Test: Lenovo ThinkPad E470 (HD-Skärm, HD 620) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
Connectivity
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 81 %
Mitt på batteriet: 215 cd/m²
Kontrast: 360:1 (Svärta: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 NT140WHM-N41, , 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, , 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -4% | -3% | 3% | 6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.13 | 41.23 5% | 37.6 -4% | 38.15 -3% | 40.21 3% | 41.6 6% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.3 | 61.4 5% | 56.6 -3% | 56.7 -3% | 60.5 4% | 61.9 6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.43 | 42.67 6% | 38.85 -4% | 39.48 -2% | 41.55 3% | 43.06 7% |
Response Times | -55% | -36% | -30% | -47% | -69% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 40.8 ? 7% | 43.2 ? 2% | 44 ? -0% | 47 ? -7% | 41.6 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14 ? | 30.4 ? -117% | 24.4 ? -74% | 16 ? -14% | 26 ? -86% | 34 ? -143% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 50 ? -75% | ||||
Screen | 24% | 4% | 13% | -4% | 41% | |
Brightness middle | 209 | 244 17% | 216 3% | 249 19% | 206 -1% | 306 46% |
Brightness | 208 | 231 11% | 203 -2% | 238 14% | 193 -7% | 287 38% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 89 10% | 83 2% | 87 7% | 87 7% | 88 9% |
Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.37 36% | 0.47 19% | 0.41 29% | 0.48 17% | 0.3 48% |
Contrast | 360 | 659 83% | 460 28% | 607 69% | 429 19% | 1020 183% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.12 | 6.41 21% | 8.98 -11% | 9.09 -12% | 11 -35% | 6.2 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.18 | 13.4 12% | 14.07 7% | 14.64 4% | 19.57 -29% | 13.6 10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.86 | 5.94 40% | 9.61 3% | 9.92 -1% | 11.51 -17% | 5.8 41% |
Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.28 96% | 2.63 84% | 2.42 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.04 108% |
CCT | 10218 64% | 6101 107% | 11265 58% | 11177 58% | 13671 48% | 6277 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 39.3 6% | 35.9 -3% | 36.5 -1% | 38.46 4% | 39.62 7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 61.1 5% | 56.7 -2% | 56.7 -2% | 60.61 5% | 61.44 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
10% | -12% /
-3% | -7% /
2% | -16% /
-8% | -7% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3674 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4834 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3144 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -0% | -14% | 7% | -92% | 117% | |
Read Seq | 454.2 | 476.5 5% | 491.2 8% | 510 12% | 108.9 -76% | 1155 154% |
Write Seq | 438.1 | 458.7 5% | 322.2 -26% | 267.2 -39% | 103.2 -76% | 1076 146% |
Read 512 | 304.6 | 346.4 14% | 310.1 2% | 347.6 14% | 811 166% | |
Write 512 | 343.7 | 291.1 -15% | 276 -20% | 267.5 -22% | 862 151% | |
Read 4k | 34.15 | 35.15 3% | 19.57 -43% | 33.12 -3% | 0.362 -99% | 55.5 63% |
Write 4k | 75.1 | 78.8 5% | 77.8 4% | 95.9 28% | 0.946 -99% | 134.6 79% |
Read 4k QD32 | 284.2 | 276 -3% | 146.3 -49% | 392.8 38% | 0.721 -100% | 496.2 75% |
Write 4k QD32 | 208.8 | 178.3 -15% | 241.4 16% | 266.4 28% | 0.901 -100% | 425.4 104% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1522 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5502 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 789 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 39.74 | 23 () | 19 () | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 21.28 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 15.7 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 32.9 / 32.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.7 °C / 80.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.5 / 0.42 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5.2 / 7.6 / 9.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
31 / 29.7 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -4% | 8% | 7% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 2.7 48% | 3 42% | 3.8 27% | 5 4% | 3.21 38% |
Idle Average * | 7.6 | 5.5 28% | 5.4 29% | 7.6 -0% | 6.8 11% | 6.15 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.9 | 6.5 34% | 6.3 36% | 8 19% | 8.9 10% | 6.82 31% |
Load Average * | 31 | 44.2 -43% | 37.5 -21% | 30.5 2% | 26.2 15% | 28.5 8% |
Load Maximum * | 29.7 | 65.2 -120% | 61.1 -106% | 32.5 -9% | 31.8 -7% | 34.5 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad E470 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -9% | 6% | -26% | -19% | 1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1112 | 1043 -6% | 1083 -3% | 791 -29% | 668 -40% | |
H.264 | 546 | 503 -8% | 571 5% | 361 -34% | 623 14% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 480 | 326 -32% | 414 -14% | 400 -17% | 278 -42% | 438 -9% |
Load | 111 | 124 12% | 151 36% | 87 -22% | 140 26% | 110 -1% |
För
Emot
Slutsatsen är att E470 är en prisvärd företagsdator, men vi kan inte rekommendera den specifika konfiguration som vi recenserat idag.
Den delar många av sina fördelar med den andra E470: bekväma och dugliga inmatningsenheter med det närmast legendariska ThinkPad-tangentbordet och "track point"-pekutrustningen; ett stabilt och välgjort skal som, även om det inte är det tjusigaste får jobbet gjort väldigt väl; ett snabbt Wi-Fi modem och pålitlig applikationsprestanda - allt du kan förvänta dig från E470. Dom två aspekter som dagens recensionex slår den andra recenserade 940MX-utrustade ThinkPad E470 (Core i5, GeForce 940MX) är ett svalare system och längre batteritid. Avsaknaden av en Nvidia-GPU gör hela datorn mycket svalare och tystare och den låga skärmupplösningen resulterar i förbättrad batteritid.
Det är, dock, HD-skärmens enda fördel. I övrigt är skärmen katastrofal: alldeles för hög svärta, fruktansvärt smal betraktningsvinkel och en färgrymdstäckning som inte är värdig namnet. Vidare använder den PWM för ljusstyrke-modulering på väldigt låga frekvenser.
Vi kan inte rekommendera den specifika E470-modellen som recenseras tack vare dess obalanserade konfiguration och dess katastrofala skärm. Är du intresserad av E470, se till att du skaffar IPS-skärmen.
Bara detta är nog för att neka en rekommendation av E470. Nästan 6 700 SEK ($800) är helt enkelt för mycket för en laptop med en så dålig skärm som det här. Skulle du vara intresserad av E470 se till att du skaffar FHD IPS-skärmen. Oavsett så är E470 långt ifrån perfekt. Vi saknar exempelvis en USB-C port och Lenovos vanliga begränsade garanti på bara 12 månader är på den korta sidan. Vi kan leva med dessa nackdelar med tanke på datorns låga pris, men skärmen gör att det inte blir någon affär. Enheten var dessutom inkapabel att leverera sin maximala prestanda på batteri, och därför fick den slutgiltiga poängen minskas i enlighet med detta.
Lenovo ThinkPad E470
-
10/12/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig