Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Lenovo Moto G4 Plus smartphone (sammanfattning)

Plus = bättre? Moto G4 Plus är i princip samma lur som Moto G4, men med en bättre kamera, snabbladdning och en fingeravtrycksläsare. Är det värt att bränna mer pengar på den dyrare modellen?
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus (Moto Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 405
Minne
2048 MB 
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 401 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, IPS, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.82 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: headset, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, gyroskop, närhet, USB OTG
Nätverk
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2 LE, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.8 x 153 x 76.6
Batteri
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 24 tim
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, Laserautofokus, phase-shift-autofokus, Dual-LED-blixt, Video@1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: högtalare fram, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Turbo-laddare, 12 Månader Garanti, vattenavstötande nano-beläggning, fanless
Vikt
155 g, Strömförsörjning: 93 g
Pris
300 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

153 mm 76.6 mm 9.8 mm 155 g151.8 mm 74.9 mm 9.85 mm 178 g151.3 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 158 g148 mm 75 mm 10.9 mm 169 g146.8 mm 72.6 mm 7.5 mm 147 g142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: Overview
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: Overview
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: Crossing
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: Crossing
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: River
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus: River
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: Crossing
Garmin Edge 500: River
Garmin Edge 500: River

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
566
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 619 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 588.6 cd/m² Minimum: 24.93 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 609 cd/m²
Kontrast: 967:1 (Svärta: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.06
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
OnePlus 2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Honor 5X
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Huawei P9 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Motorola Moto X Play
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
4%
-8%
-15%
-2%
-10%
Brightness middle
609
451
-26%
535
-12%
505
-17%
641
5%
418
-31%
Brightness
589
446
-24%
521
-12%
468
-21%
620
5%
407
-31%
Brightness Distribution
87
90
3%
85
-2%
88
1%
93
7%
95
9%
Black Level *
0.63
0.3
52%
0.43
32%
0.74
-17%
0.4
37%
0.49
22%
Contrast
967
1503
55%
1244
29%
682
-29%
1603
66%
853
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.8
3.84
-1%
4.88
-28%
4.1
-8%
5.37
-41%
3.92
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.3
8.66
-4%
5.8
30%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
3.97
-28%
5.2
-68%
4.9
-58%
6.01
-94%
3.81
-23%
Gamma
2.06 107%
2.46 89%
2.26 97%
2.5 88%
2.44 90%
2.27 97%
CCT
6725 97%
7283 89%
7766 84%
7116 91%
7806 83%
7361 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90.14

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
45232 Points
OnePlus 2
65936 Points +46%
Honor 5X
37152 Points -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
50366 Points +11%
Motorola Moto X Play
36800 Points -19%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
717 Points
OnePlus 2
1140 Points +59%
Honor 5X
698 Points -3%
Huawei P9 Lite
883 Points +23%
Motorola Moto X Play
717 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
526 Points -27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3057 Points
OnePlus 2
4804 Points +57%
Honor 5X
3047 Points 0%
Huawei P9 Lite
3768 Points +23%
Motorola Moto X Play
2558 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1561 Points -49%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9717 Points
OnePlus 2
22400 Points +131%
Honor 5X
7852 Points -19%
Huawei P9 Lite
11769 Points +21%
Motorola Moto X Play
7561 Points -22%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
4402 Points -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9773 Points
OnePlus 2
31858 Points +226%
Honor 5X
7764 Points -21%
Huawei P9 Lite
11318 Points +16%
Motorola Moto X Play
7796 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3789 Points -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
9527 Points
OnePlus 2
10985 Points +15%
Honor 5X
8174 Points -14%
Huawei P9 Lite
13676 Points +44%
Motorola Moto X Play
6839 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
10148 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
667 Points
OnePlus 2
1734 Points +160%
Honor 5X
129 Points -81%
Huawei P9 Lite
554 Points -17%
Motorola Moto X Play
218 Points -67%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
49 Points -93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
605 Points
OnePlus 2
1854 Points +206%
Honor 5X
103 Points -83%
Huawei P9 Lite
473 Points -22%
Motorola Moto X Play
178 Points -71%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
39 Points -94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1042 Points
OnePlus 2
1414 Points +36%
Honor 5X
1089 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Lite
1373 Points +32%
Motorola Moto X Play
974 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
758 Points -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
18 fps
OnePlus 2
47 fps +161%
Honor 5X
14 fps -22%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps +6%
Motorola Moto X Play
15 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
9.5 fps -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
17 fps
OnePlus 2
48 fps +182%
Honor 5X
14 fps -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
19 fps +12%
Motorola Moto X Play
15 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.3 fps -69%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
7 fps
OnePlus 2
23 fps +229%
Honor 5X
5.9 fps -16%
Huawei P9 Lite
8.4 fps +20%
Motorola Moto X Play
6.2 fps -11%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3.7 fps -47%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
6.6 fps
OnePlus 2
23 fps +248%
Honor 5X
5.4 fps -18%
Huawei P9 Lite
7.8 fps +18%
Motorola Moto X Play
5.8 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1.7 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.6 fps
OnePlus 2
19 fps +313%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.9 fps +7%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
4.2 fps
OnePlus 2
19 fps +352%
Huawei P9 Lite
4.5 fps +7%
Motorola Moto X Play
4.2 fps 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
283 Points
OnePlus 2
1681 Points +494%
Honor 5X
297 Points +5%
Huawei P9 Lite
1197 Points +323%
Motorola Moto X Play
701 Points +148%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
515 Points +82%
System (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
1359 Points
OnePlus 2
2536 Points +87%
Honor 5X
1378 Points +1%
Huawei P9 Lite
2438 Points +79%
Motorola Moto X Play
1177 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1166 Points -14%
Memory (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
604 Points
OnePlus 2
1297 Points +115%
Honor 5X
787 Points +30%
Huawei P9 Lite
1346 Points +123%
Motorola Moto X Play
595 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
394 Points -35%
Graphics (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
805 Points
OnePlus 2
2631 Points +227%
Honor 5X
763 Points -5%
Huawei P9 Lite
818 Points +2%
Motorola Moto X Play
785 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
315 Points -61%
Web (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
10 Points
OnePlus 2
923 Points +9130%
Honor 5X
9 Points -10%
Huawei P9 Lite
765 Points +7550%
Motorola Moto X Play
710 Points +7000%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
484 Points +4740%

Legend

 
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5X Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3656 Points
OnePlus 2
6955 Points +90%
Honor 5X
3595 Points -2%
Huawei P9 Lite
4756 Points +30%
Motorola Moto X Play
3764 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
11102 ms *
OnePlus 2
6585 ms * +41%
Honor 5X
12510 ms * -13%
Huawei P9 Lite
9397 ms * +15%
Motorola Moto X Play
11694 ms * -5%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
11843 ms * -7%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
61 Points
OnePlus 2
80 Points +31%
Honor 5X
65 Points +7%
Huawei P9 Lite
67 Points +10%
Motorola Moto X Play
56 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
52 Points -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
22.8 Points
OnePlus 2
44.29 Points +94%
Honor 5X
21.92 Points -4%
Huawei P9 Lite
29.03 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Play
24.51 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
20.83 Points -9%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
271.4 MB/s
OnePlus 2
234.2 MB/s -14%
Honor 5X
144 MB/s -47%
Huawei P9 Lite
283.5 MB/s +4%
Motorola Moto X Play
139 MB/s -49%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.4 MB/s -52%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
43.48 MB/s
OnePlus 2
125.5 MB/s +189%
Honor 5X
78 MB/s +79%
Huawei P9 Lite
46.24 MB/s +6%
Motorola Moto X Play
75 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s -49%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
36.32 MB/s
OnePlus 2
21.87 MB/s -40%
Honor 5X
17 MB/s -53%
Huawei P9 Lite
38.22 MB/s +5%
Motorola Moto X Play
16 MB/s -56%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s -37%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
35.79 MB/s
OnePlus 2
13.94 MB/s -61%
Honor 5X
10 MB/s -72%
Huawei P9 Lite
15.35 MB/s -57%
Motorola Moto X Play
16 MB/s -55%
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s -86%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
74.4 MB/s
Huawei P9 Lite
60.8 MB/s -18%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
46.92 MB/s
Huawei P9 Lite
25.1 MB/s -47%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high25 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high30 fps
Heat front
Heat front
Heat back
Heat back
Hög belastning
 42.7 °C41.2 °C37.9 °C 
 42.7 °C38.3 °C36.4 °C 
 38.3 °C37.9 °C36.1 °C 
Max: 42.7 °C
Medel: 39.1 °C
34.7 °C40.7 °C43 °C
35.1 °C38.4 °C38.4 °C
35.1 °C38.2 °C37 °C
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 37.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.5 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.91 / 1.96 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.88 / 8.74 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
OnePlus 2
 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto X Play
 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Power Consumption
2%
-14%
0%
-5%
38%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.6
5%
0.87
-38%
0.73
-16%
0.9
-43%
0.4
37%
Idle Average *
1.91
1.7
11%
2.08
-9%
2.09
-9%
1.6
16%
1
48%
Idle Maximum *
1.96
1.8
8%
2.22
-13%
2.11
-8%
1.8
8%
1.2
39%
Load Average *
3.88
5.7
-47%
5.26
-36%
4.15
-7%
4.9
-26%
2.9
25%
Load Maximum *
8.74
6
31%
6.34
27%
5.05
42%
7.2
18%
5
43%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
20tim 26min
WiFi Websurfing
12tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12tim 55min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
3tim 21min
Lenovo Moto G4 Plus
3000 mAh
Motorola Moto X Play
 mAh
Honor 5X
3000 mAh
Huawei P9 Lite
3000 mAh
OnePlus 2
 mAh
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-19%
1%
-12%
0%
Reader / Idle
1226
1145
-7%
1053
-14%
1404
15%
1393
14%
1364
11%
H.264
775
742
-4%
602
-22%
568
-27%
580
-25%
677
-13%
WiFi v1.3
735
674
-8%
643
-13%
604
-18%
356
-52%
526
-28%
Load
201
174
-13%
144
-28%
272
35%
229
14%
264
31%

För

+ mycket ljusstark skärm
+ bra färgreproduktion
+ skarpa bilder
+ greppvänligt hölje
+ lång batteritid
+ bra prestanda
+ Android 6.0.1

Emot

- fingeravtrycksläsaren har bara en funktion
- GPS-modulen inte alltid exakt
- medioker mikrofon
- batteri ej utbytbart
In review: Motorola Moto G4. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Motorola Moto G4. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

Moto G4 Plus är något dyrare än Moto G4. I gengäld får du en mycket bra kamera, fingeravtrycksläsare och en snabbladdningsfunktion (som är riktigt bekväm i kombination med rätt adapter).

Moto G4 Plus är därför en bra investering jämfört med G4, men även i största allmänhet, eftersom vi inte hittat några allvarliga problem. Visst är det märkligt att du inte kan använda fingeravtrycksläsaren som hemknapp, och vissa nya anslutningsmöjligheter saknas. GPS-modulen inte heller perfekt och röstkvaliteten kan förbättras.

Däremot får du en mycket ljusstark skärm med bra färger, ett relativt snabbt system, en fräsch Android-version, en anständig högtalare, snabbladdning och bra batteritid för pengarna. Sammantaget förtjänar Moto G4 Plus helt klart en köprekommendation.

Lenovo Moto G4 Plus - 06/08/2016 v5.1 (old)
Florian Wimmer

Design
84%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
94%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 75%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
25 / 63 → 39%
Programprestanda
27 / 70 → 38%
Temperatur
87%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
77%
Medel
72%
85%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Lenovo Moto G4 Plus smartphone (sammanfattning)
Florian Wimmer, 2016-07-19 (Update: 2016-07-19)