Test: MSI P65 Creator 9SF (i9-9880H, RTX2070 Max-Q) Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 476 cd/m²
Kontrast: 890:1 (Svärta: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.49 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 AU Optronics AUO41EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -20% | -22% | -20% | -22% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 84.4 | 65.3 -23% | 64.9 -23% | 66.1 -22% | 63.5 -25% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 94.9 -5% | 91 -9% | 92.6 -7% | 93.1 -7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.5 | 66.3 -33% | 65.9 -33% | 67.1 -32% | 64.5 -35% |
| Response Times | 65% | 79% | 62% | 62% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 16.8 ? 67% | 7.2 ? 86% | 17.6 ? 65% | 16.4 ? 68% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 11.6 ? 63% | 8.8 ? 72% | 12.8 ? 59% | 13.6 ? 56% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 4% | 5% | 2% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 445 | 314.7 -29% | 286 -36% | 263 -41% | 250 -44% |
| Brightness | 462 | 312 -32% | 275 -40% | 264 -43% | 235 -49% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 90 8% | 90 8% | 89 7% | 85 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.38 24% | 0.37 26% | 0.17 66% | 0.29 42% |
| Contrast | 890 | 828 -7% | 773 -13% | 1547 74% | 862 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.75 | 2.56 46% | 2.19 54% | 4.45 6% | 1.46 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.79 | 4.89 37% | 4.4 44% | 8.33 -7% | 2.47 68% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.49 | 3.4 24% | 2.2 51% | 4.77 -6% | 1.27 72% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.52 87% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 7374 88% | 6435 101% | 6405 101% | 7767 84% | 6749 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 87 | 60.7 -30% | 59 -32% | 60 -31% | 60 -31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 94.6 -5% | 91 -9% | 93 -7% | 93 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.71 | 2.27 | 1.93 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
7% | 21% /
10% | 15% /
5% | 17% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3505 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4482 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5211 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 | Average 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -32% | -24% | -17% | -31% | -7% | |
| Write 4K | 105.6 | 93.9 -11% | 97 -8% | 129.9 23% | 97.1 -8% | 98.6 ? -7% |
| Read 4K | 46.32 | 40.56 -12% | 49.58 7% | 47.15 2% | 53.7 16% | 42.5 ? -8% |
| Write Seq | 2910 | 1468 -50% | 1838 -37% | 1840 -37% | 1526 -48% | 2804 ? -4% |
| Read Seq | 2820 | 1540 -45% | 2421 -14% | 1775 -37% | 2020 -28% | 2806 ? 0% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 545 | 293.5 -46% | 326.9 -40% | 294.5 -46% | 285.6 -48% | 446 ? -18% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 632 | 346 -45% | 372.9 -41% | 373.6 -41% | 321.8 -49% | 512 ? -19% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3349 | 1941 -42% | 1894 -43% | 3295 -2% | 1533 -54% | 3252 ? -3% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3333 | 3266 -2% | 2828 -15% | 3535 6% | 2351 -29% | 3324 ? 0% |
| AS SSD | -4% | -24% | 19% | -34% | -5% | |
| Seq Read | 2860 | 1840 -36% | 2506 -12% | 2739 -4% | 2113 -26% | 2811 ? -2% |
| Seq Write | 2604 | 1822 -30% | 1712 -34% | 2650 2% | 1471 -44% | 2627 ? 1% |
| 4K Read | 45.15 | 52.3 16% | 48.32 7% | 27.86 -38% | 55 22% | 42.4 ? -6% |
| 4K Write | 100.2 | 110.7 10% | 103.6 3% | 134.7 34% | 107.1 7% | 97.5 ? -3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1428 | 1126 -21% | 624 -56% | 1651 16% | 914 -36% | 1382 ? -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1401 | 1717 23% | 1253 -11% | 2190 56% | 703 -50% | 1245 ? -11% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.049 | 0.047 4% | 0.08 -63% | 0.031 37% | 0.114 -133% | 0.05367 ? -10% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.037 | 0.033 11% | 0.04 -8% | 0.028 24% | 0.034 8% | 0.038 ? -3% |
| Score Read | 1759 | 1362 -23% | 923 -48% | 1953 11% | 1180 -33% | 1706 ? -3% |
| Score Write | 1762 | 2010 14% | 1528 -13% | 2590 47% | 957 -46% | 1605 ? -9% |
| Score Total | 4411 | 4079 -8% | 2896 -34% | 5529 25% | 2722 -38% | 4176 ? -5% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1975 | 2031 | 1864 | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 526 | 452.1 | 362.6 | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1200 | 1043 | 936 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-15% | -24% /
-24% | 1% /
4% | -33% /
-32% | -6% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19440 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36379 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14946 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Thief | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (99 - 103, n=2) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q () | |
| 1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q () | |
| 1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q () | |
| Dota 2 Reborn | |
| 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (105.8 - 126, n=13) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (111.4 - 135, n=13) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (28 - 196.9, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| 1366x768 med (1/3) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (117.4 - 141, n=13) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36.7 - 208, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (126.5 - 164, n=13) | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.2 - 233, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 369.7 | 291.8 | 277.2 | 148.8 | |
| Thief (2014) | 134.8 | 131.6 | 128.7 | 99 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 295.7 | 205.8 | 116.5 | 80.8 | 42.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.2 | 131.4 | 122.9 | 117.4 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 32.8 / 32.8 / 33.6 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 40.9 / 42.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.9 °C / 94.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.9 / 1.6 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 9.4 / 17.4 / 19.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
103 / 216 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -61% | -118% | -10% | -22% | 34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.4 | 10.4 -11% | 24 -155% | 35 -272% | 16 -70% | 15.4 ? -64% | 6.78 ? 28% |
| Idle Average * | 17.4 | 14.6 16% | 27 -55% | 39 -124% | 18 -3% | 20 ? -15% | 11.3 ? 35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.6 | 16.3 17% | 33 -68% | 47 -140% | 23 -17% | 26.7 ? -36% | 13.4 ? 32% |
| Load Average * | 103 | 88.5 14% | 129 -25% | 117 -14% | 88 15% | 105.2 ? -2% | 71.1 ? 31% |
| Load Maximum * | 216 | 182.4 16% | 216 -0% | 299 -38% | 167 23% | 201 ? 7% | 117.3 ? 46% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 155.4 | 176 | 196 | 120 |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 20% | -27% | -31% | 57% | 76% | |
| Reader / Idle | 577 | 682 18% | 353 -39% | 194 -66% | 549 -5% | 1168 ? 102% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 357 | 387 8% | 220 -38% | 157 -56% | 382 7% | 625 ? 75% |
| Load | 65 | 88 35% | 62 -5% | 83 28% | 174 168% | 97.8 ? 50% |
| H.264 | 154 | 364 | 821 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Kompakt multimedialaptop med mycket kraft
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Vår recension har visat att MSI P65 Creator 9SF är ett kompakt kraftpaket med en levande skärm. Höljet passar kontorsliknande miljöer perfekt och datorn är välbyggd. Thunderbolt 3-porten säkrar att den förblir välutrustad när det kommer till framtida portbehov.
MSI P65 Creator 9SF är slående med en attraktiv design och utmärkt prestanda. MSI kunde dock valt en version av Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q med ett högre TDP-värde.
Systemets prestanda är bra och kan lätt hålla jämna steg med de flesta av sina konkurrenter. Andra tillverkare lyckas dock krama ur lite mer ur GPU:n - även om P65 Creator förstås är utrustad med en version av RTX 2070 Max-Q som har ett lägre TDP-värde. I likhet med den föregående modellen finns det i princip inga servicemöjligheter alls. Versionen vi recenserade hade fortfarande en fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i styrplattan. Den sistnämnda är betydligt bredare än innan och har därför mer rum för gestnavigering.
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657
- 10/25/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
