Test: Huawei P9 (sammanfattning)

Name: Huawei P9
Brand: Huawei

Nu med Leica. Huawei lägger allt krut på kameran i uppföljaren till P8, men levererar återigen ett imponerande helhetspaket. Det nya flaggskeppet håller ännu högre kvalitet och batteriet är större. Men det finns fortfarande utrymme för förbättringar.

Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum, Published 05/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P9 (P9 Serie)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 955 8 x 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-T880 MP4

Minne

3 GB

, LPDDR4

Skärm

5.20 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, 10 punkter, IPS-NEO, JDI, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 23.22 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Headset, Kortläsare: Micro-SD max. 128 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, rotationssensor, accelerometer och G-sensor, digital kompass, Wifi Direct, OTG, Miracast

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8 och 19), LTE Cat. 6 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39 och 40), LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 6.95 x 145 x 70.9

Batteri

11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumpolymer, 3.82 volt, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 33 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 18 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 526 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 566 tim

Operativsystem

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dubbel-kamera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, 2-tons LED-blixt, Full HD-video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)

Övrigt

Högtalare: mono , Tangentbord: virtuellt, headset, EMUI 4.1, phone manager, HiCare, health, designs, spegel, kompass, röstinspelning, memo, 36 Månader Garanti, USB Typ-C, fanless

Vikt

144 g, Strömförsörjning: 64 g

Pris

569 Kr

Länkar

Huawei hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


531 cd/m²	548 cd/m²	572 cd/m²
553 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	578 cd/m²
556 cd/m²	573 cd/m²	570 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 582 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 562.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.89 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 582 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1532:1 (Svärta: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Huawei P8 IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Apple iPhone 6S IPS, 1334x750, 4.7"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	Microsoft Lumia 950 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.2"	OnePlus 2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen		-4%	-1%	15%	1%	-3%	-44%
Brightness middle	582	453 -22%	552 -5%	350 -40%	292 -50%	451 -23%	669 15%
Brightness	563	439 -22%	549 -2%	351 -38%	298 -47%	446 -21%	624 11%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	87 -4%	98 8%	92 1%	90 -1%	85 -7%
Black Level *	0.38	0.28 26%	0.39 -3%			0.3 21%	0.68 -79%
Contrast	1532	1618 6%	1415 -8%			1503 -2%	984 -36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.4	4.7 -7%	3.4 23%	2.04 54%	2.48 44%	3.84 13%	7.96 -81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.4			3.25 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	5.03 -5%	4.16 13%	1.63 66%	1.97 59%	3.97 17%	10.95 -128%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.21 ^100%	2.07 ^106%	2.06 ^107%	2.46 ^89%	2.61 ^84%
CCT	6175 ^105%	7439 ^87%	7288 ^89%	6391 ^102%	6640 ^98%	7283 ^89%	7402 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	77.78	72.04 -7%	62.18 -20%	86.86 12%		58.07 -25%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.44		95.93 -4%	99.35 0%		90.14 -9%

* ... smaller is better

ProPhoto RGB color space coverage: 40.62%

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 30 ms rise
49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	7058 Points
Huawei P8	4479 Points -37%
Huawei Mate 8	7344 Points +4%
Google Nexus 5X	4324 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -32%
Motorola Moto X Force	5365 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5	5184 Points -27%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	95743 Points
Huawei Mate 8	93767 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points +34%
Motorola Moto X Force	89911 Points -6%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1767 Points
Huawei P8	864 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 8	1721 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1246 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 6S	2539 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2199 Points +24%
Motorola Moto X Force	1262 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5	1325 Points -25%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	6522 Points
Huawei P8	3458 Points -47%
Huawei Mate 8	6265 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X	3530 Points -46%
Apple iPhone 6S	4422 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S7	6401 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force	4791 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5	4414 Points -32%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	19854 Points
Huawei P8	9080 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8	19179 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	18898 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 6S	28419 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points +46%
Motorola Moto X Force	25751 Points +30%
Sony Xperia Z5	24980 Points +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	21577 Points
Huawei P8	8743 Points -59%
Huawei Mate 8	20537 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X	22180 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 6S	42686 Points +98%
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Force	38394 Points +78%
Sony Xperia Z5	37738 Points +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	15517 Points
Huawei P8	10494 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 8	15575 Points 0%
Google Nexus 5X	12451 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 6S	13097 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Force	11963 Points -23%
Sony Xperia Z5	11442 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1237 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1244 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1497 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points +119%
Motorola Moto X Force	2413 Points +95%
Sony Xperia Z5	1613 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1080 Points
Huawei Mate 8	1092 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1942 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Force	3226 Points +199%
Sony Xperia Z5	2246 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2510 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2432 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	831 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points -20%
Motorola Moto X Force	1282 Points -49%
Sony Xperia Z5	812 Points -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P9	974 Points
Huawei Mate 8	945 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1096 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points +123%
Motorola Moto X Force	1849 Points +90%
Sony Xperia Z5	1084 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	829 Points
Huawei Mate 8	801 Points -3%
Google Nexus 5X	1127 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points +167%
Motorola Moto X Force	2067 Points +149%
Sony Xperia Z5	1103 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2503 Points
Huawei Mate 8	2552 Points +2%
Google Nexus 5X	1002 Points -60%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points -19%
Motorola Moto X Force	1351 Points -46%
Sony Xperia Z5	1024 Points -59%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	43 fps
Huawei P8	11 fps -74%
Huawei Mate 8	44 fps +2%
Google Nexus 5X	38 fps -12%
Microsoft Lumia 950	13.73 fps -68%
Apple iPhone 6S	59.1 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps +23%
Motorola Moto X Force	42 fps -2%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +14%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	40 fps
Huawei P8	10 fps -75%
Huawei Mate 8	41 fps +3%
Google Nexus 5X	37 fps -7%
Microsoft Lumia 950	21.82 fps -45%
Apple iPhone 6S	79.6 fps +99%
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps +110%
Motorola Moto X Force	58 fps +45%
Sony Xperia Z5	49 fps +23%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P9	19 fps
Huawei P8	5.8 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8	19 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X	17 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950	6.76 fps -64%
Apple iPhone 6S	56 fps +195%
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps +42%
Motorola Moto X Force	17 fps -11%
Sony Xperia Z5	26 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	18 fps
Huawei P8	5.5 fps -69%
Huawei Mate 8	18 fps 0%
Google Nexus 5X	16 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950	12.3 fps -32%
Apple iPhone 6S	39.5 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps +122%
Motorola Moto X Force	27 fps +50%
Sony Xperia Z5	24 fps +33%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	11 fps
Huawei Mate 8	11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps +36%
Motorola Moto X Force	12 fps +9%
Sony Xperia Z5	18 fps +64%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P9	10 fps
Huawei Mate 8	10 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps +180%
Motorola Moto X Force	20 fps +100%
Sony Xperia Z5	16 fps +60%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2025 Points
Huawei P8	1085 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 8	2046 Points +1%
Google Nexus 5X	1318 Points -35%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1140 Points -44%
Apple iPhone 6S	2194 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X Force	1774 Points -12%
Sony Xperia Z5	1437 Points -29%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P9	3930 Points
Huawei P8	1860 Points -53%
Huawei Mate 8	4064 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X	1730 Points -56%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1096 Points -72%
Apple iPhone 6S	3466 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X Force	2878 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5	2360 Points -40%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P9	2627 Points
Huawei P8	1216 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 8	2339 Points -11%
Google Nexus 5X	1115 Points -58%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1640 Points -38%
Apple iPhone 6S	1281 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Force	1085 Points -59%
Sony Xperia Z5	865 Points -67%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1583 Points
Huawei P8	882 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 8	1636 Points +3%
Google Nexus 5X	2038 Points +29%
Microsoft Lumia 950	1437 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 6S	4323 Points +173%
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points +9%
Motorola Moto X Force	3376 Points +113%
Sony Xperia Z5	3095 Points +96%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9	1029 Points
Huawei P8	694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8	1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X	769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950	655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S	1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force	939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5	675 Points -34%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P9	7.9 fps
Huawei Mate 8	7.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7	13.86 fps +75%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9	328 Points
Huawei Mate 8	347 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S	887 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy S7	732 Points +123%

Legend

Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Google Nexus 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Microsoft Lumia 950 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 6S Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia Z5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11783 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4084 Points -65%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11329 Points -4%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8202 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6990 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	16200 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13161 Points +12%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8699 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	8627 Points -27%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	68.4 Points
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	65 Points -5%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.52 Points -64%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	118.6 Points +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	74 Points +8%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.37 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	37 Points -46%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	2923 ms *
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11808 ms * -304%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3643 ms * -25%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4734 ms * -62%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6914 ms * -137%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1715 ms * +41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2562 ms * +12%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	4080 ms * -40%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	5693 ms * -95%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	128 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	70 Points -45%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	139 Points +9%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	107 Points -16%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	64 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	187 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	166 Points +30%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	103 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	73 Points -43%

Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	6580 (6523^min) Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	2756 (2248^min) Points -58%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	7008 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	7570 Points +15%

BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1029 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	694 Points -33%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1127 Points +10%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	769 Points -25%
Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	655 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	1207 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	957 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	939 Points -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	675 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	281.3 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139.9 MB/s -50%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	238.3 MB/s -15%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	245.2 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	483.8 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	252 MB/s -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	219.8 MB/s -22%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	72.2 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.58 MB/s -45%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	124.8 MB/s +73%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	98.6 MB/s +37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	145.7 MB/s +102%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.99 MB/s -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	115.5 MB/s +60%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.46 MB/s -42%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.98 MB/s -36%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.8 MB/s -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	85.9 MB/s +120%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	22.55 MB/s -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	3.59 MB/s -91%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	47.45 MB/s
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10.04 MB/s -79%
Huawei Mate 8 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash	15.74 MB/s -67%
Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	12.21 MB/s -74%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16.01 MB/s -66%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	19.78 MB/s -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	11.46 MB/s -76%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	55 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	72.3 MB/s +31%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	79 MB/s +44%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	24.83 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	53.6 MB/s +116%
Motorola Moto X Force Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	46.96 MB/s +89%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	30 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	60 fps

... jämför

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


41.9 °C	38.8 °C	40.2 °C
42.1 °C	39.6 °C	39.4 °C
41.1 °C	38 °C	38.6 °C

Max: 42.1 °C
Medel: 40 °C


36.2 °C	38.5 °C	38.8 °C
35.6 °C	38.6 °C	38.1 °C
35.9 °C	38.1 °C	38.2 °C

Max: 38.8 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 33.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.38 Watt
Låg belastning	0.77 / 2.36 / 2.37 Watt
Hög belastning	3.09 / 5.35 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Huawei P9 Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash	Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Apple iPhone 6S A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)	Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Microsoft Lumia 950 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		-12%	-1%	-17%	-4%	23%	7%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	0.77	0.7 9%	0.55 29%	0.7 9%	0.6 22%	0.5 35%	0.68 12%	1.97 -156%
Idle Average *	2.36	2 15%	1.44 39%	1.7 28%	1.7 28%	1.6 32%	1.02 57%	2.42 -3%
Idle Maximum *	2.37	2.1 11%	1.9 20%	1.8 24%	1.8 24%	1.9 20%	1.14 52%	2.96 -25%
Load Average *	3.09	4.9 -59%	3.36 -9%	5.6 -81%	5.7 -84%	2.5 19%	4.73 -53%	5.94 -92%
Load Maximum *	5.35	7.4 -38%	9.76 -82%	8.7 -63%	6 -12%	4.8 10%	7.16 -34%	7.79 -46%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		25tim 14min
WiFi Websurfing		9tim 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 26min

	Huawei P9 11.46 Wh	Huawei P8 Wh	Apple iPhone 6S 7 Wh	Samsung Galaxy S7 11.55 Wh	Motorola Moto X Force Wh	Google Nexus 5X 10 Wh	Microsoft Lumia 950 12 Wh	Huawei Mate 8 Wh
Battery Runtime		-16%	-6%	19%	17%	2%	-17%	43%
Reader / Idle	1514	826 -45%	1510 0%	1810 20%	1610 6%	1775 17%	1500 -1%	1872 24%
H.264	568	581 2%	699 23%	892 57%	710 25%	555 -2%	570 0%	963 70%
WiFi v1.3	569	434 -24%	492 -14%	456 -20%	426 -25%	412 -28%	250 -56%	865 52%
Load	206	215 4%	137 -33%	242 17%	330 60%	245 19%	187 -9%	256 24%

För

+ snabb SoC

+ minneskortplats

+ bra frekvensomfång

+ bra kameror

+ röstkvaliteten

+ headset ingår

+ snabbladdning

+ USB typ C

+ skaplig batteritid

Emot

- ej App2SD

- endast LTE Cat. 6

- ingen radiomottagare

- ej infraröd sändare

- saknar MHL och SlimPort

- bara USB 2.0

- DNGs kan inte lagras på microSD-kortet

In review: Huawei P9. Review sample courtesy of Huawei.

En längre version av testet på engelska kan läsas här.

Det kinesiska bolaget följer upp P-seriens framgångar med Huawei P9 och har utvecklat sitt flaggskepp ytterligare. Ännu en gång är den stora IPS-panelen, prestandan, bildkvaliteten från Leica-kameran, den långa batteritid vad som främst imponerar på oss.

De komponenter som ingår fungerar bra överlag, men är inte alltid toppmoderna. Till exempel ingår inte LTE Cat. 9, utan endast den äldre Cat. 6-versionen. Visserligen är frekvensområdet brett. Det är också glädjande att röstkvaliteten inte har försummats. P9 bjuder på mycket bra samtalskvalitet och anständig dämpning av bakgrundsljud.

I kombination med det anspråkslösa gränssnittet EMUI 4.1 levererar systemkretsen enastående prestanda, men visar ganska märkbar strypning under kontinuerlig belastning. De dubbla kamerorna är ingen revolution inom mobil fotografering, men tar bra bilder med en mycket unik stil. Å andra sidan har kamerans videofunktionen svagheter. Inspelningar i 60 FPS är inte imponerande och Ultra HD finns inte att tillgå.

Även om Huawei har höjt priset på P9 har den fortfarande ett bra pris/prestanda-förhållande och är en balanserad helhet.

Huawei P9 - 04/28/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design

93%

Tangentbord

70 / 75 → 93%

Mus

96%

Anslutningar

55 / 60 → 92%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

50 / 63 → 80%

Programprestanda

59 / 70 → 84%

Temperatur

87%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

81%

Medel

79%

90%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei P9 (sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-15 (Update: 2024-11- 4)