | 1538 -8% | 1744 4% | 1568 -6% | 1134 -32% | 1565 -6% | 1914 15% | 1706 2% |
| H.264 | 1003 | 947 -6% | 929 -7% | 605 -40% | 662 -34% | 742 -26% | 822 -18% | 672 -33% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 865 | 758 -12% | 818 -5% | 546 -37% | 474 -45% | 736 -15% | 774 -11% | 581 -33% |
| Load | 259 | 219 -15% | 398 54% | 214 -17% | 246 -5% | 275 6% | 267 3% | 302 17% |
För
Emot
Huawei Mate 10 är en enastående smartphone. Dom få mindre krångligheterna – den (åtminstone i vårt fall) svajiga volymknappen, avsaknaden av en IP 67-certifiering, den kontextbaserade ljusstyrke-justeringen och efterbehandlingen för foton – förtar egentligen inte helhetskonceptet.
Den "vanliga" Mate 10 är onekligen den egentliga efterföljaren till den populära Mate 9. Som en av dom mest framstående sucéerna för 2017 så är denna smartphone verkligen värd att överväga – trots det faktum att den inte finns tillgänglig i Tyskland.
Vi måste erkänna att vi har kämpat med att förstå varför Huawei har valt att inte sälja den ordinarie Mate 10 i Tyskalnd och många andra länder. Denna "phablet" har en del fördelar framför Pro-versionen: Mate 10 kommer med en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning, använder QHD-upplösning och tillåter utökning av lagringen med SD-kort. På så sätt så borde den tilltala en bredare publik av användare. Tack vare 16:9-förhållandet så är denna 6-tums phablet ett verkligt alternativ i toppskikts-segmentet.
Huawei Mate 10
- 01/02/2018 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
