Test: Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019 - Tunn arbetsstation med starkare GPU och svagare CPU
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=15, last 2 years) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Workstation (81.2 - 227, n=15, last 2 years) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 84 %
Mitt på batteriet: 521 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1322:1 (Svärta: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M Sharp SHP148D / LQ156D1, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 7% | 17% | 8% | 32% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 68.6 10% | 66.5 7% | 76.5 23% | 68.2 9% | 88.1 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.5 | 88.7 -3% | 98 7% | 98.4 8% | 96.2 5% | 99.6 9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.4 | 64.8 2% | 68.4 8% | 76.4 21% | 68.8 9% | 91.8 45% |
Response Times | -76% | -93% | -92% | -106% | 25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.4 ? | 52.8 ? -53% | 52.8 ? -53% | 48 ? -40% | 60.8 ? -77% | 2.3 ? 93% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14 ? | 36 ? -157% | 32 ? -129% | 33.6 ? -140% | 32.8 ? -134% | 2.4 ? 83% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 21370 ? -18% | 1020 ? -96% | 1000 -96% | 59.5 ? -100% | |
Screen | -26% | 14% | -12% | -5% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 542 | 331 -39% | 588 8% | 451.7 -17% | 417 -23% | 421.2 -22% |
Brightness | 528 | 305 -42% | 555 5% | 440 -17% | 412 -22% | 417 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 84 0% | 89 6% | 90 7% | 85 1% | 94 12% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.24 41% | 0.4 2% | 0.4 2% | 0.29 29% | |
Contrast | 1322 | 1379 4% | 1470 11% | 1129 -15% | 1438 9% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 5.6 -60% | 2.5 29% | 3.11 11% | 4.4 -26% | 6.06 -73% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 9.9 -27% | 6.3 19% | 8.62 -11% | 6.7 14% | 11.89 -52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 3 -131% | 0.6 54% | 3.07 -136% | 1.9 -46% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 6.3 -31% | 4.5 6% | 3.7 23% | 5 -4% | 2.8 42% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.11 104% | 2.28 96% | 2.15 102% |
CCT | 7690 85% | 7152 91% | 6836 95% | 6492 100% | 7575 86% | 6235 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.8 | 58 -1% | 63.2 7% | 69 17% | 62.3 6% | 81 38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.1 | 88.6 -3% | 98 8% | 98 8% | 96 5% | 99.6 9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-30% | -24% /
-6% | -29% /
-21% | -34% /
-15% | 16% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3986 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3897 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5332 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5046 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M SK hynix PC400 512 GB | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Average WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -21% | -23% | -26% | -7% | 8% | |
Write 4K | 162.2 | 108 -33% | 97.8 -40% | 102.7 -37% | 104.3 -36% | 183.3 ? 13% |
Read 4K | 43.71 | 37.24 -15% | 41.21 -6% | 38.32 -12% | 45.23 3% | 48.2 ? 10% |
Write Seq | 2441 | 1476 -40% | 1312 -46% | 1417 -42% | 1729 -29% | 2135 ? -13% |
Read Seq | 1753 | 1367 -22% | 1667 -5% | 1289 -26% | 1861 6% | 2102 ? 20% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 397.6 | 302.4 -24% | 449.5 13% | 278.9 -30% | 509 28% | 452 ? 14% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 520 | 375 -28% | 327.4 -37% | 348.8 -33% | 388.5 -25% | 619 ? 19% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2519 | 2433 -3% | 1385 -45% | 1895 -25% | 2813 12% | 2537 ? 1% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3448 | 3493 1% | 2948 -15% | 3352 -3% | 2906 -16% | 3466 ? 1% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33809 poäng | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 31509 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10211 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 76341 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23601 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6812 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3006 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Average NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) (52.7 - 62.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 280.4 | 210 | 184.7 | 72.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 156.2 | 94.1 | 52.7 | 30.9 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 134 | 115 | 113 | 106 | 47.9 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 190.3 | 159.6 | 111.6 | 97.9 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 136.2 | 86 | 53.4 | 43.8 | |
For Honor (2017) | 163.4 | 66.7 | 63.9 | 48.8 | |
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 94 | 47.2 | 43.9 | 24.2 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 246.4 | 150.7 | 117 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.4 | 41.9 | 31.1 | ||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 93.7 | 49.3 | 40.5 | 30.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 91 | 78 | 69 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 88 | 46 | 40 | 35 | |
FIFA 19 (2018) | 148 | 119.2 | 113.5 | 110.8 | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 57 | 40 | 35 | 29 | |
Battlefield V (2018) | 61.5 | 43.2 | 37.8 | 35 | |
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 182.4 | 106.7 | 86.3 | 66.5 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 143.7 | 73.8 | 57.8 | 55.9 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 77 | 48 | 46 | 43 | |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 185.2 | 80.7 | 63.7 | 36.3 | |
The Division 2 (2019) | 39 | 36 | 29 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 69.6 | 52.8 | 37.2 | 20 | |
F1 2019 (2019) | 118 | 73 | 61 | 49 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 36.1 / 36.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.09 / 0.78 Watt |
Låg belastning | 13.7 / 17.5 / 20.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
77.2 / 123.7 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, SK hynix PC400 512 GB, IGZO, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 35% | 21% | 5% | 23% | 11% | 16% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 13.7 | 4.14 70% | 7.1 48% | 9.8 28% | 6.8 50% | 6.2 55% | 8.33 ? 39% | 9.05 ? 34% |
Idle Average * | 17.5 | 7.3 58% | 14.4 18% | 16.8 4% | 11.3 35% | 9.6 45% | 11.8 ? 33% | 14 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 20.9 | 11.5 45% | 14.6 30% | 16.9 19% | 14.3 32% | 21.2 -1% | 15.2 ? 27% | 19.9 ? 5% |
Load Average * | 77.2 | 78.8 -2% | 93.9 -22% | 102.3 -33% | 78 -1% | 104.3 -35% | 86.4 ? -12% | 95.2 ? -23% |
Load Maximum * | 123.7 | 118 5% | 88.3 29% | 114.5 7% | 126 -2% | 135.3 -9% | 131.1 ? -6% | 166.7 ? -35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 82 | 77.9 | 76.5 | 64 | 91.7 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme-20MF000RGE i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 80 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1-20MD002LUS E-2176M, Quadro P2000 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Dell Precision 5530 Xeon E-2176M E-2176M, Quadro P2000, 97 Wh | HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, 97 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 58% | -40% | 17% | 24% | 6% | |
H.264 | 560 | 576 3% | 1053 88% | 544 -3% | 671 ? 20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 532 | 562 6% | 844 59% | 320 -40% | 501 -6% | 582 9% | 513 ? -4% |
Load | 79 | 110 39% | 100 27% | 110 39% | 131 66% | 80.9 ? 2% | |
Reader / Idle | 1261 | 991 | 1036 | 927 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Eftersom Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019 bara är en uppdatering av föregångaren ThinkPad P1 2018 visar sig omdömet i stort vara ungefär samma. De enda skillnaderna rör några mindre detaljer.
Höljet, som är tillverkat av kol, magnesium och aluminium, är fortfarande av hög kvalitet och till skillnad från den föregående modellen med en tryckkänslig skärm så knarrar inte skärmlocket den här gången. Det matta svarta höljet har fortfarande utmärkta inmatningsenheter och många anslutningar. Det är dessutom fortfarande lätt att uppgradera och underhålla ThinkPad P1 Gen 2 (2x SO-DIMM RAM, 2x 2280-M.2 SSD). Nytt för i år är en del skärmalternativ, exempelvis Full HD HDR-skärmen som sitter i vår testenhet och som övertygade med en extremt hög ljusstyrka på över 500 cd/m². Det är dock synd att den inte täcker 100% av sRGB-färgrymden. Quadro T1000 är också en nyhet som är snabbare än den Nvidia Quadro P2000 Max-Q som satt i föregångaren trots att det är en instegslösning. Andra fördelar inkluderar ett tyst kylsystem och en garantiperiod på tre år.
En negativ sak med ThinkPad P1 Gen 2 är processorns prestanda. Den är inte hemsk, snarare det motsatta: ThinkPad P1 2019 är en riktigt kraftfull laptop. Men vi känner ändå att vi måste påpeka att processorns prestanda är sämre än på den föregående modellen. På så sätt är nya ThinkPad P1 inte en uppgradering. Andra negativa aspekter är att den saknar ett alternativ för WWAN, har medioker batteritid, är dyr och lider av ett irriterande spoltjut.
Sämre CPU men bättre GPU och en betydligt mer ljusstark skärm: Så kan vi sammanfatta de ändringar som skett med ThinkPad P1 (2019) jämfört med dess föregångare.
Om vi väger fördelarna mot nackdelarna vinner definitivt fördelarna med ThinkPad P1 Gen 2. Man får en extremt välutrustad mobil arbetsstation av mycket hög kvalitet som har en otroligt ljusstark skärm. Jämfört med ThinkPad P1 2018 och många äldre bärbara arbetsstationer av liknande konstruktion står i synnerhet Nvidia Quadro T1000 för en rejäl prestandaökning samtidigt som CPU-prestandan är en svag punkt för ThinkPad P1 2019.
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
- 10/22/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig