Test: MSI GE75 Raider 9SG (Core i9-9880H, RTX 2080) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 400.7 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1179:1 (Svärta: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.39
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
| MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 31% | -1% | 31% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 62.9 2% | 90.9 48% | 62.5 2% | 90.8 48% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 92 | 87.8 -5% | 100 9% | 88.7 -4% | 99.9 9% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 63.9 1% | 86.2 36% | 63.5 0% | 85.8 35% | |
| Response Times | -383% | -23% | 1% | -435% | -133% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 40 ? -456% | 7.2 ? -0% | 8 ? -11% | 44.8 ? -522% | 28 ? -289% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6.6 ? | 27 ? -309% | 9.6 ? -45% | 5.6 ? 15% | 29.6 ? -348% | 13.6 ? -106% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 26000 ? 0% | 25000 ? -4% | |||
| Screen | -34% | -17% | -14% | -94% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle | 400.7 | 322 -20% | 288 -28% | 240 -40% | 291 -27% | 273 -32% |
| Brightness | 372 | 303 -19% | 287 -23% | 248 -33% | 277 -26% | 273 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 91 2% | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.32 6% | 0.2 41% | 0.22 35% | 0.22 35% | 0.26 24% |
| Contrast | 1179 | 1006 -15% | 1440 22% | 1091 -7% | 1323 12% | 1050 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.33 | 2.97 -123% | 2.33 -75% | 2.14 -61% | 5.52 -315% | 3.52 -165% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.51 | 5.08 -45% | 5.34 -52% | 5.04 -44% | 10.72 -205% | 6.34 -81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.39 | 2.29 -65% | 2.47 -78% | 1.54 -11% | 2.09 -50% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.26 -74% | 1.19 8% | 1.62 -25% | 6.59 -407% | 3.11 -139% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.45 90% | 2.41 91% | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6735 97% | 6892 94% | 6710 97% | 6846 95% | 7816 83% | 6999 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.2 | 57 -2% | 57 -2% | 77 32% | 58 0% | 76 31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.1 | 87 -6% | 88 -4% | 100 9% | 89 -3% | 100 9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -209% /
-87% | -14% /
-15% | 6% /
-3% | -177% /
-121% | -47% /
-44% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9880H (2953 - 3712, n=7) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9880H (441 - 474, n=7) | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Aorus X9 DT | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4550 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6004 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6306 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -28% | 9% | 10% | -2% | -84% | |
| Seq Read | 1358 | 1419 4% | 911 -33% | 3058 125% | 2517 85% | 511 -62% |
| Seq Write | 2381 | 828 -65% | 2347 -1% | 2196 -8% | 2372 0% | 425.7 -82% |
| 4K Read | 27.02 | 35.71 32% | 53 96% | 38.37 42% | 41.47 53% | 14.07 -48% |
| 4K Write | 89.2 | 86.8 -3% | 122.5 37% | 97.7 10% | 93 4% | 38.34 -57% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1642 | 848 -48% | 1577 -4% | 1347 -18% | 1057 -36% | 351.4 -79% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1799 | 708 -61% | 1734 -4% | 1236 -31% | 913 -49% | 172.7 -90% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.067 | 0.063 6% | 0.08 -19% | 0.056 16% | 0.062 7% | 0.235 -251% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.05 | 0.044 12% | 0.031 38% | 0.038 24% | 0.041 18% | 0.097 -94% |
| Score Read | 1805 | 1026 -43% | 1721 -5% | 1691 -6% | 1350 -25% | 417 -77% |
| Score Write | 2127 | 878 -59% | 2091 -2% | 1553 -27% | 1243 -42% | 254 -88% |
| Score Total | 4899 | 2405 -51% | 4771 -3% | 4066 -17% | 3282 -33% | 881 -82% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 3193 | 687 -78% | 412.5 -87% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 198.2 | 234.7 18% | 192.9 -3% | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1054 | 474.7 -55% | 295.5 -72% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 39973 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 27116 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 41840 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18947 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9266 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile (69 - 124, n=7) | |
| MSI GE75 8SG Raider | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| MSI GL73 8SE-010US | |
| Schenker Compact 15 | |
| Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2 | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 341.4 | 303.9 | 280.7 | 190.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 289.7 | 250.1 | 173 | 95.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 250.6 | 187.2 | 161.7 | 144.3 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 146 | 120 | 115 | 109 |
| MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Aorus X9 DT GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0) | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -18% | -1% | -9% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 30 1% | 36 -18% | 29 5% | 32 -5% | 32 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 30.4 | 34 -12% | 37 -22% | 32 -5% | 34 -12% | 33 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 37 -11% | 43 -29% | 33 1% | 37 -11% | 34 -2% |
| Load Average * | 37.1 | 52 -40% | 50 -35% | 47 -27% | 43 -16% | 41 -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.2 | 53 2% | 57 -5% | 49 10% | 57 -5% | 50 8% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.4 | 54 4% | 61 -8% | 51 10% | 62 -10% | 54 4% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 33.4 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 37.1 / 56.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.06 / 1.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 13.9 / 18.8 / 23.1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
112.3 / 291.5 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -3% | -61% | -31% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13.9 | 7 50% | 19 -37% | 31 -123% | 28 -101% | 15 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 18.8 | 15 20% | 22 -17% | 35 -86% | 33 -76% | 20 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 22 5% | 30 -30% | 45 -95% | 41 -77% | 26 -13% |
| Load Average * | 112.3 | 92 18% | 104 7% | 130 -16% | 94 16% | 97 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 231 | 207 10% | 167 28% | 268 -16% | 160 31% | 186 19% |
| Load Maximum * | 291.5 | 254 13% | 203 30% | 374 -28% | 222 24% | 239 18% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | Asus TUF FX705DY-AU072 R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 64 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh | MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | -22% | -51% | -37% | -4% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 294 | 430 46% | 230 -22% | 144 -51% | 186 -37% | 281 -4% |
| Reader / Idle | 757 | 298 | 150 | 303 | 468 | |
| Load | 122 | 52 | 70 | 38 | 53 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 50 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Core i9-9880H är vad Core i9-8950HK borde ha varit. De två extra kärnorna ger den en tydlig prestandafördel jämfört med både Core i7-8750H och Core i7-9750H. En genomsnittlig i7-8750H är runt 36 procent långsammare innan eventuell prestandastrypning tas i beaktande.
Nackdelarna är vad man kan förvänta sig från en snabbare CPU baserad på samma underliggande arkitektur. Det vill säga högre kärntemperaturer och energiförbrukning när processorn belastas fullständigt. i9-9880H stabiliserar sig runt 90 C vid körning av Prime95 jämfört med 73 C för modellen med i7-8750H. På samma sätt drar den 231 W när man spelar spel jämfört med 207 W för förra årets GE73 8SG. Jämfört med den sexkärniga Core i7-serien är dock prestandafördelen mindre för applikationer som inte använder alla åtta kärnorna fullt ut.
GE75 9SG är förstås bara ett exempel på en dator med Core i9-9880H. Den stora variationen i klockfrekvens i9-9880H har (2.3 - 3.8 GHz) innebär att andra tillverkare kan använda samma CPU med lägre klockfrekvenser än vad vi uppmätt här. Men med det sagt ser vårt första möte med 9:e generationens Core i9 redan riktigt lovande ut.
Entusiaster kan tänkas vilja överväga 9:e generationens Core i9, i synnerhet om man förlitar sig på applikationer som är optimerade för åtta CPU-kärnor. Gamers kan också tjäna en del på i9-9880H, om än med en mycket mindre prestandaökning på runt 10 procent för de flesta titlar. Oavsett ligger den nya processorn mycket bättre till jämfört med förra årets Core i9-8950HK.
MSI GE75 9SG
- 07/02/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
