Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Lenovo ThinkPad T490s (i5, Lågenergi-FHD) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 391 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1700:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS NV140FHM-N46, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U748 LG, LP140WF6-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA AUO3B3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 AUO503D (D04YD_B140HAN), , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -40% | -2% | 0% | -10% | -1% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 39.69 -41% | 69.3 3% | 68.3 2% | 60.2 -10% | 66.6 -1% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.6 | 59.2 -39% | 92.2 -6% | 94.9 -3% | 88.2 -10% | 96.8 -1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.5 | 41 -40% | 67.4 -2% | 69.3 1% | 61.3 -11% | 67.9 -1% | |
| Response Times | 21% | -19% | 36% | 37% | 25% | 25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 61.6 ? | 44 ? 29% | 74 ? -20% | 40 ? 35% | 39.2 ? 36% | 42.4 ? 31% | 41.6 ? 32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 38.8 ? | 34 ? 12% | 45.6 ? -18% | 25 ? 36% | 24.4 ? 37% | 31.6 ? 19% | 32 ? 18% |
| PWM Frequency | 990 | 2451 ? | |||||
| Screen | -82% | -24% | -0% | -12% | -33% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 391 | 288.3 -26% | 418 7% | 298 -24% | 334 -15% | 414 6% | 308.6 -21% |
| Brightness | 389 | 281 -28% | 400 3% | 287 -26% | 313 -20% | 387 -1% | 294 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 86 -1% | 88 1% | 91 5% | 89 2% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.21 9% | 0.24 -4% | 0.2 13% | 0.41 -78% | 0.25 -9% | 0.23 -0% |
| Contrast | 1700 | 1373 -19% | 1742 2% | 1490 -12% | 815 -52% | 1656 -3% | 1342 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 6.16 -81% | 4.7 -38% | 2.19 36% | 2.2 35% | 5.5 -62% | 6.07 -79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 18.99 -304% | 8.7 -85% | 4.39 7% | 5.7 -21% | 9.9 -111% | 10.58 -125% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 4.51 -310% | 2.1 -91% | 1.67 -52% | 2.3 -109% | 1.67 -52% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 6.3 -58% | 5.9 -48% | 1.97 51% | 2.9 27% | 6.4 -60% | 7.3 -83% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.517 87% | 2.06 107% | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.31 95% | 2.061 107% |
| CCT | 6809 95% | 6886 94% | 7350 88% | 6571 99% | 6855 95% | 7811 83% | 7269 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.4 | 37.67 -40% | 59.9 -4% | 62 -1% | 65.3 5% | 56.9 -9% | 62 -1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.4 | 58.9 -40% | 92.1 -5% | 95 -2% | 91.8 -6% | 88.1 -10% | 97 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -34% /
-61% | -15% /
-19% | 12% /
4% | 13% /
-4% | -6% /
-22% | -4% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 61.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4244 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5323 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4927 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3985 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Fujitsu LifeBook U748 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Latitude 7490 Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G | Average Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -15% | -15% | 18% | -27% | -56% | 12% | |
| Write 4K | 122 | 105.8 -13% | 116.4 -5% | 135.5 11% | 92.8 -24% | 79.4 -35% | 133.9 ? 10% |
| Read 4K | 45.56 | 40.79 -10% | 45.75 0% | 43.76 -4% | 30.67 -33% | 27.37 -40% | 59.1 ? 30% |
| Write Seq | 1497 | 1204 -20% | 455.1 -70% | 1006 -33% | 353.2 -76% | 343.9 -77% | 1378 ? -8% |
| Read Seq | 2385 | 1065 -55% | 1818 -24% | 1761 -26% | 1937 -19% | 472.7 -80% | 2341 ? -2% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 240.9 | 219.2 -9% | 248.9 3% | 660 174% | 358 49% | 206 -14% | 355 ? 47% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 338 | 304.3 -10% | 358 6% | 432.6 28% | 253.1 -25% | 188.3 -44% | 429 ? 27% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1528 | 1267 -17% | 1191 -22% | 1231 -19% | 359.6 -76% | 343.3 -78% | 1514 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2915 | 3303 13% | 2755 -5% | 3220 10% | 2613 -10% | 533 -82% | 2677 ? -8% |
| AS SSD | -12% | -80% | -13% | -128% | -81% | -2% | |
| Seq Read | 2654 | 2094 -21% | 2365 -11% | 1569 -41% | 1611 -39% | 486.2 -82% | 2408 ? -9% |
| Seq Write | 1341 | 1172 -13% | 1220 -9% | 805 -40% | 339 -75% | 294.9 -78% | 1318 ? -2% |
| 4K Read | 65.6 | 42.09 -36% | 35.67 -46% | 45.42 -31% | 29.01 -56% | 26.66 -59% | 60.9 ? -7% |
| 4K Write | 164.4 | 97.8 -41% | 87.6 -47% | 144.3 -12% | 93.6 -43% | 79.2 -52% | 153.3 ? -7% |
| 4K-64 Read | 761 | 1183 55% | 446.1 -41% | 1203 58% | 413.3 -46% | 316.1 -58% | 811 ? 7% |
| 4K-64 Write | 927 | 706 -24% | 195.8 -79% | 516 -44% | 248.3 -73% | 248.1 -73% | 895 ? -3% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.033 | 0.055 -67% | 0.108 -227% | 0.052 -58% | 0.321 -873% | 0.112 -239% | 0.0376 ? -14% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.038 3% | 0.144 -269% | 0.025 36% | 0.053 -36% | 0.056 -44% | 0.0352 ? 10% |
| Score Read | 1092 | 1435 31% | 718 -34% | 1405 29% | 603 -45% | 391 -64% | 1113 ? 2% |
| Score Write | 1226 | 921 -25% | 405 -67% | 741 -40% | 376 -69% | 357 -71% | 1180 ? -4% |
| Score Total | 2831 | 3048 8% | 1443 -49% | 2833 0% | 1232 -56% | 947 -67% | 2825 ? 0% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 733 | 319.2 | 1474 ? | ||||
| Copy Program MB/s | 210.9 | 168.2 | 460 ? | ||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 549 | 309.3 | 964 ? | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-13% | -48% /
-52% | 3% /
-0% | -78% /
-86% | -69% /
-70% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (5681 - 58068, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (712 - 9375, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| Dell Latitude 7490 | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (242 - 4109, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) | |
| Fujitsu LifeBook U748 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2079 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10155 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1217 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 58.7 | 35.3 | 30.5 | 10.3 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86 | 53.3 | 22 | 19.5 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 90.5 | 37.5 | 24.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 31.1 | 19.3 | 17.4 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 30.9 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 33.3 / 33.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Fujitsu LifeBook U748 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Latitude 7490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8350U, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 1% | -1% | -2% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 29.4 | 28.1 4% | 30.25 -3% | 29.3 -0% | 28.8 2% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.4 | 28.1 4% | 30.25 -3% | 29.3 -0% | 28.8 2% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Average * | 29.4 | 28.1 4% | 30.25 -3% | 29.3 -0% | 28.8 2% | 28.2 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 28.1 9% | 30.25 2% | 29.9 3% | 33.1 -7% | 28.7 7% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 35.5 -7% | 31.3 6% | 32.5 2% | 35.2 -6% | 29.9 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.3 | 41.5 -25% | 31.3 6% | 36.6 -10% | 35.2 -6% | 40.2 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7490 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.27 / 0.58 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 2.62 / 5.16 / 8.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
40 / 64 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TFT-LCD, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu LifeBook U748 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | -8% | 1% | -11% | 22% | -8% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.62 | 3.1 -18% | 4.7 -79% | 3.33 -27% | 3.2 -22% | 2 24% | 3.81 ? -45% | 4.51 ? -72% |
| Idle Average * | 5.16 | 6.4 -24% | 7.3 -41% | 6.9 -34% | 6.6 -28% | 4.7 9% | 6.94 ? -34% | 7.47 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 9.4 -8% | 9.4 -8% | 8.2 6% | 9.5 -9% | 5.7 34% | 8.75 ? -1% | 9.11 ? -5% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 29.8 25% | 28 30% | 29.4 26% | 36.2 9% | 38.4 4% | 35 ? 12% | 42.4 ? -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 64 | 31.2 51% | 28.2 56% | 43.4 32% | 65.6 -3% | 38.9 39% | 47.5 ? 26% | 60.5 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L7002AUS i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Fujitsu LifeBook U748 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G5-3JX66EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7490 i5-8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -2% | -27% | -7% | -10% | 0% | |
| H.264 | 834 | 657 -21% | 397 -52% | 399 -52% | 703 ? -16% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 607 | 541 -11% | 621 2% | 390 -36% | 447 -26% | 548 -10% | 598 ? -1% |
| Load | 99 | 111 12% | 106 7% | 156 58% | 117.1 ? 18% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 1468 | 937 | 1138 | 1300 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vi håller det kort den här gången: ThinkPad T490s är en riktigt bra företagslaptop och med den nya skärmen är den ett av de bästa alternativen som finns för tillfället. Campus-varianten som bara kostar 12.590 kronor är dessutom ett riktigt kap.
Vi skulle kunna avsluta vårt omdöme där, men situationen är en aning mer komplex när man jämför ThinkPad T490s med sin föregångare och Lenovos andra bärbara datorer på 14 tum. Om vi tar en titt på det nuvarande utbudet av högkvalitativa företagsmodeller ser vi att de olika serierna är mer lika varandra än någonsin tidigare. Detta inkluderar T490, T490s, X1 Carbon samt nya X390, som till och med har samma moderkort som T490s. Det finns förstås en del skillnader, men som konsument får man fyra i princip identiska system så länge man tittar på likvärdigt utrustade varianter, och då har vi inte ens inkluderat konkurrerande modeller från andra tillverkare.
Tidigare har T4x0s-modellerna oftast varit tunnare versioner av T4x0, som vanligen hade bättre komponenter och inte hamnade efter i fråga om prestanda. Detta har ändrats i och med T490s. Det nya chassit är förvisso lyckat och kvaliteten är också ett steg upp jämfört med vanliga T490, men T490s hamnar efter när det kommer till prestanda. Detta inkluderar förstås grafikkortet, för det finns inte längre något alternativ för en dedikerad GPU, men det gäller också processorns prestanda. Den sistnämnda lider av en mindre kraftfull kyllösning och föregångaren var till och med en aning snabbare.
ThinkPad T490s är i vårt tycke snarare en billig version av X1 Carbon (eller en X1 Carbon Lite). Den är en aning större och tyngre men har liknande prestandasiffror och en identisk design på tangentbordet. Tangentbordet är förresten på samma nivå som på den dyrare X1 Carbon och är subjektivt sett en aning bättre än det som sitter i T490 eller i konkurrerande modeller från Dell, Fujitsu eller HP. T490s har en portsituation som också påminner oss om X1 Carbon, vilket inkluderar den svårnådda microSD-läsaren.
Vi uppskattade de extra skärmalternativen och den matta Lågenergi-skärmen på 1080p som vi recenserat lämnade ett gott intryck, dock med undantag för de långsamma responstiderna. Vi tror att det kommer vara det populäraste skärmalternativet för både T490s och den ordinarie T490. Den har riktigt bra ljusstyrka, bildkvaliteten drar nytta av det höga kontrastförhållandet och innehållet är inte grynigt trots den matta ytan. Skärmen täcker dessutom det mindre sRGB-omfånget och den har riktigt låg nivå av färgavvikelser, särskilt efter kalibrering. Detta innebär att skärmen även passar bra till en del bildbehandling – T490s hade kanske till och med varit ett intressant alternativ för fotografer om den bara hade haft en SD-kortläsare i full storlek.
Tunnare chassi, bättre skärm, bättre tangentbord, längre batteritid – lägre CPU-prestanda, ingen dedikerad GPU, kompromisser när det gäller portar och kraftigt begränsade servicemöjligheter. Beroende på dina förväntningar kommer T490s antingen vara utmärkt eller en stor besvikelse.
T490s är för tillfället bättre än sina rivaler, för det är helt enkelt ett riktigt komplett paket i kategorin för kontors/företagsenheter. Den har en del brister, men många av dem står i relation till den föregående modellen och konkurrenterna är heller inte perfekta. Vi ger därför T490s vår utmärkelse Redaktörens Val. Konkurrenterna kommer också att uppdatera sina serier under de kommande veckorna, så rankingen kan snart komma att ändras. Lenovo kommer troligen stå för rejäl konkurrens med sina kommande AMD-motsvarigheter.
Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00
-
09/24/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
