Test: Huawei MatePad Pro (5G) 10.8 - Ett Android-alternativ till Apple iPad Pro 11? (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % | 08/2020 | Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16 | 460 g | 7.2 mm | 10.80" | 2560x1600 | |
90.4 % | 04/2020 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU | 471 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
87.8 % | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 SD 855, Adreno 640 | 420 g | 5.7 mm | 10.50" | 2560x1600 | |
83.1 % | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 |
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/6/c/csm_Foto_MatePadPro_ColorChecker_e817e30250.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/f/f/csm_Foto_MatePadPro_ColorChecker_1Lux_9edb7cca66.jpg)
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 606 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1894:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 22% | 3% | -29% | |
Brightness middle | 606 | 617 2% | 446 -26% | 503 -17% |
Brightness | 579 | 585 1% | 445 -23% | 477 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 86 -3% | 91 2% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.36 -13% | 0.29 9% | |
Contrast | 1894 | 1714 -10% | 1734 -8% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 0.94 68% | 2.7 7% | 4.4 -52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 1.87 69% | 5.4 10% | 10.4 -73% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 1.4 67% | 2.1 51% | 7.5 -74% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.156 102% | 2.05 107% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 7272 89% | 6733 97% | 6468 100% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23810 Hz | ≤ 38 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 38 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (409039 - 483224, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (55.1 - 65.9, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (101.2 - 115.5, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Average of class Tablet (64.6 - 135.7, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (97 - 119, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (63.9 - 74.1, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (19885 - 23568, n=2) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 (Chrome 77.0.3865.116) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990 (1963 - 2345, n=2) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80) |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -34% | -6% | -15% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1789 | 1416 -21% | 483.7 -73% | 1547 ? -14% | 904 ? -49% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 399 | 522 31% | 219.3 -45% | 575 ? 44% | 586 ? 47% |
Random Read 4KB | 224.6 | 191.6 -15% | 119.8 -47% | 210 ? -7% | 177.1 ? -21% |
Random Write 4KB | 262.4 | 170.2 -35% | 195.8 -25% | 188.5 ? -28% | 167.4 ? -36% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.4 ? | 70.5 ? -14% | 78.3 ? -5% | 70.6 ? -14% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.7 ? | 54.5 ? -24% | 65.3 ? -9% | 59.8 ? -17% |
PUBG Compare
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Låg belastning | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hög belastning |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | 11% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.98 | 1.3 34% | 1.96 1% | 1.21 39% |
Idle Average * | 5.66 | 3.5 38% | 2.8 51% | 4.24 25% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.69 | 5.6 2% | 2.82 50% | 4.34 24% |
Load Average * | 6.96 | 12.5 -80% | 5.31 24% | 6.99 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 6.98 | 19.2 -175% | 11.91 -71% | 8.79 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 7250 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 7538 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 SM-T860 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | -7% | 10% | |
Reader / Idle | 1877 | 2001 7% | 1276 -32% | 2120 13% |
H.264 | 909 | 936 3% | 872 -4% | 950 5% |
WiFi v1.3 | 891 | 902 1% | 556 -38% | 792 -11% |
Load | 233 | 197 -15% | 340 46% | 309 33% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - MatePad Pro är en lyxig specialsurfplatta
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Det är i princip omöjligt att ge ett generellt omdöme för Huaweis surfplatta eftersom den saknar Googles tjänster och Widevine L1-certifiering - här är det individuella preferenser och vad man vill använda den till som avgör. Multimedia-älskare bör känna till att den är dålig på att spela upp DRM-skyddat innehåll. Så fort en testenhet med tysk mjukvara når oss ska vi förtydliga huruvida detta även gäller den tyska versionen.
Att den saknar Googles tjänster gör att det blir svårt att använda Googles appar och leder till problem med en del appar från tredje part. Det går att installera appar från externa källor, men det kan innebära en säkerhetsrisk för ovana användare och det är inte heller alltid vana användare förstår hur APK-filer från externa källor interagerar med deras system.
Trots detta har MatePad Pro ett högtalarsystem som låter bra, lång batteritid och skaplig prestanda. Dessutom har den riktigt hög konstruktionskvalitet och funktioner som man sällan hittar på surfplattor, exempelvis trådlös laddning och omvänd trådlös laddning.
Men MatePad Pros hårdvara är inte bortom kritik. Med tanke på priset borde plattan komma med möjlighet till säker biometrisk upplåsning samt en tillräckligt kraftfull nätadapter på 40 Watt. Vidare kan en lyxig platta antingen ha en OLED-skärm eller en IPS-skärm med hög bilduppdateringsfrekvens som iPad Pro. Att man valt att använda LC-teknik med tillhörande svagheter (moln-effekt, betraktningsvinklarna) i kombination med ett kamerahål (som kastar skuggor) lär inte göra skärm-fans nöjda.
MatePad Pro är en vacker surfplatta, men generellt sett kan vi inte rekommendera den åt de flesta användarna.
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
-
07/06/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich