Test: Lenovo ThinkPad E15 - För mycket prestanda och för lite kylning (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640 | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.1 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130 | 2 kg | 18.04 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Jämförelse av storlek och vikt
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 81 %
Mitt på batteriet: 284 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1286:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.25% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE NV156FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Lenovo B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE LP156WFC-SPD1, aSi IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5581 156CL04 1G2XW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -2% | -2% | 61% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.25 | 39.88 -1% | 38.79 -4% | 38.86 -3% | 66 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 59.9 4% | 58.3 1% | 58.5 1% | 92.1 60% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.59 | 41.21 -1% | 40.11 -4% | 40.15 -3% | 66.5 60% |
Response Times | 7% | 25% | -10% | 667% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 47.2 ? 5% | 37.2 ? 25% | 36 ? 27% | 43.2 ? 13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 32.8 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 24% | 27 ? 25% | 34.4 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | 208 ? -83% | 26040 ? 1983% | ||
Screen | 15% | 12% | 19% | 32% | |
Brightness middle | 283 | 284 0% | 276 -2% | 231 -18% | 289.4 2% |
Brightness | 258 | 272 5% | 262 2% | 213 -17% | 273 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 92 14% | 88 9% | 87 7% | 82 1% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.21 5% | 0.23 -5% | 0.13 41% | 0.27 -23% |
Contrast | 1286 | 1352 5% | 1200 -7% | 1777 38% | 1072 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 5.3 33% | 5.6 29% | 4.81 39% | 2.32 71% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.6 | 18.9 20% | 16.4 31% | 8.33 65% | 5.76 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.8 | 4.4 24% | 4.7 19% | 4.2 28% | 2.49 57% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 3.2 52% | 3 55% | 5.19 21% | 3 55% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.18 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 5735 113% | 6736 96% | 7075 92% | 7088 92% | 6867 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 37.9 2% | 36.9 0% | 37 0% | 59.8 62% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.1 | 59.7 5% | 58.1 2% | 58 2% | 92 61% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
11% | 12% /
11% | 2% /
10% | 253% /
149% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4045 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5142 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5023 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Vostro 15-5581 SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Average Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -28% | 17% | -48% | 55% | -3% | |
Write 4K | 144.4 | 111.2 -23% | 126.2 -13% | 129.3 -10% | 208.4 44% | 129.5 ? -10% |
Read 4K | 52.3 | 49.01 -6% | 48.93 -6% | 41.02 -22% | 51 -2% | 45.1 ? -14% |
Write Seq | 946 | 586 -38% | 1345 42% | 203.4 -78% | 2687 184% | 1172 ? 24% |
Read Seq | 1608 | 783 -51% | 1373 -15% | 271.2 -83% | 2168 35% | 1496 ? -7% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 592 | 263 -56% | 383.8 -35% | 252.3 -57% | 489.2 -17% | 448 ? -24% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 397.7 | 481.5 21% | 434.8 9% | 281.4 -29% | 600 51% | 415 ? 4% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1364 | 784 -43% | 2966 117% | 319.8 -77% | 2699 98% | 1397 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2301 | 1602 -30% | 3230 40% | 1589 -31% | 3374 47% | 2307 ? 0% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20261 poäng | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 14141 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5243 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 61367 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13593 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3049 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1100 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=71, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 640 (19.7 - 19.9, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 150.5 | 94.1 | 74.4 | 27.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 63.2 | 38.4 | 19.7 | 11.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110 | 95.5 | 51.7 | 48.2 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 64.7 | 28.6 | 19.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 21 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 42 | 22 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 39 | 20 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 61.8 | 29.8 | 23.2 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 72 | 27 | 20 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 37 | 17 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 52 | 18 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 61.8 | 20.5 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 51.4 | 16.9 | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 55 | 23 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 112.6 | |||
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 29 | |||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 60.6 | 20.4 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 31.7 | 14.3 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 25.9 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 31.7 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 34.8 / 34.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 67.8 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
Av/Standby | 0.47 / 0.71 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.2 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt |
Hög belastning |
44 / 66.4 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, aSi IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average AMD Radeon RX 640 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -24% | -9% | -72% | -2% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 3.48 -9% | 4.1 -28% | 5 -56% | 6.6 -106% | 3.25 ? -2% | 4.48 ? -40% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.2 -6% | 8.3 -22% | 7.9 -16% | 9.9 -46% | 6.5 ? 4% | 7.43 ? -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 10.2 -7% | 11.8 -24% | 11.2 -18% | 14.7 -55% | 8.95 ? 6% | 8.91 ? 6% |
Load Average * | 44 | 59.6 -35% | 61.6 -40% | 34 23% | 82.9 -88% | 51.6 ? -17% | 42 ? 5% |
Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 65.1 2% | 69.4 -5% | 50.2 24% | 109.3 -65% | 66.5 ? -0% | 61.6 ? 7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 54.4 | 59.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 57 Wh | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | 48% | -19% | -12% | 19% | |
H.264 | 625 | 541 -13% | 725 16% | 394 -37% | 716 ? 15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 447 | 423 -5% | 628 40% | 410 -8% | 388 -13% | 608 ? 36% |
Load | 112 | 105 -6% | 209 87% | 97 -13% | 101 -10% | 117.4 ? 5% |
Reader / Idle | 1133 | 747 | 924 | 1239 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
På namnet låter det som att Lenovo ThinkPad E15 är ett enormt steg framåt jämfört med Lenovo ThinkPad E590, men ThinkPad E15 påminner mycket om sin föregångare. Det grundläggande konceptet har inte ändrats men Lenovo har arbetat en del på detaljerna. Den har fortfarande det utmärkta ThinkPad-tangentbordet och en TrackPoint-enhet, vilket är sällsynt i det här prisskiktet. Chassit, som är gjort av aluminium och plast, är robust och uppgraderingsmöjligheterna är exemplariska – åtminstone när det kommer till masslagring.
I likhet med den mindre ThinkPad E14 innebär det tunnare chassit att en del funktioner har försvunnit. En av dem är microSD-platsen. Vi saknar verkligen också den andra RAM-platsen. Det som skiljer E15 från sitt mindre syskon är faktum att de saknade funktionerna inte är det största problemet. För problemet med ThinkPad E15 är att kylsystemet helt enkelt är överbelastat. I stress-testet fick vår ThinkPad strypa både CPU och GPU en hel del. Strypningen kan också ske vid vardagsbruk eller i det här fallet när man spelar spel. Dessutom blir chassit extremt varmt. På ett extra varmt ställe mätte vi upp 65 °C. Detta hände förvisso bara i stress-testet, men i det mindre krävande The Witcher 3-testet blev chassit nästan lika varmt.
För varm: En dedikerad GPU borde bara ingå om den kan kylas ordentligt vid belastning. Så är tyvärr inte fallet med Lenovo ThinkPad E15.
I slutändan kan vi inte rekommendera Lenovo ThinkPad E15 med en dGPU. AMD-chippet är helt enkelt malplacerat om det inte får tillräckligt med kylning. iGPU-versionen kan däremot vara mer prisvärd – som en större version av ThinkPad E14 eller som en bra laptop för hemmakontoret.
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE
- 03/17/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig