Notebookcheck Logo

Test: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - RTX 3070 som körs med 140 Watt (Sammanfattning)

Maximal TGP.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 visar innehållet med maximalt TGP på MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG:s 17-tumsskärm. Vår recension visar vad detta innebär för vardagsspelande och hur resten av hårdvaran står sig i jämförelse.
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG (GP76 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 200 W PL2 / Short Burst, 84 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1720 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, NVIDIA 461.40, Intel UHD Graphics 630
Minne
16 GB 
, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, glansig: nej, 144 Hz
Moderkort
Intel HM470
Hårddisk
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, 512 GB 
, 400 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm ljudanslutning
Nätverk
Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 26 x 397 x 284
Batteri
65 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, MSI Dragon Center, MSI App Player, Power Director 17, Photo Director 10, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.9 kg, Strömförsörjning: 595 g
Pris
2 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Testgrupp

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85.1 %
v7 (old)
03/2021
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.1 %
v7 (old)
02/2021
Aorus 15P XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg27 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
v7 (old)
02/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.1 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG

Storleksjämförelse

397 mm 284 mm 26 mm 2.9 kg396 mm 261 mm 27 mm 2.5 kg357 mm 244 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: Kensington-lås, 1x USB Typ-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Headset-anslutning
Vänster: Kensington-lås, 1x USB Typ-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Headset-anslutning
Höger: 2x USB Typ-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Höger: 2x USB Typ-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Baksidan: 1x USB Typ-C 3.2 Gen. 2, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, Nätadapter
Baksidan: 1x USB Typ-C 3.2 Gen. 2, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, Nätadapter
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1350 MBit/s +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1190 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1310 MBit/s +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -1%
ColorChecker
14.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG: 8.71 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 14.49 ∆E
288
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Chi Mei CMN176E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 331 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 314.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1131:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.68
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Aorus 15P XC
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Display
3%
2%
6%
Display P3 Coverage
64.7
67.2
4%
67.7
5%
70.5
9%
sRGB Coverage
96.4
98.7
2%
94.3
-2%
99.5
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.9
68.6
3%
68.2
2%
71.8
7%
Response Times
-14%
2%
-60%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-51%
8.2 ?(2.6, 5.6)
-11%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
-127%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
15%
10 ?(4, 6)
7%
PWM Frequency
24510 ?(39)
24040 ?(25)
-2%
Screen
9%
-20%
-9%
Brightness middle
328
298
-9%
308
-6%
410
25%
Brightness
314
278
-11%
288
-8%
381
21%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
86
-1%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.29
-0%
0.23
21%
0.37
-28%
Contrast
1131
1028
-9%
1339
18%
1108
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.93
0.96
50%
3.28
-70%
2.55
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.94
3.22
35%
8.51
-72%
4.33
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.68
0.83
-22%
0.83
-22%
1.28
-88%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
1.3
54%
5
-79%
3.4
-21%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.242 98%
2.057 107%
2.275 97%
CCT
7023 93%
6519 100%
7393 88%
6637 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67
69
3%
68
1%
72
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
91
2%
90
1%
95
7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 4%
-5% / -13%
-21% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24510 Hz ≤ 39 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 39 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - CPUz
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - CPUz
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - CPUz
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - CPUz
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - GPUz
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - HWiNFO
01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)
Aorus 15P XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1597 (1574.49-1728.16)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2058 (1969.09-2151.12)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)
278 Points +40%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
238 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points +17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (184 - 213, n=45)
196.7 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)
3417 Points +172%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2151 (1969.09min - 2151.12max) Points +71%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2108 (2036.87min - 2108.48max) Points +68%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1728 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (804 - 1418, n=50)
1263 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1258 (1113.24min - 1257.82max) Points
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (322 - 587, n=43)
389 Seconds * -9%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds *
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
292 Seconds * +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
245 Seconds * +32%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
245 Seconds * +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)
170.8 Seconds * +52%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)
6305 MIPS +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS +6%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5244 MIPS 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
5236 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4504 - 5470, n=43)
5114 MIPS -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)
85207 MIPS +136%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57284 MIPS +58%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55335 MIPS +53%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
46431 MIPS +28%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
36161 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (26040 - 37345, n=43)
33946 MIPS -6%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)
725 Points +58%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
540 Points +17%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
473 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (431 - 504, n=43)
473 Points +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
460 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)
8300 Points +177%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5045 Points +68%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4510 Points +50%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3721 Points +24%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
2998 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1749 - 3325, n=43)
2848 Points -5%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)
1892 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1487 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1354 Points +4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1304 Points
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1285 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (1114 - 1333, n=43)
1263 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)
14993 Points +135%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8035 Points +26%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7758 Points +21%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7518 Points +18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
6392 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (4443 - 6674, n=43)
6135 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)
23.5 fps +126%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps +50%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.4 fps +38%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.9 fps +24%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)
9.61 fps -8%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
53.3 s * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)
53.3 s * -5%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.9 s *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
50.8 s * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.3 s * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)
47.3 s * +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10750H
  (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)
0.611 sec * -3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.592 sec *
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.586 sec * +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * +14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1258 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
198 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2998 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
460 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)
7791 Points +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6983 Points +16%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6922 Points +15%
Aorus 15P XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
6463 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6017 - 6034, n=2)
6026 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6017 Points
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)
10841 Points +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10051 Points +16%
Aorus 15P XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
9193 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8652 - 8953, n=2)
8803 Points +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8652 Points
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)
9900 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8849 Points +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8657 Points
Aorus 15P XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
8353 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8022 - 8657, n=2)
8340 Points -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)
12077 Points +53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10389 Points +32%
Aorus 15P XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
9539 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7893 - 8300, n=2)
8097 Points +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7893 Points
PCMark 10 Score
6017 poäng
Hjälp
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1821 μs * -68%
Aorus 15P XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
1201 μs * -11%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1082 μs *
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
466.9 μs * +57%

* ... smaller is better

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Aorus 15P XC
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Average Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
64%
101%
6%
Write 4K
143.7
130.2
-9%
206.1
43%
194.5 ?(107.3 - 286, n=8)
35%
Read 4K
45.1
45.47
1%
53
18%
Write Seq
978
2269
132%
3018
209%
Read Seq
1163
1643
41%
2575
121%
Write 4K Q32T1
519
547
5%
535
3%
505 ?(327 - 625, n=8)
-3%
Read 4K Q32T1
302.7
654
116%
608
101%
301 ?(298 - 303, n=8)
-1%
Write Seq Q32T1
981
2512
156%
3242
230%
Read Seq Q32T1
1983
3382
71%
3617
82%
AS SSD
105%
87%
114%
-4%
Seq Read
1659
2694
62%
2881
74%
3020
82%
Seq Write
921
2327
153%
1570
70%
2631
186%
4K Read
51
47.77
-6%
52.4
3%
60.3
18%
4K Write
120.1
98.8
-18%
124
3%
171.6
43%
118.9 ?(66 - 170.5, n=10)
-1%
4K-64 Read
463.5
1746
277%
1334
188%
1410
204%
4K-64 Write
909
2267
149%
2189
141%
2324
156%
Access Time Read *
0.179
0.079
56%
0.055
69%
0.045
75%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.039
-22%
0.03
6%
0.024
25%
0.0371 ?(0.019 - 0.084, n=10)
-16%
Score Read
680
2063
203%
1675
146%
1773
161%
Score Write
1121
2598
132%
2470
120%
2759
146%
Score Total
2130
5698
168%
4943
132%
5429
155%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
85% / 88%
87% / 87%
108% / 108%
1% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1983 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 981 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 302.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 519 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1163 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 143.7 MB/s

DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43857 Points +15%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
38275 Points
Aorus 15P XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
36675 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
33862 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12535 - 38275, n=54)
32331 Points -16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31092 Points -19%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)
31443 Points +8%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
29128 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27968 Points -4%
Aorus 15P XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
27764 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
25509 Points -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7178 - 29128, n=52)
24302 Points -17%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
23893 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)
13142 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10898 Points 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
10850 Points
Aorus 15P XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
10500 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10148 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (2644 - 11019, n=53)
9300 Points -14%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9131 Points -16%
3DMark 11 Performance
25847 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22121 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
9933 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +18%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
109 (83min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 fps -7%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.9 (70min) fps -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (34.9 - 109, n=52)
91.8 fps -16%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89.7 (83min - 95max) fps -18%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=180, last 2 years)
119.9 fps +33%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90.2 fps
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.9 fps -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.5 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (27.9 - 107, n=49)
86.4 fps -4%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)
131 fps +15%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (89 - 140, n=36)
108.6 fps -5%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
108 (84min - 137max) fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92 (68min - 117max) fps -19%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)
108.1 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (12.4 - 118.8, n=61)
81.1 fps +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.2 fps
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.5 fps -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76.4 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75.8 fps -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
70.1 fps -13%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
150.5 fps +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
128 (112.9min) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (26.9 - 163.9, n=58)
120.7 fps +3%
Aorus 15P XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
120 (103.4min) fps +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (101.8min) fps
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (89.3min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
107 (95.3min) fps -9%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø107 (96-112)
lågmed.högultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 109
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 140 139 123 117
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 90.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 105 93.9 80.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 114
Anno 1800 (2019) 38.9 38.3 34.5 24.4
Doom Eternal (2020) 216

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
25 / 32 / 34 dB(A)
Hög belastning
54 / 54 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.740.340.341.641.742.52549.635.843.841.436.940.73149.344.343.546.942.748.9403431.93327.829.533.45037.938.84422.92335.76332.528.928.622.621.731.78035.533.726.118.216.137.110026.223.2221814.426.112529.827.227.116.214.628.116032.130.829.418.316.530.32003021.223.82520.130.625030.624.123.715.316.633.731534.319.621.211.811.934.540032.419.518.310.610.533.950034.519.620.410.510.536.263036.818.820.210.31037.980035.818.819.311.210.239.1100039.525.425.510.710.639.6125041.92325.61110.742.5160042.121.323.713.310.942.820004321.523.612.611.342.9250042.618.521.61311.742.8315044.818.820.414.612.244.640004620.522.613.712.346.6500044.118.720.813.212.643.9630042.517.620.712.912.942.280003713.614.413.413.136.71000034.813.413.613.412.734.31250033.213.813.913.312.432.71600026.312.513.212.512.925.9SPL54.232.634.325.324.154.4N9.11.820.70.59.4median 35.8median 19.6median 21.2median 13.2median 12.3median 36.7Delta62.42.72.21.76.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
 41 °C42 °C43 °C 
 35 °C39 °C39 °C 
 27 °C29 °C27 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
47 °C40 °C42 °C
39 °C40 °C30 °C
26 °C28 °C30 °C
Max: 47 °C
Medel: 35.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  56 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.737.92536.933.73142.7384029.529502322.66321.730.58016.128.210014.429.112514.642.716016.551.920020.156.525016.66531511.965.940010.567.750010.572.16301073.380010.273.1100010.672.8125010.774.3160010.973.2200011.374.1250011.773.8315012.271.7400012.370.4500012.673.5630012.974.9800013.167.81000012.7661250012.463.11600012.958.8SPL24.184.7N0.565.4median 12.3median 70.4Delta1.77.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GP76 Leopard 10UGApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.9 / 1.5 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 12 / 16 / 28 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 92 / 210 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Aorus 15P XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-10%
8%
-9%
-0%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
12
14
-17%
4
67%
13
-8%
12.9
-8%
Idle Average *
16
17
-6%
9
44%
16
-0%
15.4
4%
Idle Maximum *
28
33
-18%
36
-29%
26
7%
27.1
3%
Load Average *
92
96
-4%
130
-41%
125
-36%
98.2
-7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
198
179
10%
174
12%
187
6%
164.9
17%
Load Maximum *
210
256
-22%
227
-8%
259
-23%
232.9
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
5tim 37min
WiFi Websurfing
4tim 12min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
0tim 49min
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh
Aorus 15P XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
70%
90%
-15%
108%
64%
Reader / Idle
337
571
69%
281
-17%
649
93%
WiFi v1.3
252
399
58%
441
75%
208
-17%
426
69%
Load
49
89
82%
100
104%
44
-10%
129
163%

För

+ Väldigt stabilt hölje
+ RTX 3070 laptop GPU med stöd för maximalt TGP
+ Två SSD-platser

Emot

- Insidan är svår att komma åt
- Saknar Thunderbolt-port

Omdöme - Kraftfull spellaptop

Recension av MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG. Recensionsex från: MSI Germany
Recension av MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG. Recensionsex från: MSI Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG är en klassisk spellaptop. Då den kommer med en 144 Hz-skärm på 17 tum kan den inte betraktas som liten, men det finns exempelvis inga större skillnader i tjocklek jämfört med enheter på 15 tum. Höjdpunkten är en mobil Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 som körs i maximalt TGP-läge på 140 Watt. Detta ger ganska mycket högre grafikprestanda jämfört med de strypta varianterna och ger därför lite högre FPS i spel.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG kan visa moderna spel på sin skärm utan problem. Men det är onödigt svårt att utföra service på den.

Inga nedskärningar har gjorts på den övriga utrustningen heller, vilket gör GP76 Leopard till en högkvalitativ spellaptop som passar till lite allt möjligt. Vi hade däremot gärna sett att det var lättare att komma åt insidan. Understycket är inte bara fastskruvat och ikrokat, utan det går runt datorns framsida och nästan upp till hörnen. Som ett resultat måste man ta loss framstycket också, så alla krokar lossnar på baksidan och sidorna. Detta är väldigt opraktiskt och svårt att genomföra för den som är ovan, vilket gör det onödigt svårt att lägga till en andra SSD-enhet eller mer RAM.

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - 03/05/2021 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
83 / 98 → 84%
Tangentbord
79%
Mus
88%
Anslutningar
61 / 80 → 76%
Vikt
58 / 10-66 → 85%
Batteri
59 / 95 → 62%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
99%
Programprestanda
91%
Temperatur
87 / 95 → 92%
Ljudnivå
64 / 90 → 72%
Audio
83%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Medel
75%
85%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG - RTX 3070 som körs med 140 Watt (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2021-03- 9 (Update: 2024-11- 4)