Test: Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018 (i7-8550U, HDR WQHD) Omvandlingsbar (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=27, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 567 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1873:1 (Svärta: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
88.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Lenovo 40AE / B140QAN02.0, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, , 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , , 3000x2000, 13.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -23% | -19% | -18% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 86.5 | 65.5 -24% | 67.9 -22% | 68.7 -21% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 88.8 -11% | 95.7 -4% | 96.8 -3% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.4 | 64.9 -35% | 69.4 -30% | 70.4 -29% | |
Response Times | 91% | -5% | -9% | -41% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 3.6 ? 94% | 55.2 ? 3% | 52.8 ? 7% | 67 ? -18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 3.2 ? 87% | 27.2 ? -13% | 30 ? -25% | 39 ? -63% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | ||||
Screen | -29% | -36% | 7% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 562 | 243 -57% | 262 -53% | 385 -31% | 442 -21% |
Brightness | 522 | 240 -54% | 256 -51% | 372 -29% | 410 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 95 10% | 83 -3% | 89 3% | 86 0% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.25 17% | 0.21 30% | 0.22 27% | |
Contrast | 1873 | 1048 -44% | 1833 -2% | 2009 7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.3 -89% | 5.13 -83% | 1.6 43% | 5.22 -86% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 8.9 -53% | 9.46 -63% | 4.5 22% | 11.84 -104% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 3.7 18% | 6.23 -38% | 1.5 67% | 7.88 -75% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 1.78 124% | 2.45 90% | 2.22 99% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 7205 90% | 6202 105% | 6413 101% | 6502 100% | 6756 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 88.9 | 84.8 -5% | 57.84 -35% | 64 -28% | 64 -28% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 100 0% | 88.57 -11% | 95.9 -4% | 97 -3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 31% /
-5% | -21% /
-30% | -7% /
-0% | -30% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 35.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3824 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4719 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3829 poäng | |
Hjälp |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | -60% | -31% | -58% | 4% | |
Read Seq | 2317 | 2004 -14% | 467.1 -80% | 1370 -41% | 469 -80% | 2002 ? -14% |
Write Seq | 1889 | 1693 -10% | 443.6 -77% | 341.2 -82% | 277.3 -85% | 1656 ? -12% |
Read 512 | 719 | 1040 45% | 312.3 -57% | 654 -9% | 404.4 -44% | 1213 ? 69% |
Write 512 | 1413 | 1292 -9% | 372.5 -74% | 337.9 -76% | 266.6 -81% | 1641 ? 16% |
Read 4k | 61.4 | 58.2 -5% | 29.43 -52% | 43.64 -29% | 25.24 -59% | 61.4 ? 0% |
Write 4k | 140 | 182.2 30% | 56.5 -60% | 148.5 6% | 89.4 -36% | 131.3 ? -6% |
Read 4k QD32 | 425.4 | 632 49% | 311.3 -27% | 465.5 9% | 322.5 -24% | 407 ? -4% |
Write 4k QD32 | 474.5 | 507 7% | 225.2 -53% | 337.1 -29% | 208.1 -56% | 402 ? -15% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2081 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9415 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1178 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.3 | |||
Battlefield 1 (2016) | 29.7 | 18.9 | ||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 45.6 | 25.2 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Microsoft Surface Book 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.36 / 1.6 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.4 / 8.8 / 11.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
50.4 / 71.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS Dolby Vision HDR, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK512GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | 34% | -33% | 41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 4.9 -44% | 3.2 6% | 4.7 -38% | 3.4 -0% |
Idle Average * | 8.8 | 7.6 14% | 5.5 37% | 10.6 -20% | 5.8 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.9 | 13.8 -16% | 6.5 45% | 12.3 -3% | 6.7 44% |
Load Average * | 50.4 | 33.4 34% | 29.7 41% | 81 -61% | 21.4 58% |
Load Maximum * | 71.2 | 46.5 35% | 41.3 42% | 100.3 -41% | 21.6 70% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Toshiba Portege X20W-D-10R i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 44 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -15% | 56% | 56% | 29% | 23% | |
Reader / Idle | 1203 | 784 -35% | 1387 15% | 1469 22% | 1001 -17% | 1344 ? 12% |
H.264 | 561 | 408 -27% | 659 17% | 933 66% | 773 ? 38% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 517 | 368 -29% | 630 22% | 663 28% | 719 39% | 591 ? 14% |
Load | 91 | 120 32% | 244 168% | 190 109% | 150 65% | 114.9 ? 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 90 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vår Campuspoint-modell av den nya Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga finns vid skrivande stund tillgänglig för 18 000 kronor. I USA säljs enheten för straxt under 16 500 kronor - för det priset kan du få en snabb spellaptop. Om du har dom extra pengarna som den här enheten kostar så kommer du bli belönad med en snygg, flexibel, snabb och särskilt välutrustad omvandlingsbar med en innovativ skärm som bockar av alla kriterier, samt ett överdådigt, modernt portutbud som är svårt att hitta på någon annan enhet och som borde tillfredställa alla dina behov. Detaljer som det infällbara tangentbordet, ThinkShutter-överdraget för webbkameran och dom inkluderade adaptrarna visar att Lenovo anstränger sig för att hela tiden förbättra ThinkPad-serien.
Hade vår version inkluderat Windows 10 Pro med hårddisk-krypteringsfunktionen BitLocker så hade säkerhetsfunktionerna varit kompletta. Mobila företagskunder kommer att uppskatta den treåriga på-plats garantin samt dom utmärkta inmatningsenheterna, som är typiska för ThinkPads. Om du är ny till serien så får du först vänja dig vid några egenheter i tangenbordets layout.
Den enda nackdelen är att batteritiderna inte riktigt är så bra som dom borde vara. Det är priset man får betala för fyra "riktiga" kärnor - även om dessa knappt erbjuder några riktiga fördelar för kontorskunder jämfört med hypertrådade dualkärnor såsom i5-7200U.
En omvandlingsbar med Dolby Vision HDR och ett portutbud som inkluderar 2 Thunderbolt 3 via USB Typ C-portar - dessa komponenter gör Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018 till en unik enhet.
Självklart kan vi rekommendera denna enhet trots problemet med högtalaren, då detta troligen är en engångsföretelse som rör vår testenhet.
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2018-20LES01W00
- 10/17/2019 v7 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn