Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)

Name: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Brand: MSI

Extrem makeover.

GS65 hade på många sätt svårt att stå sig mot sina konkurrenter, men nu presenterar MSI en fullständigt uppdaterad efterföljare i form av GS66. I vår detaljerade recension får du reda på vad som har blivit bättre.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/11/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI

Test device courtesy of MSI Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS (GS66 Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 930 MHz, Minne: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 445.87, Optimus

Minne

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, Alla platser upptagna, max. 64 GB

Skärm

15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, glansig: nej, 300 Hz

Moderkort

Intel HM470

Hårddisk

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

, NVMe, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Anslutningar

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning

Nätverk

Killer E3100G 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 20 x 358 x 248

Batteri

99.99 Wh, 6578 mAh Litiumpolymer, 4 celler

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: HD (720p)

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2.0 Dynaudio, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB SteelSeries, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 Watt, Snabbstartsguide, Dragon Center, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

2.167 kg, Strömförsörjning: 732 g

Pris

2849 EUR

Länkar

MSI hemsida
MSI kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.2 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	19 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.3 % v7 ^(old)	09/2019	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.4 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.1 kg	22 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA DIN A4 ❌

Vänster: Ström, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, USB-A 3.1 Gen2

Höger: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen2, RJ45-LAN

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1330 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1140 MBit/s -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s -49%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Wireless-AC 9560	654 MBit/s -51%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	554 MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1360 MBit/s +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1320 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	696 MBit/s -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	694 MBit/s -47%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Wireless-AC 9560	688 MBit/s -48%

ColorChecker MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS: 14.2 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 22.63 ∆E


298 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	323 cd/m²
303 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	320 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 323 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 310.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 316 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1505:1 (Svärta: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-7%	-5%	-6%	-8%
Display P3 Coverage	69.5	64.6 -7%	65.3 -6%	66.2 -5%	64 -8%
sRGB Coverage	99.6	92.6 -7%	95.5 -4%	92.3 -7%	90.3 -9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.8	66 -7%	66.5 -6%	67.2 -5%	65.4 -8%
Response Times		23%	-13%	-11%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14 ?(6.8, 7.2)	5.2 ?(2.6, 2.6) 63%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -9%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) -9%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) 31%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -17%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -17%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -13%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -25%
PWM Frequency			23580 ?(24)
Screen		-7%	-8%	-34%	-12%
Brightness middle	316	288 -9%	266 -16%	324.8 3%	313 -1%
Brightness	311	265 -15%	248 -20%	316 2%	295 -5%
Brightness Distribution	92	84 -9%	89 -3%	84 -9%	89 -3%
Black Level *	0.21	0.22 -5%	0.31 -48%	0.26 -24%	0.3 -43%
Contrast	1505	1309 -13%	858 -43%	1249 -17%	1043 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.03	3.22 -6%	2.78 8%	4.96 -64%	3.33 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.32	6.26 14%	5.96 19%	8.95 -22%	6.25 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.1	1.5 -36%	0.91 17%	3.23 -194%	1.77 -61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	3.43 12%	3.58 8%	5 -28%	3.1 21%
Gamma	2.42 ^91%	2.41 ^91%	2.46 ^89%	2.21 ^100%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	7439 ^87%	7290 ^89%	7186 ^90%	7742 ^84%	6930 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	65	60 -8%	62 -5%	59.8 -8%	59 -9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	93 -7%	96 -4%	91.8 -8%	90 -10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		3% / -4%	-9% / -8%	-17% / -26%	-6% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)

HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +51%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	477 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	457 Points -4%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	442 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	429 Points -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +122%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3713 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	2448 Points -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	2427 Points -35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	2384 Points -36%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	2298 Points -38%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +37%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	201 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	189 Points -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	181 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +108%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1635 (1518.31^min - 1635.12^max) Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H	1188 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	1181 Points -28%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H	1115 Points -32%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H	1057 Points -35%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	295 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS +20%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5227 MIPS
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS +93%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	43786 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points +47%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1283 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points +95%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	7634 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +91%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.2 fps

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	52.4 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * +9%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.592 sec *
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1635 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

131 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

201 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3713 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

477 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +20%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6490 Points
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	5991 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5746 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5697 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001	5522 Points -15%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	1916 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-4%	-4%	2%	-12%
Write 4K	131.3	108.8 -17%	115.5 -12%	137.4 5%	108.7 -17%
Read 4K	45.84	40.31 -12%	58 27%	41.37 -10%	41.4 -10%
Write Seq	2370	2488 5%	1555 -34%	2500 5%	1083 -54%
Read Seq	1509	1916 27%	2590 72%	1576 4%	917 -39%
Write 4K Q32T1	481.5	382.4 -21%	369.3 -23%	446.7 -7%	468.5 -3%
Read 4K Q32T1	560	421.8 -25%	441.7 -21%	522 -7%	530 -5%
Write Seq Q32T1	2392	2542 6%	1547 -35%	2796 17%	3057 28%
Read Seq Q32T1	3232	3320 3%	2969 -8%	3415 6%	3422 6%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3232 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2392 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 560 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 481.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1509 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2370 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.84 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		21934 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		45202 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17312 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score		7272 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +65%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	18992 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18060 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17419 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17335 Points -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	16483 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +84%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	7084 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6748 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6716 Points -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6419 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6387 Points -10%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +102%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	4280 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3738 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3721 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3719 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3717 Points -13%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +73%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	25135 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22749 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22005 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	21861 Points -13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18434 Points -27%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +80%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK	70.5 (55^min) fps
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	69 fps -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64.4 (54^min) fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	64.1 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	60.4 (49^min) fps -14%

	låg	med.	hög	ultra
GTA V (2015)	182	174	153	83.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)			131	70.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	153	138	128	120
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	113	97.4	82.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			102	91
Battlefield V (2018)			121	113
Apex Legends (2019)			140	139
Borderlands 3 (2019)			76.3	58.9
FIFA 20 (2019)			196	190
Need for Speed Heat (2019)			88.2	80.7
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)			95	88.8
Escape from Tarkov (2020)			121	119
Hunt Showdown (2020)			91.6
Doom Eternal (2020)			141	137
Gears Tactics (2020)			116	90.6

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		32 / 34 / 39 dB(A)
Hög belastning		53 / 53 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Noise		4%	0%	8%	1%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	29 3%	31 -3%
Idle Minimum *	32	30 6%	31 3%	30.5 5%	31 3%
Idle Average *	34	33 3%	34 -0%	31.5 7%	34 -0%
Idle Maximum *	39	39 -0%	39 -0%	31.5 19%	37 5%
Load Average *	53	45 15%	46 13%	40.6 23%	47 11%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	49 -2%	53 -10%	49.5 -3%	50 -4%
Load Maximum *	53	51 4%	55 -4%	53.4 -1%	54 -2%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


48 °C	53 °C	53 °C
44 °C	45 °C	42 °C
34 °C	36 °C	30 °C

Max: 53 °C
Medel: 42.8 °C


52 °C	55 °C	48 °C
50 °C	53 °C	45 °C
37 °C	38 °C	35 °C

Max: 55 °C
Medel: 45.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 45 °C | Rumstemperatur 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
27 °C	28 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Max: 28 °C
Medel: 26.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	29 °C
29 °C	28 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Max: 29 °C
Medel: 28.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 37 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Hög belastning

Låg belastning

Witcher 3


50 °C	52 °C	53 °C
45 °C	47 °C	44 °C
37 °C	36 °C	32 °C

Max: 53 °C
Medel: 44 °C


52 °C	54 °C	48 °C
50 °C	53 °C	46 °C
39 °C	39 °C	37 °C

Max: 54 °C
Medel: 46.4 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 48 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Heat		0%	-10%	-24%	-13%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	49 8%	58 -9%	48.8 8%	60 -13%
Maximum Bottom *	55	59 -7%	64 -16%	55 -0%	66 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	28	28 -0%	30 -7%	41 -46%	30 -7%
Idle Bottom *	29	29 -0%	31 -7%	45.6 -57%	32 -10%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	1.4 / 1.8 Watt
Låg belastning	13 / 16 / 27 Watt
Hög belastning	109 / 236 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Power Consumption		24%	-17%	-109%	15%
Idle Minimum *	13	7 46%	21 -62%	46 -254%	11 15%
Idle Average *	16	12 25%	23 -44%	59 -269%	15 6%
Idle Maximum *	27	22 19%	32 -19%	65.5 -143%	21 22%
Load Average *	109	86 21%	97 11%	99.8 8%	94 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	155	144 7%	148 5%	154.1 1%	143 8%
Load Maximum *	236	177 25%	213 10%	222.7 6%	173 27%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		8tim 25min
WiFi Websurfing		6tim 04min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		1tim 42min

	MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		19%	34%	-48%	-14%	-0%
Reader / Idle	505	666 32%	545 8%	221 -56%	439 -13%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 12%
WiFi v1.3	364	478 31%	421 16%	129 -65%	340 -7%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 3%
Load	102	96 -6%	181 77%	80 -22%	79 -23%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -16%
H.264			408			408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

För

+ Fler servicemöjligheter än föregångaren

+ Höljet är mycket robustare

+ Skärmlocket har en större öppningsvinkel

+ Moderna USB-anslutningar (inklusive TB3)

+ Kraftfullt batteri

+ Elegant design

+ 300 Hz-skärm

Emot

- CPU:n passar inte bra ihop med det bärbara konceptet / kylsystemet

- Irriterande fläktar (Varvar upp, egenheter, ljudnivå)

- Tangentbordet tar tid att vänja sig vid

- Ingen kortläsare

- Mediokert ljud

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS, recensionsex från MSI Germany

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

GS66 är ett tydligt steg framåt jämfört med GS65.

MSI har tagit hand om de viktigaste klagomålen och ger bättre stabilitet och fler servicemöjligheter till det kompakta höljet. GS66 förtjänar också beröm för moderna anslutningar (Thunderbolt 3), en snabb och kontrastrik 300 Hz-skärm samt ett stort batteri, även om det inte riktigt lyckades leva upp till sin potential.

Vi förstår däremot inte riktigt valet av processor. Core i9-10980HK är förstås väldigt lockande från ett marknadsföringsperspektiv och i fråga om prestanda, men då man som kund snarare får leva med nackdelarna (väldigt höga temperaturer och hög ljudnivå) istället för fördelarna (högre prestandapotential) känns det inte som att man som leverantör borde erbjuda det alternativet till en laptop som är designad för mobilitet.

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - 05/17/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Design

78 / 98 → 80%

Tangentbord

77%

Mus

86%

Anslutningar

62 / 80 → 78%

Vikt

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Batteri

69 / 95 → 73%

Skärm

86%

Spelprestanda

93%

Programprestanda

93%

Temperatur

78 / 95 → 82%

Ljudnivå

59 / 90 → 66%

Audio

74%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Medel

74%

83%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS - Visuellt nedtonad, akustiskt slående (Sammanfattning)

Florian Glaser, 2020-05-11 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Storleksjämförelse

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS audio analysis

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison