Test: Lenovo ThinkPad A485 (Ryzen 5 Pro) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Connections
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 273 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1058:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.24% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 Lenovo LP140WF6-SPB7, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X AU Optronics AUO263D, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -10% | 49% | 74% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.24 | 39.24 -2% | 36.28 -10% | 61.3 52% | 72.8 81% |
sRGB Coverage | 60 | 58.8 -2% | 54.6 -9% | 87.6 46% | 97.9 63% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.57 | 40.56 -2% | 37.48 -10% | 62.3 50% | 74.1 78% |
Response Times | 26% | 3% | 26% | 17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 35.6 ? 21% | 46.9 ? -5% | 35 ? 22% | 38.4 ? 14% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 24.8 ? 30% | 31.2 ? 11% | 25 ? 29% | 28.4 ? 19% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | ||||
Screen | 4% | 1% | 35% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 275 | 307 12% | 227 -17% | 421 53% | 352 28% |
Brightness | 272 | 295 8% | 211 -22% | 398 46% | 343 26% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 90 6% | 88 4% | 86 1% | 91 7% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.25 4% | 0.19 27% | 0.27 -4% | 0.46 -77% |
Contrast | 1058 | 1228 16% | 1195 13% | 1559 47% | 765 -28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5.7 3% | 5.6 5% | 4.08 31% | 3.3 44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20 | 21.3 -7% | 22.4 -12% | 7.48 63% | 7.3 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.9 | 4.7 4% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3.7 -3% | 2.4 33% | 2.92 19% | 5.3 -47% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.11 104% | 2.44 90% | 2.32 95% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6798 96% | 7353 88% | 6506 100% | 7043 92% | 6452 101% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.1 | 37.4 -2% | 34.5 -9% | 57 50% | 68.4 80% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.6 | 58.7 -2% | 54.4 -9% | 87 46% | 98 64% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
5% | -2% /
-1% | 37% /
37% | 36% /
28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2937 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4123 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2673 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -19% | 43% | -30% | -2% | 20% | |
Read Seq | 1193 | 1549 30% | 1540 29% | 465.1 -61% | 922 -23% | 1837 ? 54% |
Write Seq | 1280 | 269.7 -79% | 1613 26% | 425 -67% | 928 -27% | 1402 ? 10% |
Read 512 | 765 | 823 8% | 835 9% | 410.1 -46% | 561 -27% | 860 ? 12% |
Write 512 | 1169 | 298.1 -74% | 1716 47% | 360.7 -69% | 567 -51% | 1038 ? -11% |
Read 4k | 52.2 | 24.9 -52% | 66.9 28% | 27.34 -48% | 64.4 23% | 47.3 ? -9% |
Write 4k | 89.7 | 97.1 8% | 160.6 79% | 89 -1% | 108 20% | 103 ? 15% |
Read 4k QD32 | 286.5 | 310.6 8% | 444.9 55% | 295.6 3% | 383.4 34% | 348 ? 21% |
Write 4k QD32 | 205.6 | 208.4 1% | 343 67% | 300.2 46% | 271.4 32% | 341 ? 66% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 10336 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2875 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8192 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1585 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (27.7 - 49.3, n=10) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE | |
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 29.5 | 9.8 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 34.2 | 10.9 | ||
Civilization VI (2016) | 43.6 | 11.1 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 29.6 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 31.6 / 31.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.9 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.6 °C / -8.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.31 / 0.69 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5.3 / 8.3 / 11.4 Watt |
Hög belastning |
42 / 48.8 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | 4% | 15% | -5% | 3% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 4.9 8% | 3.1 42% | 3.3 38% | 3.6 32% | 5.68 ? -7% | 4.54 ? 14% |
Idle Average * | 8.3 | 8.1 2% | 6.8 18% | 5.54 33% | 7.1 14% | 8.75 ? -5% | 7.49 ? 10% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.4 | 10.6 7% | 10.1 11% | 6.59 42% | 9.5 17% | 10.1 ? 11% | 9.14 ? 20% |
Load Average * | 42 | 32.2 23% | 48.4 -15% | 42.4 -1% | 63.9 -52% | 37.8 ? 10% | 42.8 ? -2% |
Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 42.3 13% | 67.1 -38% | 67.6 -39% | 67.3 -38% | 46.2 ? 5% | 61.3 ? -26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE R5 PRO 2500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 5490-TD70X i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480-20L6S01V00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02D00 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 18% | 116% | 124% | 80% | 85% | |
Reader / Idle | 671 | 639 -5% | 1556 132% | 1671 149% | 1300 ? 94% | |
H.264 | 368 | 426 16% | 791 115% | 638 73% | 721 96% | 704 ? 91% |
WiFi v1.3 | 330 | 394 19% | 897 172% | 794 141% | 537 63% | 600 ? 82% |
Load | 68 | 95 40% | 97 43% | 159 134% | 124 82% | 118.1 ? 74% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Lenovo ThinkPad A485 hade verkligen stor potential: ThinkPad T-serien, som ThinkPad A är baserad på, är extremt populär och det finns en stor efterfrågan på bra Ryzen-baserade bärbara datorer. Men denna Ryzen-ThinkPad visade sig vara en besvikelse i våra tester.
Som exempel beror det på att Lenovo i onödan har hållt QHD-skärmen borta från ThinkPad A485 och dessutom saknar A485 Thunderbolt 3. Vidare ligger CPU-prestandan långt efter den Intel-baserade syskonmodellen ThinkPad T480. Än värre är faktum att energiförbrukningen är alldeles för hög, vilket resulterar i extremt dåligt batteritid i jämförelse med T480. Detta är bara till viss del Lenovos fel, då modeller med Ryzen oftast får kämpa med högre energiförbrukning jämfört med Intel-baserade modeller.
Lenovo ThinkPad A485 har förstås även många positiva sidor, vilket leder till ett bra omdöme. Dessa inkluderar det robusta höljet, de utmärkta inmatningsenheterna och den väl tilltagna anslutningsutrustningen. Men allt det får du även på ThinkPad T480. Det är bara när det kommer till grafikprestanda som A485 ligger före, men endast jämfört med iGPU-varianten av T480. Modellen med GeForce MX150 är bättre även på den punkten.
Rekommenderas inte: Allt som gör ThinkPad A485 till en bra laptop klarar ThinkPad T480 också av, samtidigt som den har bättre CPU-prestanda och batteritid än A485.
I slutändan kan vi inte riktigt rekommendera ThinkPad A485. I praktiken är Lenovo ThinkPad T480 verkligen ett bättre val på alla sätt. Och vill du undvika Intel-processorer bör du istället välja HP EliteBook 745 G5, som inte riktigt har lika dålig batteritid och som dessutom har en aningen bättre LCD-panel.
Uppdaterad UEFI: Version 1.02: Vi har testat ThinkPad A485 igen med en nyare UEFI BIOS. Batteritiden har nu förbättrats en aning och processorn presterar även bättre vid belastning med denna nya firmware. Vi har därför justerat poängsumman och vill också modifiera vårt omdöme en aning: Även om ThinkPad T480 fortsätter att vara bättre än A485 är den sistnämnda ett intressant alternativ på grund av sitt relativt överkomliga pris, i synnerhet om du behöver en aning mer GPU-prestanda.
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE
- 10/22/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig