Test: Lenovo IdeaPad L340 Gaming - Stel klickplatta påverkar det roliga (Sammanfattning)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE (Ideapad L340-15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i5-9300H 4 x 2.4 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1395 MHz, Minne: 2001 MHz, GDDR5, TU117M, NVIDIA 430.81, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Minne
8 GB
, Enkel kanal
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, CMN 156HCA-EAB, IPS, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, 512 GB
, 454 GB ledigt
Vikt
2.082 kg, Strömförsörjning: 586 g
Pris
799 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN 156HCA-EAB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 275 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 253 cd/m² Minimum: 28.2 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 275 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1528:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.81% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE CMN 156HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE Chi Mei N173HCE-E31, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Panda LM156LF-CL03, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 50% | -10% | -8% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.81 | 66.3 55% | 38.37 -10% | 39.56 -8% | 40.33 -6% |
| sRGB Coverage | 63.8 | 92.7 45% | 57.6 -10% | 59.5 -7% | 60.6 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.31 | 66.6 50% | 39.69 -10% | 40.91 -8% | 41.69 -6% |
| Response Times | -15% | 8% | 22% | 5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 32 ? 30% | 40 ? 12% | 30.4 ? 33% | 34 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 23 ? 25% | 29.6 ? 4% | 27.6 ? 10% | 28 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | 25910 ? | 250 ? -99% | 21280 ? -18% | ||
| Screen | 22% | -6% | -15% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 275 | 318 16% | 251 -9% | 286.2 4% | 240.1 -13% |
| Brightness | 253 | 292 15% | 232 -8% | 267 6% | 231 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 85 2% | 76 -8% | 84 1% | 85 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.21 -17% | 0.17 6% | 0.33 -83% | 0.34 -89% |
| Contrast | 1528 | 1514 -1% | 1476 -3% | 867 -43% | 706 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 4.04 25% | 6.2 -15% | 5.45 -1% | 4.2 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.3 | 6.59 69% | 18.6 13% | 18.08 15% | 17.8 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.4 | 2.06 53% | 4.8 -9% | 4.47 -2% | 4.09 7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 4.21 -14% | 4.2 -14% | 5.3 -43% | 2.8 24% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.5 88% | 2.32 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6376 102% | 7189 90% | 7454 87% | 7679 85% | 6925 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.8 | 60 47% | 36.5 -11% | 37.6 -8% | 38.4 -6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63.6 | 93 46% | 57.4 -10% | 59.1 -7% | 60.4 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
20% | -3% /
-5% | -0% /
-9% | -4% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25910 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25910 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25910 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø755 (746.1-761.43)
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø708 (647.94-717.51)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø741 (732.32-778.15)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, AMD Ryzen 7 3750H: Ø790 (787.28-796.5)
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3416 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4556 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4400 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512 | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 8% | 50% | 9% | 1% | 11% | |
| Write 4K | 103.6 | 100.7 -3% | 112.1 8% | 137.5 33% | 132.2 28% | 115.1 ? 11% |
| Read 4K | 39.91 | 40.26 1% | 42.01 5% | 57 43% | 55.5 39% | 41.4 ? 4% |
| Write Seq | 1160 | 1196 3% | 1964 69% | 984 -15% | 986 -15% | 1208 ? 4% |
| Read Seq | 990 | 1091 10% | 2065 109% | 1564 58% | 1318 33% | 1121 ? 13% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 283.4 | 376 33% | 318.2 12% | 237.4 -16% | 220.3 -22% | 421 ? 49% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 344.5 | 418.6 22% | 406.7 18% | 340.7 -1% | 315.5 -8% | 393 ? 14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1455 | 1459 0% | 2534 74% | 959 -34% | 987 -32% | 1388 ? -5% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1690 | 1684 0% | 3438 103% | 1732 2% | 1416 -16% | 1697 ? 0% |
| AS SSD | 11% | 50% | -16% | -20% | 8% | |
| Seq Read | 1090 | 1278 17% | 2955 171% | 1019 -7% | 907 -17% | 1287 ? 18% |
| Seq Write | 1354 | 1327 -2% | 2440 80% | 889 -34% | 926 -32% | 1170 ? -14% |
| 4K Read | 37.77 | 39.59 5% | 40.56 7% | 48.22 28% | 47.26 25% | 40.2 ? 6% |
| 4K Write | 94 | 77 -18% | 118.6 26% | 115.5 23% | 98.7 5% | 104.3 ? 11% |
| 4K-64 Read | 996 | 1027 3% | 1283 29% | 321.5 -68% | 321.5 -68% | 1003 ? 1% |
| 4K-64 Write | 986 | 1270 29% | 1538 56% | 787 -20% | 736 -25% | 1066 ? 8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.105 | 0.058 45% | 0.084 20% | 0.065 38% | 0.064 39% | 0.07767 ? 26% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.036 8% | 0.032 18% | 0.047 -21% | 0.045 -15% | 0.033 ? 15% |
| Score Read | 1143 | 1195 5% | 1619 42% | 472 -59% | 459 -60% | 1172 ? 3% |
| Score Write | 1215 | 1480 22% | 1901 56% | 992 -18% | 927 -24% | 1287 ? 6% |
| Score Total | 2961 | 3294 11% | 4323 46% | 1717 -42% | 1641 -45% | 3059 ? 3% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 954 | 1418 | 942 | 905 | 954 ? | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 370.5 | 392.5 | 444.5 | 496.9 | 371 ? | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 745 | 907 | 867 | 819 | 745 ? | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
10% | 50% /
50% | -4% /
-6% | -10% /
-11% | 10% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512
Sequential Read:
1068 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1161 MB/s
512K Read:
656 MB/s
512K Write:
906 MB/s
4K Read:
34.93 MB/s
4K Write:
72.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
236.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
184.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (10885 - 13575, n=30) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (38016 - 66073, n=21) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (7741 - 9810, n=32) | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (2900 - 3700, n=31) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11307 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20115 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7833 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3459 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (68.5 - 99.4, n=18) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (69.3 - 244, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (63.3 - 127, n=20) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| Anno 1800 | |
| 1280x720 Low Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (49.2 - 74.9, n=4) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (43.3 - 69.8, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (34 - 44.7, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (17.4 - 22.7, n=5) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (44.5 - 77.3, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 193.1, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile (50.5 - 93.6, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512: Ø34.5 (32-37)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 191 | 160.8 | 148.6 | 78.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 34.5 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114 | 97 | 79 | 73 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 73 | 61 | 54.1 | |
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 53.8 | 43.3 | 33.98 | 17.35 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.4 / 28.4 / 28.4 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 30.1 / 40.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.1 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.1 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.47 / 0.64 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 3.8 / 6.6 / 8.9 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
78.4 / 124 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | -13% | -30% | -82% | -27% | -157% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.4 11% | 4.04 -6% | 7 -84% | 7.4 -95% | 4.96 ? -31% | 13.6 ? -258% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 7.7 -17% | 7.2 -9% | 9.9 -50% | 8.6 -30% | 8.61 ? -30% | 19 ? -188% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.6 -8% | 11.4 -28% | 12 -35% | 39.1 -339% | 14.8 ? -66% | 26.8 ? -201% |
| Load Average * | 78.4 | 75 4% | 80.8 -3% | 68.4 13% | 65.9 16% | 81.7 ? -4% | 106.3 ? -36% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 82 | 92 -12% | 93.6 -14% | 94.9 -16% | 106.9 -30% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 124 | 135 -9% | 144.5 -17% | 130.9 -6% | 141.3 -14% | 131.9 ? -6% | 249 ? -101% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 45 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17IRH 81LL001YGE i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 45 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | 43% | 8% | 78% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 469 | 951 103% | 466 -1% | 916 95% | 565 ? 20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 368 | 371 1% | 385 5% | 285 -23% | 482 31% | 375 ? 2% |
| Load | 59 | 71 20% | 87 47% | 123 108% | 85.6 ? 45% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 59 | 78.3 ? |
För
+ matt IPS-skärm
+ skaplig spelprestanda
+ ljusstark skärm med bra kontrast
+ bra tangentbord
+ bra batteritid
Emot
- saknar minneskortsläsare
- WiFi-hastigheter under genomsnittet
- dålig klickplatta
Omdöme - Bara mindre brister
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming visar att till och med budgetdatorer med aningen lägre grafikprestanda kan passa bra till spel. Men man får stå ut med en del i utbyte, exempelvis en aningen svag klickplatta samt att datorn saknar minneskortsläsare. Den kunde också haft snabbare WiFi.
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH Gaming kan spela spel utan problem till ett lågt pris.
Tillsammans med bra servicemöjligheter och en ljusstark skärm med bra kontrast och svärta är det mycket Lenovo gör rätt. Även om processorn lyckades prestera bra i det motsvarande testet och inte visade upp några tapp i prestanda blev vi förvånade över att prestandan var dålig i testet som rörde generell systemprestanda. Enkelkanals-RAM och SSD-enheten kan vara misstänkta. Även om den sistnämnda kan bytas ut har man tyvärr inget val när det kommer till minnet. Vid vardagsbruk märks dock inte de måttfulla PCMark-resultaten.
Lenovo IdeaPad L340-15IRH 81LK00BMGE
- 09/28/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Gaming - Vägt medel
Price comparison
