Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (sammanfattning)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (ThinkPad X1 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core m7-6Y75 2 x 1.2 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Grafikkort
Intel HD Graphics 515, Kärna: 1000 MHz, 10.0.10586.0
Minne
8 GB
, LPDDR3 1866 MHz
Skärm
12.00 tum 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixlar 216 PPI, ja, multi-touch, native pen support, INT3470, IPS, glansig: ja, detachable screen
Moderkort
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Hårddisk
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256 GB
Vikt
1.048 kg, Strömförsörjning: 184 g
Pris
1549 Kr
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
INT3470 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Max: 342.4 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 315.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.167 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 342.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 460:1 (Svärta: 0.744 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.36 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 12", 2160x1440 | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K 12.5", 3840x2160 | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA 12", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 13.3", 3200x1800 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C 12.5", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 12.3", 2736x1824 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 32% | -19% | -6% | -32% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 83.9 34% | 52.9 -15% | 59.1 -5% | 42.63 -32% | 67.5 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93 | 99.8 7% | 71.8 -23% | 85.5 -8% | 63.6 -32% | 96.6 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 98.1 54% | 52.6 -18% | 61 -5% | 44.1 -31% | 69 8% |
| Response Times | 75% | -57% | 152% | -72% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 36 ? -27% | 47 ? -65% | 38 ? -34% | 46 ? -62% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 17.6 ? | 35 ? -99% | 26 ? -48% | 27 ? -53% | 31 ? -76% | |
| PWM Frequency | 222.2 ? | 1000 ? 350% | 1429 ? 543% | 50 ? -77% | ||
| Screen | 42% | 7% | 15% | -8% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle | 342.4 | 437 28% | 353 3% | 390 14% | 342 0% | 389.2 14% |
| Brightness | 315 | 399 27% | 347 10% | 352 12% | 301 -4% | 392 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 81 -5% | 91 7% | 81 -5% | 76 -11% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.744 | 0.35 53% | 0.44 41% | 0.69 7% | 0.393 47% | 0.27 64% |
| Contrast | 460 | 1249 172% | 802 74% | 565 23% | 870 89% | 1441 213% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.33 | 3.56 33% | 6.09 -14% | 3.04 43% | 9.69 -82% | 3.61 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.25 | 9.3 -1% | 7.01 24% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.36 | 2.67 50% | 6.24 -16% | 2.88 46% | 9.27 -73% | 3.8 29% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.95 75% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 7671 85% | 6681 97% | 7238 90% | 6848 95% | 6010 108% | 5969 109% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 86 51% | 46 -19% | 55 -4% | 40.4 -29% | 63 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 100 8% | 71 -24% | 85 -9% | 97 4% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 50% /
46% | -23% /
-8% | 54% /
37% | -20% /
-14% | -7% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 222.2 Hz | ≤ 49 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 222.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 49 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 222.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2976 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3583 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4058 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Överföringshastighet min.:
314.7 MB/s
Överföringshastighet max.:
408.5 MB/s
Överföringshastighet med.:
401.9 MB/s
Accesstid:
0.1 ms
Burst rate:
114 MB/s
CPU-användning:
4 %
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 7515 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1283 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46344 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4474 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 697 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Dell XPS 12 9250 4K | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44 | 25 | 20 | 6 |
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-23.2 °C / -41.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.2 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-23.2 °C / -41.8 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -34% | -4% | -6% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.87 | 5.4 8% | 4.5 23% | 4.2 28% | 2.4 59% |
| Idle Average * | 6.05 | 10.2 -69% | 7.7 -27% | 8.4 -39% | 4.6 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.13 | 12.5 -104% | 8.3 -35% | 8.9 -45% | 5.6 9% |
| Load Average * | 21.27 | 21.4 -1% | 19.8 7% | 15.9 25% | 15.6 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 23.03 | 24.4 -6% | 20.6 11% | 22.5 2% | 30.7 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby |   0.27 / 1.92 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  5.87 / 6.05 / 6.13 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
21.27 / 23.03 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell XPS 12 9250 4K HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | HP Spectre x2 12-a003ng K3D42EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006 | Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2 | Toshiba Portege Z20t-B-10C HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256GVNU | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -27% | 38% | 50% | 168% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 628 | 370 -41% | 954 52% | 1013 61% | 1616 157% | 791 26% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 300 | 243 -19% | 361 20% | 402 34% | 760 153% | 488 63% |
| Load | 118 | 93 -21% | 166 41% | 182 54% | 348 195% | 138 17% |
För
+ smart stativdesign som förbättrar komforten
+ bra WLAN-prestanda
+ bekvämt tangentbord
+ rymlig och exakt pekplatta med bra integrerade knappar
+ skärm med bra färgrymd
+ bra generell systemprestanda
+ moduler som säljs separat är ett tilltalande koncept
+ underhåll är möjligt via den löstagbara bakpanelen
Emot
- chassit är styvt, men inte lika vridstyvt som Surface m.fl. konkurrenter
- svår att bära med en hand när den är öppen
- medelmåttig ljusstyrka och kontrast jämfört med konkurrenterna
- PWM vid alla ljusstyrkor upp till 49 procent
- kontinuerlig CPU/GPU-prestandan resulterar i strypning
- GPU-prestandan är t.o.m. sämre än med m3-modellen av Surface Pro
- mediokra högtalare
- batteritiden är en bra bit under genomsnittet
- dyr
Lenovo var en av pionjärerna på tabletmarknaden för länge sedan, men med X1 Tablet vill man utmana Microsoft Surface-konceptet. Målet är gissningsvis att plattan ska vara ett företagsvänligt alternativ till Surface Pro – och på många sätt lyckas man med det.
X1 Tablet har de bekväma inmatningsenheter vi har kommit att förvänta oss av en ThinkPad. Den har också bra prestanda för att vara passivt kyld. Underhållsmöjligheter finns också och en rad separata moduler kan köpas till för att utöka funktionalitet och portutbud. Vi blev också imponerade av stativets design, som gör användning i knät betydligt bekvämare än Surface Pro.
Den är dessvärre inte utan nackdelar. Användningen av plast för några delar av höljet gör enheten mindre vridstyv än modeller helt i magnesium (som Microsoft Surface Pro ). Maskinen går också varm (åtminstone konfigurationen vi testade), vilket gör den obekväm att använda under längre perioder. Vi ifrågasätter värdet av den dyrare Core-m7-konfigurationen som testas här, eftersom den extra prestandan förmodligen äts upp av den extra värmen. Slutligen är batteritiden sämre jämfört med nästan alla direkta konkurrenter.
Kanske kan man lindra flera av de här problemen genom att välja en billigare modell med Core m3 eller m5 istället, utan några nämnvärda uppoffringar vad gäller prestandan.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet
- 06/02/2016 v5.1 (old)
Steve Schardein
Convertible - Vägt medel
Price comparison
