Test: Huawei P20 Pro Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 569 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.31
| Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -38% | -4% | -38% | -64% | -136% | -39% | -55% | |
| Brightness middle | 569 | 568 0% | 600 5% | 565 -1% | 415 -27% | 432 -24% | 425 -25% | 361 -37% |
| Brightness | 578 | 562 -3% | 606 5% | 571 -1% | 420 -27% | 428 -26% | 423 -27% | 356 -38% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 92 -3% | 94 -1% | 96 1% | 87 -8% | 87 -8% | 92 -3% | 90 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.21 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.4 -85% | 1.2 8% | 2.3 -77% | 2.7 -108% | 4.18 -222% | 2.1 -62% | 2.5 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 3.8 -81% | 3 -43% | 4.8 -129% | 4.3 -105% | 8.53 -306% | 3.4 -62% | 5.3 -152% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.5 -56% | 1.6 -0% | 1.9 -19% | 3.3 -106% | 5.3 -231% | 2.5 -56% | 1.7 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.31 95% | 2.37 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6401 102% | 6779 96% | 6707 97% | 6332 103% | 6787 96% | 7487 87% | 6455 101% | 6580 99% |
| Contrast | 1321 | 1719 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (21.5 - 25.9, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| HTC U11 Plus | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (788 - 887, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro | Huawei P10 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | OnePlus 5T | Google Pixel 2 XL | LG V30 | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -2% | -24% | -26% | -20% | -41% | 8% | 241% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 832 | 733 -12% | 819 -2% | 699 -16% | 760 -9% | 669 -20% | 760 ? -9% | 1887 ? 127% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 196.7 | 182.6 -7% | 204.9 4% | 203.4 3% | 195.3 -1% | 193.2 -2% | 297 ? 51% | 1471 ? 648% |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 173.1 20% | 129.7 -10% | 138.1 -4% | 170.6 18% | 78.2 -46% | 152.9 ? 6% | 278 ? 93% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.5 | 149.8 -7% | 22.74 -86% | 20 -88% | 17.84 -89% | 10.21 -94% | 131.6 ? -18% | 311 ? 94% |
| Real Racing 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 51 fps | ||
| World of Tanks Blitz | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high, 0xAA, 0xAF | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.28 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.84 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
2.47 / 2.49 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -132% | -21% | -66% | -55% | -74% | -44% | -88% | -93% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.84 | 1.03 -23% | 0.68 19% | 1.03 -23% | 0.51 39% | 1.28 -52% | 0.72 14% | 0.978 ? -16% | 0.88 ? -5% |
| Idle Average * | 1.54 | 2.61 -69% | 0.95 38% | 2.4 -56% | 1.62 -5% | 1.87 -21% | 1.37 11% | 2.12 ? -38% | 1.444 ? 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.83 -80% | 1.09 31% | 2.6 -66% | 1.87 -19% | 1.89 -20% | 1.41 10% | 2.51 ? -60% | 1.6 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 2.47 | 7.03 -185% | 4.58 -85% | 2.96 -20% | 3.92 -59% | 3.73 -51% | 3.46 -40% | 5.01 ? -103% | 6.57 ? -166% |
| Load Maximum * | 2.49 | 10.08 -305% | 5.16 -107% | 6.6 -165% | 8.27 -232% | 8.08 -224% | 7.83 -214% | 8.1 ? -225% | 9.91 ? -298% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | -24% | -16% | -29% | -12% | -1% | -6% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1727 | 1655 -4% | 1343 -22% | 1625 -6% | 1292 -25% | 1706 -1% | 1914 11% | 1754 2% | 1744 1% |
| H.264 | 784 | 756 -4% | 674 -14% | 611 -22% | 634 -19% | 672 -14% | 822 5% | 799 2% | 929 18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 744 | 760 2% | 521 -30% | 607 -18% | 564 -24% | 581 -22% | 774 4% | 718 -3% | 818 10% |
| Load | 345 | 174 -50% | 237 -31% | 291 -16% | 180 -48% | 302 -12% | 267 -23% | 257 -26% | 398 15% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Huawei P20 Pro är en utmärkt smartphone. P20 Pro är i huvudsak baserad på Mate 10 Pro, och den sistnämnda gör en del saker bättre än P20 Pro. Mate 10 Pro har en estetiskt sett mer tilltalande design, längre batteritid och bättre samtalskvalitet för 2 500 kronor mindre, vid skrivande stund. Den stora fördelen med P20 Pro är dess Leica-trippelkamera, som fullständigt krossar Mate 10 Pro och all konkurrens.
Huawei har satt en ny standard för mobil fotografering med sin Leica-trippelkamera. P20 Pro är den enhet som alla andra smartphone-kameror nu kommer jämföras med.
Huawei P20 Pro har även lyxig hårdvara utöver den enastående kameran. Kirin 970 är en snabb SoC, det finns rikligt med intern lagring, en snabb USB-port, kvickt MIMO WiFi, IP67-certifiering, stark LTE-prestanda och stöd för aptX HD. Allt det här kommer med ett rejält batteri på 4,000 mAh och en imponerande skärm. Det finns dock några nackdelar som är värda att nämna. P20 Pro kunde ha presterat bättre på 2.4 Ghz WiFi och vi hade gärna sett både en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning och utökningsbar lagring. Vi förväntade oss också en 1,440p-skärm på en enhet för det här priset släppt under 2018.
Trots detta så skiner kvaliteten hos Leica-trippelkameran igenom. P20 Pro tar inte bara utmärkta bilder utan mjukvaran är tillräckligt flexibel för att ta imponerande bilder oavsett vad du använder den till, till och med vid låg belysning. Videoinspelningen kunde ha varit bättre, men det är en petitess. Som exempel så kan P20 Pro inte spela in Ultra HD i 60 FPS och Full HD i 60 FPS är heller inte så imponerande även om prestandan har förbättrats jämfört med föregångaren. Totalt sett har P20 Pro för tillfället den bästa kameran hos någon smartphone.
Huawei P20 Pro
- 04/19/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
