Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Surround-ljud.

Huawei har utrustat MediaPad M5 lite med fyra högtalare som är certifierade av harman/kardon. Man får en tjusig surfplatta från mittenskiktet med LTE-stöd. I vår recension får du reda på vad mer du kan förvänta dig av denna surfplatta för ca 3.500 kronor.
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (MediaPad M5 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 659 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Minne
3 GB 
Skärm
10.10 tum 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixlar 224 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 256 GB), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: g-sensor, närhetssensor, Hallsensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B5/B6/B8/B19), LTE FDD/TDD (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B40/B41), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 243.4 x 162.2
Batteri
7500 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix autofokus
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix fast fokus
Övrigt
Högtalare: 4 högtalare, harman/kardon, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-laddare, USB Typ C-kabel, SIM-verktyg, EMUI 8.0, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde (kropp): 1.01 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
475 g, Strömförsörjning: 78 g
Pris
330 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Storleksjämförelse

267 mm 169.2 mm 8.9 mm 531 g262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g247 mm 173 mm 7.1 mm 475 g243.4 mm 162.2 mm 7.7 mm 475 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
263 MBit/s +383%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s +340%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s +335%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s +317%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
350 MBit/s +577%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s +407%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s +366%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s +314%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 lite

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite - Testkarta
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite - Testkarta (detalj)
529
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
439
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 546 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 492.2 cd/m² Minimum: 4.26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 514 cd/m²
Kontrast: 535:1 (Svärta: 0.96 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.216
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8"
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Screen
47%
-3%
38%
26%
Brightness middle
514
382
-26%
340
-34%
443
-14%
426
-17%
Brightness
492
378
-23%
320
-35%
428
-13%
399
-19%
Brightness Distribution
80
92
15%
84
5%
94
18%
91
14%
Black Level *
0.96
0.24
75%
0.19
80%
0.36
62%
0.38
60%
Contrast
535
1592
198%
1789
234%
1231
130%
1121
110%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.42
2.8
48%
15
-177%
3.3
39%
4.5
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.84
6
39%
22.8
-132%
7.2
27%
7.9
20%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.5
3.5
46%
4
38%
2.9
55%
5.2
20%
Gamma
2.216 99%
2.33 94%
2.09 105%
2.27 97%
2.23 99%
CCT
6780 96%
6903 94%
6940 94%
6961 93%
6875 95%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points +120%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points +18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
66863 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (62810 - 68232, n=8)
65730 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
62725 Points -6%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (81992 - 89639, n=6)
87019 Points 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
86908 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points -11%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (5704 - 6252, n=7)
5956 Points
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
5648 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
Points
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points +8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4615 - 4911, n=8)
4805 Points +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
4719 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4626 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points -22%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points +203%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points +27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1334 - 1480, n=8)
1418 Points +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1389 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1281 Points -8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points -27%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points +136%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3214 Points +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3080 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2899 - 3223, n=8)
3056 Points -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points -8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points -36%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points +150%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points +36%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1948 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1757 - 2011, n=8)
1910 Points -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
972 Points -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points -50%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points +997%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points +92%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1015 Points +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (836 - 859, n=8)
848 Points +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
836 Points
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points 0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points -16%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
850 Points +15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (724 - 919, n=8)
819 Points +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points +9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
742 Points
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (745 - 9443, n=15, last 2 years)
3721 Points +296%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points +74%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
940 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (869 - 946, n=8)
919 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
868 Points -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1418 - 30983, n=15, last 2 years)
10683 Points +181%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points +53%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
4323 Points +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3805 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3316 - 3805, n=8)
3608 Points -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points -35%
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points +268%
Average of class Tablet (2128 - 10799, n=7, last 2 years)
7758 Points +146%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3235 Points +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3148 Points
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2772 - 3148, n=8)
3045 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points -50%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points +128%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13742 Points +17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points +12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11791 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (10294 - 12278, n=8)
11543 Points -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points +208%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
13239 Points +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points +12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
11419 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (9936 - 11713, n=8)
11066 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
15850 Points +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points +10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (11780 - 14930, n=8)
13618 Points +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
13310 Points
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (507 - 5864, n=18, last 2 years)
2615 Points +1992%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points +1372%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points +643%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
852 Points +582%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points +446%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (125 - 627, n=8)
347 Points +178%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
125 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (454 - 6698, n=18, last 2 years)
2648 Points +2575%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points +1636%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points +793%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
731 Points +638%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points +504%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (99 - 532, n=8)
288 Points +191%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
99 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Average of class Tablet (863 - 4085, n=18, last 2 years)
2806 Points +60%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
2031 Points +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1758 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1586 - 1788, n=8)
1707 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points -23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (361 - 14235, n=47, last 2 years)
2050 Points +751%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points +581%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points +150%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points +103%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
464 Points +93%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (176 - 409, n=8)
308 Points +28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
241 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (290 - 24605, n=47, last 2 years)
2176 Points +1027%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points +679%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points +189%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points +114%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
381 Points +97%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (140 - 338, n=8)
251 Points +30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
193 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet (858 - 5751, n=47, last 2 years)
2796 Points +60%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
1991 Points +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
1744 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (1527 - 1827, n=8)
1696 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points -22%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years)
63.9 fps +236%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
20 fps +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
19 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.4 fps -3%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps -11%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years)
187.6 fps +838%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps +380%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
23 fps +15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps +10%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
20 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (16 - 20, n=8)
18.8 fps -6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (8.1 - 122, n=67, last 2 years)
52.1 fps +506%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps +202%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps +10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.2 fps +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.6 fps
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (6.7 - 8.9, n=8)
8.28 fps -4%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (7.3 - 530, n=67, last 2 years)
108.9 fps +1138%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps +400%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps +13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
9.8 fps +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
8.8 fps
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (7.3 - 8.8, n=8)
8.31 fps -6%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.8 - 120, n=67, last 2 years)
39.4 fps +643%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps +183%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6 fps +13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.3 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4.5 - 5.6, n=8)
5.04 fps -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps -11%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (5 - 400, n=67, last 2 years)
78.2 fps +1348%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps +233%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
6.4 fps +19%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
5.4 fps
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (3.2 - 5.4, n=8)
4.81 fps -11%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 117.9, n=66, last 2 years)
24.6 fps +720%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps +233%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.3 fps +10%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.7 - 3.3, n=8)
2.96 fps -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps -33%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.2 - 284, n=66, last 2 years)
46.4 fps +1350%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps +463%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
3.5 fps +9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
3.2 fps
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (2.9 - 3.2, n=8)
3.06 fps -4%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps -6%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps -37%

