Test: Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05 (Legion 7i) - Utmärkt prestanda och skärm (Sammanfattning)
Lenovo 7i (Legion 7 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 5.3 GHz, 99.49 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54.9 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 735 MHz, Minne: 1353 MHz, 91.49 W TDP, GDDR6, 457.51, Ja
Minne
32 GB
, DDR4-3200 Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO048E, IPS, glansig: nej, HDR, 240 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB
, 1.8 GB ledigt
Vikt
2.383 kg, Strömförsörjning: 875 g
Pris
3200 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.4 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | 04/2020 | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1421 (1349-1450)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1238 (1020-1354)
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (777-1768)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1039 (522-1214)
25.8 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
20 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
26 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
12 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO048E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 508 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 468.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.7 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 472 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2238:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE AUO048E, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R3 P87F AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 0% | -2% | -0% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.3 | 69.9 -1% | 70.3 0% | 68.6 -2% | 69.9 -1% | 70.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.1 0% | 99.5 0% | 98.9 -1% | 99.6 0% | 99 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.3 | 71.1 0% | 72.2 1% | 69.8 -2% | 71.4 0% | 71.4 0% |
| Response Times | -33% | -55% | 8% | -48% | 6% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8 ? | 11.2 ? -40% | 14.4 ? -80% | 4 ? 50% | 14.4 ? -80% | 6 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 10 ? -25% | 10.4 ? -30% | 10.8 ? -35% | 9.2 ? -15% | 9 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -3% | -19% | -17% | -1% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 470 | 339.4 -28% | 320 -32% | 326.7 -30% | 307.2 -35% | 347 -26% |
| Brightness | 468 | 331 -29% | 318 -32% | 316 -32% | 301 -36% | 328 -30% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 92 8% | 88 4% | 87 2% | 91 7% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.24 -14% | 0.24 -14% | 0.33 -57% | 0.21 -0% | 0.285 -36% |
| Contrast | 2238 | 1414 -37% | 1333 -40% | 990 -56% | 1463 -35% | 1218 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.28 | 1.58 52% | 4.03 -23% | 2.4 27% | 1.85 44% | 2.35 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.31 | 3.8 48% | 8.43 -15% | 6.06 17% | 3.92 46% | 4.15 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 1.47 -84% | 0.98 -23% | 1.51 -89% | 1.26 -58% | 1.16 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.49 | 2.3 49% | 5.94 -32% | 3.2 29% | 2 55% | 3.04 32% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.24 98% | 2.42 91% | 2.13 103% | 2.15 102% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 7438 87% | 6952 93% | 6751 96% | 7129 91% | 6479 100% | 6658 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | 64.8 0% | 66 2% | 63.7 -2% | 65 0% | 65 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 99.4 0% | 99 0% | 99.2 0% | 99.7 1% | 99 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-6% | -25% /
-20% | -4% /
-11% | -16% /
-7% | -0% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1649 (1629.93-1670.36)
Alienware m15 R3 P87F Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1338 (1320.39-1347.39)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1622 (1604.75-1733.1)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1028 (1017.94-1187.05)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (465 - 507, n=13) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (3526 - 4487, n=13) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (5081 - 5542, n=13) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (43786 - 49275, n=13) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1283 - 1401, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (7634 - 8666, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13) | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
| Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6574 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
| MSI GS66 10SGS | |
| Alienware m15 R3 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Alienware m15 R3 P87F 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0) | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -7% | -5% | -14% | -7% | 1% | 17% | |
| Write 4K | 110.4 | 132.5 20% | 131.7 19% | 67.3 -39% | 128.4 16% | 135.7 23% | 175.9 ? 59% |
| Read 4K | 55.1 | 45.03 -18% | 47.34 -14% | 41.47 -25% | 53.7 -3% | 46.98 -15% | 49.7 ? -10% |
| Write Seq | 1987 | 2884 | 2239 | 1875 | 2180 | 4078 ? | |
| Read Seq | 1434 | 2303 | 2112 | 2315 | 1949 | 3653 ? | |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 466.6 | 467.5 0% | 423.9 -9% | 488.9 5% | 427.2 -8% | 510 9% | 540 ? 16% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 517 | 536 4% | 487.7 -6% | 557 8% | 440.7 -15% | 569 10% | 456 ? -12% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3424 | 2003 -42% | 2822 -18% | 2654 -22% | 2793 -18% | 2984 -13% | 4457 ? 30% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3519 | 3306 -6% | 3478 -1% | 3137 -11% | 3101 -12% | 3238 -8% | 5307 ? 51% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1496 | 1496 ? 0% | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1597 | 1597 ? 0% | |||||
| AS SSD | -12% | 1% | -79% | -15% | -2% | 12% | |
| Seq Read | 3088 | 1086 -65% | 2767 -10% | 2058 -33% | 1982 -36% | 1950 -37% | 3515 ? 14% |
| Seq Write | 2561 | 1901 -26% | 2613 2% | 2316 -10% | 1444 -44% | 2322 -9% | 2878 ? 12% |
| 4K Read | 43.01 | 51 19% | 47.55 11% | 39.72 -8% | 50.3 17% | 45.48 6% | 48.4 ? 13% |
| 4K Write | 102 | 117.3 15% | 98.9 -3% | 62.9 -38% | 120.1 18% | 95.4 -6% | 165.6 ? 62% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1549 | 1503 -3% | 1205 -22% | 1334 -14% | 1016 -34% | 1484 -4% | 1419 ? -8% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1378 | 1721 25% | 2007 46% | 1271 -8% | 1351 -2% | 1887 37% | 1348 ? -2% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.059 -16% | 0.065 -27% | 0.062 -22% | 0.044 14% | 0.051 -0% | 0.0455 ? 11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.1 -170% | 0.038 -3% | 0.388 -949% | 0.109 -195% | 0.038 -3% | 0.04375 ? -18% |
| Score Read | 1901 | 1662 -13% | 1529 -20% | 1580 -17% | 1264 -34% | 1725 -9% | 1818 ? -4% |
| Score Write | 1737 | 2029 17% | 2367 36% | 1565 -10% | 1615 -7% | 2215 28% | 1801 ? 4% |
| Score Total | 4583 | 4588 0% | 4677 2% | 3968 -13% | 3510 -23% | 4843 6% | 4521 ? -1% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2684 | 2155 -20% | 1685 -37% | 3474 29% | 1903 -29% | 2919 ? 9% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 544 | 715 31% | 669 23% | 751 38% | 505 -7% | 706 ? 30% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1116 | 1506 35% | 1493 34% | 1684 51% | 1113 0% | 1560 ? 40% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-11% | -2% /
-1% | -47% /
-59% | -11% /
-12% | -1% /
-1% | 15% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3519 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3424 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
517 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
466.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
55.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
110.4 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
1496 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
1597 MB/s
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26066 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19229 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 10158 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8621 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
Alienware m15 R3 P87F GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0); FPS: Ø70.8 (65-79)
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0): Ø88.8 (73-93)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0): Ø76.5 (71-83)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø74.8 (63-82)
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 345 | 245 | 160 | 88.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 156 | 141 | 134 | 128 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 114 | 104 | 87.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 154 | 122 | 116 | 110 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 150 | 120 | 116 | 106 |
| Battlefield V (2018) | 173 | 148 | 135 | 125 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 49.3 / 46.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.35 / 1.5 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 9 / 12.6 / 17 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
115 / 216 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -10% | -146% | -20% | 0% | -28% | -33% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9 | 14.9 -66% | 11 -22% | 34 -278% | 8 11% | 10.6 -18% | 12.9 ? -43% | 13.5 ? -50% |
| Idle Average * | 12.6 | 17.5 -39% | 15 -19% | 48.6 -286% | 9.8 22% | 13.1 -4% | 17.3 ? -37% | 18.9 ? -50% |
| Idle Maximum * | 17 | 29.5 -74% | 25 -47% | 58.2 -242% | 25.8 -52% | 15.8 7% | 26.9 ? -58% | 26.7 ? -57% |
| Load Average * | 115 | 94.8 18% | 95 17% | 129.4 -13% | 169 -47% | 131 -14% | 123.9 ? -8% | 106.3 ? 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 159 | 146.1 8% | 140 12% | 214.5 -35% | 201 -26% | 146 8% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 216 | 210.9 2% | 211 2% | 257.3 -19% | 271.6 -26% | 169 22% | 205 ? 5% | 249 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh | Alienware m15 R3 P87F i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 86 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 57% | 39% | -33% | 24% | 162% | 143% | |
| H.264 | 92 | 437 375% | 409 ? 345% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 204 | 413 102% | 378 85% | 167 -18% | 293 44% | 366 79% | 375 ? 84% |
| Load | 85 | 94 11% | 78 -8% | 44 -48% | 88 4% | 113 33% | 85.6 ? 1% |
| Reader / Idle | 614 | 495 | 299 | 486 | 522 | 565 ? |
För
+ Utmärkt 240 Hz-skärm
+ Enastående prestandautveckling
+ Konsekvent hög prestanda
+ Tilltalande design med utförlig RGB-belysning
+ Bra kylning tack vare Vapor Chamber (endast på specifika modeller)
Emot
- Tangentbordet och klickplattan ser billiga ut
- Högt pris
Omdöme - Utmärkt prestanda och skärm
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Lenovo Legion 7 har ren spelprestanda som huvudfokus. En Core i9-10980HK CPU och en GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GPU säkrar riktigt snabb bilduppdatering i spel, vilket datorn kan upprätthålla även vid ihållande belastning tack vare ett bra kylsystem. 240 Hz-skärmen har hög ljusstyrka och är utan like när det kommer till kvalitet. Även om en del konkurrenter erbjuder ännu bättre hantverk lämnade vår testenhet ett gediget intryck tack vare sitt metallhölje. Dessutom var den visuellt sett tilltalande. Det finns med andra ord ingen anledning att klaga på datorns grundkvaliteter.
Däremot lämnade inmatningsenheterna en hel del att önska. De var verkligen en besvikelse, särskilt om du hoppats på några likheter med Lenovos ThinkPad-modeller. Även om det kanske inte är helt nödvändigt att utrusta en speldator med de bästa styrplattorna bör man förvänta sig ett lite bättre tangentbord i den här prisklassen. Inte ens de många justerbara ljuseffekterna kan kompensera för detta.
Lenovo Legion 7 fokuserar på det viktigaste.
Men det största felet med Legion 7 är egentligen att den släpps nu: Den nya generationen av mobila grafikkort, som troligen kommer innebära ett stort steg framåt i prestanda, kan släppas så tidigt som i Januari nästa år. Så oavsett om du hoppas på högre prestanda eller lägre pris kan det vara värt att vänta ett tag. I det sistnämnda fallet kan det också vara värt att hålla kolla på hur priset på Legion 7 utvecklas, för den är fortfarande en imponerande spellaptop med bra hantverk och en förstklassig skärm.
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE
- 12/23/2020 v7 (old)
Marius Schell
Gaming - Vägt medel
Price comparison
