Notebookcheck Logo

Test: LG V10 smartphone (sammanfattning)

Teknisk tvilling. LG:s V10 påminner starkt om G4. Den sydkoreanska tillverkaren har dock utrustat den här mobilen med en andra skärm och en extra framåtriktad kamera. Här tar vi reda på om den är värd prispåslaget.
LG V10 (V Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A53/A57
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 418, Kärna: 600 MHz
Minne
4 GB 
Skärm
5.70 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar, Kapacitiv, 10 beröringspunkter, Quantum IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 21.95 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Ljudanslutningar: Headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 2 TB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), NFC, Sensorer: ljussensor, närhetssensor, positionssensor, accelerometer, G-sensor, magnetometer, digital kompass, WiFi Direct, infraröd, Miracast, OTG
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 och 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 6 (800, 1800 och 2600 MHz), LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.6 x 159.6 x 79.3
Batteri
12 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, 3.85 volts, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 22 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 18 tim, Standby 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 150 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 150 tim
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix (f/1.8, 8x digital zoom, RAW-stöd, laserautofokus, OS 2.0, HDR, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (dual-lens, 80°/120°, Full HD-video)
Övrigt
Högtalare: mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, headset, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
192 g, Strömförsörjning: 78 g
Pris
6490 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

159.6 mm 79.3 mm 8.6 mm 192 g159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g153.9 mm 76.2 mm 10.6 mm 177 g154.4 mm 75.8 mm 6.9 mm 153 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g148.9 mm 76.1 mm 9.8 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
LG V10
LG V10
LG V10
LG V10
LG V10
LG V10

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
424
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 450 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 430.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.92 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 450 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2045:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Screen
-17%
18%
-17%
21%
14%
Brightness middle
450
566
26%
297
-34%
538
20%
363
-19%
335.7
-25%
Brightness
431
536
24%
297
-31%
528
23%
365
-15%
332
-23%
Brightness Distribution
93
90
-3%
93
0%
92
-1%
90
-3%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.22
0.47
-114%
0.66
-200%
Contrast
2045
1204
-41%
815
-60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.18
6.17
-19%
2.67
48%
2.63
49%
2.34
55%
2.33
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.39
3.98
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.94
6.26
10%
2.81
60%
3.24
53%
1.03
85%
2.15
69%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.48 89%
2.08 106%
2.17 101%
2.23 99%
2.15 102%
CCT
8091 80%
8171 80%
6379 102%
6906 94%
6429 101%
6184 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.48
66.31
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.63
99.79

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 40 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V10
1172 Points
LG G4
1107 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Style
1276 Points +9%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1317 Points +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V10
3684 Points
LG G4
3556 Points -3%
Motorola Moto X Style
3567 Points -3%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4207 Points +14%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG V10
18585 Points
LG G4
18821 Points +1%
Motorola Moto X Style
19702 Points +6%
Google Nexus 6P
26876 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
23798 Points +28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG V10
23276 Points
LG G4
23390 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Style
23321 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P
34758 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
27549 Points +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V10
10898 Points
LG G4
11178 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X Style
12767 Points +17%
Google Nexus 6P
14983 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16117 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG V10
1332 Points
LG G4
1324 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X Style
1400 Points +5%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1616 Points +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG V10
1361 Points
LG G4
1399 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X Style
1419 Points +4%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points +69%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1606 Points +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG V10
1241 Points
LG G4
1115 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Style
1339 Points +8%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1652 Points +33%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V10
9.4 fps
LG G4
9.5 fps +1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
11.81 fps +26%
Motorola Moto X Style
9.3 fps -1%
Google Nexus 6P
17 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
14 fps +49%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V10
15 fps
LG G4
15 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
17.54 fps +17%
Motorola Moto X Style
15 fps 0%
Google Nexus 6P
25 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
18 fps +20%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
LG V10
4800 Points
LG G4
4579 Points -5%
Motorola Moto X Style
5859 Points +22%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
5130 Points +7%
Smartbench 2012
Productivity Index (sort by value)
LG V10
9071 points
LG G4
8940 points -1%
Motorola Moto X Style
8815 points -3%
Google Nexus 6P
10823 points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
16793 points +85%
Gaming Index (sort by value)
LG V10
4055 points
LG G4
4118 points +2%
Motorola Moto X Style
3873 points -4%
Google Nexus 6P
4332 points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
4566 points +13%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG V10
1627 Points
LG G4
1596 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1465 Points -10%
Motorola Moto X Style
1743 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1801 Points +11%
System (sort by value)
LG V10
2598 Points
LG G4
2368 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1386 Points -47%
Motorola Moto X Style
2783 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
3321 Points +28%
Memory (sort by value)
LG V10
1527 Points
LG G4
1558 Points +2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
1945 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Style
1776 Points +16%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
1298 Points -15%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG V10
1954 Points
LG G4
1995 Points +2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2040 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X Style
1918 Points -2%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
2457 Points +26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V10
25 fps
LG G4
24.9 fps 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
18.75 fps -25%
Motorola Moto X Style
24 fps -4%
Google Nexus 6P
33 fps +32%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V10
35 fps
LG G4
33.7 fps -4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
27.11 fps -23%
Motorola Moto X Style
34 fps -3%
Google Nexus 6P
44 fps +26%
Linpack Android / IOS
Single Thread (sort by value)
LG V10
453.2 MFLOPS
LG G4
361.4 MFLOPS -20%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
369.6 MFLOPS -18%
Motorola Moto X Style
415 MFLOPS -8%
Google Nexus 6P
87.1 MFLOPS -81%
Multi Thread (sort by value)
LG V10
570 MFLOPS
LG G4
507 MFLOPS -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
2957 MFLOPS +419%
Motorola Moto X Style
590 MFLOPS +4%
Google Nexus 6P
262 MFLOPS -54%

Legend

 
LG V10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Style Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
90 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
82 Points -9%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points +26%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points +22%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
95 Points +6%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8083 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7832 (6791min) Points -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8065 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
7724 Points -4%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.12 Points +3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points +10%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45 Points +7%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
48.14 Points +15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4499 ms *
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4771 ms * -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5553 ms * -23%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7325 ms * -63%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
5067 ms * -13%
Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7818 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7818 Points 0%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7362 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7829 Points 0%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8622 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8801 Points +13%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
903 Points
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
881 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points -7%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
974 Points +8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
993 Points +10%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
249.3 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MB/s +1%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
246.9 MB/s -1%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.3 MB/s -5%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
383 MB/s +54%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
105.3 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
153 MB/s +45%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46.15 MB/s -56%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.5 MB/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
151.1 MB/s +43%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29.57 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.5 MB/s +7%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26.97 MB/s -9%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s -32%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
89.9 MB/s +204%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16.55 MB/s
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 MB/s -9%
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.1 MB/s +88%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s -29%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
20.95 MB/s +27%
Hög belastning
 41 °C37.2 °C37.7 °C 
 40.7 °C38.8 °C37.7 °C 
 39.6 °C38.3 °C36.3 °C 
Max: 41 °C
Medel: 38.6 °C
37.8 °C41.1 °C41.2 °C
37.3 °C40.1 °C40.9 °C
37.5 °C37.9 °C37.7 °C
Max: 41.2 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  29.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.21 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.94 / 2.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 6.53 / 9.93 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
28tim 17min
WiFi Websurfing
5tim 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 59min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 23min
LG V10
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Style
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-16%
-8%
7%
13%
-10%
Reader / Idle
1697
1654
-3%
1078
-36%
1447
-15%
1459
-14%
1141
-33%
H.264
539
501
-7%
611
13%
533
-1%
383
-29%
WiFi v1.3
353
326
-8%
369
5%
375
6%
501
42%
400
13%
Load
203
114
-44%
179
-12%
280
38%
223
10%
219
8%

För

+ snabb SoC
+ robust premiumdesign
+ hyggliga anslutningsmöjligheter
+ Minneskortplats
+ Löstagbart batteri
+ Bra kamera
+ Snabbladdning
+ Snabb fingeravtrycksläsare
+ strömsnål sekundär skärm...

Emot

- ...med begränsad funktionalitet
- För klen adapter
- Strypning
- UI som gör systemet långsammare
- Ingen trådlös laddning
In review: LG V10. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.
In review: LG V10. Review sample courtesy of LG Germany.

LG V10 är en utmärkt smartphone som är mycket lik LG:s egna G4 på specifikationsbladet, men den har inte så mycket gemensamt med systermodellen i fråga om utseendet. Selfie-fans kommer säkert att uppskatta framsidans dubbla objektiv. Den andra skärmen är bra att ha, men dess potential är inte fullt utnyttjad och de flesta av funktionerna kan utföras lika snabbt på huvudskärmen.

V10 har också en bra fingeravtrycksläsare, som har integrerats diskret i strömbrytaren på baksidan. I övrigt har LG förbättrat skärmen från G4, som nu bland annat har oerhört hög kontrast. Funktionerna i den mycket bra kameran har utvecklats ytterligare, men tyvärr har man misslyckats med att förbättra det automatiska läget.

Valet är i slutändan en fråga om smak och budget när man väljer mellan LG:s flaggskeppsmodeller. V10 kostar cirka 2000 kr mer än G4, vars pris har under tiden sjunkit avsevärt.

LG V10 - 02/02/2016 v4.1 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design
90%
Tangentbord
76 / 75 → 100%
Mus
95%
Anslutningar
59 / 60 → 98%
Vikt
89%
Batteri
92%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
66 / 63 → 100%
Programprestanda
51 / 70 → 73%
Temperatur
86%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
86%
Medel
80%
87%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: LG V10 smartphone (sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-03- 6 (Update: 2016-03- 6)