Test: Huawei Y7 2018 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Huawei Y7 2018
Brand: Huawei

Ung och billig Huawei Y7 2018 är en "phablet" med en skärm på 5.99 tum. I egenskap av att vara den nyaste medlemmen i Y-serien får Y7 2018 i uppgift att upprätthålla seriens image som billig med få kompromisser bland funktioner eller kamerahårdvara. I den här recensionen får du reda på huruvida Huawei Y7 2018 lyckas med att upprätthålla sin föregångares karaktär.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 06/06/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y7 2018 (Y7 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Minne

2048 MB

Skärm

5.99 tum 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixlar 269 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort upp till 256 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Ljussensor, Fingeravtrycksläsare, USB OTG, FM-Radio

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.8 x 158.3 x 76.7

Batteri

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 8.0 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix Kontrast-Autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, Video i upp till 1080p i 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED-blixt

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Headset, Designs, HiCare, Phone Clone, Game Suite, 24 Månader Garanti, Bandbredd – Nerladdning/Uppladdning: 150 Mbps / 50 Mbps (LTE); SAR-värde: 0.81 W/kg (Huvud), 1.16 W/kg (Kropp), fanless

Vikt

155 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g

Pris

199 Kr

Länkar

Huawei hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s +79%
Ulefone Power 3 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99.1 MBit/s +74%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56.9 MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.7 MBit/s -2%
Huawei Y7 Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash	50.6 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U18 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s +102%
Ulefone Power 3 Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash	106 MBit/s +93%
Huawei Y7 2018 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	55 MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	53.9 MBit/s -2%
Huawei Y7 Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.4 MBit/s -5%

GPS Test: Garmin Edge 520 – Litet skogsområde

GPS Test: Huawei Y7 2018 – Litet skogsområde

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


361 cd/m²	389 cd/m²	336 cd/m²
365 cd/m²	393 cd/m²	347 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	354 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 393 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 364.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.44 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 334 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1355:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.6

	Huawei Y7 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 6"	Huawei Y7 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Oukitel U18 LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.9"	Ulefone Power 3 IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		8%	9%	-20%	8%
Brightness middle	393	467 19%	620 58%	565 44%	494 26%
Brightness	365	456 25%	612 68%	535 47%	485 33%
Brightness Distribution	85	92 8%	96 13%	83 -2%	87 2%
Black Level *	0.29	0.39 -34%	0.57 -97%	0.55 -90%	0.33 -14%
Contrast	1355	1197 -12%	1088 -20%	1027 -24%	1497 10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.28	4.3 19%	3.46 34%	7.1 -34%	5.1 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9	6.8 24%	7.88 12%	13.7 -52%	9.9 -10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.2	3.5 17%	3.9 7%	6.2 -48%	3.5 17%
Gamma	2.6 ^85%	2.35 ^94%	2.073 ^106%	2.85 ^77%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	7086 ^92%	7273 ^89%	7230 ^90%	7153 ^91%	7253 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

9091 Hz

≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 9091 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 9091 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.4 ms rise
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12.8 ms rise
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	45687 Points
Huawei Y7	43303 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	60490 Points +32%
Ulefone Power 3	54201 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42798 - 47066, n=16)	45027 Points -1%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	59421 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	76178 Points +28%
Oukitel U18	54989 Points -7%
Ulefone Power 3	54192 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (44992 - 59990, n=11)	56835 Points -4%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	4918 Points
Huawei Y7	5365 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	5801 Points +18%
Oukitel U18	4532 Points -8%
Ulefone Power 3	6344 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3347 - 5290, n=18)	4577 Points -7%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	3874 Points
Huawei Y7	3928 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4905 Points +27%
Oukitel U18	3358 Points -13%
Ulefone Power 3	4770 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (3408 - 3892, n=16)	3668 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	1020 Points
Huawei Y7	869 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1229 Points +20%
Oukitel U18	899 Points -12%
Ulefone Power 3	1340 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (263 - 1055, n=17)	737 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +537%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	1906 Points
Huawei Y7	1790 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3236 Points +70%
Oukitel U18	1838 Points -4%
Ulefone Power 3	2906 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1281 - 2154, n=17)	1726 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +443%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	1144 Points
Huawei Y7	686 Points -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	961 Points -16%
Oukitel U18	798 Points -30%
Ulefone Power 3	1566 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (530 - 1209, n=17)	769 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +517%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	739 Points
Huawei Y7	768 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	1017 Points +38%
Oukitel U18	640 Points -13%
Ulefone Power 3	855 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (715 - 788, n=17)	738 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +2335%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	673 Points
Huawei Y7	606 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	722 Points +7%
Oukitel U18	698 Points +4%
Ulefone Power 3	829 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10 - 866, n=17)	499 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +134%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	676 Points
Huawei Y7	645 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	870 Points +29%
Oukitel U18	608 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (619 - 685, n=16)	657 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +730%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	2889 Points
Huawei Y7	2866 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	4292 Points +49%
Oukitel U18	2617 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2222 - 2889, n=16)	2553 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +446%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	2133 Points
Huawei Y7	2235 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3316 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1731 - 2461, n=13)	2118 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +489%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	9583 Points
Huawei Y7	9961 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13682 Points +43%
Oukitel U18	10117 Points +6%
Ulefone Power 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9213 - 9977, n=18)	9559 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	9713 Points
Huawei Y7	10152 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	13219 Points +36%
Oukitel U18	10100 Points +4%
Ulefone Power 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (9342 - 10271, n=17)	9707 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	9153 Points
Huawei Y7	9345 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	15593 Points +70%
Oukitel U18	10143 Points +11%
Ulefone Power 3	Points -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (8253 - 10364, n=17)	9093 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	603 Points
Huawei Y7	616 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	854 Points +42%
Oukitel U18	559 Points -7%
Ulefone Power 3	72 Points -88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (554 - 613, n=18)	583 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +597%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	524 Points
Huawei Y7	533 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	732 Points +40%
Oukitel U18	484 Points -8%
Ulefone Power 3	57 Points -89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (483 - 535, n=18)	509 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +805%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	1280 Points
Huawei Y7	1360 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2058 Points +61%
Oukitel U18	1219 Points -5%
Ulefone Power 3	1237 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1002 - 1339, n=18)	1182 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +158%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	310 Points
Huawei Y7	341 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	463 Points +49%
Oukitel U18	393 Points +27%
Ulefone Power 3	69 Points -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (284 - 330, n=18)	303 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=70, last 2 years)	3006 Points +870%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	255 Points
Huawei Y7	281 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	379 Points +49%
Oukitel U18	329 Points +29%
Ulefone Power 3	54 Points -79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (234 - 271, n=18)	250 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=70, last 2 years)	3166 Points +1142%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	1258 Points
Huawei Y7	1340 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	2038 Points +62%
Oukitel U18	1195 Points -5%
Ulefone Power 3	1240 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (1034 - 1360, n=18)	1178 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=70, last 2 years)	3260 Points +159%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	27 fps
Huawei Y7	24 fps -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	17 fps -37%
Oukitel U18	25 fps -7%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (14 - 27, n=17)	20.6 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	86.6 fps +221%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	16 fps
Huawei Y7	17 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	23 fps +44%
Oukitel U18	17 fps +6%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (15 - 18, n=17)	16.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=174, last 2 years)	296 fps +1750%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	14 fps
Huawei Y7	16 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.4 fps -33%
Oukitel U18	13 fps -7%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.6 - 15, n=17)	10.8 fps -23%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	76.1 fps +444%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	7.1 fps
Huawei Y7	7.5 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	9.9 fps +39%
Oukitel U18	6.8 fps -4%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (6.7 - 7.7, n=17)	7.14 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years)	175 fps +2365%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	10 fps
Huawei Y7	12 fps +20%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.2 fps -38%
Oukitel U18	10 fps 0%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (4.3 - 11, n=17)	7.58 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years)	66.7 fps +567%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	4.6 fps
Huawei Y7	2.3 fps -50%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	6.5 fps +41%
Oukitel U18	4.6 fps 0%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.2 - 4.9, n=17)	4.19 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years)	124.3 fps +2602%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	5.4 fps
Huawei Y7	5.9 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.4 fps -37%
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps -56%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 5.9, n=17)	4.05 fps -25%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +817%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y7 2018	2.6 fps
Huawei Y7	2.7 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	3.5 fps +35%
Oukitel U18	2.4 fps -8%
Ulefone Power 3	fps -100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2.4 - 2.7, n=17)	2.55 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=174, last 2 years)	74.8 fps +2777%

Legend

Huawei Y7 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Y7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	23.1 Points +29%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)	22.91 Points +28%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)	20.6 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (17.6 - 21.5, n=16)	19.1 Points +7%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	18.33 Points +3%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	17.86 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +1046%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	4424 Points +32%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	3377 Points 0%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	3363 Points
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)	3209 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (2604 - 3438, n=18)	3194 Points -5%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)	3155 Points -6%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)	23714 ms * -75%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)	14566 ms * -8%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	13541 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (10396 - 14709, n=18)	12677 ms * +6%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)	11007 ms * +19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	10895 ms * +20%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +89%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)	112 Points +37%
Huawei Y7 2018 (Chrome 66)	82 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (42 - 82, n=9)	60.4 Points -26%
Huawei Y7 (Chrome 60)	44 Points -46%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)	43 Points -48%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei Y7 2018	Huawei Y7	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus	Oukitel U18	Ulefone Power 3	Average 16 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	42%	5%	69%	-33%	1596%
Sequential Read 256KB	256	119.4 -53%	270 5%	273.1 7%	294.6 15%	164.5 ?(9.66 - 294, n=256) -36%	1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 637%
Sequential Write 256KB	71.5	33.2 -54%	194.5 172%	109.2 53%	214.9 201%	43 ?(8.74 - 106.3, n=256) -40%	1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) 1957%
Random Read 4KB	38.8	53.2 37%	79.5 105%	28.7 -26%	61.4 58%	21.7 ?(2.49 - 62.1, n=256) -44%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) 616%
Random Write 4KB	9.5	6.9 -27%	7.1 -25%	12.96 36%	21.25 124%	8.08 ?(0.49 - 44.9, n=256) -15%	311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) 3174%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85	82.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -3%	84.4 -1%	71.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -16%	81.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	59.1 ?(8.1 - 87.7, n=137) -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	61.5	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	59.5 -3%	47.02 ?(Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401) -24%	71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 17%	39.8 ?(6.38 - 65.8, n=137) -35%

Shadow Fight 3
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	47 fps
	minimal	47 fps

Arena of Valor
	Inställningar	Värde
	min	31 fps
	high HD	30 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


37.9 °C	33.2 °C	34.1 °C
36.9 °C	33.3 °C	35.2 °C
35.6 °C	33.3 °C	33.9 °C

Max: 37.9 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C


31.7 °C	34.3 °C	38.3 °C
32.4 °C	34 °C	38.1 °C
32.6 °C	33.9 °C	36.1 °C

Max: 38.3 °C
Medel: 34.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 37.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Y7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.9 / 2.3 Watt
Hög belastning	4.7 / 5.7 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		28%	-18%	-59%	23%	-1%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.57 37%	0.7 22%	1.12 -24%	0.79 12%	0.918 ?(0.52 - 1.88, n=18) -2%	0.881 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.9	1.61 15%	2.8 -47%	2.27 -19%	1.82 4%	2.01 ?(1.4 - 4.17, n=18) -6%	1.463 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Maximum *	2.3	1.62 30%	3.4 -48%	2.49 -8%	1.87 19%	2.28 ?(1.52 - 4.2, n=18) 1%	1.618 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	4.7	3.09 34%	4.2 11%	10.75 -129%	2.7 43%	3.97 ?(2.85 - 7.5, n=18) 16%	6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) -40%
Load Maximum *	5.7	4.26 25%	7.2 -26%	12.39 -117%	3.62 36%	6.46 ?(4.88 - 13.7, n=18) -13%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) -74%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		21tim 45min
WiFi Websurfing		10tim 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11tim 27min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 05min

	Huawei Y7 2018 3000 mAh	Huawei Y7 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh	Oukitel U18 4000 mAh	Ulefone Power 3 6080 mAh
Battery Runtime		36%	-20%	2%	121%
Reader / Idle	1305	1914 47%
H.264	687	812 18%
WiFi v1.3	624	716 15%	497 -20%	639 2%	1376 121%
Load	245	402 64%

För

+ robust hölje

+ stöd för Dual-SIM & microSD-kort

+ hyfsat exakt GPS

+ skärm med hög kontrast

+ bra färgåtergivning

+ ingen strypning

+ håller sig relativt sval

+ bra batteritid

Emot

- udaterade säkerhetsuppdateringar för Android

- ingen 5 GHz WiFi

- mikrofonen saknar känslighet - den tar bara upp höga röster

- mörk skärm

Huawei Y7 2018 recenseras. Testenhet från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Till en början låter Huawei Y7 2018 som ett bra erbjudande tack vare dess moderna design, relativt högupplösta framåtriktade kamera och dess låga pris. Men dessa positiva aspekter vägs ner av en del brister. I huvudsak utdaterade säkerhetsuppdateringar för Android och en mörk skärm.

Men batteritiden är skaplig, hantverket är på en bra nivå och dess GPS är tillräckligt exakt för en enhet på den här prisnivån. Bilderna är dessutom oväntat skarpa.

På samma sätt är systemprestandan lämplig för sin klass och monohögtalaren är godkänd. Enheten håller sig dessutom ganska sval vid belastning.

Frustrerande nog så lyckas Y7 2018 inte vara bättre än sin föregångare på en del områden. Som exempel är batteritiden sämre, högtalaren tystare, prestandan är samma och modemet är långsammare och stödjer färre LTE-band.

Huawei Y7 2017 är ett gediget val för den som letar efter en smartphone med en stor skärm men som inte vill spendera mycket pengar.

Y7 2018 är en billig "phablet" som fortfarande har bäst prisförhållande i sin klass, trots att konkurrenterna har förbättrat sig.

Huawei Y7 2018 - 05/30/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design

77%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

83%

Anslutningar

37 / 60 → 61%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

93%

Skärm

84%

Spelprestanda

20 / 63 → 31%

Programprestanda

44 / 70 → 62%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

51 / 91 → 56%

Camera

53%

Medel

68%

79%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11437 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Huawei Y7 2018 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 6 (Update: 2018-06- 6)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei Y7 2018 audio analysis

Huawei Y7 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison