Test: Lenovo ThinkPad T470 (Core i5, Full-HD) (sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 304 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1020:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.44% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.06% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE Lenovo LEN40A9 / N140HCE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE N140HCE-EAA, LEN40A9, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 AUO B140QAN Dell PN F0WXVV, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 0% | 59% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 42.09 1% | 41.65 0% | 67.2 62% | 41.23 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.9 | 62 0% | 61.6 0% | 95.9 55% | 61.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.06 | 43.6 1% | 43.14 0% | 69.3 61% | 42.67 -1% |
Response Times | 13% | 7% | 3% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 42.4 ? -2% | 42 ? -1% | 48 ? -15% | 40.8 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 24.8 ? 27% | 29.2 ? 14% | 27 ? 21% | 30.4 ? 11% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -12% | -5% | 33% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 306 | 230 -25% | 226 -26% | 380 24% | 244 -20% |
Brightness | 287 | 216 -25% | 211 -26% | 354 23% | 231 -20% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 85 -3% | 89 1% | 81 -8% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.26 13% | 0.22 27% | 0.26 13% | 0.37 -23% |
Contrast | 1020 | 885 -13% | 1027 1% | 1462 43% | 659 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 7.32 -18% | 6.44 -4% | 3.11 50% | 6.41 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.6 | 18.14 -33% | 17.18 -26% | 6.73 51% | 13.4 1% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 6.98 -20% | 5.87 -1% | 4.35 25% | 5.94 -2% |
Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.5 88% | 2.37 93% | 2.37 93% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6277 104% | 6683 97% | 6856 95% | 6771 96% | 6101 107% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.62 | 39.97 1% | 39.58 0% | 62 56% | 39.3 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61.44 | 61.55 0% | 61.15 0% | 96 56% | 61.1 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-6% | 1% /
-3% | 32% /
34% | -1% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3507 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4347 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4667 poäng | |
Hjälp |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1554 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5317 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 762 poäng | |
Hjälp |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE |
Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Low Preset | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
HP Spectre x360 15-bl002xx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 66.1 | 33.3 | 19.5 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 40.5 | 23.9 | 19.9 | 6.4 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 31.5 | 25 | 16.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.3 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.8 | 12.6 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 28 / 28 / 29.4 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 31.4 / 34.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | -3% | -6% | -6% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 29 -4% | 29.1 -4% | 31.2 -11% | 29 -4% | 31 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 29 -4% | 29.1 -4% | 31.2 -11% | 29 -4% | 31 -11% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 29 -4% | 29.1 -4% | 31.2 -11% | 29 -4% | 31 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.4 | 29 1% | 29.1 1% | 31.2 -6% | 29 1% | 31 -5% |
Load Average * | 31.4 | 34.2 -9% | 32.3 -3% | 31.9 -2% | 35.6 -13% | 33.5 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 34.6 | 37.8 -9% | 36.6 -6% | 31.9 8% | 38.5 -11% | 33.7 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.1 °C / -3.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.31 / 0.45 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.21 / 6.15 / 6.82 Watt |
Hög belastning |
28.5 / 34.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 2560x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -5% | -5% | -32% | -22% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.21 | 3.5 -9% | 3.7 -15% | 5.1 -59% | 2.7 16% | 2.9 10% |
Idle Average * | 6.15 | 6.7 -9% | 6.8 -11% | 8.5 -38% | 5.5 11% | 5.6 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.82 | 7.3 -7% | 7.3 -7% | 10.1 -48% | 6.5 5% | 8.15 -20% |
Load Average * | 28.5 | 28.2 1% | 26.3 8% | 35.2 -24% | 44.2 -55% | 30.6 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 34.5 | 34.6 -0% | 34.6 -0% | 31 10% | 65.2 -89% | 31 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | -6% | -10% | -11% | |
H.264 | 623 | 512 -18% | 534 -14% | 503 -19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 438 | 338 -23% | 395 -10% | 346 -21% | 326 -26% |
Load | 110 | 98 -11% | 116 5% | 112 2% | 124 13% |
För
Emot
Läs det längre originaltestet på engelska här.
Nya ThinkPad T470 gör i stora drag bra ifrån sig, trots vissa nackdelar. Det nya chassit är bara något mindre och lättare än tidigare, men både byggkvalitet och stabilitet är mycket bra. Tangentbordet är fortfarande ett av de bästa i mobilsegmentet, även om det kunde haft något bättre bakbelysning.
Lenovo har även förbättrat portarna i här uppdateringen och inkluderat alla viktiga standarder, inklusive Thunderbolt 3. WiFi-modulen är snabb och datorn har en rejäl uppsättning säkerhetsfunktioner.
Prestandan är mycket bra och det förekommer ingen strypning ens under extrema arbetsbelastningar. Lenovo låter processorn dra mer ström än vanligt, så Core i7-processorn är – till skillnad från i många konkurrerande modeller – ett intressant alternativ. Kylningslösningen har inga som helst problem att hantera ULV-kretsen.
Skärmen är fortfarande en av de största nackdelarna, även om Lenovo förbättrat ljusstyrkan och kontrastförhållandet. Testmodellen är inte lämplig för bildredigering – i så fall bör du antagligen (återigen) uppgradera till den dyrare T470s (test kommer snart) för ändamålet. Asus visade nyligen med Zenbook UX3410 hur en bra 14-tums panel ser ut. Vi skulle naturligtvis föredra en bättre panel, men samtidigt får man ta hänsyn till målgruppen. De flesta företag kommer inte att använda ThinkPad T470 för bildredigering, och om de gör det kommer de förmodligen använda den i kombination med bättre externa bildskärmar.
Den sista aspekten är det höga priset. Visserligen ingår treårig service på plats, vilket ofta är ett tillval hos konkurrenterna. En NVMe-SSD på 512 GB påverkar också priset. Du kan spara en slant med en standard-SSD, något som förmodligen inte påverkar den subjektiva prestandan.
Sammantaget är ThinkPad T470 en av de bästa företagsmaskinerna på marknaden idag. Anledningarna är: bra temperaturhantering, lågt fläktljud, utmärkta inmatningsenheter, bra prestanda och lång batteritid.
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE
- 02/26/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff