Notebookcheck Logo

Test: LG G5 (sammanfattning)

Modulär med dubbla kameror. LG:s nya G5 kommer med en del nya innovationer. Mobilen är nu modulär och utrustad med två kameror, varav den ena har vidvinkelobjektiv, men tyvärr är upplösningen ganska låg. Batteriet har också blivit mindre.
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 4 x 2.15 GHz, Kryo
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 530, Kärna: 624 MHz
Minne
4 GB 
, LPDDR4
Skärm
5.30 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar 554 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, 10 punkter, IPS Quantum, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.07 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: Headset, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Närhet, Rotation, Accelerometer och G-Sensor, VR-sensorer, digital kompass, barometer, Android Beam, Wifi Direct, Miracast, SlimPort, OTG, DLNA, Infraröd
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2 LE, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 och 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38 och 40), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 149.4 x 73.9
Batteri
10.78 Wh, 2800 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, 3.85 Volt, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 29 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 21 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 400 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 400 tim
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (78° standard angle and 135° wide-angle, f/1.8, HDR, Color Spectrum Sensor, Laser AF, OIS 2.0, RAW support)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, headset, LG Backup, SmartWorld, QuickRemote, QuickMemo+, LG Health, LG Friends Manager, 24 Månader Garanti, USB Typ-C, FM-radio, Huvud-SAR: 0,737 W/kg, fanless
Vikt
159 g, Strömförsörjning: 68 g
Pris
699 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g154.4 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 181 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.8 mm 78 mm 9.2 mm 169 g148.9 mm 76.1 mm 9.8 mm 155 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g149.4 mm 73.9 mm 7.7 mm 159 g145 mm 70.9 mm 6.95 mm 144 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
LG G5
Standard camera
Standard camera
Wide-angle camera
Wide-angle camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Main camera
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
Wide-angle camera
Main camera
Wide-angle camera
774
cd/m²
809
cd/m²
749
cd/m²
734
cd/m²
784
cd/m²
781
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
803
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 809 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 773.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.93 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 784 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1823:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.46% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
LG G5
IPS Quantum, 2560x1440, 5.3", 16:9
LG G4
Quantum-IPS, 2560x1440, 5.5", 16:9
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5", 16:9
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5", 16:9
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5", 16:9
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2", 16:9
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7", 16:9
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5", 16:9
Screen
-9%
-22%
-1%
-1%
7%
9%
25%
Brightness middle
784
566
-28%
560
-29%
451
-42%
583
-26%
582
-26%
363
-54%
554
-29%
Brightness
774
536
-31%
541
-30%
446
-42%
560
-28%
563
-27%
365
-53%
552
-29%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
85
-7%
90
-1%
91
0%
91
0%
90
-1%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.43
0.47
-9%
0.45
-5%
0.3
30%
0.46
-7%
0.38
12%
Contrast
1823
1204
-34%
1244
-32%
1503
-18%
1267
-30%
1532
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.5
6.17
5%
9.19
-41%
3.84
41%
3.55
45%
4.4
32%
2.34
64%
1.59
76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.7
15.01
-28%
7.4
37%
2.56
78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8
6.26
22%
10.58
-32%
3.97
50%
3.88
51%
4.8
40%
1.03
87%
2.01
75%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.48 89%
2.7 81%
2.46 89%
2.2 100%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.01 109%
CCT
8699 75%
8171 80%
9760 67%
7283 89%
7280 89%
6175 105%
6429 101%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68.08
65.48
-4%
73.19
8%
58.07
-15%
59.05
-13%
77.78
14%
82.12
21%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.46
98.63
1%
90.14
-8%
92.8
-5%
99.44
2%
99.98
3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2273 Hz ≤ 34 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2273 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 34 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2273 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
124244 Points
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X Force
89911 Points -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
94122 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points +8%
OnePlus 2
65936 Points -47%
Huawei P9
95743 Points -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
131327 Points +6%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5
2396 Points
LG G4
1107 Points -54%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
1262 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1335 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (2120min) Points -9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points +6%
OnePlus 2
1140 Points -52%
Huawei P9
1767 Points -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2376 Points -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG G5
5507 Points
LG G4
3556 Points -35%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points -17%
Motorola Moto X Force
4791 Points -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4492 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (6415min) Points +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points -20%
OnePlus 2
4804 Points -13%
Huawei P9
6522 Points +18%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
5500 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG G5
5581 Points
LG G4
4579 Points -18%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X Force
5365 Points -4%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points -17%
OnePlus 2
4282 Points -23%
Huawei P9
7058 Points +26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
6590 Points +18%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG G5
28730 Points
LG G4
18821 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Force
25751 Points -10%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
26380 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
27795 Points -3%
OnePlus 2
22400 Points -22%
Huawei P9
19854 Points -31%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
24446 Points -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG G5
32109 Points
LG G4
23390 Points -27%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points +8%
Motorola Moto X Force
38394 Points +20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
37725 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points +3%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
41615 Points +30%
OnePlus 2
31858 Points -1%
Huawei P9
21577 Points -33%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
30585 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
20997 Points
LG G4
11178 Points -47%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points -29%
Motorola Moto X Force
11963 Points -43%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
12852 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
12854 Points -39%
OnePlus 2
10985 Points -48%
Huawei P9
15517 Points -26%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
14358 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG G5
3277 Points
LG G4
1324 Points -60%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points -43%
Motorola Moto X Force
2413 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points -17%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points +1%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points -47%
Huawei P9
1237 Points -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
4468 Points
LG G4
1399 Points -69%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points -48%
Motorola Moto X Force
3226 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points -33%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points +2%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points -59%
Huawei P9
1080 Points -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
1695 Points
LG G4
1115 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X Force
1282 Points -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points +18%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points 0%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points -17%
Huawei P9
2510 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG G5
2478 Points
LG G4
513 Points -79%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points -39%
Motorola Moto X Force
1849 Points -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1132 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points -11%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points -6%
OnePlus 2
938 Points -62%
Huawei P9
974 Points -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2207 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
2833 Points
LG G4
440 Points -84%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
2067 Points -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1074 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points -21%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points -8%
OnePlus 2
846 Points -70%
Huawei P9
829 Points -71%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2773 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG G5
1723 Points
LG G4
1216 Points -29%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points -24%
Motorola Moto X Force
1351 Points -22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1402 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points +23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points -3%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points -12%
Huawei P9
2503 Points +45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
1288 Points -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
47 fps
LG G4
24.9 fps -47%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps -30%
Motorola Moto X Force
42 fps -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
52 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
59 fps +26%
OnePlus 2
47 fps 0%
Huawei P9
43 fps -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
56 fps +19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
74 fps
LG G4
33.7 fps -54%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps -41%
Motorola Moto X Force
58 fps -22%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -63%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
56 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
78.9 fps +7%
OnePlus 2
48 fps -35%
Huawei P9
40 fps -46%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
91 fps +23%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG G5
30 fps
LG G4
9.5 fps -68%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps -43%
Motorola Moto X Force
17 fps -43%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps -61%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
27 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps +28%
OnePlus 2
23 fps -23%
Huawei P9
19 fps -37%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
27 fps -10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
42 fps
LG G4
15 fps -64%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps -40%
Motorola Moto X Force
27 fps -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
25 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
38.4 fps -9%
OnePlus 2
23 fps -45%
Huawei P9
18 fps -57%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
48 fps +14%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
17 fps
LG G4
5.7 fps -66%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps -44%
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps +65%
OnePlus 2
19 fps +12%
Huawei P9
11 fps -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
15 fps -12%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
31 fps
LG G4
10 fps -68%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps -48%
Motorola Moto X Force
20 fps -35%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps -10%
OnePlus 2
19 fps -39%
Huawei P9
10 fps -68%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
31 fps 0%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
11 fps
Motorola Moto X Force
7.3 fps -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6.1 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps -28%
OnePlus 2
11 fps 0%
Huawei P9
7.1 fps -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
9.4 fps -15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG G5
18 fps
Motorola Moto X Force
12 fps -33%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5.8 fps -68%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps -17%
OnePlus 2
11 fps -39%
Huawei P9
6.5 fps -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
18 fps 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG G5
2079 Points
LG G4
1596 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points -32%
Motorola Moto X Force
1774 Points -15%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points -30%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points +6%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points -19%
Huawei P9
2025 Points -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2410 Points +16%
System (sort by value)
LG G5
2925 Points
LG G4
2368 Points -19%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points -39%
Motorola Moto X Force
2878 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points -53%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points +34%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points -13%
Huawei P9
3930 Points +34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
3600 Points +23%
Memory (sort by value)
LG G5
1478 Points
LG G4
1558 Points +5%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points -23%
Motorola Moto X Force
1085 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points +32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points -24%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points -12%
Huawei P9
2627 Points +78%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2035 Points +38%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG G5
4807 Points
LG G4
1995 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points -50%
Motorola Moto X Force
3376 Points -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points -58%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points -54%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points -11%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points -45%
Huawei P9
1583 Points -67%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
4710 Points -2%
Web (sort by value)
LG G5
900 Points
LG G4
881 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P
791 Points -12%
Motorola Moto X Force
939 Points +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
837 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
986 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1199 Points +33%
OnePlus 2
923 Points +3%
Huawei P9
1029 Points +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
985 Points +9%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
LG G5
543 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
478 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points +35%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points +58%
OnePlus 2
427 Points -21%
Huawei P9
328 Points -40%
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality (sort by value)
LG G5
25532 Points
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
23747 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32273 Points +26%
OnePlus 2
21533 Points -16%
Huawei P9
16610 Points -35%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
35000 Points +37%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
LG G5
25.26 fps
LG G4
8.74 fps -65%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.52 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps -47%
OnePlus 2
15.68 fps -38%
Huawei P9
7.9 fps -69%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
22.7 fps -10%

Legend

 
LG G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
82 Points -24%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103 Points -5%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points +5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
106 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
163 Points +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points +76%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points -26%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
128 Points +19%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
108 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9731 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7832 (6791min) Points -20%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8699 Points -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points -17%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8851 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13191 Points +36%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points +64%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points -29%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11783 Points +21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
10559 Points +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
8395 Points -14%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3461 ms *
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4771 ms * -38%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * -21%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4080 ms * -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5553 ms * -60%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4377 ms * -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2564 ms * +26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * +50%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585 ms * -90%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2923 ms * +16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
6310 ms * -82%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
2460 ms * +29%
Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5473 (4080min) Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4053 (4006min) Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5395 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7198 (6255min) Points +32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4526 Points -17%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6580 (6523min) Points +20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
5954 Points +9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
5142 Points -6%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
900 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
881 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points -12%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
939 Points +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
986 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points +10%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1199 Points +33%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
923 Points +3%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points +14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
985 Points +9%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.12 Points -13%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points -5%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.37 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.1 Points +51%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points +139%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.29 Points -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
68.4 Points +38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
64 Points +29%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
55 Points +11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
427.6 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MB/s -41%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.3 MB/s -45%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
252 MB/s -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256.8 MB/s -40%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
487.3 MB/s +14%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.2 MB/s -45%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
281.3 MB/s -34%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
141.3 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
153 MB/s +8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.5 MB/s -13%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.99 MB/s -66%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 MB/s -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.1 MB/s +3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.5 MB/s -11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
72.2 MB/s -49%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
89.3 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.5 MB/s -65%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s -77%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
22.55 MB/s -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.11 MB/s -79%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
86.7 MB/s -3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s -76%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 MB/s -56%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16.22 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 MB/s -8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s -27%
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.78 MB/s +22%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.53 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15.79 MB/s -3%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s -14%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.45 MB/s +193%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
78.5 MB/s
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
76.4 MB/s -3%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55 MB/s -30%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
LG G5
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.53 MB/s
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.96 MB/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
50.4 MB/s +11%
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 955, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.83 MB/s -45%
Hög belastning
 37.5 °C37.7 °C35.7 °C 
 37.6 °C34.8 °C34 °C 
 37.5 °C34.3 °C33.5 °C 
Max: 37.7 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
35.8 °C35.7 °C35.5 °C
35 °C34.9 °C34.8 °C
34.1 °C34.2 °C33.9 °C
Max: 35.8 °C
Medel: 34.9 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.8 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.22 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.55 / 1.37 / 2.25 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.24 / 9.12 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 33min
WiFi Websurfing
6tim 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10tim 00min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
4tim 27min
LG G5
10.78 Wh
LG G4
12 Wh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh
Battery Runtime
-25%
4%
1%
10%
-22%
45%
-19%
46%
Reader / Idle
1833
1654
-10%
1655
-10%
1514
-17%
1610
-12%
1277
-30%
1663
-9%
1078
-41%
1872
2%
H.264
600
501
-16%
714
19%
568
-5%
710
18%
411
-31%
914
52%
611
2%
963
61%
WiFi v1.3
387
326
-16%
513
33%
569
47%
426
10%
372
-4%
732
89%
369
-5%
865
124%
Load
267
114
-57%
197
-26%
206
-23%
330
24%
210
-21%
392
47%
179
-33%
256
-4%

För

+ ljusstark skärm med hög konstrast
+ Always-On-skärm
+ många säkerhetsfunktioner
+ bra kameror
+ bra röstkvalitet och brusreducering
+ modulär plats
+ snabb lagring
+ minneskortplats
+ mycket snabb systemkrets

Emot

- bara USB 2.0
- ej App2SD
- förinstallerade tvångsappar
- bara LTE Cat. 6
- låg upplösning i vidvinkel
- ljussensorn ställer in för låg ljusstyrka
- strypning under hög belastning
In review: LG G5. Test model courtesy of LG Germany.
In review: LG G5. Test model courtesy of LG Germany.

Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här.

LG har varit riktigt kreativa i år och som helhet är G5 tilltalande. Kombinationen av en bra skärm, beprövad kamera och anständig batteritid är ett starkt fundament. Vi uppskattar verkligen den nya designen och det modulära konceptet som LG G5 erbjuder med intressanta tilläggsmoduler.

Ljussensorn borde kalibreras med en uppdatering, eftersom skärmen blir för mörk utomhus. Kameran presterar i nivå med föregångaren, och idén med en extra vidvinkelobjektiv kan säkert gå hem hos vissa. Vi uppskattade funktionen, trots den låga upplösningen.

LG G5 är en modern smartphone i premiumklassen med bra dubbelkamera. Tack vare modulplatsen kan mobilen dessutom bli en mycket individuell följeslagare, men allt har sitt pris.

Vi har inte lyckat hitta några större problem med LG G5, så för tillfället är den bland de bästa på marknaden. Mobilen är väl rustad för kommande trender som VR. Man har också lagt till LG Friends, vilket skapar nya möjligheter i kombination med andra produkter från LG.

 

LG G5 - 05/04/2016 v5.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design
91%
Tangentbord
70 / 75 → 94%
Mus
97%
Anslutningar
59 / 60 → 98%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
61 / 63 → 96%
Programprestanda
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatur
90%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
81%
Medel
80%
89%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG G5 (sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-05-31 (Update: 2024-11- 4)