Test: Huawei MatePad T8 - Är surfplattan för 1.000 kronor värd pengarna? (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Huawei MatePad T8 Helio MT8768, PowerVR GE8320 | 310 g | 8.55 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 80.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 80.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 MT8168, Mali-G52 MP1 | 355 g | 9.7 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320 | 305 g | 8.2 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 79.6 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 SD 429, Adreno 504 | 345 g | 8 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleLow-light photography4X zoomWide-angle
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 331 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2069:1 (Svärta: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei MatePad T8 LCD, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Lenovo Tab M8 HD IPS, 1280x800, 8" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 TFT, 1280x800, 8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 10% | 12% | -7% | -33% | |
| Brightness middle | 331 | 490 48% | 501 51% | 379 15% | 377 14% |
| Brightness | 326 | 447 37% | 463 42% | 346 6% | 372 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 88 -4% | 85 -8% | 88 -4% | 87 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.23 -44% | 0.25 -56% | 0.21 -31% | 0.29 -81% |
| Contrast | 2069 | 2130 3% | 2004 -3% | 1805 -13% | 1300 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 4 2% | 3.6 12% | 3.8 7% | 6.1 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.2 | 8.3 -15% | 8.4 -17% | 7.5 -4% | 10.9 -51% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 2 49% | 1 74% | 5 -28% | 6.6 -69% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.29 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 7355 88% | 6618 98% | 6473 100% | 7514 87% | 7861 83% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 () | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 19, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10 - 12, n=3) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (7 - 13, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (6.9 - 8.3, n=3) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (89714 - 91467, n=2) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (14 - 23.3, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (22.1 - 23, n=2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (24 - 39, n=4) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (13.3 - 17.3, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (4070 - 6281, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 (Huawei Browser 10.1.4 ) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Average Mediatek MT8768 (10163 - 12342, n=4) | |
| Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 (Silk Browser) | |
| Lenovo Tab M8 HD (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 (Chrome 79) | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad T8 | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 | Lenovo Tab M8 HD | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 15% | 16% | 12% | 17% | -41% | 655% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 274.1 | 314.2 15% | 315 15% | 297.1 8% | 291.9 6% | 164.5 ? -40% | 1045 ? 281% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 67.4 | 100.2 49% | 103.9 54% | 79.6 18% | 108.5 61% | 43 ? -36% | 684 ? 915% |
| Random Read 4KB | 57.5 | 69.1 20% | 67.6 18% | 77.4 35% | 57.8 1% | 21.7 ? -62% | 189.2 ? 229% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.63 | 15.62 7% | 15.72 7% | 15.84 8% | 16.89 15% | 8.08 ? -45% | 189.5 ? 1195% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.9 ? | 84.9 ? 2% | 84.1 ? 1% | 83.8 ? 1% | 87.1 ? 5% | 59.1 ? -29% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.4 ? | 61.5 ? -1% | 62 ? -1% | 64.3 ? 3% | 69.9 ? 12% | 39.8 ? -36% |
PUBG Mobile
Real Racing 3
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Huawei MatePad T8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M8 HD audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.17 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.68 / 2.24 / 2.27 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.06 / 4.45 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MatePad T8 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -19% | -23% | 10% | -8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.68 | 0.74 -9% | 0.72 -6% | 0.66 3% | 0.62 9% |
| Idle Average * | 2.24 | 2.81 -25% | 2.97 -33% | 2.15 4% | 2.68 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.27 | 2.83 -25% | 2.99 -32% | 2.18 4% | 2.7 -19% |
| Load Average * | 3.06 | 3.73 -22% | 4.02 -31% | 2.48 19% | 3.61 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.45 | 4.97 -12% | 5.1 -15% | 3.49 22% | 4 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MatePad T8 5100 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 Plus 2020 4850 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 8 2020 4850 mAh | Lenovo Tab M8 HD 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2019 Wifi SM-T290 5100 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -8% | -8% | 30% | -1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2393 | 2661 11% | 3581 50% | 3132 31% | |
| H.264 | 1137 | 949 -17% | 1696 49% | 934 -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 949 | 869 -8% | 902 -5% | 1124 18% | 831 -12% |
| Load | 359 | 286 -20% | 374 4% | 342 -5% |
För
Emot
Omdöme: MatePad T8 - Huaweis lösningar lyckas inte kompensera för att den saknar Googles Play-tjänsterna
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
T8 är riktigt konkurrenskraftig när det kommer till prestanda, konstruktionskvalitet och batteritid. WiFi-modulen i Huaweis platta lyckades dessutom få topp-poäng i vårt WiFi-test. För ett litet prispåslag om 200 kronor går det dessutom att få en version med ett LTE-modem.
IPS-panelen har relativt stabila betraktningsvinklar och färgåtergivningen är på en bra nivå för en surfplatta som kostar 1.000 kronor. Men skärmen är inte tillräckligt ljusstark för att kunna användas utomhus en solig dag. Huruvida någon enhet borde komma med 2 GB RAM och 16 GB eMMC-minne 2020 kan diskuteras. Däremot borde i vårt tycke ingen enhet komma med en microUSB-port och en laddare på 5 watt.
På grund av Google-situationen är det väldigt svårt att komma fram till en slutsats rörande den billiga MatePad T8. Det är inga problem att titta på YouTube-filmer, surfa på nätet eller läsa PDF-filer med T8. Appar som inte behöver Google Play-tjänsterna fungerar bra. Men om dina favoritappar behöver Google Play-tjänsterna är det inte mycket att göra. Vidare har Huaweis AppGallery inte något särskilt stort utbud av appar.
Huawei lyckas inte kompensera för att många användare nog kommer sakna Google Play-tjänsterna på deras billiga surfplatta. T8 har heller inte några avgörande egenskaper som får den att stå ut från mängden.
Huawei MatePad T8
- 09/18/2020 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Price comparison