Legend

 
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points +429%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points +64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points +58%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points +26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
5412 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (4191 - 5471, n=8)
4947 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
4502 Points -17%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points +14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
120 Points
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (86 - 120, n=8)
103.6 Points -14%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
93 Points -22%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.34 Points +60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points +57%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.13 Points +22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
29.6 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (23.4 - 31.3, n=8)
28.1 Points -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
25.76 Points -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average HiSilicon Kirin 659 (8684 - 10788, n=8)
9440 ms * -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67)
9249 ms *
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)
9237 ms * -0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3976 ms * +57%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * +59%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756 ms * +59%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei MediaPad M5 liteHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Lenovo Tab 4 10 PlusAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-38%
-16%
-30%
-25%
317%
Sequential Read 256KB
308.1
247.8
-20%
173.7
-44%
270.1
-12%
262.2
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB
82.6
126.8
54%
92.4
12%
135.5
64%
147.7
79%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
22%
Random Read 4KB
73.5
54.7
-26%
13.7
-81%
37.3
-49%
27.72
-62%
Random Write 4KB
77.3
60.8
-21%
8.77
-89%
11.8
-85%
9.37
-88%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-71%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
80.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
83.9
0%
55.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-34%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
56.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
61.1
-16%
30.14 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-27%
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 30.3 °C35.4 °C30.8 °C 
 29.1 °C30.5 °C31.2 °C 
 29.1 °C29.5 °C30.1 °C 
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C
31.2 °C33.7 °C30.8 °C
30.5 °C31.2 °C30.6 °C
30.3 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C
Max: 33.7 °C
Medel: 31 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  39.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.3362525.634.83125.7364027.428.1503735.56323.328.68021.431.510021.734.712519.942.716017.448.72001756.725016.45931514.558.740014.26350014.160.563012.655.680012.557.610001258.3125011.863.3160011.669.6200011.469.3250011.369.9315011.470.9400011.171.6500011.270.4630011.369.5800011.269.41000011.359.81250011.359.41600011.349.5SPL65.56767.167.365.824.180.5N18.919.520.221.617.80.646.7median 12median 59.8median 43.6median 44.5median 41.8median 12.3median 63.6Delta4.59.523.422.82411.816.928.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.76.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MediaPad M5 liteHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 2.8 / 3.3 / 3.9 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Power Consumption
-40%
-56%
8%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
2.8
2.01
28%
3.21
-15%
1.23
56%
1.55
45%
Idle Average *
3.3
5.4
-64%
5.97
-81%
3.92
-19%
4.17
-26%
Idle Maximum *
3.9
5.44
-39%
6.19
-59%
4.03
-3%
4.25
-9%
Load Average *
5.2
8.55
-64%
9.72
-87%
5
4%
7.13
-37%
Load Maximum *
7.2
11.53
-60%
9.97
-38%
7.09
2%
9.63
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
36tim 02min
WiFi Websurfing
14tim 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 34min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 59min
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite
7500 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
7000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-54%
-20%
-34%
Reader / Idle
2162
1344
-38%
735
-66%
1625
-25%
960
-56%
H.264
934
702
-25%
795
-15%
585
-37%
WiFi v1.3
852
648
-24%
387
-55%
647
-24%
542
-36%
Load
299
196
-34%
175
-41%
256
-14%
274
-8%

För

+ stabilt hölje
+ bra systemprestanda
+ kompatibel med stylus
+ USB Typ C
+ stödjer LTE

Emot

- skärm med låg kontrast
- medelmåttig kamera
- appar kan inte lagras på SD-kort
Recenseras: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany
Recenseras: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite. Recensionsex från Huawei Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

MediaPad M5 lite gjorde bra ifrån sig i vår recension. Den har tillräckligt med systemprestanda för de flesta vardagsuppgifter och har även reserver kvar för mer krävande applikationer. Det går även att spela moderna spel på den här enheten, även om man kanske får nöja sig med genomsnittliga grafikinställningar.

MediaPad M5 lite kan på många sätt hålla jämna steg med sitt storasyskon. Dess största svagheter är skärmen och kamerorna.

Huwei har utrustat MediaPad M5 lite riktigt bra med tanke på priset på 3.500 kronor. Den har ett stort batteri, en fingeravtrycksläsare, LTE samt en bra SD-kortläsare. Men man får acceptera en kamera av låg kvalitet med jämförelsevis låg upplösning samt de begränsade lagringsalternativen. Då det inte går att lagra appar på microSD-kort är app-lagringen begränsad till 32 GB och skärmens låga kontrast kanske inte passar alla.

Huawei MediaPad M5 lite - 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
83 / 98 → 85%
Tangentbord
71 / 80 → 89%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
42 / 70 → 60%
Vikt
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
81%
Spelprestanda
6 / 78 → 7%
Programprestanda
46 / 92 → 50%
Temperatur
95%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
80 / 91 → 88%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Medel
70%
81%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei MediaPad M5 lite Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-10- 2 (Update: 2018-10- 2)