Test: Huawei MateBook 14 (i7-8565U, GeForce MX250) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 | |
| Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 401.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 956:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.36
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Chi Mei CMN8C02, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 3000x2000 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -3% | 0% | -4% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.6 | 65.9 -1% | 64.7 -3% | 67.5 1% | 64.7 -3% | 64.3 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.8 | 95.2 -3% | 94.3 -4% | 95.8 -2% | 93.1 -5% | 94.6 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 67.6 -1% | 66 -3% | 69 1% | 65.3 -4% | 66.2 -3% |
| Response Times | 0% | -4% | -8% | -43% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 40.4 ? -6% | 36.8 ? 3% | 47.2 ? -24% | 58 ? -53% | 40.8 ? -7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 25.6 ? 6% | 30 ? -10% | 24.8 ? 9% | 36 ? -32% | 27.6 ? -1% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 9% | -6% | 21% | 1% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle | 401.7 | 442.7 10% | 333.8 -17% | 466 16% | 404 1% | 316 -21% |
| Brightness | 386 | 428 11% | 307 -20% | 462 20% | 389 1% | 291 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 84 -12% | 83 -13% | 90 -5% | 85 -11% | 83 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.31 26% | 0.4 5% | 0.33 21% | 0.37 12% | 0.36 14% |
| Contrast | 956 | 1428 49% | 835 -13% | 1412 48% | 1092 14% | 878 -8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.11 | 2.24 45% | 3.54 14% | 1.93 53% | 3.72 9% | 5.9 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.93 | 7.19 19% | 5.8 35% | 4.26 52% | 7.38 17% | 12.9 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.36 | 1.11 18% | 2.36 -74% | 1.99 -46% | 2.06 -51% | 1.3 4% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 9.7 -59% | 4.7 23% | 1.7 72% | 4.44 27% | 8.6 -41% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 1.42 155% | 2.14 103% | 2.15 102% | 2.34 94% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 7222 90% | 6227 104% | 6261 104% | 6382 102% | 7095 92% | 6854 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.7 | 61.6 -2% | 61.2 -2% | 62.2 -1% | 60 -4% | 60.7 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.6 | 95 -4% | 94.7 -4% | 95.7 -3% | 93 -6% | 94.5 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
6% | -4% /
-5% | 4% /
13% | -15% /
-6% | -8% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3612 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4796 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4205 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -25% | -70% | -45% | -15% | -55% | |
| Seq Read | 1225 | 2416 97% | 476.1 -61% | 2035 66% | 1224 0% | 1850 51% |
| Seq Write | 1386 | 1170 -16% | 487.4 -65% | 658 -53% | 907 -35% | 661 -52% |
| 4K Read | 56.4 | 48.33 -14% | 30.57 -46% | 39.74 -30% | 41.46 -26% | 38.04 -33% |
| 4K Write | 137.6 | 103.1 -25% | 66.1 -52% | 105.7 -23% | 126.2 -8% | 95 -31% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1190 | 1039 -13% | 352.9 -70% | 461 -61% | 1021 -14% | 434.3 -64% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1377 | 399.6 -71% | 263.1 -81% | 300.1 -78% | 1251 -9% | 266.3 -81% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.058 -26% | 0.092 -100% | 0.061 -33% | 0.053 -15% | 0.069 -50% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.036 -38% | 0.055 -112% | 0.051 -96% | 0.027 -4% | 0.056 -115% |
| Score Read | 1369 | 1329 -3% | 431 -69% | 704 -49% | 1185 -13% | 657 -52% |
| Score Write | 1653 | 620 -62% | 378 -77% | 471 -72% | 1468 -11% | 427 -74% |
| Score Total | 3743 | 2575 -31% | 1040 -72% | 1479 -60% | 3250 -13% | 1373 -63% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1837 | 739 -60% | 514 -72% | 893 -51% | 1404 -24% | 539 -71% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 473.6 | 312.3 -34% | 259.3 -45% | 287.9 -39% | 402.4 -15% | 209.7 -56% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1216 | 486.3 -60% | 521 -57% | 618 -49% | 902 -26% | 340 -72% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4681 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13455 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3350 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1240 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 | |
| Asus GL552JX-CN154H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (39 - 46.2, n=5) | |
| Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN | |
| Asus VivoBook S410UQ-NH74 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64.5 | 36.5 | 21 | 11.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 74.9 | 43.7 | 24.1 | 19.4 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 171.7 | 122.5 | 58 | 35 |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | 3% | -1% | 3% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 27.9 1% | 28.2 -0% | 28.1 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 28.4 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 27.9 1% | 28.4 -1% | 28.1 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 28.5 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.1 | 27.9 1% | 28.4 -1% | 28.1 -0% | 29.3 -4% | 29 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.7 | 27.9 6% | 28.4 4% | 29 2% | 29.7 -0% | 29.1 2% |
| Load Average * | 31.2 | 36.2 -16% | 35.7 -14% | 41.1 -32% | 31.8 -2% | 42.8 -37% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.5 | 45 -1% | 41.1 8% | 41.4 7% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 45.2 5% | 34.2 28% | 41.1 13% | 32.7 31% | 41.6 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.1 / 28.1 / 29.7 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 31.2 / 47.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-8.5 °C / -15.3 F).
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.39 / 0.79 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.7 / 9.3 / 12.8 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
58.8 / 65 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 40% | 18% | 21% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.5 5% | 2.7 27% | 3.4 8% | 3.3 11% | 6.7 -81% |
| Idle Average * | 9.3 | 8.9 4% | 6 35% | 6.3 32% | 6.8 27% | 8.6 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.8 | 12.3 4% | 6.5 49% | 10.4 19% | 9.5 26% | 9.4 27% |
| Load Average * | 58.8 | 54.2 8% | 32.5 45% | 51 13% | 40.8 31% | 64.1 -9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.8 | 42.4 24% | 39 30% | 63.7 -14% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 65 | 52.1 20% | 35.5 45% | 62.7 4% | 57 12% | 64.1 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 57.4 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 7% | 48% | 0% | 4% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1435 | 1243 -13% | 2238 56% | 1032 -28% | 1710 19% | 1432 0% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 503 | 557 11% | 720 43% | 498 -1% | 506 1% | 550 9% |
| Load | 109 | 133 22% | 159 46% | 141 29% | 99 -9% | 124 14% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
MateBook 13 får Microsoft Surface Laptop att se utdaterad ut. För runt samma pris är detta onekligen den bästa 3:2-datorn i fråga om funktioner, konstruktionskvalitet, skärm och i synnerhet grafikprestanda. Om kombinationen av ett unikt bildförhållande och en relativt högpresterande GPU är tilltalande så är MateBook 14 för dig.
Om du däremot i huvudsak ska spela upp multimedia eller spela spel snarare än syssla med ordbehandling och surfande så passar en mer traditionell 16:9-Ultrabook med Thunderbolt 3-anslutning såsom Asus ZenBook S13 UX392 eller Razer Blade Stealth troligen bättre. MX250-kortet som sitter i MateBook 14 är knappt bättre än MX150-kortet som sitter i MateBook 13 och processorn har fortfarande svag Turbo Boost.
MateBook X Pro som släpps under 2019 kommer ha exakt samma kombination av CPU och GPU som MateBook 14 men i ett ännu tunnare hölje med fler USB Typ C-portar och en mer högupplöst tryckkänslig skärm. Nackdelen är förstås att den kommer att hamna i ett högre prisspann på 16.000 - 20.000 kronor istället för de 15.000 kronor som MateBook 14 kostar. Om du tycker att MateBook X Pro låter tilltalande men är tveksam till det höga priset bör du ta en titt på MateBook 14. Vi rekommenderar SKU:n med Core i5-8265U framför den med i7-8565U eftersom CPU-prestandan ändå kommer vara nästan identisk.
En Core i7-8565U CPU och en GeForce MX250 GPU på 25W erbjuder ganska lite jämfört med den kombination av en Core i7-8550U och ett GeForce MX150 på 25W som satt i MateBook 13. Även om detta är en av de bästa Ultrabook-modellerna med en 3:2-skärm som finns på marknaden så skulle den definitivt kunna vara ännu bättre när det kommer till portar, klickplattans återkoppling och webbkamerans placering.
Huawei MateBook 14 KLV-W29
- 05/06/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
