Test: MSI PX60 6QD Prestige iBuyPower Edition (sammanfattning)
MSI PX60 6QD (PX60 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Kärna: 1124 MHz, Minne: 1800 - 5000 MHz, 10.18.13.5396 - nVIDIA ForceWare 353.96, Yes
Minne
16 GB
, DDR4-2133 MHz
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Vikt
2.176 kg, Strömförsörjning: 572 g
Länkar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN N156HGE-EAL tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Max: 241.5 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 208.4 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 80 %
Mitt på batteriet: 221.1 cd/m²
Kontrast: 361:1 (Svärta: 0.612 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.76% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| MSI PX60 6QD 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI PX60 QD-034US 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ZBook 15 G3 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 15.4", 2880x1800 | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -13% | -47% | -14% | -20% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 84.5 | 67 -21% | 40.93 -52% | 66.8 -21% | 61.4 -27% | 87.8 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 97.7 -2% | 59.6 -40% | 95.5 -4% | 90.8 -9% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.1 | 69.2 -17% | 42.55 -49% | 69 -17% | 62.9 -24% | 99.4 20% |
| Response Times | -18% | -30% | ||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.4 ? | 54 ? -22% | 58 ? -31% | |||
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 35.6 ? -31% | 35 ? -29% | |||
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 198 ? -1% | ||||
| Screen | 43% | 63% | 40% | 55% | 52% | |
| Brightness middle | 221.1 | 300.9 36% | 307.3 39% | 306 38% | 341 54% | 361 63% |
| Brightness | 208 | 285 37% | 285 37% | 289 39% | 315 51% | 344 65% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 86 8% | 85 6% | 85 6% | 82 3% | 90 13% |
| Black Level * | 0.612 | 0.431 30% | 0.3 51% | 0.34 44% | 0.34 44% | 0.38 38% |
| Contrast | 361 | 698 93% | 1024 184% | 900 149% | 1003 178% | 950 163% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.96 | 1.79 84% | 5.1 53% | 2.07 81% | 5.34 51% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.39 | 3.96 80% | 9.9 49% | 3.27 83% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.8 | 2.19 81% | 7.4 37% | 1.9 84% | 4.84 59% | |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.29 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.62 84% | 2.21 100% | |
| CCT | 15654 42% | 6724 97% | 7263 89% | 6514 100% | 7395 88% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.9 | 63.1 -15% | 63 -15% | 58 -22% | 89 20% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.76 | 97.8 -2% | 95 -5% | 91 -9% | 100 0% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
30% | 8% /
22% | 3% /
19% | 18% /
37% | 10% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3590 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4426 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4703 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
Överföringshastighet min.:
144.9 MB/s
Överföringshastighet max.:
394.9 MB/s
Överföringshastighet med.:
292.2 MB/s
Accesstid:
0.2 ms
Burst rate:
163.4 MB/s
CPU-användning:
1.9 %
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| MSI PX60 6QD | |
| MSI PX60 QD-034US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB | |
| HP ZBook 15 G3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 | |
| Dell Precision 5510 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 23380 poäng | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 18030 poäng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4740 poäng | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 85864 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16389 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3448 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 166 | 112 | 104 | 39 | ||
| World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 246.4 | 75.1 | 26 | 19 | 8.9 | |
| Hitman 2 (2018) | 29.8 | 18.6 | 15.7 | 13.4 | ||
| Fallout 76 (2018) | 55.7 | 30.2 | 25.9 | 25 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 68.1 | 31 | 25.7 | 19.8 | ||
| Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 122.1 | 58.5 | 35.9 | 26.5 | ||
| Darksiders III (2018) | 124 | 51 | 43 | 29 | ||
| Just Cause 4 (2018) | 39.8 | 24.4 | 19.4 | 18.8 | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 26 | 22 | 20 | 19 | ||
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 29.67 | 13.93 | ||||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 67.9 | 37.34 | 32.48 | |||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 49 | 24 | 17 | 12 | ||
| Anno 1800 (2019) | 52.8 | 26.7 | 15.9 | |||
| Rage 2 (2019) | 22.4 | 13.1 | ||||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 101.4 | 31.2 | 19.1 | 13.2 | ||
| League of Legends (2019) | 110.3 | 81 | 75.5 | 75.9 | 60.9 | 40.4 |
| F1 2019 (2019) | 84 | 38.8 | 34.3 | 19 | 14.5 | 7.5 |
| Control (2019) | 49.4 | 14.4 | ||||
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 48.9 | 47.4 | 13.9 | 10.3 | ||
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 48 | 37.7 | 33.2 | 18.6 | 18.4 | |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 98.1 | 37.5 | 20.5 | 14.8 | 10 | |
| F1 2020 (2020) | 79.9 | 38.4 | 28.8 | 18.5 | 12.6 |
| MSI PX60 6QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ | MSI PX60 QD-034US GeForce GTX 950M, 5700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP | HP ZBook 15 G3 Quadro M2000M, E3-1505M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 Radeon R9 M370X, 4870HQ, Apple SSD SM0512G | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 15% | 4% | 8% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | ||||
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 34.8 1% | 30 14% | 30 14% | 28.9 17% | 31.4 10% |
| Idle Average * | 35.2 | 37.2 -6% | 30.7 13% | 30 15% | 28.9 18% | 32.5 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 35.2 | 37.4 -6% | 31.4 11% | 30 15% | 28.9 18% | 33.6 5% |
| Load Average * | 38.8 | 41.8 -8% | 33.8 13% | 45.3 -17% | 46 -19% | 45.2 -16% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 49.4 -1% | 38 22% | 49.7 -2% | 46 6% | 46 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 35 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 38.8 / 48.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.4 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby | 0.27 / 1.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 15 / 18.6 / 19.7 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
64.6 / 129 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI PX60 6QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T560 20FH001APB HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN256HCHP | HP ZBook 15 G3 Quadro M2000M, E3-1505M v5, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 Radeon R9 M370X, 4870HQ, Apple SSD SM0512G | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | Dell Precision 5510 Quadro M1000M, E3-1505M v5, SK hynix SC920 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 53% | 19% | 25% | -9% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15 | 3.8 75% | 5.7 62% | 6 60% | 12.5 17% | 8.6 43% |
| Idle Average * | 18.6 | 10.2 45% | 12.2 34% | 12.8 31% | 19.6 -5% | 16.2 13% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.7 | 15.6 21% | 12.6 36% | 13.3 32% | 22.8 -16% | 16.7 15% |
| Load Average * | 64.6 | 30.8 52% | 83.1 -29% | 82.4 -28% | 102 -58% | 82.6 -28% |
| Load Maximum * | 129 | 33.9 74% | 138.2 -7% | 91.8 29% | 107 17% | 131.8 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
För
+ mycket bra tangentbord
+ attraktiv design
+ relativt lättviktig i klassen
+ högljudda högtalare med skaplig ljudkvalitet
+ bra prestanda överlag
+ humant prissatt med tanke på specifikationerna
Emot
- dålig batteritid
- krångligt underhåll
- låg ljusstyrka och kontrast
- begränsade betraktningsvinklar
- PWM på alla ljusstyrkor under 100%
- dålig kalibrering från fabrik
- högljudd under belastning men ändå ganska varm
- prestandan inte bättre än föregångaren
Läs en mer omfattande version av testet på engelska här.
Även om vårt betygsystem har utvecklats i takt med marknaden har vår bedömning av PX60 knappt förändrats sedan förra årets modell. Det hade inte varit något problem om föregångaren var felfri, men vi hittade mycket övrigt att önska under det testet. Skylake-versionen av PX60 åtgärdar få av dessa brister, utan hämtar istället sina marginella förbättringar från ett uppdaterat chipset och ny CPU-arkitektur.
Resultatet är ännu en ”företagsdator” som har mer gemensamt med en spelmaskin bortsett från vissa utseendemässiga skillnader. MSI följde bara minsta motståndets lag genom att döpa om GS60 Ghost-serien.
Problemet är att företagsmarknaden är extremt konkurrensutsatt och de flesta köpare sätter funktioner som ergonomi och funktionalitet framför allt annat. Genom att underprestera i viktiga kategorier som batteritid, underhållsmöjligheter och pekplatta, hade PX60 verkligen behövt glänsa på andra punkter för att kunna konkurrera.
Som företagsmaskin har den tyvärr inga sådana egenskaper. Ser man istället datorn som en mer återhållsamt designad speldator står den sig möjligen bättre.
Den har fortfarande ett antal brister, men så länge du inte gå i förväntar dig en ThinkPad eller Latitude kan PX60 fungera som en billig stationär dator (eller bärbar med kort batteritid) för prismedvetna konsumenter. För de flesta företag finns det däremot alldeles för många överlägsna alternativ.
MSI PX60 6QD
- 05/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Steve Schardein
Office - Vägt medel
Price comparison
